Beware of @Le_CRIF (and probably others)

[FancyMancy]

I posted this below originally on the other forum. Some of this post is NSfW/NSfSensitives (i.e. weakling, passive, masochistic slave people/children). Send them to their "safe places" so they are not offended and start crying, shield them from reality, and mollycoddle and wrap them up in cotton wool. It's not all text; there are also pictures and videos.


I received an email from "Twitter Legal" telling me some jews in France (which I thought was a secular country, seeing as some jews say "jew" is not a race but a religion) are crying about a tweet I made.



(((Their))) (((twitter))) account - https://twitter.com/search?q=%40Le_CRIF&src=typd

The tweet I made contained:

1. something which is supposed to be fake or somehow inaccurate, due to someone pointing out something about it, and
2. questioning "the" holocaust

so what, precisely, is their problem? I am all but certain that if all of my replies in that tweet thread were "offensive", then they would have provided links to all of my individual tweets but they provided only one, as you can see. What about the people who liked and re-tweeted it? Are they as "naughty" "legally"? Check all of my posts on this forum, and check all of my tweets, and see the very low percentage of likes and re-tweets/praise/support/encouragement that I receive. The phrase "clutching at straws" comes to mind.

Is the following, on @Le_CRIF's account, also "offensive" "free speech" which must be removed "legally"?


http://web.archive.org/web/201611031109 ... 6582966276
http://web.archive.org/web/201611031109 ... 0233723904
http://web.archive.org/web/201611031109 ... 0338468864


http://web.archive.org/web/201611031109 ... 2513793024
http://web.archive.org/web/201611031109 ... 0648141825
http://web.archive.org/web/201611031109 ... 7138327552
http://web.archive.org/web/201611031109 ... 4855486465

Does the following,

'The Germans, contrary to what a lot of people think, were pretty good to us on the whole.'

sources:
https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-ar ... -bury.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -camp.html

AKA



also have to be deleted "legally" due to lies spread in history by the winners? i.e. Does it have to be deleted "legally" because the truth is offensive?!

Dear @Le_CRIF,



The link in the email goes to https://support.twitter.com/articles/20175009

So if various tweets are "illegal" because they ask questions/say things, and the Auschwitz goalkeeper's words are also "illegal", then what else is "illegal"?

Perhaps this


and this



and this



and this



and this



yes?

http://imgur.com/a/zSq9Z

Then we have this



& http://web.archive.org/web/201611141830 ... 13950.html

and these





and we have more things, such as these






Speaking about jews and French jews,






Then we have these





With Boris Johnson also wanting to help them, and the muslim who did his campaigning in hebrew to become Londonistan mayor Sadiq Khan, and Barack Obama bin Laden wanting more non-Whites to flood into America. There was also a film called London Has Fallen, wasn't there? Wow. That wasn't a cohencidence at all.




Say, what about China and Tibet? Was that not genocide?!







Actually, it did, and it apologised to israel for it.


We know Hitler didn't want war,








If you look online, you should be able to find Hitler's pleadings to not go to war. I found it on on jewgle books but for the life of me I can't find it again. I am certain I posted the name of the woman who did the book/s and maybe a bit of a description, as well, but I don't know the name and all my searches were fruitless - and I would have saved it to my computer but it's not here! For anyone who might know or search, it was on jewgle books, as I said, and due to "copyright" BS you could view only a bit of the text at a time. I got two separate bits on two links...but search terms are biased on jewgle and "Why did Hitler break the Treay of Versailles?"-type results are all that come up. The name of the book or books, by a female if I am not mistaken, was something like Writings of Hitler, or Writings On Hitler, or something like his writings or something like that... If anyone can find it, please add it in a reply here! In it, he describes his pleading to not go to war, and with which he will lay down the least of his weapons - but all countries must also abide by the treaty as per Versailles, and if not, then Germany must at least be able to defend herself. I most definitely would have saved it but I can't find it anywhere.




NOTE: TGSNT.tv has christian crap mixed in with it. A trusted Nazi toid me it mixes 98% truth with 2% lies.

See below regarding these j00 "laws" and the pictures at the top of this thread.


Why is he not having any "legal" bullshit to delete his opinion?

