Wotanwarrior said:

I agree 100% in that we have to promote healthy relationships between men and women, traditional family values and that people have more children, but I am against to a system that decides who is matched with who, not even if it is based on compatibilities.

If the capacity of free choice of the people is eliminated or trimped, then we are making the same shit as the jews in their world order.

Click to expand...

Wotanwarrior said:

Jack said:

Wotanwarrior said:

I agree 100% in that we have to promote healthy relationships between men and women, traditional family values and that people have more children, but I am against to a system that decides who is matched with who, not even if it is based on compatibilities.

If the capacity of free choice of the people is eliminated or trimped, then we are making the same shit as the jews in their world order.

Click to expand...

Why should it eliminate free Choice ? There must be a lot of favorable pairings possible for a single person.

Click to expand...

A solution could be that this system of pairing that you say is an optional service for anyone who requests it, but that is not mandatory.

Click to expand...

Stormblood said:

Wotanwarrior said:

I agree 100% in that we have to promote healthy relationships between men and women, traditional family values and that people have more children, but I am against to a system that decides who is matched with who, not even if it is based on compatibilities.

If the capacity of free choice of the people is eliminated or trimped, then we are making the same shit as the jews in their world order.

Click to expand...

The way I see it is that a system could be available but not mandatory. So one can choose whether to abide by it or not, and live with the consequences of their choices. Obviously, miscegenation and paedophilia would still be punished but I don't see why other choice should. Nature takes care of everything.

Click to expand...

StyleCoin said:

My ex was bi, once she slept with a woman and even sent me a picture on whatsapp thinking I would be angry, I don't give a damn as long as she is hygienic and uses protection at the time.

Click to expand...

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

Click to expand...

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

StyleCoin said:

My ex was bi, once she slept with a woman and even sent me a picture on whatsapp thinking I would be angry, I don't give a damn as long as she is hygienic and uses protection at the time.

Click to expand...

I would have the same reaction as you, actually I would think it was hilarious. “Slept with a woman”, what did they do rub gashes together? What a joke.

I’d also like to add this for any Hetero male that isn’t a chiseled king wondering why they aren’t successful with online dating.

Click to expand...

Stormblood said:

Wish this was still a thing on Tinder, with an added value for lifestyle lol Unfortunately, I joined Tinder much after this was a thing and the Tinder score is completely fucked. The more selective you are, the lower your Tinder score is. To get a good Tinder score, one of the thing to do is to like about 70% of the profiles, which is total bs, especially considering the population of entitled, narcissistic people that inhabits. Tinder sucks.

Click to expand...

Meteor said:

Good looking people usually have better personalities anyway. People tend to look good when they're healthy
and take good care of themselves, so a bias like that is completely natural. Why would you be attracted to someone who chooses to live an unhealthy lifestyle and can't even be bothered to take care of their appearance? People like that are often toxic and ugly even on the ins

Click to expand...

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

StyleCoin said:

My ex was bi, once she slept with a woman and even sent me a picture on whatsapp thinking I would be angry, I don't give a damn as long as she is hygienic and uses protection at the time.

Click to expand...

I would have the same reaction as you, actually I would think it was hilarious. “Slept with a woman”, what did they do rub gashes together? What a joke.

I’d also like to add this for any Hetero male that isn’t a chiseled king wondering why they aren’t successful with online dating.

Click to expand...

DarkSwan said:

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

StyleCoin said:

My ex was bi, once she slept with a woman and even sent me a picture on whatsapp thinking I would be angry, I don't give a damn as long as she is hygienic and uses protection at the time.

Click to expand...

I would have the same reaction as you, actually I would think it was hilarious. “Slept with a woman”, what did they do rub gashes together? What a joke.

I’d also like to add this for any Hetero male that isn’t a chiseled king wondering why they aren’t successful with online dating.

Click to expand...

Well, this is just basic human nature and nothing astonishing or a very new revelation.

It’s called instinct.
Women and men are very different in nature, while women have to choose their partner very wisely to create a family, men are do not have this issue.
Men want to give their genes, and women want to receive good genes. So of course women are a bit more picky, when it comes to plain looks.
Altho looks are not everything.
That’s it. Pure nature. And it’s how it should be.

