Flavius Josephus

[volk_victory]

If I'm not mistaken, the jew (alleged) "historian Flavius Josephus is a very tricky. Is he viewed as one of the
trailblazers concerning the demonization of Satan, by the leadership of the Jos

 

[Invictvs]

If I'm not mistaken, the jew (alleged) "historian Flavius Josephus is a very tricky. Is he viewed as one of the
trailblazers concerning the demonization of Satan, by the leadership of the Jos

No, the demonization of Satan already began with Zoroastrianism. In the Vedas, there are the Devas which are the Gods (many of them are Satan and the Demons with other names) and the Asuras which are demigods and oppose the Devas, but they are not considered "evil" in the Christian way. They are just inferior beings. What the Zoroastrians did is they took the whole Deva/Asura thing and inverted it, so they called beings who are absolute good "Ahuras" and "evil" beings "Daevas". Many of the "Daevas" in Zoroastrianism are well-known Vedic Gods like Indra and Rudra and so they were demonized into manifestations of "evil".

Zoroastrianism is an enemy religion and is proto-Christianity.

Of course then Christianity was influenced by Mithraism which was an offshoot of Zoroastrianism and it carried the entire dualistic good/evil mindset from it.

 

[Xenophon]

If I'm not mistaken, the jew (alleged) "historian Flavius Josephus is a very tricky. Is he viewed as one of the
trailblazers concerning the demonization of Satan, by the leadership of the Jos

Even secular historians allow that his version of history is often self-serving.

 

[aksiptrina]

some people are translating Asura as 'demon'. Apparently this is not correct. I think some translate some Sanskrit literature in that way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OZ-XaFx1V4

 

[Stormblood]

While members of the Flavian dynasty have not been pioneers of this, they certainly started this process inside of Ancient Rome and introduced degenerate practices like gladiators fighting and so on. This opened the door for people like Constantine and Theodosius to give the finishing blows by establishing the enemy religion as a legitimate one, and enforcing death conversions. May they be cursed for eternity and damnatio memoriae fall upon them.

 

[Xenophon]

While members of the Flavian dynasty have not been pioneers of this, they certainly started this process inside of Ancient Rome and introduced degenerate practices like gladiators fighting and so on. This opened the door for people like Constantine and Theodosius to give the finishing blows by establishing the enemy religion as a legitimate one, and enforcing death conversions. May they be cursed for eternity and damnatio memoriae fall upon them.

Julius Caesar was promoting public gladitorial contests nearly a century before the Flavians. Suetonius hints that he scarcely began the spectacles. At most, the Flavians seem to have enlarged and popularized the games, not begun them.

 

[Wotanwarrior]

While members of the Flavian dynasty have not been pioneers of this, they certainly started this process inside of Ancient Rome and introduced degenerate practices like gladiators fighting and so on. This opened the door for people like Constantine and Theodosius to give the finishing blows by establishing the enemy religion as a legitimate one, and enforcing death conversions. May they be cursed for eternity and damnatio memoriae fall upon them.

Trajan was another puppet who did the same and then on the contrary Hadrian and Marcus Aurelius tried to reverse that and restore the ancient Greek values of Rome.

 

[Stormblood]

Julius Caesar was promoting public gladitorial contests nearly a century before the Flavians. Suetonius hints that he scarcely began the spectacles. At most, the Flavians seem to have enlarged and popularized the games, not begun them.

Who is the source for that? Because it may be wrong.

For example, sources like Pliny the Elder and Tacitus are mostly lies. They had a good relationship with Flavian dynasty, who had no real claim to the throne other than their fabricated claim of "the Gods chose me". They definitely had no blood heritage from Julius Caesar and not to any emperors from the previous dynasty.

Flavius Josephus is also claimed on Wikipedia to be a kike, which means nothing he wrote can be trusted.

The thing is that death games have never been part of any Gentile culture and, looking at how the gladiator games came to be, it's clear that their origin is actually the enemy. It started as a ritual of mass sacrifices, allegedly instructed by the Sybilla, which is wrong as the Sybilla would never instruct any form of human or animal sacrifice, because the Gods don't want and it's an enemy invention.