Don't forget that the "out of Africa" claim has been proven false; we (non-Blacks) are not Black, and we never was. They are trying to make Europe and White areas Black/non-White now. Furthermore, more recent articled said that "Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa, scientists find". Also don't forget the "'I HATE WHITES' is not 'hate crime'"-type of news article threads I posted before, as well (on the other forum); but me merely mentioning something in a thread about history being incorrect has "legal" bullshit with it. People are not likely to see that tweet anymore, anyway; it's weeks old and people make thousands of tweets per day, and why would they go looking through a Nazi twitter account when Nazis are evil devil-worshippers bent on enslaving Europe for a dictator's perverse will? For those who are incapable of understanding, I'm being sarcastic. The j00 has raped peoples' minds with such j00 p00 for so long that people (non-j00z) don't know they are Nazis. Nazism might be a political thing, but it's also a Gentile/Pagan (non-jew) thing. The jew is clutching at straws.




I used to be a christian, sucking an invisible kike on a kross's kock and paying it to have that privilege. That dirty kike fucked me over, in more ways than one - including in such a way that it is me who is being "punished" for it now, in a long, drawn-out fashion, despite it not being my fault, so I am well within my rights to say as I please about any dirty jewkike. "You can't generalise and stereotype." Actually, I can. If no two people were the same, then there wouldn't be any genres and sub-cultural groups/gangs - "in-groups". I don't say things lightly. I consider and re-consider before I say things. What jurisdiction does (((twitter))) have in the UK against "free speech"? What jurisdiction does France have in the UK? Is it "illegal" to say "a jew is..." in the UK? Sorry, Scotland. I meant in Breaking Britain?

https://antisemitism.uk/law



So apparently, out of sight, out of mind; before the kike starting kiking its kike all over us, we didn't say anything bad about the kike's kikey kike. A bully feels victimised.



So the term has become muddied and as kikey as the kike - dirty. It means "hatred for/dislike of the kike" for the simple reason the kike hates Gentiles/Pagans/Nazis, as has been shown above and on this forum and its related sites, not to mention with people waking up and realising the truth, as welll with the Right/Nazism being on the rise again, because the kike wants to enslave non-kikes. Get rid of the kike, and the world fixes itself. Yes, I said "hatred for kikes". There is nothing "wrong" with hatred, but they want jewsus to thrust its dirty p00 dick down your throat and make you gag and be sick because "if you hate your brother, then you kill him in your heart" so sayeth the buybull's "god" jewzus in 1 John 3:15, under the heading "Love Each Other". It's all about love, love, love - and don't forget to mix races to weaken both races, especially the White race most, first, and foremost. Stupid goyim.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemit ... ed_Kingdom

From: Foreign & Commonwealth Office and The Rt Hon Sir Eric Pickles MP
Written on: 30 March 2016
First published: 30 March 2016
Part of: Human rights internationally

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/ ... tisemitism

If there is no "definition" (read: dissimilation of meanings), then there is no grounds for "illegality". Problem, reaction, solution. The jew is waiting to see how antisemitism occurs before "defining" it "properly".

EXCLUSIVE: Tough new laws to combat the surge in anti-Semitic abuse in Britain

MINISTERS will today unleash a tough new crackdown to combat rising anti-Semitism in Britain following a surge of sickening attacks against the Jewish community

By Martyn Brown
PUBLISHED: 00:01, Mon, Dec 29, 2014

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/549164 ... itic-abuse

The following videos are on Dropbox. You don't have to log-in to view them; just click the "no thanks" link below. You can also change the dl=0 at the end of the links to dl=1 to download the files directly.

Europe will be diverse - Frans Timmermans -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7qhtd72ia1d38 ... s.mp4?dl=0

Similarly to the Auschwitz goalkeeper above, Holocaust Survivors who Tell the Truth -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zr11yc8oi7si6 ... h.mp4?dl=0

Former British deputy prime minister in the Con/LibDem coalition, regarding j00z and EUrabia "hate crime" legislation, Nick Clegg welcoming jewish 'law' -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/sw5c3fhxjj2zu ... 7.mp4?dl=0

Reporter Admits the News is Fake! -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/smju7qpkf3zat ... 1.mp4?dl=0

SIX MILLION JEWS reference in 10 newspapers between 1915 & 1938 -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mxi2xke5nfioc ... 8.mp4?dl=0

Israel Monster Crushing Europe -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/duvyze7kt0drm ... e.mp4?dl=0

Israel Monster Crushing Europe 2 -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/osbnxif2cyoav ... 2.mp4?dl=0

I'm not White; I'm jewish -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hsxfhr08qgagj ... 7.mp4?dl=0

Hidden camera shows streets blocked by huge crowds of muslims - islam in Paris -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gf82jg73pqvjz ... s.mp4?dl=0

muslim Teacher Teaching islam terrorism in UK -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uu58qxoiy4nu4 ... K.mp4?dl=0

islamic Leader Making Fun of 'Moderate' islam Myth -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mngo71sqs2u5m ... h.mp4?dl=0

