SATchives
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
- Messages
- 1,379
https://satanslibrary.org/English/Parapsychological%20Powers%20of%20the%20Siddhis%20Documented%20By%20Science.pdf
Parapsychological Powers of the Siddhis Documented By Science Already
in humans. This was documented by the president of the Royal Society in
England (the top ranking scientific society), Sir William Crookes, and the
cofounder of the Theory of Evolution with Darwin, Alfred Russell Wallace (the
Theory of Evolution was originally called the Darwin-Wallace Theory).
The siddhis documented ranged from telekinesis and levitation under scientific
conditions. In the case of Daniel Hume, Hume once levitated in front of the
scientists up into the air, out the open window on the third floor, and came back
through another open window. This just one ability Hume demonstrated.
There is also a book "The New Soviet Psychic Discoveries" published by two
American researchers (Henry Gris and William Dick) who went into the Soviet
Union and documented numerous cases of people who have been tested by
scientists under lab conditions and have the same abilities Hume did, along with
other powerful psychic abilities.
Dr. Dean Radin has also documented the fact that humans have ESP in
numerous lab tests. We have the numerous works of Rupert Sheldrake on the
subject. The prominent Nobel Prize winners in physics, Pierre and Marie Curie,
documented the same abilities of telekinesis and other psychic abilities in a
psychology institute in Paris. After years of studying such individuals under lab
conditions, they wrote to their fellow colleagues in the physics community and
stated the siddhis are absolutely real and must be taken into accountability.
As Radin stated in his lecture on taboo on physic abilities, the scientific
community has a taboo against researching physic abilities, they can even lose
their career. This is why Wallace's name was taken off the Theory of Evolution
and Darwin's was left.
“Science and the taboo of psi" with Dean Radin:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qw_O9Qiwqew
The test you are mentioning is by James Randi. There was a lawyer who wrote a
report on this. The contract Randi offers is not a legal document and is designed
so that Randi can deny you no matter what, even if he can't disprove anything
you demonstrated. This is what happens, people go and prove they have abilities
and get denied anyway. This challenge is biased to the point that it’s a purposeful
fraud. This has lead to law suits against him and his fake challenge:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210720013233/https://bolenreport.com/us-federalagents-arrest-top-skeptic/
So who is this “nobody has ever been able to prove any evidence of the siddhis”
again....
March 6, 2016
Joy of Satan Forums Contributions
--------
https://satanslibrary.org/English/The_Question_of_Revenge.pdf
The Question of Revenge by Joseph Goebbels
As our V-1s raced over the English Channel for the first time during the
night of 16 June, the English public was struck by paralyzing fear. The
British Home Secretary Morrison saw himself forced to speak to the House
of Commons the next morning about the use of our new weapon of revenge.
He did that in a very tortured manner, openly admitting the seriousness of
the situation for the British capital, but also attempting to reduce or even
deny the serious effects of our revenge weapon. He apparently believed that
he could deceive us about the extent of the damage caused, which was not
possible, since our months of tests gave us opportunity to understand the
new V-1 weapon in every detail, in particular its accuracy and explosive
force. There was yet another crucial reason behind the British home
secretary’s attempt to make our first revenge weapon ridiculous. He did not
want to give foreign countries the chance to learn the effects of the V-1,
particularly since English government circles hoped to develop sufficient
defensive measures. These hopes have proved vain. Nearly every day, the
London press wrote about a new and effective, or even more effective,
defensive measure, but none of them so far has been able to stop our V-1s
from flying undisturbed, and in large numbers, toward London.
Now the English government has given up its attempts to deceive its own
public and the world as to the extent of the damage. Indeed, they are
increasingly doing the opposite, dramatizing things in an emotional manner
to arouse the world’s sympathy, and making every effort at injured or
tortured innocence. The English are making such efforts to appear the good
guy that one has to assume that they do not realize how ridiculous that looks.
