Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Welcome to Our New Forums

  • Our forums have been upgraded! You can read about this HERE

if you were fuhrer,what would be your policies?

pacharica

New member
Joined
Dec 9, 2022
Messages
60
I want a national socialist society that violently eliminates buddhism,abrahamic religions,communism,and finance capitalism, and all other jewish created ideologies like jainism ,zoroastrianism,mandeaism or advaita vedanta but also promotes worshipping the gods of orion.

and has a dedication to the social ethics and metaphysics of the greco-latin meditereneans.like peripatetic philosophy.a culture based on honor.

as for women,I want them to have the same rights and high standing they had in ancient rome and celtic tribes.but I do believe in aristocracy.

I want a return to the elegant,sometimes libertine yet simple dress of tuscan etruscans and romans.

I want to ban gmo,and encourage high culture and music,beautiful natural planned architecture and cities etc

implement a vast array of actual FREE energy technologies like cold fusion ones.

deport all negro and muslim male violence from europe,and sterilize all jews since renouncing their religion would be a sham like in spain.

expel coalburners to africa or wherever they have 'partners'from .

we would be eugenic and research genetic engineering,to create a master race.

basically I am a roman national socialist,but would only impose my will as emperor on the southern european countries,anatolia and middle east,as a national socialist that is my concern,but if my army ever reached northern europe or the caucuses and anatolia to liberate them from jewish rule,I'd encourage a return to celto-germanic,slavic and hellenized culture in these areas,in dress,food,ethics,art,music etc


porn would be banned with severe consequences for production and distribution,though not any for watching it.sex dolls would be funded by the state for men who cannot marry yet.women and men would be encouraged to be virgins at marriage,and moderately shamed(though not punished) for not being such.

this leads to greater pair bonding and stable marriages.

co-ed schooling would stop.

divorce laws would be reasonable,women would get alimony but not his assets and alimony only for a determined period until she can marry a new man or work herself.

abortion would be legal but not in every case,but in most cases of deformity or such issues yes.

I would create a high trust society and encourage socialization activities of high culture,for men and women to meet and court each other properly.

makeup would be banned.women do not need that crap to look beautiful,and beauty standards would become more natural and realistic.

healthy diet would make women and men have nice bodies,complexions and hair quality.

women can work,though that would not be needed with my economic policies,which I will elaborate on later(basically extreme economic freedom and gold standard).Slavery of enemy nations(Small hats) would be used for domestic help,though I would castrate their men first.
 
To be a spiritual leader, you would have to be spiritually advanced, wise, and enlightened. Compare some of the things you have written to what HP HoodedCobra and HPS Maxine have written. HP HoodedCobra has said it is good for women to wear makeup if they want to, and it can be an art form or expression.

Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

What is ideal to one person, does not necessarily reflect what is best for society.

Your people would rise up and revolt against you just for banning makeup.
 
Leadership is not about "wanting" and much less about shaping the world to fit one's personal wants and desires. A real leader totally separates the "self" from his profession and focuses on his duty with a totally pragmatic and selfless attitude.

A proper leader is concerned with order and progress and not with petty matters such as which liberties should be limited or which should be permitted, these are all things that sort themselves naturally when you remove jewish influence from media and politics, and without jews pushing people to destroy themselves, one can grant people almost full liberty without much issue.

This is something I mentioned in a discussion regarding what plagues sexuality and the issue of race mixing. One does not have to do much to fix this issue simply remove the jewish funded propaganda and media which programs people into these issues in the first place, and things will begin to fall back in place. When one removes jewish poisons, things have a tendency to simply fall back into place without much else being needed.


A leader who is incapable of separating the self from his duty will be unable to make the really tough decisions which are necessary to ensure progress and order. His personal ambitions and desires will cloud his judgement and make him use his position to serve himself rather than his race and his nation.

This plants the seeds of discontent within his people which will inevitably bloom to become his downfall.
 
Virgins are a pain in the ass for me. Sexual experience is much preferred.

I would not tolerate makeup being banned.

You would have to wait a while before implementing a new national dress code for civilians like in Rome. I don't think people are ready for that. Even in Rome, I think tunics for instance were standard not because they were enforced, but because they are similar to what an undershirt is today. I believe the national dress, the toga, would likely be comparable to the role of a suit in modern society. Changing this too quickly and dramatically would be a great shock to people.

If hypothetically you suddenly found yourself in a position of supreme power in society, and you want to focus on updating the culture, it's better to start with religion first and give people time to get used to that.

Before considering any of this though, you need to focus on your life in the here and now. What can you do today? Make every day count.

Now for the fun question. If I were in charge, what would my policies be? Easy. Listen to your damn clergy, or else. :lol:
 
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

It's fine until 100 years ago, modernity fucked up white families. My parents, grandparents, great-grandparents were whole virgins and no of them divorced.

I do and will continue to shame every mand and woman those got cocks in their wombs or fucked women before marriage. 1980-2000s generation fucked up my tradition. I will revive it. If my children fail finding virgin husbands&wifes then I will kill myself because I failed my mission.

This world must be pure.
 
Ogidracona said:
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

It's fine until 100 years ago, modernity fucked up white families. My parents, grandparents, great-grandparents were whole virgins and no of them divorced.

I do and will continue to shame every mand and woman those got cocks in their wombs or fucked women before marriage. 1980-2000s generation fucked up my tradition. I will revive it. If my children fail finding virgin husbands&wifes then I will kill myself because I failed my mission.

This world must be pure.

Having zero sexual encounters is not what makes a good wife, nor does purity have anything to do with sex. It's unhealthy and abnormal to obsess over the sexual activity of other people like that.

It really does not matter if another man has been inside your wife before you met her. Many other men were inside her throughout her past lives, and many more men will be inside her throughout her future lives. Abandon this judeochristian nonsense that a woman is only pure if her hymen is intact. It's bullshit.
 