Click to expand...

Stormblood said:

DarkSwan said:

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

I would have the same reaction as you, actually I would think it was hilarious. “Slept with a woman”, what did they do rub gashes together? What a joke.

I’d also like to add this for any Hetero male that isn’t a chiseled king wondering why they aren’t successful with online dating.

Click to expand...

Well, this is just basic human nature and nothing astonishing or a very new revelation.

It’s called instinct.
Women and men are very different in nature, while women have to choose their partner very wisely to create a family, men are do not have this issue.
Men want to give their genes, and women want to receive good genes. So of course women are a bit more picky, when it comes to plain looks.
Altho looks are not everything.
That’s it. Pure nature. And it’s how it should be.

Click to expand...

Going for the least attractive doesn't sound like choosing good genes.

Click to expand...

Stormblood said:

DarkSwan said:

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

I would have the same reaction as you, actually I would think it was hilarious. “Slept with a woman”, what did they do rub gashes together? What a joke.

I’d also like to add this for any Hetero male that isn’t a chiseled king wondering why they aren’t successful with online dating.

Click to expand...

Well, this is just basic human nature and nothing astonishing or a very new revelation.

It’s called instinct.
Women and men are very different in nature, while women have to choose their partner very wisely to create a family, men are do not have this issue.
Men want to give their genes, and women want to receive good genes. So of course women are a bit more picky, when it comes to plain looks.
Altho looks are not everything.
That’s it. Pure nature. And it’s how it should be.

Click to expand...

Going for the least attractive doesn't sound like choosing good genes.

Click to expand...

Ol argedco luciftias said:

Stormblood said:

DarkSwan said:

Well, this is just basic human nature and nothing astonishing or a very new revelation.

It’s called instinct.
Women and men are very different in nature, while women have to choose their partner very wisely to create a family, men are do not have this issue.
Men want to give their genes, and women want to receive good genes. So of course women are a bit more picky, when it comes to plain looks.
Altho looks are not everything.
That’s it. Pure nature. And it’s how it should be.

Click to expand...

Going for the least attractive doesn't sound like choosing good genes.

Click to expand...

They are not going for least attractive. They are rating them as being the least attractive. They are avoiding most of the men and only going for a small number of the best ones, saying that most of the men are not good enough.

At least that's what it looks like from the graphs. And this is exactly how it should be. Women have to choose only the greatest men.

Click to expand...

Ol argedco luciftias said:

Stormblood said:

DarkSwan said:

Well, this is just basic human nature and nothing astonishing or a very new revelation.

It’s called instinct.
Women and men are very different in nature, while women have to choose their partner very wisely to create a family, men are do not have this issue.
Men want to give their genes, and women want to receive good genes. So of course women are a bit more picky, when it comes to plain looks.
Altho looks are not everything.
That’s it. Pure nature. And it’s how it should be.

Click to expand...

Going for the least attractive doesn't sound like choosing good genes.

Click to expand...

They are not going for least attractive. They are rating them as being the least attractive. They are avoiding most of the men and only going for a small number of the best ones, saying that most of the men are not good enough.

At least that's what it looks like from the graphs. And this is exactly how it should be. Women have to choose only the greatest men.

Click to expand...

Jack said:

Ol argedco luciftias said:

Stormblood said:

Going for the least attractive doesn't sound like choosing good genes.

Click to expand...

They are not going for least attractive. They are rating them as being the least attractive. They are avoiding most of the men and only going for a small number of the best ones, saying that most of the men are not good enough.

At least that's what it looks like from the graphs. And this is exactly how it should be. Women have to choose only the greatest men.

Click to expand...

Women find majority of men as "economically unattractive " and unattractive in the face. 50% of all marriages end in Divorce, 80% of these are initiated by women. Only 10- 20% of men are having sex with 80% of the women on these Dating apps. These women's choices to never settle and not have kids while chasing the bag trying to be independent is what's driving the Demographic fall as whites get replaced by Moslems, South African blacks and South Americans in real time.

You know what, fine. Push the immigrants out and then let women have free reign. Legalize polygyny and let the state support these 20% men who are going to be shared by 80% of the women. Since they find all the other average men as so repulsive and nothing you will say will change their mind.