It is enough to recall all their praise few months ago for the brutal and
cynical attacks of the Anglo-American air forces on the German civilian
population. When we spoke then of the barbaric nature of such a method of
warfare, London replied with mocking laughter. They thought it no longer
necessary to wear a humanitarian mask. One had the power, one was on the
way down from the mountain peak, and the Reich was no longer a subject,
merely the object, of the war. One could do to it what one wanted. Even
more than that, in fact, Germany had to be treated in a way formerly used
only on defenseless Negro tribes. One no longer paid any heed to the world
public or the conscience of the world, which one had so often called upon
before. That is how it was if we look back to the beginning of the year. The
Western enemies no longer even bothered to keep up appearances. They
openly and cynically named their bombs “blockbusters,” and gave their
“Flying Fortresses” names like “Murder, Inc.” The English in particular
showed their true nature in the plainest manner, without covering anything
up.
When we modestly said that we might still have a word or two to say in this
regard, that we were preparing new weapons of revenge that would one day
fall on England, those in London fell over laughing, and asked us witty
questions about whether these new weapons were invented by propagandists
rather than scientists and engineers. We did not then think it necessary to
persuade the English of the correctness of our announcements. We knew that
sooner than the English public would like, facts would speak louder than
words, and England has certainly lost the desire to laugh. Even its prime
minister, who is usually so fond of cynical jokes, found nothing funny to say
about the V-1 in his last speech to the House of Commons. And one has the
impression that the London press cannot and will not trivialize things as
much as the British home secretary apparently wished. For the first few
days, English newspapers called our V-1 the “doodlebug.” Now they call
them “robot bombs.” That alone shows the change in their opinion from
yesterday to today.
No one can say that the English have given up their appeals to humanity and
the conscience of the world in this regard. They made too much of that
during their major and successful terror attacks on the German civilian
population. Back then, we warned of what is happening today, and said that
we were taking careful note of the most cynical voices of British public
opinion on the bombing war, since we would be able to make good use of
them one day. Now that time has come. It is not persuasive for London to
insist that the German V-1 lacks the accuracy and military value that British
night attacks on the German homeland last winter presumably had. One need
only look at bombed German cities to readily prove the very opposite. If the
Royal Air Force’s bombs actually did have some accuracy, British pilots
made no use of it when attacking the German civilian population. They
above all chose the cultural centers and heavily populated residential areas
of our cities to bomb, largely destroying them, while British public opinion,
including its prime minster and archbishop, applauded. Those English
newspapers that write that England will be repaid for what it did are correct.
It does not take great prophetic gifts to say that, since in contrast to our usual
modesty, we predicted it clearly dozens of times.
The newest English objection to the V-1 is that it is vile and unfair, since it
is not directed by anyone on our side, but kills and injures people on the
enemy side. That is not persuasive. Almost the same thing could be said of
British night bombing attacks. Last winter, the weather was so bad that our
night fighters were unable to take off. Yet those were just the nights the
British preferred for their attacks on the German homeland. When we
objected, London told us coldly and bluntly that the purpose of war was to
employ and lose as few of one’s own men as possible, not as many, and to
cause the enemy as much damage as possible, not as little.
Is not our V-1 the perfect fulfillment of this British desire, and does anyone
doubt that if the English themselves had this weapon, they would make full
use of it, and would also be able to find reasons to claim it was fair and
moral? In London, the newspapers are screaming for revenge. They do this
only to make the world forget that our V-1 attacks are already revenge. If the
English could take revenge, they would not hesitate. They and their U.S. ally
have enough airplanes at their disposal. These, however, are needed for the
invasion beachhead. Were they to be taken from there, it would be an
advantage for us that is not to be underestimated, which itself proves that,
despite British claims, our V-1 has clear military goals and purposes. The
English do not want to admit that because they are appealing to the world’s
pity.
We do not want to cynically welcome the use of our first revenge weapon, or
look forward with glee to coming ones. We would have been happy if it had
been possible to conduct the war, also the air war, in a humane and knightly
manner. The English did not want that. They never accepted proposals that
would have been good for the fighting armies and peoples. As is well
known, this attitude on the part of the British cabinet was responsible for the
war back in 1939. London will not listen to reason. One deludes oneself, and
comes to the wrong conclusion.