Dahaarkan said:
Leadership is not about "wanting" and much less about shaping the world to fit one's personal wants and desires. A real leader totally separates the "self" from his profession and focuses on his duty with a totally pragmatic and selfless attitude.

A proper leader is concerned with order and progress and not with petty matters such as which liberties should be limited or which should be permitted, these are all things that sort themselves naturally when you remove jewish influence from media and politics, and without jews pushing people to destroy themselves, one can grant people almost full liberty without much issue.

This is something I mentioned in a discussion regarding what plagues sexuality and the issue of race mixing. One does not have to do much to fix this issue simply remove the jewish funded propaganda and media which programs people into these issues in the first place, and things will begin to fall back in place. When one removes jewish poisons, things have a tendency to simply fall back into place without much else being needed.


A leader who is incapable of separating the self from his duty will be unable to make the really tough decisions which are necessary to ensure progress and order. His personal ambitions and desires will cloud his judgement and make him use his position to serve himself rather than his race and his nation.

This plants the seeds of discontent within his people which will inevitably bloom to become his downfall.

You have very beautifully explained this!!

Thank you so much!!
 
Jrvan [Library Chief said:
" post_id=430421 time=1678805625 user_id=46372]
Ogidracona said:
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

It's fine until 100 years ago, modernity fucked up white families. My parents, grandparents, great-grandparents were whole virgins and no of them divorced.

I do and will continue to shame every mand and woman those got cocks in their wombs or fucked women before marriage. 1980-2000s generation fucked up my tradition. I will revive it. If my children fail finding virgin husbands&wifes then I will kill myself because I failed my mission.

This world must be pure.

Having zero sexual encounters is not what makes a good wife, nor does purity have anything to do with sex. It's unhealthy and abnormal to obsess over the sexual activity of other people like that.

It really does not matter if another man has been inside your wife before you met her. Many other men were inside her throughout her past lives, and many more men will be inside her throughout her future lives. Abandon this judeochristian nonsense that a woman is only pure if her hymen is intact. It's bullshit.

I fully agree with you, brother!!!

It's not healthy to only seek out the most "purest" of them all. It's all xian bullshit.
Like how the biblie spouted bullshit about sacrificing virgins to please the "G-D".

Also, imagine if a woman was born without a hymen (there are cases of those, myself included), would that make her too "impure" for ones taste? It's bullshit.

I think people who join with such a mentality should do a freeing of the soul working to free themselves from such unatural thinking as it is unhealthy and self destructive. But alas, if one prefers to be rotten inside and not remove the rot so beautiful things can bloom, then they are beyond redemption as they themselves prefer to be destroyed, rather than let their souls bloom.
 
Ogidracona said:
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

It's fine until 100 years ago, modernity fucked up white families. My parents, grandparents, great-grandparents were whole virgins and no of them divorced.

I do and will continue to shame every mand and woman those got cocks in their wombs or fucked women before marriage. 1980-2000s generation fucked up my tradition. I will revive it. If my children fail finding virgin husbands&wifes then I will kill myself because I failed my mission.

This world must be pure.
Lol wtf? You're on the wrong forum my dude.
 
Ogidracona said:
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

It's fine until 100 years ago, modernity fucked up white families. My parents, grandparents, great-grandparents were whole virgins and no of them divorced.

I do and will continue to shame every mand and woman those got cocks in their wombs or fucked women before marriage. 1980-2000s generation fucked up my tradition. I will revive it. If my children fail finding virgin husbands&wifes then I will kill myself because I failed my mission.

This world must be pure.

Virginity does not reassure anything besides you having not tried many ice-creams, and then you try another one. As the world grows, the ability to see more ice-cream will start coming up. This affects moral laws.

Your world collapses when someone else wants to try another ice-cream, but these are the laws of life. The tightest rules of bullshit of Xianity, this still happened.

Real love is built on trust, and trust is built on understanding, and by restraining understanding, you cannot have real and lasting love and trust. Only falsehood.
 
Most people envision their own worlds but the real "Fuhrers" the Gods would ever appoint, are those who would accept the world and have an ear for it. Most people even in these forums don't really understand what "must" be done, they are a series of hang-ups and just want power like Klaus Schwab.

I come to this Forum often and I read similar rants bordering to the ideas of Klaus Schwab. Maybe not as much but often-times similar. Most of these come because both the writer and Klaus Schwab are primarily on the same level of consciousness while not understanding it, but Klaus Schwab is just on the unfortunate state for humanity to have power to carry these through.

This comes from misunderstanding life on a very deep level and major denial of life and existence, and what happens in it.

If you want the help of the Gods in that task, you must start removing yourself from the Samsaric level of consciousness to become someone who can lead others, because leading is done primarily for others and not for one's self needs of domination.

As everyone writes their real "desires" on this, you will see it has nothing to do with the Aryan Gita or Rita way of leadership, it just has to do with how open or closed your sacral chakra is, if you love makeup, or if you want to fuck girls or something.

______________________________________
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Most people envision their own worlds but the real "Fuhrers" the Gods would ever appoint, are those who would accept the world and have an ear for it. Most people even in these forums don't really understand what "must" be done, they are a series of hang-ups and just want power like Klaus Schwab.

I come to this Forum often and I read similar rants bordering to the ideas of Klaus Schwab. Maybe not as much but often-times similar. Most of these come because both the writer and Klaus Schwab are primarily on the same level of consciousness while not understanding it, but Klaus Schwab is just on the unfortunate state for humanity to have power to carry these through.

This comes from misunderstanding life on a very deep level and major denial of life and existence, and what happens in it.

If you want the help of the Gods in that task, you must start removing yourself from the Samsaric level of consciousness to become someone who can lead others, because leading is done primarily for others and not for one's self needs of domination.