Literally in Japan (where they don't have Feminism) a woman was interviewed and she said that Polygyny should be legalized so that she could share a good looking husband rather than marry someone average looking or average income.

Currently 40 - 50% of the male population in marriageble age is Incel. If that percentage grows ,you can expect a lot of angry people who have no purpose in life because they have been refused a chance to have a family in life. And these unhinged angry people could do a lot of damage.

Click to expand...

Jack said:

Wotanwarrior said:

Jack said:

Why should it eliminate free Choice ? There must be a lot of favorable pairings possible for a single person.

Click to expand...

A solution could be that this system of pairing that you say is an optional service for anyone who requests it, but that is not mandatory.

Click to expand...

Or it could be mandatory at first and if you aren't satisfied, the system pairs you with another closest compatibility. And if you want to completely go at it yourself, you can give an application.

But I think the incidence of that happening ,taking into account that you'll het paired with your perfect partner at the first time, would be very very low.

Click to expand...

Wotanwarrior said:

Jack said:

Wotanwarrior said:

A solution could be that this system of pairing that you say is an optional service for anyone who requests it, but that is not mandatory.

Click to expand...

Or it could be mandatory at first and if you aren't satisfied, the system pairs you with another closest compatibility. And if you want to completely go at it yourself, you can give an application.

But I think the incidence of that happening ,taking into account that you'll het paired with your perfect partner at the first time, would be very very low.

Click to expand...

But I won't resort to that because I already have a past life partner, I love her and I'm not interested in dating or marrying any other partner.

Click to expand...

DarkSwan said:

Jack said:

Ol argedco luciftias said:

They are not going for least attractive. They are rating them as being the least attractive. They are avoiding most of the men and only going for a small number of the best ones, saying that most of the men are not good enough.

At least that's what it looks like from the graphs. And this is exactly how it should be. Women have to choose only the greatest men.

Click to expand...

Women find majority of men as "economically unattractive " and unattractive in the face. 50% of all marriages end in Divorce, 80% of these are initiated by women. Only 10- 20% of men are having sex with 80% of the women on these Dating apps. These women's choices to never settle and not have kids while chasing the bag trying to be independent is what's driving the Demographic fall as whites get replaced by Moslems, South African blacks and South Americans in real time.

You know what, fine. Push the immigrants out and then let women have free reign. Legalize polygyny and let the state support these 20% men who are going to be shared by 80% of the women. Since they find all the other average men as so repulsive and nothing you will say will change their mind.

Literally in Japan (where they don't have Feminism) a woman was interviewed and she said that Polygyny should be legalized so that she could share a good looking husband rather than marry someone average looking or average income.

Currently 40 - 50% of the male population in marriageble age is Incel. If that percentage grows ,you can expect a lot of angry people who have no purpose in life because they have been refused a chance to have a family in life. And these unhinged angry people could do a lot of damage.

Click to expand...

Huh? Refused a chance of marriage in life?
What are you talking about?

When people get too frustrated they can just get out side and interact with the other sex.

When 40-50% of the male population is single, then also 40-50% of the female population is single as well haha.

Just on those dating apps you find 13 times more males than females. So this also factors in heavily.

You need to find something where it’s the other way around.

Click to expand...

DarkSwan said:

When 40-50% of the male population is single, then also 40-50% of the female population is single as well haha.

Click to expand...

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

DarkSwan said:

When 40-50% of the male population is single, then also 40-50% of the female population is single as well haha.

Click to expand...

Things like this that you say make me wonder how you can even function normally. Does someone have to cloth and feed you like a toddler? Every day I read things like this and think, “He can’t be serious”. But you are.

Click to expand...

Jack said:

DarkSwan said:

Jack said:

Women find majority of men as "economically unattractive " and unattractive in the face. 50% of all marriages end in Divorce, 80% of these are initiated by women. Only 10- 20% of men are having sex with 80% of the women on these Dating apps. These women's choices to never settle and not have kids while chasing the bag trying to be independent is what's driving the Demographic fall as whites get replaced by Moslems, South African blacks and South Americans in real time.