How often over the past months has the English government used its captive
press to claim either that there were no German secret weapons, or that if
there were, London knew all about them and was prepared for them. If they
did not exist, how can they be in use, and if London knew all about them,
how is it possible that our V-1s are flying undisturbed toward London, that
women and children are being evacuated from the British capital, that the
larger part of London’s population is sleeping in packed subway stations,
and that, as English newspapers report, the British people can only talk
about German revenge weapons — but yet the English government has
taken no defensive measures?
Although we have the most cause to be satisfied, we take no pleasure in the
desolation our revenge is causing in London. We see is only as a defensive
measure that is having an effect. We even shudder to think about what the
British capital has to expect from our future and more deadly revenge
weapons. Our revenge action is not at an end, but at its beginning. Military
experts far and wide are of the opinion that our revenge weapons are a
revolution in military technology. What will they say when our newest and
even more impressive weapons come into use! Did London really think that
we would simply allow Anglo-American air terror to continue without
objection? That we would not take appropriate steps? It may be that the
enemy’s scientists are ahead of German scientists in one area or another of
military technology, even if their work is based on German research that we
unfortunately saw the military significance of too late.
However, one would underestimate German thoroughness and German
scientific fanaticism if he assumed that our institutes and laboratories had
given up. They have done more than the enemy likes. Their latest inventions
are nearly all finished. Some are in the final testing stages, but most are
already in production. We are not among those who see technology as the
single decisive factor in modern warfare, but it is important. In the past, the
enemy was ahead of us in technology, we were ahead in morale. Morale and
technology together lead to victory. We can and will surpass him in
technology, but he cannot and will not surpass us in morale. That is the
decisive advantage on which we must build. Here will we see who in the end
has the most endurance.
For our enemy, modern warfare has little to do with humanity. They have
been hard and uncompromising toward us; we must face them in the same
hard and uncompromising way. They will use every method of warfare they
have against us, if it has any prospect of success. We have to do the same to
save our necks. We are ahead in one area, they in another. It depends on who
fights with the greatest fanaticism, who has the better ideas, who the better
morale on the battlefield. He will win. It is not important where the last
battle is fought, rather that one has enough regiments and divisions, and that
they fight as well on the last day of the war as they did on the first. The
fortunes of war will always shift. He who wants to accomplish great things
must also accept great risks and dangers. That is what proves the hard and
manly character of a warring nation — the determination to defend its life
and freedom to the last breath, never showing even the slightest sign of
weakness. The stronger peoples will win this war, and they alone will have
the moral and historical right to form a new world, for they have earned it
with their blood and with the lives of their best sons. The weapons that they
use are signs of their inventive genius and their unbreakable will for national
existence and freedom. Those weapons do not determine success by
themselves. More important is the morale of a people, its firm determination
to fight and to win, its absolute faith in the justice of its cause. We have all
of that. The enemy has only greater numbers and better technology for a
while in a few areas. We must catch up in those areas and surpass him.
We speak neither from a sense of superiority nor of weakness. We are
absolutely confident of our cause, even though we have had severe trials.
We would have had to doubt the duration of our victory if France had fallen
to us without a fight in summer 1940. That would have been too easy for us,
and we could hardly have survived the later hard tests. Fate can be mastered
only through hard struggle. When the war is over, we will all know the price
that we have paid. No one then will be willing to endanger what we have
gained through carelessness or a lack of alertness.
The coming victory will belong to all of us, for we will all have fought,
worked, and suffered for it. We will therefore make its results a matter for
the people as well, both its benefits as well as its costs. Today everyone must
stand firm, fanatically and without compromising. The nation is called to
that. It lacks neither means nor opportunities; it need only use them. If it
does that, it can look to the coming storms with sovereign confidence. They
resemble nature’s thunderstorms that break over the cities and countryside
with elemental force, but then suddenly, as if by a divine hand, the darkness
of the heavens is parted and the sun begins to shine again.