As everyone writes their real "desires" on this, you will see it has nothing to do with the Aryan Gita or Rita way of leadership, it just has to do with how open or closed your sacral chakra is, if you love makeup, or if you want to fuck girls or something.
...
Many don't understand. You want to lead others? In that case you put your ego aside and you bend yourself for others tirelessly, leading is the most excruciating and also satisfying of the tasks, but it does not involve you making parades about how superior you are, but it means you're gonna sacrifice many parts of your life for others. Look at HP HoodedCobra, he's like on task 24/7, this soul is in a constant state of struggle, that is the life of a leader, not for any kind of desire of grandiosity or something like that.
 
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
To be a spiritual leader, you would have to be spiritually advanced, wise, and enlightened. Compare some of the things you have written to what HP HoodedCobra and HPS Maxine have written. HP HoodedCobra has said it is good for women to wear makeup if they want to, and it can be an art form or expression.

Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

What is ideal to one person, does not necessarily reflect what is best for society.

Your people would rise up and revolt against you just for banning makeup.

once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever.

if she does oral,it travels to her brain and becomes one,forever.

and her children with her future husband.

makeup is deception and false advertising,and those that consider made up women to be superior to natural ones,are simply conditioned that way by it's ubiquity.
 
pacharica said:
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
To be a spiritual leader, you would have to be spiritually advanced, wise, and enlightened. Compare some of the things you have written to what HP HoodedCobra and HPS Maxine have written. HP HoodedCobra has said it is good for women to wear makeup if they want to, and it can be an art form or expression.

Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

What is ideal to one person, does not necessarily reflect what is best for society.

Your people would rise up and revolt against you just for banning makeup.

once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever.

if she does oral,it travels to her brain and becomes one,forever.

and her children with her future husband.

makeup is deception and false advertising,and those that consider made up women to be superior to natural ones,are simply conditioned that way by it's ubiquity.

Your sperm isn't a parasite seeking host in a woman's DNA or brain.

If you are a seasoned man and go with a virgin woman, you'd be a little bit uncomfortable.

Women and men need a period of maturing in their sexual lives, in their own natural specificity. This is healthy.

I'm sorry but most virgins, while instinctually suit a sexual intercourse, they are about to undergo a sexual maturing. There is an awakening since a young age, a manifestation, a maturing.

While some people are exclusive in certain aspects, this doesn't prove something of a natural order for all or a healthy path.

Have sex people, what the fuck. What are you holding back? The armageddon horse? The bleeding orange? Like fools you miss out how awesome is to be alive and get to know love prospects and actually make kids.

Or we are busy masturbating at screens?

Sex is also not logical so why all this doctorate level logic on basic nature of man and woman? Do you drink water? Do you eat? Does your thing get aroused? So?
 
OP aren't you tri-racial, as you said before? You said about race-mixing women being deported but you yourself said you are tri-racial and go with White women so...? :? This is not hostile I'm just confused.

Think on what is good, healthy and ideal for Central/South America and those of your race. Other than that I agree with NakedPluto as usual, all these technicalities and words being put onto sex like a microscope, it can be too much.
 

I say this with good intentions, how can you say you want women to be treated equally but at the same time claim they can't wear makeup? You said you wanted to ban xianity and it's related ilk. But shaming people for wearing makeup or not being virgins is exactly what they do. Spirtual Satanism is about free will. No one's saying women have to wear makeup to be beautiful, but why should someone have the right to tell a woman what she can and can't wear? This isn't xianity and isn't Islam. Women and men have been restricted enough, ideas like this belong with the enemy. These aren't our ways. No one in power should enforce someone else to conform to anything of that nature. The Gods don't enforce things over us, they empower us with the knowledge of what we can do to be better, and this is how we should be to our people as well.

The idea that makeup is deception so therefore it's wrong and should be outlawed is no different than the Muslim idea that women have to be covered head to toe, it's the same root idea. Is it also deception for a man to shave his beard, gel his hair back, and put on cologne? I understand most men don't like a woman fully made up, but women have the right to do as they please, and a woman dresses up for herself too it's not always to impress a man. Sometimes it's just for her to have a little fun.

Also this...

"once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever"

This is clearly false, I don't know where you learned this from but this is a delusional idea.

we are allowed to have however many, or as few sexual partners we want. Some people are perfectly happy with only one partner, some with many. It has to do with one's nature and chart placements. A woman isn't damaged or tainted for having sex with more than one partner.. that is completely coocoo nonsense. Absolute jewnanigans. Not grounded in reality. It may be a hard pill to swallow for those who have been severely damaged from enemy programming but the truth isn't meant to be sugar coated and sometimes it shakes up your entire belief system. This is necessary for growth. You can't learn and go forward in life very far clinging to superstition and enemy ways of thinking. It's not healthy. You're still supporting the very things you say you want to get rid of, by staying in that frame of mind.

Again I say this with good intentions, not as a personal attack. Just offering my opinion.
 
Karnonnos said:
OP aren't you tri-racial, as you said before? You said about race-mixing women being deported but you yourself said you are tri-racial and go with White women so...? :? This is not hostile I'm just confused.

Think on what is good, healthy and ideal for Central/South America and those of your race. Other than that I agree with NakedPluto as usual, all these technicalities and words being put onto sex like a microscope, it can be too much.

I look 100% italic/iberic with white skin as I also said before,I am not a central american or south american,and I loathe their women and culture.

don't compare me to them.I have zero cultural affinity to 'latin americans'.

my white side is overwhelmingly germanic,with only some south slavic,italic,iberic and southern french blood.

As for 'white women'I have copulated with them before my coming into satanism,not after,and I was told also I can mix with a woman that is south european or near eastern,due to their similar mixture,albeit more ancient.

