AskSatanOperator
Well-known member
I'm embarrassed to ask this but understand it contains a very important point. Though I'm not a forum poster, I'd like to ask JoS opinion on this. It seems like we all study history in our way and interpret it and that is fine very interesting but....
I'm well aware of the George Orwell and Kane from Command and Conquer quote:
But over the last few years I can't help but feel like history is about as fluid as liquid when it comes to interpretation.
For example we are all well aware that history isn't rife with non-sense in fact judging from some interpretations the Ancient Greeks and Romans were nearly at the 1700s of age or certainly into a Renaissance level of property. Unfortunately to even sail the waters into the Ancient Greeks, MUCH less the Ancient Romans except for a recent sub-level.
For example I believe the Romans date back to a much older period. And I believe the Romans have been around for a surprising longer period. But I have no evidence nor do I know. In fact it's just a belief certainly the Greeks have been around with some surviving texts stating Pre-Homeric times or the Minoan people were so alien to Greeks that even if their pantheon aligns it's a total mess to try to figure it out especially after the volcanic eruption.
My question is it normal for history to be as fluid as the present and future?
Do the Gods speak of fluidity in history? Certainly if Satan did X, 18,750 years ago. X is the action. But to someone else X can mean a lot. I'm going to assume preservation of history and the explanation of history requires EXTREME carefulness and delicate handling or else it can alter all the present and future. Correct?
Also can I ask another separate question:
Is there a specific reason without mention of the enemy, I know they purposefully fucked things up. But is there a specific reason why history before 3,000bce is so muddy? Right about Ramses the 2nd 3Kbce or so before this is when things get odd.
Is there a reason why before this range we mostly see it preserved in 4-5-6-7 thousand year plus historicity of the Hindus, Sumerians, some rarities in Egyptology and practically the Asiatic cultures?
I kinda get the feeling the enemy destroyed a lot of the history in between Europe, Asia Minor, Middle East, and areas of India. To create a we wuz kangz mentality of first 'n' sheit. I strongly recall Hp.Cobra sickened and pissed off the we wuz first sheit is even still around as that creates a colossal arrogant shit attitude towards others.
========================================
I'm well aware my information above is laughable by the JoS as of COURSE history is so destroyed. I don't mean to literally ask historical stuff down to the button on their shirt or the wallet that they used, even if I am on some level very interested in that. I like to explore deep and know deep. As a Cancarian person I value history greatly.
Unfortunately as much as I love or used to love history. I've been so shocked at this whole cultural wipe-out through rewriting look all the kangz we got lets niggernize and spicify everything. Excuse the racially charged language I'm not trying to create animosity but I understand the blacks and latins and other minorities in the World hell in many cases overall in certain places they aren't even minorities but represent entire races and sub-races of a nation or nations.
But I can't help but feel racially violated by all the animosity. Just the other day they were discussing on these websites I visit the appropriation of insert XYZ item. Pretty soon their gonna say "Lulz goy did you not know a blackcists invented da computerz yo make to be razizsts on".
I'm well aware of the George Orwell and Kane from Command and Conquer quote:
But over the last few years I can't help but feel like history is about as fluid as liquid when it comes to interpretation.
For example we are all well aware that history isn't rife with non-sense in fact judging from some interpretations the Ancient Greeks and Romans were nearly at the 1700s of age or certainly into a Renaissance level of property. Unfortunately to even sail the waters into the Ancient Greeks, MUCH less the Ancient Romans except for a recent sub-level.
For example I believe the Romans date back to a much older period. And I believe the Romans have been around for a surprising longer period. But I have no evidence nor do I know. In fact it's just a belief certainly the Greeks have been around with some surviving texts stating Pre-Homeric times or the Minoan people were so alien to Greeks that even if their pantheon aligns it's a total mess to try to figure it out especially after the volcanic eruption.
My question is it normal for history to be as fluid as the present and future?
Do the Gods speak of fluidity in history? Certainly if Satan did X, 18,750 years ago. X is the action. But to someone else X can mean a lot. I'm going to assume preservation of history and the explanation of history requires EXTREME carefulness and delicate handling or else it can alter all the present and future. Correct?
Also can I ask another separate question:
Is there a specific reason without mention of the enemy, I know they purposefully fucked things up. But is there a specific reason why history before 3,000bce is so muddy? Right about Ramses the 2nd 3Kbce or so before this is when things get odd.
Is there a reason why before this range we mostly see it preserved in 4-5-6-7 thousand year plus historicity of the Hindus, Sumerians, some rarities in Egyptology and practically the Asiatic cultures?
I kinda get the feeling the enemy destroyed a lot of the history in between Europe, Asia Minor, Middle East, and areas of India. To create a we wuz kangz mentality of first 'n' sheit. I strongly recall Hp.Cobra sickened and pissed off the we wuz first sheit is even still around as that creates a colossal arrogant shit attitude towards others.
========================================
I'm well aware my information above is laughable by the JoS as of COURSE history is so destroyed. I don't mean to literally ask historical stuff down to the button on their shirt or the wallet that they used, even if I am on some level very interested in that. I like to explore deep and know deep. As a Cancarian person I value history greatly.
Unfortunately as much as I love or used to love history. I've been so shocked at this whole cultural wipe-out through rewriting look all the kangz we got lets niggernize and spicify everything. Excuse the racially charged language I'm not trying to create animosity but I understand the blacks and latins and other minorities in the World hell in many cases overall in certain places they aren't even minorities but represent entire races and sub-races of a nation or nations.
But I can't help but feel racially violated by all the animosity. Just the other day they were discussing on these websites I visit the appropriation of insert XYZ item. Pretty soon their gonna say "Lulz goy did you not know a blackcists invented da computerz yo make to be razizsts on".