Parapsychological Powers of the Siddhis Documented By Science Already
Back in the 19th century, there was documented proof of the existence of siddhis
in humans. This was documented by the president of the Royal Society in
England (the top ranking scientific society), Sir William Crookes, and the
cofounder of the Theory of Evolution with Darwin, Alfred Russell Wallace (the
Theory of Evolution was originally called the Darwin-Wallace Theory).
The siddhis documented ranged from telekinesis and levitation under scientific
conditions. In the case of Daniel Hume, Hume once levitated in front of the
scientists up into the air, out the open window on the third floor, and came back
through another open window. This just one ability Hume demonstrated.
There is also a book "The New Soviet Psychic Discoveries" published by two
American researchers (Henry Gris and William Dick) who went into the Soviet
Union and documented numerous cases of people who have been tested by
scientists under lab conditions and have the same abilities Hume did, along with
other powerful psychic abilities.
Dr. Dean Radin has also documented the fact that humans have ESP in
numerous lab tests. We have the numerous works of Rupert Sheldrake on the
subject. The prominent Nobel Prize winners in physics, Pierre and Marie Curie,
documented the same abilities of telekinesis and other psychic abilities in a
psychology institute in Paris. After years of studying such individuals under lab
conditions, they wrote to their fellow colleagues in the physics community and
stated the siddhis are absolutely real and must be taken into accountability.
As Radin stated in his lecture on taboo on physic abilities, the scientific
community has a taboo against researching physic abilities, they can even lose
their career. This is why Wallace's name was taken off the Theory of Evolution
and Darwin's was left.
“Science and the taboo of psi" with Dean Radin:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qw_O9Qiwqew
The test you are mentioning is by James Randi. There was a lawyer who wrote a
report on this. The contract Randi offers is not a legal document and is designed
so that Randi can deny you no matter what, even if he can't disprove anything
you demonstrated. This is what happens, people go and prove they have abilities
and get denied anyway. This challenge is biased to the point that it’s a purposeful
fraud. This has lead to law suits against him and his fake challenge:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210720013233/https://bolenreport.com/us-federalagents-arrest-top-skeptic/
So who is this “nobody has ever been able to prove any evidence of the siddhis”
again....
March 6, 2016
Joy of Satan Forums Contributions
--------
https://satanslibrary.org/English/The_Question_of_Revenge.pdf
The Question of Revenge by Joseph Goebbels
As our V-1s raced over the English Channel for the first time during the
night of 16 June, the English public was struck by paralyzing fear. The
British Home Secretary Morrison saw himself forced to speak to the House
of Commons the next morning about the use of our new weapon of revenge.
He did that in a very tortured manner, openly admitting the seriousness of
the situation for the British capital, but also attempting to reduce or even
deny the serious effects of our revenge weapon. He apparently believed that
he could deceive us about the extent of the damage caused, which was not
possible, since our months of tests gave us opportunity to understand the
new V-1 weapon in every detail, in particular its accuracy and explosive
force. There was yet another crucial reason behind the British home
secretary’s attempt to make our first revenge weapon ridiculous. He did not
want to give foreign countries the chance to learn the effects of the V-1,
particularly since English government circles hoped to develop sufficient
defensive measures. These hopes have proved vain. Nearly every day, the
London press wrote about a new and effective, or even more effective,
defensive measure, but none of them so far has been able to stop our V-1s
from flying undisturbed, and in large numbers, toward London.
Now the English government has given up its attempts to deceive its own
public and the world as to the extent of the damage. Indeed, they are
increasingly doing the opposite, dramatizing things in an emotional manner
to arouse the world’s sympathy, and making every effort at injured or
tortured innocence. The English are making such efforts to appear the good
guy that one has to assume that they do not realize how ridiculous that looks.