I will never go for a 'latina'.

saying me mixing with a racial copy of myself,is the same as a pure jungle dwelling cannibal mixing with them is just crabs in a bucket from the latter.

some south europeans like 'sardinians'are literally like 3x more african than me,they just look white because the african element was not jungle dwelling cannibals,but proto-cushite.
 
IF I was fuhrer,I would have started rebuilding all the temples of the Gods around the world.after this,I will try to instill dignity of labor amongst the citizens.Furthermore, I will instate a one party meritocracy like the NSDAP.I will draft policies centered around racial preservation.(For example:- Good amount of incentives will be provided to same race couples.Mixed race couples will be discouraged as much as possible).lastly,I will try to promote sexual and dietary freedom amongst the masses.

Regards,
BabySatan
 
SapphireDragon said:

I say this with good intentions, how can you say you want women to be treated equally but at the same time claim they can't wear makeup? You said you wanted to ban xianity and it's related ilk. But shaming people for wearing makeup or not being virgins is exactly what they do. Spirtual Satanism is about free will. No one's saying women have to wear makeup to be beautiful, but why should someone have the right to tell a woman what she can and can't wear? This isn't xianity and isn't Islam. Women and men have been restricted enough, ideas like this belong with the enemy. These aren't our ways. No one in power should enforce someone else to conform to anything of that nature. The Gods don't enforce things over us, they empower us with the knowledge of what we can do to be better, and this is how we should be to our people as well.

The idea that makeup is deception so therefore it's wrong and should be outlawed is no different than the Muslim idea that women have to be covered head to toe, it's the same root idea. Is it also deception for a man to shave his beard, gel his hair back, and put on cologne? I understand most men don't like a woman fully made up, but women have the right to do as they please, and a woman dresses up for herself too it's not always to impress a man. Sometimes it's just for her to have a little fun.

Also this...

"once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever"

This is clearly false, I don't know where you learned this from but this is a delusional idea.

we are allowed to have however many, or as few sexual partners we want. Some people are perfectly happy with only one partner, some with many. It has to do with one's nature and chart placements. A woman isn't damaged or tainted for having sex with more than one partner.. that is completely coocoo nonsense. Absolute jewnanigans. Not grounded in reality. It may be a hard pill to swallow for those who have been severely damaged from enemy programming but the truth isn't meant to be sugar coated and sometimes it shakes up your entire belief system. This is necessary for growth. You can't learn and go forward in life very far clinging to superstition and enemy ways of thinking. It's not healthy. You're still supporting the very things you say you want to get rid of, by staying in that frame of mind.

Again I say this with good intentions, not as a personal attack. Just offering my opinion.

they can wear makeup,just that it's production and distribution will be prohibited in my country.

this is a strawman.

women are allowed to do what they want,but virgnity and monogamy would be encouraged,and such women who aren't would be moderately shamed,I never said there would be legal consequences for promiscuity.
men also would be shamed for not being virgins at marriage.

another strawman.

as for your blatant denial,of the fact women are permanently altered genetically from who they sleep with this is refuted here:
Sex cannot only be deadly, DNA from the semen of your past sexual partners can come back to DNA Chimerahaunt you, your children and even generations to come. You may want to think twice about that next one night stand or dude with less than stellar DNA you might secretly shack up with to end your long dry spell.

There is a little known ancient scientific fact I would like to share with you about human sexual relations. That is if you would like to remain in control of your mind, body and the integrity of your divine tree of life. It deals with your DNA, and imposter male gooey semen in the form of DNA of people that can infiltrate your blood through the sacred act of sex when that is often absolutely the last thing you would ever want to happen.

This science gives a new meaning to one night stands being that there really is no such thing as a one night stand when sexual partners swap semen and DNA with one another. They are not just forming a one day sexual union of animalistic fueled passion, but a life long connection in which they may in fact be forever connected through the tree of life that we know of as DNA.
The theory that all the mothers’ sexual partners influence their children’s physical characteristics dates back to ancient Greece and Rome, where it was simply an accepted fact. They did not have the science to back it up, but they definitely knew enough about sexual relations and blood to even have laws at times against adultery, and sodomy.

Many of these laws were punishable by banishment, torture and murder by horrible deaths. Under the laws of the Constantines “Constans and Constantius,” adulterers were burned, or sown in sacks and cast into the sea: under Leo and Marcian the penalty was reduced to perpetual banishment and cutting off the nose. Under Justinian it was again permitted to kill the parties.(1)

I assume these laws were not just done to control their citizens and keep peace, but to control the integrity of their race. Now we have the genetic science to prove these theories. As I mentioned, what I speak of here is a science and it is now being proven as a fact. Scientists have discovered that many women are carrying multiple male Y-chromosome gene sequences in their DNA. Just in case you didn’t know, women are supposed to only carry female Mitochondrial or mtDNA.

Your sexual partners DNA can and may in fact not only become incorporated into a female’s DNA, it can also affect a future unborn child. This is called Microchimerism (abbreviated Mc) which is the presence of a small number of cells that originate from another individual and are therefore genetically distinct from the cells of the host individual.

The word microchimerism is derived from the Greek chimera who was a mythological creature composed of parts of various animals like that of the head of a lion, the belly of a goat, and the tail of a dragon or serpent.

THE DNA RESEARCH

Here is some research on this subject: Male microchimerism in women without sons: quantitative assessment and correlation with pregnancy history.

Purpose: Fetal microchimerism, derived from fetal cells that persist after pregnancy, is usually evaluated by tests for male microchimerism in women who gave birth to sons. We investigated male microchimerism in women without sons and examined correlation with prior pregnancy history. Immunologic consequences of microchimerism are unknown. We studied healthy women and women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Conclusions: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or sexual intercourse. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.

Another recent study shows evidence to support the theory that the semen from a woman’s previous sexual partners may affect the genetics of a future unborn child. Scientists have discovered a new form of non-genetic inheritance, showing for the first time that offspring can resemble a mother’s previous sexual partner — in flies at least.