All impactful Gentile civilisation have had strong morals and ethics for the majority of their time before their corruption by the enemy. Killing for the sake of killing is not moral nor ethical. You kill for survival (i.e. food, self-defence) and for population control (i.e. disease prevention in animals). You don't kill for entertainment or to please any Gentile God or Goddess. You can also kill for ethical reasons (i.e. the worst criminals) and that's the final reason for killing.

Trajan was another puppet who did the same and then on the contrary Hadrian and Marcus Aurelius tried to reverse that and restore the ancient Greek values of Rome.

Thanks for adding this!

 

[Wotanwarrior]

While members of the Flavian dynasty have not been pioneers of this, they certainly started this process inside of Ancient Rome and introduced degenerate practices like gladiators fighting and so on. This opened the door for people like Constantine and Theodosius to give the finishing blows by establishing the enemy religion as a legitimate one, and enforcing death conversions. May they be cursed for eternity and damnatio memoriae fall upon them.

Julius Caesar was promoting public gladitorial contests nearly a century before the Flavians. Suetonius hints that he scarcely began the spectacles. At most, the Flavians seem to have enlarged and popularized the games, not begun them.

As I understand it, the events organized by Julius Caesar were not gladiator fights, but chariot races and Olympic sports competitions.

 

[Blitzkreig [JG]]

...

Everyone is free to share their opinions, debate, and stimulate intellectual advancement. If you believe someone is thinking the wrong thing, especially your fellow SS, then you should take the time to educate them, rather than getting excessively hostile. What you have written here is just insulting and also does not help your own sake in regards to building good relationships, so it is best to calm down and try to avoid expressing your anger like this.

 

[Karnonnos]

From Suetonius: "During his aedileship, Caesar filled the Comitium, the Forum, its adjacent basilicas, and the Capitol itself with a display of the material he meant to use in his public shows, building temporary colonnades for the purpose. He exhibited wild-beast hunts and stage plays, some at his own expense. . . Caesar also put on a gladiatorial show. Still, he had collected so immense a troop of combatants that his terrified political opponents rushed through a bill limiting the number of gladiators that anyone might keep in Rome.” (Book X, "The 12 Caesars") Chariot racers are scarcely "combatants." And the senate would scarcely be terrified by anyone keeping discus throwers and sprinters.

Marx once said the Jews would be safe when Europeans internalized Jewish thought-habits. That day has come to pass. This forum's participants do EXACTLY what they accuse the kike of: rewriting history to order. JofS has great magic. Shite for human material. Fuck off all of you.

I understand that some people speak too quickly on history here, stating their theories as fact, but you have to understand people like Magestein also wrote things about Roman history that are confusing to say the least, so people are just going off what they understand to be true.

History and philosophical works have also been extensively rewritten, or may have just been slanderous at the time they were written, to the point where we don't know what is real or not. Suetonius claimed Tiberius trained newborn baby boys to fellate him while bathing, sodomized a acolyte and his brother the flute player then had their legs broken, and forced a high-born lady he tried to rape to commit suicide (Tiberius 44.1-2, 45). Cassius Dio also calls him a sexual predator who forced sexual morality laws on the populace and then raped young girls and boys.

Tiberius isn't even Flavian, but Julio-Claudian, the successor of a man (Augustus) who was so impeccable in terms of sexual morals that he exiled his own debauched daughter to an island with only her mother to talk to for humiliating him as an emperor.

On the other hand, when Napoleon forced his way into the Vatican archive with a team of translators, he walked out and said 'history is a lie!'

Astral Projection and Past Life Regression is a possible cure for this, but as HP Cobra said, it is more of an advanced technique that is confusing and one can fall victim to their delusions with it as well. I have tried to be careful with it, even though what I saw seems to be reasonable and definitely not self-glorifying of me, but I can't say for sure that what I've seen is 666 percent true.