It is enough to recall all their praise few months ago for the brutal and
cynical attacks of the Anglo-American air forces on the German civilian
population. When we spoke then of the barbaric nature of such a method of
warfare, London replied with mocking laughter. They thought it no longer
necessary to wear a humanitarian mask. One had the power, one was on the
way down from the mountain peak, and the Reich was no longer a subject,
merely the object, of the war. One could do to it what one wanted. Even
more than that, in fact, Germany had to be treated in a way formerly used
only on defenseless Negro tribes. One no longer paid any heed to the world
public or the conscience of the world, which one had so often called upon
before. That is how it was if we look back to the beginning of the year. The
Western enemies no longer even bothered to keep up appearances. They
openly and cynically named their bombs “blockbusters,” and gave their
“Flying Fortresses” names like “Murder, Inc.” The English in particular
showed their true nature in the plainest manner, without covering anything
up.
When we modestly said that we might still have a word or two to say in this
regard, that we were preparing new weapons of revenge that would one day
fall on England, those in London fell over laughing, and asked us witty
questions about whether these new weapons were invented by propagandists
rather than scientists and engineers. We did not then think it necessary to
persuade the English of the correctness of our announcements. We knew that
sooner than the English public would like, facts would speak louder than
words, and England has certainly lost the desire to laugh. Even its prime
minister, who is usually so fond of cynical jokes, found nothing funny to say
about the V-1 in his last speech to the House of Commons. And one has the
impression that the London press cannot and will not trivialize things as
much as the British home secretary apparently wished. For the first few
days, English newspapers called our V-1 the “doodlebug.” Now they call
them “robot bombs.” That alone shows the change in their opinion from
yesterday to today.
No one can say that the English have given up their appeals to humanity and
the conscience of the world in this regard. They made too much of that
during their major and successful terror attacks on the German civilian
population. Back then, we warned of what is happening today, and said that
we were taking careful note of the most cynical voices of British public
opinion on the bombing war, since we would be able to make good use of
them one day. Now that time has come. It is not persuasive for London to
insist that the German V-1 lacks the accuracy and military value that British
night attacks on the German homeland last winter presumably had. One need
only look at bombed German cities to readily prove the very opposite. If the
Royal Air Force’s bombs actually did have some accuracy, British pilots
made no use of it when attacking the German civilian population. They
above all chose the cultural centers and heavily populated residential areas
of our cities to bomb, largely destroying them, while British public opinion,
including its prime minster and archbishop, applauded. Those English
newspapers that write that England will be repaid for what it did are correct.
It does not take great prophetic gifts to say that, since in contrast to our usual
modesty, we predicted it clearly dozens of times.
The newest English objection to the V-1 is that it is vile and unfair, since it
is not directed by anyone on our side, but kills and injures people on the
enemy side. That is not persuasive. Almost the same thing could be said of
British night bombing attacks. Last winter, the weather was so bad that our
night fighters were unable to take off. Yet those were just the nights the
British preferred for their attacks on the German homeland. When we
objected, London told us coldly and bluntly that the purpose of war was to
employ and lose as few of one’s own men as possible, not as many, and to
cause the enemy as much damage as possible, not as little.
Is not our V-1 the perfect fulfillment of this British desire, and does anyone
doubt that if the English themselves had this weapon, they would make full
use of it, and would also be able to find reasons to claim it was fair and
moral? In London, the newspapers are screaming for revenge. They do this
only to make the world forget that our V-1 attacks are already revenge. If the
English could take revenge, they would not hesitate. They and their U.S. ally
have enough airplanes at their disposal. These, however, are needed for the
invasion beachhead. Were they to be taken from there, it would be an
advantage for us that is not to be underestimated, which itself proves that,
despite British claims, our V-1 has clear military goals and purposes. The
English do not want to admit that because they are appealing to the world’s
pity.
We do not want to cynically welcome the use of our first revenge weapon, or
look forward with glee to coming ones. We would have been happy if it had
been possible to conduct the war, also the air war, in a humane and knightly
manner. The English did not want that. They never accepted proposals that
would have been good for the fighting armies and peoples. As is well
known, this attitude on the part of the British cabinet was responsible for the
war back in 1939. London will not listen to reason. One deludes oneself, and
comes to the wrong conclusion.