CONCLUSIONSexual energy

The conclusions of these ancient beliefs and studies shows possible sources of male michrochimerism that are known from pregnancies, miscarriages, vanished male twin, or sexual intercourse. This science proves that through intercourse alone women can obtain the male genes and DNA within their organs and blood for their entire life.

The act of sex is a divine gift between a man and a women for the purpose of human reproduction. It is a sacred covenant, and holy sacrament between a husband and wife. This sacred spiritual act of the union of souls should always be regarded as such.

SOURCES:

1. The doctrine and law of marriage, adultery and divorce, with an …, Volume 1 By Hector Davies Morgan

2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084184

3. Science Daily
 
pacharica said:
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
To be a spiritual leader, you would have to be spiritually advanced, wise, and enlightened. Compare some of the things you have written to what HP HoodedCobra and HPS Maxine have written. HP HoodedCobra has said it is good for women to wear makeup if they want to, and it can be an art form or expression.

Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

What is ideal to one person, does not necessarily reflect what is best for society.

Your people would rise up and revolt against you just for banning makeup.

once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever.

if she does oral,it travels to her brain and becomes one,forever.

and her children with her future husband.

makeup is deception and false advertising,and those that consider made up women to be superior to natural ones,are simply conditioned that way by it's ubiquity.

Where did you get these nonsensical ideas from?

This is literally thinking on the level of mental illness. None of this is even remotely true on any level or in any capacity.

Get your head out of your ass and get real.

There is literally 0 mixing of any kind that happens on the DNA or on the body when a woman and men have sex.

All that happens is an exchange of energy between the souls, which creates temporary links between people, and an exchange of energy which can have lasting effects for better or worse depending on the people involved, and this exchange goes both ways equally for men and woman.

That is all.

Hail Satan!
 
pacharica said:
they can wear makeup,just that it's production and distribution will be prohibited in my country.

this is a strawman.

women are allowed to do what they want,but virgnity and monogamy would be encouraged,and such women who aren't would be moderately shamed,I never said there would be legal consequences for promiscuity.
men also would be shamed for not being virgins at marriage.

another strawman.

as for your blatant denial,of the fact women are permanently altered genetically from who they sleep with this is refuted here:
Sex cannot only be deadly, DNA from the semen of your past sexual partners can come back to DNA Chimerahaunt you, your children and even generations to come. You may want to think twice about that next one night stand or dude with less than stellar DNA you might secretly shack up with to end your long dry spell.

There is a little known ancient scientific fact I would like to share with you about human sexual relations. That is if you would like to remain in control of your mind, body and the integrity of your divine tree of life. It deals with your DNA, and imposter male gooey semen in the form of DNA of people that can infiltrate your blood through the sacred act of sex when that is often absolutely the last thing you would ever want to happen.

This science gives a new meaning to one night stands being that there really is no such thing as a one night stand when sexual partners swap semen and DNA with one another. They are not just forming a one day sexual union of animalistic fueled passion, but a life long connection in which they may in fact be forever connected through the tree of life that we know of as DNA.
The theory that all the mothers’ sexual partners influence their children’s physical characteristics dates back to ancient Greece and Rome, where it was simply an accepted fact. They did not have the science to back it up, but they definitely knew enough about sexual relations and blood to even have laws at times against adultery, and sodomy.

Many of these laws were punishable by banishment, torture and murder by horrible deaths. Under the laws of the Constantines “Constans and Constantius,” adulterers were burned, or sown in sacks and cast into the sea: under Leo and Marcian the penalty was reduced to perpetual banishment and cutting off the nose. Under Justinian it was again permitted to kill the parties.(1)

I assume these laws were not just done to control their citizens and keep peace, but to control the integrity of their race. Now we have the genetic science to prove these theories. As I mentioned, what I speak of here is a science and it is now being proven as a fact. Scientists have discovered that many women are carrying multiple male Y-chromosome gene sequences in their DNA. Just in case you didn’t know, women are supposed to only carry female Mitochondrial or mtDNA.

Your sexual partners DNA can and may in fact not only become incorporated into a female’s DNA, it can also affect a future unborn child. This is called Microchimerism (abbreviated Mc) which is the presence of a small number of cells that originate from another individual and are therefore genetically distinct from the cells of the host individual.

The word microchimerism is derived from the Greek chimera who was a mythological creature composed of parts of various animals like that of the head of a lion, the belly of a goat, and the tail of a dragon or serpent.

THE DNA RESEARCH

Here is some research on this subject: Male microchimerism in women without sons: quantitative assessment and correlation with pregnancy history.

Purpose: Fetal microchimerism, derived from fetal cells that persist after pregnancy, is usually evaluated by tests for male microchimerism in women who gave birth to sons. We investigated male microchimerism in women without sons and examined correlation with prior pregnancy history. Immunologic consequences of microchimerism are unknown. We studied healthy women and women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Conclusions: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or sexual intercourse. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.

Another recent study shows evidence to support the theory that the semen from a woman’s previous sexual partners may affect the genetics of a future unborn child. Scientists have discovered a new form of non-genetic inheritance, showing for the first time that offspring can resemble a mother’s previous sexual partner — in flies at least.

CONCLUSIONSexual energy

The conclusions of these ancient beliefs and studies shows possible sources of male michrochimerism that are known from pregnancies, miscarriages, vanished male twin, or sexual intercourse. This science proves that through intercourse alone women can obtain the male genes and DNA within their organs and blood for their entire life.

The act of sex is a divine gift between a man and a women for the purpose of human reproduction. It is a sacred covenant, and holy sacrament between a husband and wife. This sacred spiritual act of the union of souls should always be regarded as such.