You know what, fine. Push the immigrants out and then let women have free reign. Legalize polygyny and let the state support these 20% men who are going to be shared by 80% of the women. Since they find all the other average men as so repulsive and nothing you will say will change their mind.

Literally in Japan (where they don't have Feminism) a woman was interviewed and she said that Polygyny should be legalized so that she could share a good looking husband rather than marry someone average looking or average income.

Currently 40 - 50% of the male population in marriageble age is Incel. If that percentage grows ,you can expect a lot of angry people who have no purpose in life because they have been refused a chance to have a family in life. And these unhinged angry people could do a lot of damage.

Click to expand...

Huh? Refused a chance of marriage in life?
What are you talking about?

When people get too frustrated they can just get out side and interact with the other sex.

When 40-50% of the male population is single, then also 40-50% of the female population is single as well haha.

Just on those dating apps you find 13 times more males than females. So this also factors in heavily.

You need to find something where it’s the other way around.

Click to expand...

This isn't about dating apps. That's just a exacerbated example of the problem.

The reason why most men are single (in society at large) is because most women find average men as "economically unattractive ". Search that term. This is why most women are refusing to marry ,because they don't want to settle with average men with average looks and average income.

40% of marriageable women are single. That automatically eliminates 40% of the men in the same age range. These women are currently focused on their careers. And after they establish themselves in life ,they won't budge before the unrealistic standards they've constructed for themselves. They will rather share a man they deem as their superior rather than choose an average man who will be loyal to them. And that 40% is poised to 50% (the zenith point) before society completely collapses due to the Replacement Migration through the UN (600 million migrants to be put in US and Europe by 2050 as their countries collapse due to economic collapse and lockdowns. )

Click to expand...

DarkSwan said:

Wotanwarrior said:

Jack said:

Or it could be mandatory at first and if you aren't satisfied, the system pairs you with another closest compatibility. And if you want to completely go at it yourself, you can give an application.

But I think the incidence of that happening ,taking into account that you'll het paired with your perfect partner at the first time, would be very very low.

Click to expand...

But I won't resort to that because I already have a past life partner, I love her and I'm not interested in dating or marrying any other partner.

Click to expand...

Do you know who she is tho?

Click to expand...

Wotanwarrior said:

Now if I know, until we can get back together physically it will still be years.

Click to expand...

DarkSwan said:

Jack said:

DarkSwan said:

Huh? Refused a chance of marriage in life?
What are you talking about?

When people get too frustrated they can just get out side and interact with the other sex.

When 40-50% of the male population is single, then also 40-50% of the female population is single as well haha.

Just on those dating apps you find 13 times more males than females. So this also factors in heavily.

You need to find something where it’s the other way around.

Click to expand...

This isn't about dating apps. That's just a exacerbated example of the problem.

The reason why most men are single (in society at large) is because most women find average men as "economically unattractive ". Search that term. This is why most women are refusing to marry ,because they don't want to settle with average men with average looks and average income.

40% of marriageable women are single. That automatically eliminates 40% of the men in the same age range. These women are currently focused on their careers. And after they establish themselves in life ,they won't budge before the unrealistic standards they've constructed for themselves. They will rather share a man they deem as their superior rather than choose an average man who will be loyal to them. And that 40% is poised to 50% (the zenith point) before society completely collapses due to the Replacement Migration through the UN (600 million migrants to be put in US and Europe by 2050 as their countries collapse due to economic collapse and lockdowns. )

Click to expand...

"Women’s potential husbands had an average income that was about 58% higher than the actual unmarried men currently available to unmarried women. They also were 30% more likely to be employed and 19% more likely to have a college degree."


Yeah, this makes sense. Men have to care for women financially, this goes without saying, doesn't it?
Children are expensive, you need a steady home, car, have fun with her, go on holidays, everything in this world is expensive, of course they want husbands who earns above the average and takes care of them and their children. Settling down with someone who can give you stability is a must for women. (Just my views, agree or disagree idc tbh)

And yes, many women are focused on their careers that's right, and many men are not. Many men are degenerates, who will also attract other degenerate women. That's how life is.

Click to expand...

DarkSwan said:

Start meditating before you talk to me, you „Spiritual“ Satanist.

