Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Welcome to Our New Forums

  • Our forums have been upgraded! You can read about this HERE

On the Shifting of Stars

Shael

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
3,127
I have talked before here with some astrologers on the phenomenon of stars moving out of their "normal" constellations in view of astrology. For example the matter of Castor and Pollux being in Cancer now rather than Gemini.

Nobody seemed to have a precise explanation on it, even though it was evidently happening, but now I found an interesting article. I do not know if it's true or accurate, but I believe it's worth sharing here for discussion.
https://astrologyking.com/precession/
 
The only issue with this article is the writer feels the need to take emphasis away from our own Sun and Solar system which by proximity and poignancy in the creation of our planet and thus soul is very emphasised in the whole understanding of Earth's astrology, and means that the impact our nearest star and planets have are much deeper and important in a natal chart both from that physical scientific variable of being closest to us, and also the spiritual one in their elements and energy frequencies being reflected within our bodies. Our solar system though in turn, was in fact created as a part of the universe and hence the notion that yeah, we are a part of everything and all. The outer fixed stars for that sense, do impact us seriously but the means we have at the moment materially are not able to exactly defer how they do so, that goes even before the Roman/Greek era of written astrological knowledge.

The reason why Ptolemy as it says in the article ignored the precession, is because we had to understand first the fixed constant of one "side" of the universe over another, BESIDES of the moving fixed stars. Aries remains Aries even though the Aquarian and Piscean-like stars before it have moved into it, and it's natural description and expression that we use now remains too. Ptolemy's insistence on doing that means we now have it so people can say "I'm an Aries" and it does mean something concrete that an Aries can relate to. Of course there are fixed stars in Aries which may intercept their Aries planets and detract and delineate the expression of their Aries planets into perhaps the interpretation of another sign. If he tried to blend in the shifting of these other waterier or whatever stars moving into Aries it muddles it for the common people who can't be arsed and just want food, a roof over their head and easy-access knowledge of their damn bloody soul
( :lol: )

Nowadays because of the passage of time and the movement of these stars we can look to the past and also with the spiritual knowledge here- analyse astrally in depth what these stars represent on the carnal, Cardinal and emphasised level of our soul, not just the generic crap. It required time first in order for us to have reached this level. If the western astrologers decided to deliberate on about what the changing of the constellations meant and tried to have it so they constantly changed the zodiac, someone might be born in Aries but instead the focus is on the constellation within it, so we have one of 88 moving (mutable and changing) signs which are too specific to write all about in books and these books will be made defunct by the time the next constellation has moved into Aries' original place. Not only that, but perhaps the expression of a star changes also, when it is on another "side" of Earth. Like if Castor exploded or otherwise was separated from Pollux, and Pollux was in 23' of Aquarius instead of Cancer/Gemini, would Pollux's interpretation change and require different mythological understanding? Probably. It was better to keep things fixed so people could understand better and not have to constantly have scribes rewriting the knowledge down as they were also spiritually being besieged by the enemy.

I don't like how the article at the end calls the interpretation of Sun signs 'purely symbolic' either lol. Yeah nah, all the ancient people who preserved the knowledge for you revered and worshipped the Sun but yeah nah it's totally all symbolic. The Sun is our closest fixed Star, the provider of our light and a source for photosynthesis, oxygen generation and the energy of life but nah must just be symbolic dude :lol:

"Taking the meaning of the signs a step further by using rulerships and detriments, even saying someone is lacking in an element such as fire is fundamentally flawed"
Another confusing and muddling thing to say. Nope goyim you can't have your elements now it's actually more confusing than that hue hue. No it's not. Instead of just leaving it there it should have expanded on how exactly other notions of the elements can be seen in a chart like through tight prominent aspects (like I wrote in the first paragraph of my reply here: https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=198517#p198517) and also maybe deliberating on how through our passing life and it's transits, our elemental makeup changes in how we respond to events in life like challenges, meeting new intriguing friends or death of a loved one. It's all important but the article shouldn't have just left it there.

Also the condemnation of the Druids at the last sentence. Absolute moron who wrote this. The strength of spirit of the Druids which remained in the soul of Britannia is what even led to the civilisation of the whole world in the first fucking place, even the means this writer uses which traveled under European hands under the protection of the British, from the east. The Celtic tradition on the other hand was that they didn't write anything down because everything should be strongly emphasised within the self, one should have an immortal memory and cognitive force so that they don't need to rely on second-hand and mutable written sources to remember their history. If such a situation occurs where that tradition survives, it is harder for fabricated lies to deceive the future generations of people.The Celts passed their knowledge down through oral tradition only, which relates to Thoth's quote of the power in breathing and vibration. The Fianna warriors of Ireland and the early Brythonic Celts had martial rites which carried this same emphasis of complete power centralized within the self. Sort of like the German NS ideal of 'in every action you take you should always have the love of your volk and your race deep within your heart to lead you to total success'. Organisation and order wasn't necessarily important like with the Roman formations (this implies an inherent weakness within the men in your ranks that you then seek to minimize through such a system), the emphasis instead was in individual spiritual power. Eliminating weakness totally, instead of minimizing it.They all had to perform feats like being able to jump over a branch at the height of their head without touching it, or run at full speed through a forest without cracking any dry branches or leaves and be able to pull a thorn out of their foot while maintaining speed. http://irishimbasbooks.com/tests-of-the-fianna-do-you-have-the-right-stuff-to-join-the-fianna/

Also the Celtic berzerkers too.

The Druids had the best astrologers across all of Europe in that time and supposedly a large number of Northern Egyptians when Egypt fell, traveled by boat to live in Ireland. This would go to support and explain such a thing. But leave it to this writer to tut at the Druids who emotionally in the unseen and energetic way do back up probably this persons whole "in" into astrology. If anyone understood how the shifting of signs and the precession affected things as well as the ability to decrypt the decans and other dead-specific things, it was the Druids. Shame Ptolemy didn't go and live in Ireland for a bit eh? :D
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top