SOURCES:

1. The doctrine and law of marriage, adultery and divorce, with an …, Volume 1 By Hector Davies Morgan

2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084184

3. Science Daily

You need to clean the abrahamic programming of your soul asap, as your thoughts regarding sex and woman's rights and all else are completely infested with abrahamic kosher nonsense.


Also, a study based on flies cannot be extrapolated to a human being. It is quite literally irrelevant and worthless in relation to human beings.

You completely don't understand what micro-chimerism really is, at all. I have to wonder if you misunderstand what you share due to English not being your first language or something.

The DNA doesn't get mixed, but a small number of cells (really small compared to the 30 trillion cells of a human body, like maybe a few tens of thousands), can be exchanged between the fetus and the mother during pregnancy.

These are only autoimmune cells, no other kind of cells, and these cells can remain active in the body of the both the mother and the child for a many years, however they do not in any way affect the DNA of the mother, or the child!

They are foreign bodies which flow through the bloodstream, as autoimmune cells do, along side the autoimmune cells produced by the persons own body, and act also the same way as autoimmune cells do.


What this really is, is a mutually beneficial symbiotic process, where immune cells are exchanged between the mother and the child, which give an added layer of protection against disease and other related things to both the child and the mother.

In some cases, if a woman gets pregnant shortly after giving birth to a child, or after getting an abortion, the autoimmune cells exchanged by the mother and the first child may be present and active in enough quantity that a tiny portion of cells originating from the first child can also be exchanged with the second child and thus be present in the second child.

This is not based on the DNA at all, neither does anything get "incorporated" into the DNA of the woman, or the child, in any way whatsoever.

They are simply groups of autoimmune cells from a previous child that are present in the body of the woman alongside the autoimmune cells made by the woman's own body.

You have completely misunderstood how this works or what this means, likely because you did not read properly about this subject and only see through your tinted lenses what you want to see in a vain attempt to validate your ignorance and delusions.

Hail Satan!
 
VoiceofEnki said:
pacharica said:
they can wear makeup,just that it's production and distribution will be prohibited in my country.

this is a strawman.

women are allowed to do what they want,but virgnity and monogamy would be encouraged,and such women who aren't would be moderately shamed,I never said there would be legal consequences for promiscuity.
men also would be shamed for not being virgins at marriage.

another strawman.

as for your blatant denial,of the fact women are permanently altered genetically from who they sleep with this is refuted here:
Sex cannot only be deadly, DNA from the semen of your past sexual partners can come back to DNA Chimerahaunt you, your children and even generations to come. You may want to think twice about that next one night stand or dude with less than stellar DNA you might secretly shack up with to end your long dry spell.

There is a little known ancient scientific fact I would like to share with you about human sexual relations. That is if you would like to remain in control of your mind, body and the integrity of your divine tree of life. It deals with your DNA, and imposter male gooey semen in the form of DNA of people that can infiltrate your blood through the sacred act of sex when that is often absolutely the last thing you would ever want to happen.

This science gives a new meaning to one night stands being that there really is no such thing as a one night stand when sexual partners swap semen and DNA with one another. They are not just forming a one day sexual union of animalistic fueled passion, but a life long connection in which they may in fact be forever connected through the tree of life that we know of as DNA.
The theory that all the mothers’ sexual partners influence their children’s physical characteristics dates back to ancient Greece and Rome, where it was simply an accepted fact. They did not have the science to back it up, but they definitely knew enough about sexual relations and blood to even have laws at times against adultery, and sodomy.

Many of these laws were punishable by banishment, torture and murder by horrible deaths. Under the laws of the Constantines “Constans and Constantius,” adulterers were burned, or sown in sacks and cast into the sea: under Leo and Marcian the penalty was reduced to perpetual banishment and cutting off the nose. Under Justinian it was again permitted to kill the parties.(1)

I assume these laws were not just done to control their citizens and keep peace, but to control the integrity of their race. Now we have the genetic science to prove these theories. As I mentioned, what I speak of here is a science and it is now being proven as a fact. Scientists have discovered that many women are carrying multiple male Y-chromosome gene sequences in their DNA. Just in case you didn’t know, women are supposed to only carry female Mitochondrial or mtDNA.

Your sexual partners DNA can and may in fact not only become incorporated into a female’s DNA, it can also affect a future unborn child. This is called Microchimerism (abbreviated Mc) which is the presence of a small number of cells that originate from another individual and are therefore genetically distinct from the cells of the host individual.

The word microchimerism is derived from the Greek chimera who was a mythological creature composed of parts of various animals like that of the head of a lion, the belly of a goat, and the tail of a dragon or serpent.

THE DNA RESEARCH

Here is some research on this subject: Male microchimerism in women without sons: quantitative assessment and correlation with pregnancy history.

Purpose: Fetal microchimerism, derived from fetal cells that persist after pregnancy, is usually evaluated by tests for male microchimerism in women who gave birth to sons. We investigated male microchimerism in women without sons and examined correlation with prior pregnancy history. Immunologic consequences of microchimerism are unknown. We studied healthy women and women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Conclusions: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or sexual intercourse. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.

Another recent study shows evidence to support the theory that the semen from a woman’s previous sexual partners may affect the genetics of a future unborn child. Scientists have discovered a new form of non-genetic inheritance, showing for the first time that offspring can resemble a mother’s previous sexual partner — in flies at least.

CONCLUSIONSexual energy

The conclusions of these ancient beliefs and studies shows possible sources of male michrochimerism that are known from pregnancies, miscarriages, vanished male twin, or sexual intercourse. This science proves that through intercourse alone women can obtain the male genes and DNA within their organs and blood for their entire life.

The act of sex is a divine gift between a man and a women for the purpose of human reproduction. It is a sacred covenant, and holy sacrament between a husband and wife. This sacred spiritual act of the union of souls should always be regarded as such.

