Kadisiye said:
Stormblood said:
That is just xtard propaganda from the enemy, just like they did with Herr Hitler and NS Germany, as well as Ancient Egypt and my other enemies of the enemy. It is completely out of touch with reality, as usual. Start meditating and deprogramming from enemy brainwashing.
everything that doesn't work for you is enemy corruption. I think Sultan Mehmed II was a satanist. It is a great talent to be able to maintain peace in the Balkans and Anatolia while the christian kings of Europe chop each other. Vlad and Michael the Brave was both christian but they didn't fight for europe or romanian or christianity. They fought because of title and name (King of the Romania) Btw I am meditating since summer of 2016.
Not all European Kings were the same. Some of them even banished the jews. And what's wrong with fighting for your nationality? Not all wars were religious wars back then. Not every noble or warrior was a Machiavellian schemer either, nor supporting enemy agenda. It's kind of an accident of circumstance that most were fighting for jews whether they wanted to or not. You don't see me launching hate campaigns against the British for fighting for the jews against the American colonists, do you? It's called ZOG, and it's been a huge problem for a long time. We can't blame gentiles for being swept up in their nation's politics when it is controlled by the enemy. There were also some good kings who played the act of being a good xian because they had to. It was a disguise that had to be donned at times. Just like the Knights Templar. What's wrong with defending the motherland? Nobody wants a caliphate. And even if what you said was true, that Vlad was only interested in prestige, I still have to ask you what the problem is. What is wrong with seeking prestige or titles? Besides, one can do a lot more to fight against the enemy programs if they manage to win a powerful position in society.
You should try to take a step back and realize that it just seems weird to people that you are so invested in this to the point of throwing accusations on your fellow Satanists. Like the charged statement you made, "If you have fallen so low as to defend a christian" this is an attack on a person's integrity and honor while at the same time insisting that people take your assumption about Vlad for fact (especially when we have a lot of contrary evidence to suggest otherwise). And also we could make the same charges based on almost any individual of society for the past thousand+ years. Everyone was forced into xianity whether they wanted it or not. Nobody had a choice. It was either publicly present as a xian, or lose support of society and perish/be tortured and burned alive as an apostate. Should I never say anything good about my ancestors, or even spit on them for carrying my genetic legacy into the future for me, just because they were xians? Just because someone of the past was a xian in name, doesn't
necessarily mean they were bad or never did anything good or positive. It's very plain to see that Vlad was an occultist. The average uneducated xian oaf didn't get into occult organizations like The Order of the Dragon. Most xian peasants back then probably didn't even know their way around basic symbols like the equal armed cross. They probably knew what hoes and rakes were, but not powerful ancient symbols.
Either way, Vlad is not alive today as far as we know. It's a nonissue. It has no bearing on the issues we face today, and arguing over it in such a heavily invested manner is weird and a waste of energy. It's easier to look at the fact that the jews defamed him for centuries now, and made all kinds of sensational movies, cartoon references, a famous book, comics, even video games, and other propaganda against him. The whole vampire genre may have only taken off as much as it did because of Bram Stoker's legend of Count Dracula in the first place, and the protagonist of that book has the first name of Abraham. The whole vampire nobleman with the Gargoyle statues in the courtyard and all that, and by night he captures victims and drains blood. I see this as jews accusing others of their own crimes. The sensational propaganda became so bloody popular that it even became a common Halloween character. Kids dressing up as Vlad/Count Dracula with the cape and the fake teeth. This seems strange enough to me that I can suspect written history of lying about Vlad the third. Even in the mainstream narrative though, all he really did was repel an invasion/attempted expansion by the Turks into Europe.
There's no reason to go this far to the point of hostility over defending individuals who lived centuries ago. The discussion about it prior was peaceful and lax. We're not enemies here, right?
![The Alchemist7 [JG]](/data/avatars/m/1/1057.jpg?1704756197){kind=avatar}
![NakedPluto [JG]](/data/avatars/m/21/21004.jpg?1712372085){kind=avatar}