Click to expand...

My point was that there are enough single women out there. Was it so hard to understand for you? Want me dumb that down a bit?

Click to expand...

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

I’m still smarter than you without the extra advantage. How’s that for ya?

Click to expand...

Jack said:

...

Click to expand...

DarkSwan said:

Hahaha no you are not.
You even call it an „extra advantage“, so what does it make you, for not taking it? -Stupid! Hahaha

Click to expand...

ME:

NINRICK and his swamp pals:

Everybody sees your very narrow minded views of the world and reality, you don‘t even have a clear vision of your own little world, you are a little man with big ego.

Click to expand...

You have an issue and blame other people and society for that, you see the issue but no solution, you have no desire to advance, no passion, no vivid and positive attributes, only gloominess, pessimism and stagnation.

Click to expand...

Like, why are you even mad at me,

Click to expand...

When 40-50% of the male population is single, then also 40-50% of the female population is single as well haha.

Click to expand...

But I am glad you quoted me, because now I am talking to you, and I enjoy it. You are fun talking to.

Click to expand...

Tell me is there ANYTHING you are good at? What makes you better than even 30% of other men?Like do you have any special skills? (Oh surprise me)

Click to expand...

Good characteristics of your personality? (Hahaha)

Click to expand...

Are you like good looking?

Click to expand...

Or maybe super jacked?

Click to expand...

Are you able to reach your Goals spiritually?

Click to expand...

Are you very passionate and determined?

Click to expand...

Are you educated and earn much money? (perhaps at least you got that?)

Click to expand...

Do you have much charisma? (That’s why we are bff!)

Click to expand...

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

I’m so smart that I don’t even need it!

Good because I don’t dislike you. There’s just some things I read on here that make my brain melt and most of the time they are written by you.

Click to expand...

DarkSwan said:

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

DarkSwan said:

When 40-50% of the male population is single, then also 40-50% of the female population is single as well haha.

Click to expand...

Things like this that you say make me wonder how you can even function normally. Does someone have to cloth and feed you like a toddler? Every day I read things like this and think, “He can’t be serious”. But you are.

Click to expand...

Start meditating before you talk to me, you „Spiritual“ Satanist.

My point was that there are enough single women out there. Was it so hard to understand for you? Want me dumb that down a bit?

Click to expand...

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

[stuff]

Click to expand...

Inflorescentia said:

'Single' doesn't mean what you think it means when coming from a woman. You can easily apply the 90/10 rule to that 40%. Single men are usually celibates. A woman can get sex whenever she wants. It's common-sense biology at work. Don't let the vernacular blind you from this reality.

Click to expand...

Meteor said:

Henu the Great said:

Stormblood said:

The way I see it is that a system could be available but not mandatory. So one can choose whether to abide by it or not, and live with the consequences of their choices. Obviously, miscegenation and paedophilia would still be punished but I don't see why other choice should. Nature takes care of everything.

Click to expand...

Excactly, and it does not in any way take away from free will and freedom of choice. It would enhance it, and people would more likely choose it because it gives people better results than blindly dating people and going with luck of the draw approach.

If someone wants to do it the other way, then by all means, do so. It's not like this should be forced, but only really stubborn people would not choose it since it can give so much better return of investment when we talk about time spent finding a suitable partner.

Click to expand...

I don't know if it really has to do with being stubborn. I just prefer the old-fashioned way of finding a partner since I always felt like dating sites or apps tend to attract a rather shallow crowd.

Click to expand...

Jack said:

Uruz ,Ansuz,*54/108 each with the affirmation.
"In a healthy and positive manner for me, I am permanently and completely free of any and all(emphasis) unattractive and repulsive behaviors like fear,anxiety or awkwardness." Visualize eliminating any and all unattractive behaviors that you might currently have. You can start these at freeing the soul,endings, days.

Unattractive behaviors are - Stuttering, having nothing to say, cannot keep a conversation going, fear of what people think about you, micromanaging what you say, anxiety when talking to many people, shyness, inability to relate to others, being weird, being socially unaware, being an asshole, etc.)

Click to expand...