SOURCES:

1. The doctrine and law of marriage, adultery and divorce, with an …, Volume 1 By Hector Davies Morgan

2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084184

3. Science Daily

You need to clean the abrahamic programming of your soul asap, as your thoughts regarding sex and woman's rights and all else are completely infested with abrahamic kosher nonsense.


Also, a study based on flies cannot be extrapolated to a human being. It is quite literally irrelevant and worthless in relation to human beings.

You completely don't understand what micro-chimerism really is, at all. I have to wonder if you misunderstand what you share due to English not being your first language or something.

The DNA doesn't get mixed, but a small number of cells (really small compared to the 30 trillion cells of a human body, like maybe a few tens of thousands), can be exchanged between the fetus and the mother during pregnancy.

These are only autoimmune cells, no other kind of cells, and these cells can remain active in the body of the both the mother and the child for a many years, however they do not in any way affect the DNA of the mother, or the child!

They are foreign bodies which flow through the bloodstream, as autoimmune cells do, along side the autoimmune cells produced by the persons own body, and act also the same way as autoimmune cells do.


What this really is, is a mutually beneficial symbiotic process, where immune cells are exchanged between the mother and the child, which give an added layer of protection against disease and other related things to both the child and the mother.

In some cases, if a woman gets pregnant shortly after giving birth to a child, or after getting an abortion, the autoimmune cells exchanged by the mother and the first child may be present and active in enough quantity that a tiny portion of cells originating from the first child can also be exchanged with the second child and thus be present in the second child.

This is not based on the DNA at all, neither does anything get "incorporated" into the DNA of the woman, or the child, in any way whatsoever.

They are simply groups of autoimmune cells from a previous child that are present in the body of the woman alongside the autoimmune cells made by the woman's own body.

You have completely misunderstood how this works or what this means, likely because you did not read properly about this subject and only see through your tinted lenses what you want to see in a vain attempt to validate your ignorance and delusions.

Hail Satan!

I quoted what I could find due to my lack of being able to find the article I was looking for,here is the study in humans:

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592

also,pre-christian roman society and greek society had these same views of women and believed in microchimerism,with harsh punishments for fornicatresses.

many people on here are just simps.
 
VoiceofEnki said:
pacharica said:
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
To be a spiritual leader, you would have to be spiritually advanced, wise, and enlightened. Compare some of the things you have written to what HP HoodedCobra and HPS Maxine have written. HP HoodedCobra has said it is good for women to wear makeup if they want to, and it can be an art form or expression.

Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

What is ideal to one person, does not necessarily reflect what is best for society.

Your people would rise up and revolt against you just for banning makeup.

once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever.

if she does oral,it travels to her brain and becomes one,forever.

and her children with her future husband.

makeup is deception and false advertising,and those that consider made up women to be superior to natural ones,are simply conditioned that way by it's ubiquity.

Where did you get these nonsensical ideas from?

This is literally thinking on the level of mental illness. None of this is even remotely true on any level or in any capacity.

Get your head out of your ass and get real.

There is literally 0 mixing of any kind that happens on the DNA or on the body when a woman and men have sex.

All that happens is an exchange of energy between the souls, which creates temporary links between people, and an exchange of energy which can have lasting effects for better or worse depending on the people involved, and this exchange goes both ways equally for men and woman.

That is all.

Hail Satan!

https://naturalnews.com/2022-08-07-any-time-women-intercourse-man-retains-dna-brain.html


read all of it.the truth cannot be hidden by simps and cucks anymore.

the simpery and whiteknighting for Sl*ts on here really puts me off.
 
Women are not someones fucking property!!!

We have our own lives, dreams and ambitions to fulfill and yes some of us are also polygamous!

The DNA staying in another persons body is just BS. If that were true we'd all look like vegetables and other animals. We wouldn't even look like humans at all.

Our system is specialized in dealing with the inner/outer world. That includes the airways, the mouth/digestive system and also the vagina / womb. They are THE MOST protected by mucus AND our immune system.

We are NOT snakes either. We do NOT store someone elses sperm to use as fertilization for a clutch of eggs later.

Quit with this nonsense and actually deprogram! These are very cringey lies.
 
pacharica said:
https://naturalnews.com/2022-08-07-any-time-women-intercourse-man-retains-dna-brain.html


read all of it.the truth cannot be hidden by simps and cucks anymore.

the simpery and whiteknighting for Sl*ts on here really puts me off.

We already accept that sex and love are exchanges of energy, so whether this is true or not doesn't matter, although it appears true.

The real question is what do you want to do about it? Keep in mind that this author, Ethan Huff, is a hardcore Christian, so this will skew things in that direction.

If you enter a relationship with a woman, and you believe she is unfairly attached to other men, then you should ask her to detach from them through spiritual means, which would then translate to a change in DNA in the body.

The same should hold true in a situation where a man is still attached to other women besides his girlfriend. The solution has always been the same: Build up the relationship which you want to occur, which may include removing other sexual connections, if those unjustly threaten the agreed-upon monogamy.

To act like this is all the fault of women, and to act like men should control their lives over this, ignores the fact that everyone in society intermingles with one another. If we want to create new relationships, even friendships, this requires us to change where we invest our time or energy.

Your overly defensive or controlling nature either aligns or stems from Abrahamic nonsense that defines women as evil, deceptive, or other negative stereotypes, but this ignores how men can also do evil, and how attacking femininity will only make things worse.

Yes, we should be realistic about how people are interconnected with one another, but we also have to allow the freedom of exchange of energy and let people do what they want. If a woman OR man wants to enter into a new monogamous relationship, then some energy work may be required to quell any threats to this, whether such threats come from synastry, karma, or past relationships.

The above is the extent of any solutions, rather than preemptively attempting to chain a person to the floor, or otherwise shame them for life, or other cruel acts which stem from one-sided fears of an entire gender.
 