Jews Admit Destroying the White Race; Barbara Lerner Spectre -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ufstjdpqk3kx6 ... e.mp4?dl=0

Netanyahu - 'Hitler Didn't Want to Exterminate the Jews' -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/226x1upwqti1x ... 7.mp4?dl=0

'We, the jews, are in the middle of this clash of civilisations...' -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/12myc5ayu90zv ... ..mp4?dl=0

So the j00 reckons if Europe doesn't bow down and worship it, then the j00 will destroy Europe with islam, and if Europe does, they Europe will be "saved" from islam by the j00. So "secular" France is now islam France with j00z at the top of it. "Sorry" but I am not going to kowtow to islamised France controlled by "French j00z" with muslims trying to take over my country.

The Last Days of the Big Lie -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3f47cyu1two6m ... e.mp4?dl=0

The Decay of Western Civilisation -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vyk0nvjj7igpw ... n.mp4?dl=0

Truth Shall be the Victor in this Struggle -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xlyqojfq3gqkg ... e.mp4?dl=0

Then among all of this, there is a new "free speech" social media site, at the same time, called gab.ai. The word "gabai" is jewish. (((They))) say that gab.ai is for "free speech" for people. More like trying to segregate everyone into one area, to keep us away from everyone else who are being distracted by (((the cult of celebritism, materialism, etc.)))


The only ones who will receive "torah honours" in the Right Wing are (((those who promote alt-right))), which is also (((jewish))).

So it's OK for j00z to say shit and to admit things, but it's not OK for me to say one thing in a tweet online that much less than 1/1000th of a percent of the entire world has seen, and the rest will most probably not see? That makes sense. If @Le_CRIF, or anyone, chooses to be offended by things I say, then they should stop listening to me/reading what I say. No-one is forcing them to be upset, except for themselves by their own choices. Not to mention France doesn't have any jurisdiction over here; we voted for Brexitting the EUrabia, so as far as the Brexiters (or Brexiteers, as they're saying it) are concerned, we're not in EUrabia. I also didn't pay much attention in French at school, either.

Thanks to the respective individuals who uploaded/created pictures and videos. Unfortunately, I don't know who did what, so I can't username you.

[AncientShadow666]

THAAAT, my dear, is s**tload of information.... damn you are on fire and thank you for the info, even i didnt know some things like that 6 million stuff has been happening for a looooooonnnggg time...

[FancyMancy]

THAAAT, my dear, is s**tload of information.... damn you are on fire and thank you for the info, even i didnt know some things like that 6 million stuff has been happening for a looooooonnnggg time...

I'm glad I helped. The more the jew pushes, the more we resist.

I can't wait for that quote in the jew's dirty talmud, which I showed above, to come true. Here are more dirty-jew-book quotes -

A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death...

Sanhedrin 59a

To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.

Libbre David 37

A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them.

Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17

Why would someone ask "Does your book contain anything against me" randomly? What is the meaning and reason here? Oh, of course - the jew is covering its own back, to be as safe as possible; then in the latter days, when a Without person might be inclined to ask a jew such a question, this lie that its dirty sinbook doesn't contain anything about us, that Without person would then accept that answer as...well...gospel, instead of investigating further and seeing what the jew's sinbook says.

When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves.

Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D

Resh Lakish said: He who is observant of fringes will be privileged to be served by two thousand eight hundred slaves...

Mas. Shabbath 31b

On the house of the Goy one looks as on the fold of cattle.

Tosefta, Tractate Erubin VIII

When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it.

Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156

If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth.

Choschen Hamm 388, 15

Happy will be the lost of Israel, whom the Holy One, blessed be He, has chosen from amongst the Goyim, of whom the Scriptures say: "Their work is but vanity, it is an illusion at which we must laugh; they will all perish when God visits them in His wrath." At the moment when the Holy One, blessed be He, will exterminate all the Goyim of the world, Israel alone will subsist, even as it is written: "The Lord alone will appear great on that day!...

Zohar, Vayshlah 177b

That the Jewish nation is the only nation selected by God, while all the remaining ones are contemptible and hateful.

That all property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which consequently is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general.

A Jew may rob a Goy, he may cheat him over a bill, which should not be perceived by him, otherwise the name of God would become dishonoured.

Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat, 348

R. Hanina said: If a heathen smites a Jew, he is worthy of death; for it is written, And he looked this way and that way, and when he saw that there was no man, he slew the Egyptian. [Ex. 2:12] R. Hanina also said: He who smites an Israelite on the jaw, is as though he had thus assaulted the Divine Presence; for it is written, one who smiteth man [i.e. an Israelite] attacketh the Holy One.