Master said:

Stormblood said:

Jack said:

The main cause of unhappiness in a relationship is previous romantic experiences. The more romantic experiences a person has, the greater likelihood that their subsequent relationship will fail.

The most successful marriages and relationships are ones where both partners have less than 3 previous partners, according to statistics.

The best indicator of a relationship failing is the no of past sexual partners. Because a persons pairbonding mechanism is damaged with each failure of a relationship.

Agreements and lifestyle may be aligned afterwards by coming to a mutual agreement. Typically a relationship is bound to fail when the man is unable to take charge and make her feel secure. When a man is going to a very certain path and is leading the woman, they will always be happy and find something to agree upon.

Click to expand...

In the first part, we think something very similar, with the difference is that you focus on different details. My general statement is that the healthier you are physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually, the better your starting foundation for when you are in a relationship. You don't need to be perfect but being free of psychological and sexual hang-ups, as well as illness (both physical and psychological), and knowing yourself are the strongest roots you can build a relationship upon. This is a fact nearly everyone neglects because they don't come from a healthy, eugenic mindset but from a toxic, xtard mindset of "everyone is equal".

In the second part, we disagree. For example, pairing up a healthy, morning bird with a toxic, night owl is too big of an ask. Even in the case both were healthy (i.e. the night owl being in bad with healthy night owl times of "by 11pm" and waking up by healthy night owl times of "no later than 8am") requires too much compromise. A different case may be pairing up an alcoholic with a social drinker, but you can never pair an alcoholic with a teetotal like me, as the alcoholic is too addicted to toxic social norms to understand compromise and will always have a problem even if the teetotal were to become a social drinker. I think a minimum of 80% match in lifestyle (I call it 'silver rule') is needed to foster a healthy relationship.

Being an alcoholic and other types of obsessive-compulsive behaviours which NPCs (and low-level SS) have in abundance are difficult to deal with when someone is healthy, because the addicted/OCD person cannot think straight because they have an actual psychological disorder. Eugenics should aim to minimise and then remove these, starting by removing brainwashing in media that portray addictive behaviours as normal, healthy and socially desirable.

If I had to date an alcoholic, chubby, couch potato, which are 3 OCD types if we go by the definition of what obsessions and compulsions are, I would become irritated beyond compromise because experience shows that the great majority of them have no intention into transitioning into a healthy life path. Not only that, but their 'compromises' would mostly have to be you sinking to their levels rather than them raising (best) or meeting half-way sometimes, because they genuinely cannot recognise they are doing something wrong to themselves, their loved ones and the human consciousness as a whole.

If you have children with this people, they'll be a very poor example to them, whether they compromise a little bit or not. And we all know children try to emulate their parents and develop different types of attachments to them, depending on parenting.

Modern culture is built on a very large collection of liabilities and very small set of assets.

Click to expand...

Good question. There is no worse thing than being dragged down by inferiors. I have noticed this in some people to occur intellectually.

Something similar if not worse than alcohol is smoking. Some time ago I met a beautiful girl, she smelled worse than my grandfather from tobacco. Some people are so retarded and the worst thing, limited, that if you tell them not to smoke, it's like you're telling them not to breathe.

The question is, how willing are people to learn, improve and elevate themselves?

Click to expand...

HiperX said:

Jack said:

Uruz ,Ansuz,*54/108 each with the affirmation.
"In a healthy and positive manner for me, I am permanently and completely free of any and all(emphasis) unattractive and repulsive behaviors like fear,anxiety or awkwardness." Visualize eliminating any and all unattractive behaviors that you might currently have. You can start these at freeing the soul,endings, days.

Unattractive behaviors are - Stuttering, having nothing to say, cannot keep a conversation going, fear of what people think about you, micromanaging what you say, anxiety when talking to many people, shyness, inability to relate to others, being weird, being socially unaware, being an asshole, etc.)

Click to expand...

How to work with two runes? Are they combined like URUZ x 108 then ANSUZ x 108 / Affirmation , or (URUZ + ANSUZ) x 108 / Affirmation like URUZ + ANSUZ * URUZ + ANSUZ * URUZ + ANSUZ

Click to expand...