This also goes for the Carthage thread on AskSatan. More than thirty Greco-Roman sources claim Carthage (and any Phoenician enemy of the jews) practiced human sacrifice of young boys, but the excavation team claiming this is true is from Hebrew University and uses skewed logic in interpreting graveyard offerings as validating the sources, when the characteristics actually don't really validate the sources. Many of these corpses are unborn or stillbirths, the oldest is 12 months, and more than half are female.

 

[Wotanwarrior]

Julius Caesar was promoting public gladitorial contests nearly a century before the Flavians. Suetonius hints that he scarcely began the spectacles. At most, the Flavians seem to have enlarged and popularized the games, not begun them.

As I understand it, the events organized by Julius Caesar were not gladiator fights, but chariot races and Olympic sports competitions.

From Suetonius: "During his aedileship, Caesar filled the Comitium, the Forum, its adjacent basilicas, and the Capitol itself with a display of the material he meant to use in his public shows, building temporary colonnades for the purpose. He exhibited wild-beast hunts and stage plays, some at his own expense. . . Caesar also put on a gladiatorial show. Still, he had collected so immense a troop of combatants that his terrified political opponents rushed through a bill limiting the number of gladiators that anyone might keep in Rome.” (Book X, "The 12 Caesars") Chariot racers are scarcely "combatants." And the senate would scarcely be terrified by anyone keeping discus throwers and sprinters.

Marx once said the Jews would be safe when Europeans internalized Jewish thought-habits. That day has come to pass. This forum's participants do EXACTLY what they accuse the kike of: rewriting history to order. JofS has great magic. Shite for human material. Fuck off all of you.

Suetonius was a puppet who was linked to the Flavian dynasty, I find it very curious how he speaks unfavorably of emperors who were good rulers such as Tiberius, Nero or Caligula and then does the opposite with others who were nefarious as the Flavians or the useless puppet of Octavius/Augustus.

 

[Stormblood]

From Suetonius: "During his aedileship, Caesar filled the Comitium, the Forum, its adjacent basilicas, and the Capitol itself with a display of the material he meant to use in his public shows, building temporary colonnades for the purpose. He exhibited wild-beast hunts and stage plays, some at his own expense. . . Caesar also put on a gladiatorial show. Still, he had collected so immense a troop of combatants that his terrified political opponents rushed through a bill limiting the number of gladiators that anyone might keep in Rome.” (Book X, "The 12 Caesars") Chariot racers are scarcely "combatants." And the senate would scarcely be terrified by anyone keeping discus throwers and sprinters.

Marx once said the Jews would be safe when Europeans internalized Jewish thought-habits. That day has come to pass. This forum's participants do EXACTLY what they accuse the kike of: rewriting history to order. JofS has great magic. Shite for human material. Fuck off all of you.

You disagreeing with what I and other people say doesn't give you grounds to insult us, you know. You can proceed the conversation as normal and behave like JG Blitzkreig mentioned.

Of what you quoted, I only want to comment that gladiator literally means swordsman. From gladium, which is the short sword Roman infantry used as opposed to the spatha, which is a long sword used by Roman cavalry.

Gladiatorial show can literally mean anything. It can mean swordsmen executing prisoners of war and criminal. It can mean swordsmen displaying their skill in an artistic fashion (aka with imaginary opponents in the air). It can mean an array of things and it is very ambiguous.

Just because you like an author, it doesn't mean that what they say is the Word of Satan and should be taken verbatim without questioning. Karnonnos did a great job of describing the difficulties of verifying history, with or without using spiritual abilities. The only reason why I express certain concepts as facts is because they align with SS principles.

We know, for example, that the Roman Empire, like many other Pagan civilisations, fully embodied SS values before being corrupted by the enemy which is why certain enemy practices cannot have been part of it before the corruptions. The shows in the Flavian Amphitheatre are one such enemy practice as enjoying people killing each other is completely against the life-loving teaching of Spiritual Satanism, as is sending your racial brothers to die without a reasons.

A game is different from the necessities of war. It takes a very twisted mentality to enjoy killing for the sake of killing, which is what the enemy likes. Killing your enemy is different and some people enjoy it, rightfully so. Killing your enemy, however, is a necessity of survival, not a form of entertainment.