[In other words, if a non-Jew kills a Jew, the non-Jew can be killed. Punching an Israelite is akin to assaulting God. (But killing a non-Jew is NOT like assaulting God.]

Sanhedrin 58b

If a goy killed a goy or a Jew he is responsible, but if a Jew killed a goy he is not responsible.

Tosefta, Aboda Zara, VIII, 5

Has it not been taught: "With respect to robbery -- if one stole or robbed or [seized] a beautiful woman, or [committed] similar offences, if [these were perpetrated] by one Cuthean ["Cuthean" or "Samaritan" = goy/gentile/heathen/non-Jew] against another, [the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft] of an Israelite by a Cuthean, but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained?" But if robbery is a capital offence, should not the Tanna have taught: He incurs a penalty? -- Because the second clause wishes to state, "but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be retained," therefore the former clause reads, "[theft of an Israelite by a Cuthean] must not be kept." But where a penalty is incurred, it is explicitly stated, for the commencing clause teaches: "For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty?"

[Translation: A Jew may rob a Goy, but a Goy may not rob a Jew. If a Goy murders another Goy or a Jew, he should be killed, but a Jew will not be incur the death penalty for killing a non-Jew.]

Sanhedrin 57a

Kill the Goyim by any means possible.

Choshen Ha'mishpat 425:50

Everyone who sheds the blood of the impious [non-Jews] is as acceptable to God as he who offers a sacrifice to God.

Yalkut 245c

Extermination of the Christians is a necessary sacrifice.

Zohar, Shemoth

Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed.

[NB: Hoffman says, "This passage is not from the Soncino edition but is from the original Hebrew of the Babylonian Talmud as quoted by the 1907 Jewish Encyclopedia, published by Funk and Wagnalls and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, 'Gentile,' (p. 617)." Another source says this passage is at Avodah Zara 26b. We have not been able to verify any of these references. It does not seem to be at Avodah Zara 26b of the Soncino edition.]

Soferim 15, Rule 10, or
Abodah Zara 26b

A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death.

Sanhedrin 59a

Plus many more similar scriptural quotes.


Ask the rabbi: May a Jew teach Torah to a gentile?
[My Note: The first letter of the last word in a title should be capitalised; notice "jew" has a capital J, but non-jew, i.e. "Gentile" has a lowercase G. See this picture, and see the link at the end of the article, quoted below.

http://archive.is/iELy7
That was a coincidence that that Saudi prince happened to have been saved on that archive.is page there, mentioning going to israel. I didn't archive the article; someone else did 2 years ago.

Back to the article.]

In contemporary society, non-Jews learn Jewish texts in many forums, including University and Internet sites.
...
Yet most scholars limited the prohibition in one form of another. The Talmud itself contends that gentiles may learn material necessary to properly observe the seven Noahide laws. In this spirit, Rabbi David Tzvi Hoffman argued that one may teach non-Jews the narrative portions of the Torah which will inspire belief in the grandeur of God. Beyond that, rabbis Naftali Berlin and Tzvi Hirsch Chajes contended that the prohibition only applies to aspects of the Oral Law but not to the written Scriptures.

Alternatively, Rabbi Samuel Eidels argued that the prohibition only included the “reasons and secrets” of the Torah but not the basic texts or laws, with Rabbi Eliyahu Mizrahi further contending that the prohibition could be waived if one cannot extract oneself from a situation without discussing that information.

http://www.jpost.com/Magazine/Judaism/A ... -a-gentile

Why not the "oral law", AKA spoken-word "law"? Because of this -
"In the Beginning was the Word" ~Thoth
http://www.angelfire.com/empire/serpent ... balah.html
https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=8986#p8986

"The 7 noahide laws." Someone on the other forum mentioned this - the jew is trying to force this into existence for Gentiles to be enslaved by.

[Stormblood]

Oh man. Hold your horses. You're killing with these swastika-fold walls of text.

[FancyMancy]

Longer version of Nick Clegg welcoming jewish manifesto
https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5382

[Banmaskim666]

“Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, excepts when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation.

It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundation of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.

The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”
-Raphael Lemkin

“The Messiah will come only when Edom, Europe, Christianity, has totally fallen. So, I ask you, is it good news that Muslims are invading Europe? It’s excellent news! It means the coming of the Messiah! Excellent news!”
- Rav Touitou

These two quotes really stuck out to me about what’s going on.

[FancyMancy]

Also see this -
...and just as you saw the iron mixed with baked clay, so the people will be a mixture and will not remain united, any more than iron mixes with clay.
~Daniel 2:43