HiperX said:

Jack said:

Uruz ,Ansuz,*54/108 each with the affirmation.
"In a healthy and positive manner for me, I am permanently and completely free of any and all(emphasis) unattractive and repulsive behaviors like fear,anxiety or awkwardness." Visualize eliminating any and all unattractive behaviors that you might currently have. You can start these at freeing the soul,endings, days.

Unattractive behaviors are - Stuttering, having nothing to say, cannot keep a conversation going, fear of what people think about you, micromanaging what you say, anxiety when talking to many people, shyness, inability to relate to others, being weird, being socially unaware, being an asshole, etc.)

Click to expand...

How to work with two runes? Are they combined like URUZ x 108 then ANSUZ x 108 / Affirmation , or (URUZ + ANSUZ) x 108 / Affirmation like URUZ + ANSUZ * URUZ + ANSUZ * URUZ + ANSUZ

Click to expand...

Fuchs said:

Master said:

Stormblood said:

In the first part, we think something very similar, with the difference is that you focus on different details. My general statement is that the healthier you are physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually, the better your starting foundation for when you are in a relationship. You don't need to be perfect but being free of psychological and sexual hang-ups, as well as illness (both physical and psychological), and knowing yourself are the strongest roots you can build a relationship upon. This is a fact nearly everyone neglects because they don't come from a healthy, eugenic mindset but from a toxic, xtard mindset of "everyone is equal".

In the second part, we disagree. For example, pairing up a healthy, morning bird with a toxic, night owl is too big of an ask. Even in the case both were healthy (i.e. the night owl being in bad with healthy night owl times of "by 11pm" and waking up by healthy night owl times of "no later than 8am") requires too much compromise. A different case may be pairing up an alcoholic with a social drinker, but you can never pair an alcoholic with a teetotal like me, as the alcoholic is too addicted to toxic social norms to understand compromise and will always have a problem even if the teetotal were to become a social drinker. I think a minimum of 80% match in lifestyle (I call it 'silver rule') is needed to foster a healthy relationship.

Being an alcoholic and other types of obsessive-compulsive behaviours which NPCs (and low-level SS) have in abundance are difficult to deal with when someone is healthy, because the addicted/OCD person cannot think straight because they have an actual psychological disorder. Eugenics should aim to minimise and then remove these, starting by removing brainwashing in media that portray addictive behaviours as normal, healthy and socially desirable.

If I had to date an alcoholic, chubby, couch potato, which are 3 OCD types if we go by the definition of what obsessions and compulsions are, I would become irritated beyond compromise because experience shows that the great majority of them have no intention into transitioning into a healthy life path. Not only that, but their 'compromises' would mostly have to be you sinking to their levels rather than them raising (best) or meeting half-way sometimes, because they genuinely cannot recognise they are doing something wrong to themselves, their loved ones and the human consciousness as a whole.

If you have children with this people, they'll be a very poor example to them, whether they compromise a little bit or not. And we all know children try to emulate their parents and develop different types of attachments to them, depending on parenting.

Modern culture is built on a very large collection of liabilities and very small set of assets.

Click to expand...

Good question. There is no worse thing than being dragged down by inferiors. I have noticed this in some people to occur intellectually.

Something similar if not worse than alcohol is smoking. Some time ago I met a beautiful girl, she smelled worse than my grandfather from tobacco. Some people are so retarded and the worst thing, limited, that if you tell them not to smoke, it's like you're telling them not to breathe.

The question is, how willing are people to learn, improve and elevate themselves?

Click to expand...

In case of addicted there must be 2 things achived before they will change:

1. Realisation of a better life style-> meditation etc.
2. A crysis which comes from the addiction, which does leave them too two choices:

A. Continue downward spiral
B. Starting meditation seriously, stopping addiction.

Click to expand...

Stormblood said:

SouthernWhiteGentile said:

Click to expand...

Wish this was still a thing on Tinder, with an added value for lifestyle lol Unfortunately, I joined Tinder much after this was a thing and the Tinder score is completely fucked. The more selective you are, the lower your Tinder score is. To get a good Tinder score, one of the thing to do is to like about 70% of the profiles, which is total bs, especially considering the population of entitled, narcissistic people that inhabits. Tinder sucks.

Click to expand...