How often over the past months has the English government used its captive
press to claim either that there were no German secret weapons, or that if
there were, London knew all about them and was prepared for them. If they
did not exist, how can they be in use, and if London knew all about them,
how is it possible that our V-1s are flying undisturbed toward London, that
women and children are being evacuated from the British capital, that the
larger part of London’s population is sleeping in packed subway stations,
and that, as English newspapers report, the British people can only talk
about German revenge weapons — but yet the English government has
taken no defensive measures?
Although we have the most cause to be satisfied, we take no pleasure in the
desolation our revenge is causing in London. We see is only as a defensive
measure that is having an effect. We even shudder to think about what the
British capital has to expect from our future and more deadly revenge
weapons. Our revenge action is not at an end, but at its beginning. Military
experts far and wide are of the opinion that our revenge weapons are a
revolution in military technology. What will they say when our newest and
even more impressive weapons come into use! Did London really think that
we would simply allow Anglo-American air terror to continue without
objection? That we would not take appropriate steps? It may be that the
enemy’s scientists are ahead of German scientists in one area or another of
military technology, even if their work is based on German research that we
unfortunately saw the military significance of too late.
However, one would underestimate German thoroughness and German
scientific fanaticism if he assumed that our institutes and laboratories had
given up. They have done more than the enemy likes. Their latest inventions
are nearly all finished. Some are in the final testing stages, but most are
already in production. We are not among those who see technology as the
single decisive factor in modern warfare, but it is important. In the past, the
enemy was ahead of us in technology, we were ahead in morale. Morale and
technology together lead to victory. We can and will surpass him in
technology, but he cannot and will not surpass us in morale. That is the
decisive advantage on which we must build. Here will we see who in the end
has the most endurance.
For our enemy, modern warfare has little to do with humanity. They have
been hard and uncompromising toward us; we must face them in the same
hard and uncompromising way. They will use every method of warfare they
have against us, if it has any prospect of success. We have to do the same to
save our necks. We are ahead in one area, they in another. It depends on who
fights with the greatest fanaticism, who has the better ideas, who the better
morale on the battlefield. He will win. It is not important where the last
battle is fought, rather that one has enough regiments and divisions, and that
they fight as well on the last day of the war as they did on the first. The
fortunes of war will always shift. He who wants to accomplish great things
must also accept great risks and dangers. That is what proves the hard and
manly character of a warring nation — the determination to defend its life
and freedom to the last breath, never showing even the slightest sign of
weakness. The stronger peoples will win this war, and they alone will have
the moral and historical right to form a new world, for they have earned it
with their blood and with the lives of their best sons. The weapons that they
use are signs of their inventive genius and their unbreakable will for national
existence and freedom. Those weapons do not determine success by
themselves. More important is the morale of a people, its firm determination
to fight and to win, its absolute faith in the justice of its cause. We have all
of that. The enemy has only greater numbers and better technology for a
while in a few areas. We must catch up in those areas and surpass him.
We speak neither from a sense of superiority nor of weakness. We are
absolutely confident of our cause, even though we have had severe trials.
We would have had to doubt the duration of our victory if France had fallen
to us without a fight in summer 1940. That would have been too easy for us,
and we could hardly have survived the later hard tests. Fate can be mastered
only through hard struggle. When the war is over, we will all know the price
that we have paid. No one then will be willing to endanger what we have
gained through carelessness or a lack of alertness.
The coming victory will belong to all of us, for we will all have fought,
worked, and suffered for it. We will therefore make its results a matter for
the people as well, both its benefits as well as its costs. Today everyone must
stand firm, fanatically and without compromising. The nation is called to
that. It lacks neither means nor opportunities; it need only use them. If it
does that, it can look to the coming storms with sovereign confidence. They
resemble nature’s thunderstorms that break over the cities and countryside
with elemental force, but then suddenly, as if by a divine hand, the darkness
of the heavens is parted and the sun begins to shine again.