Lunar Dance 666 said:

Whether this is true or not doesn't change the situation anyway. You can see my other post for more details.
The main point is that even if true, men still get attached. There is no reason to put all of this "blame" on women, when men are also capable of cheating or other bad behavior.
 
pacharica said:
VoiceofEnki said:
pacharica said:
once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever.

if she does oral,it travels to her brain and becomes one,forever.

and her children with her future husband.

makeup is deception and false advertising,and those that consider made up women to be superior to natural ones,are simply conditioned that way by it's ubiquity.

Where did you get these nonsensical ideas from?

This is literally thinking on the level of mental illness. None of this is even remotely true on any level or in any capacity.

Get your head out of your ass and get real.

There is literally 0 mixing of any kind that happens on the DNA or on the body when a woman and men have sex.

All that happens is an exchange of energy between the souls, which creates temporary links between people, and an exchange of energy which can have lasting effects for better or worse depending on the people involved, and this exchange goes both ways equally for men and woman.

That is all.

Hail Satan!

https://naturalnews.com/2022-08-07-any-time-women-intercourse-man-retains-dna-brain.html


read all of it.the truth cannot be hidden by simps and cucks anymore.

the simpery and whiteknighting for Sl*ts on here really puts me off.

Why are you censoring the word slut? Having sex with women is not simp behavior. Or women having sex with men. Not having sex and being an idiot onto brainwashing by emotional pains is on the other hand, simp behavior.

Talking about sex like a degenerate, processing over this non stop, trying to enforce your own limitations in life, believing idiocy, not fucking beautiful women but obsessing over them subconsciously non stop, well that's a simp.

Stop simping over your "exclusive" penis like it's a secret nuclear code women can't have. :lol:

Yes, you are a cuck if you only masturbate at other girls on screens being railed by other men and then you get bitter that you are an incel.

You should also grow up and understand that adult people have sex all the time, men and women.

I don't understand why not find this docile virgin girl you simp about non stop already? What stops you? Leave the sluts and stop paying attention to them, lets say. What's the problem then?

Any woman naturally healthy sexual of expression and intercourse will appear to you as a slut. So you like "women" that haven't became women already, to say it in a way, because yourself are a little boy who thinks women are impure and other funny shit.

Pray that you are "cursed" so an evil and elegant woman puts a hand on you and makes you a man. Maybe then in that moment you realize, I'm the actual man and not making a doctrine over marriage to have sex and other praising of sperm cuckholdry.

If you also are so fond of your sperm and penis, at least treat it right and put it in a vagina. You can tell your penis that you'll do the paperwork in a few years. If your penis is still alive, it will thank you.
 
pacharica said:
Karnonnos said:
OP aren't you tri-racial, as you said before? You said about race-mixing women being deported but you yourself said you are tri-racial and go with White women so...? :? This is not hostile I'm just confused.

Think on what is good, healthy and ideal for Central/South America and those of your race. Other than that I agree with NakedPluto as usual, all these technicalities and words being put onto sex like a microscope, it can be too much.

I look 100% italic/iberic with white skin as I also said before,I am not a central american or south american,and I loathe their women and culture.

don't compare me to them.I have zero cultural affinity to 'latin americans'.

my white side is overwhelmingly germanic,with only some south slavic,italic,iberic and southern french blood.

As for 'white women'I have copulated with them before my coming into satanism,not after,and I was told also I can mix with a woman that is south european or near eastern,due to their similar mixture,albeit more ancient.

I will never go for a 'latina'.

saying me mixing with a racial copy of myself,is the same as a pure jungle dwelling cannibal mixing with them is just crabs in a bucket from the latter.

some south europeans like 'sardinians'are literally like 3x more african than me,they just look white because the african element was not jungle dwelling cannibals,but proto-cushite.

OK then you're delusional. You can't be 'tri-racial' and be White, it is impossible. I don't care how you look. The Gods are not America Firsters or the Apricity or some similar losers who would tolerate this shit so don't try this routine.

What you said about Sardinia is total bullshit too.
 
Karnonnos said:
pacharica said:
Karnonnos said:
OP aren't you tri-racial, as you said before? You said about race-mixing women being deported but you yourself said you are tri-racial and go with White women so...? :? This is not hostile I'm just confused.

Think on what is good, healthy and ideal for Central/South America and those of your race. Other than that I agree with NakedPluto as usual, all these technicalities and words being put onto sex like a microscope, it can be too much.

I look 100% italic/iberic with white skin as I also said before,I am not a central american or south american,and I loathe their women and culture.

don't compare me to them.I have zero cultural affinity to 'latin americans'.

my white side is overwhelmingly germanic,with only some south slavic,italic,iberic and southern french blood.

As for 'white women'I have copulated with them before my coming into satanism,not after,and I was told also I can mix with a woman that is south european or near eastern,due to their similar mixture,albeit more ancient.

I will never go for a 'latina'.

saying me mixing with a racial copy of myself,is the same as a pure jungle dwelling cannibal mixing with them is just crabs in a bucket from the latter.

some south europeans like 'sardinians'are literally like 3x more african than me,they just look white because the african element was not jungle dwelling cannibals,but proto-cushite.

OK then you're delusional. You can't be 'tri-racial' and be White, it is impossible. I don't care how you look. The Gods are not America Firsters or the Apricity or some similar losers who would tolerate this shit so don't try this routine.

What you said about Sardinia is total bullshit too.
I think he thinks that because he has various types of Whites in him, that he's triracial.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Most people envision their own worlds but the real "Fuhrers" the Gods would ever appoint, are those who would accept the world and have an ear for it. Most people even in these forums don't really understand what "must" be done, they are a series of hang-ups and just want power like Klaus Schwab.

I come to this Forum often and I read similar rants bordering to the ideas of Klaus Schwab. Maybe not as much but often-times similar. Most of these come because both the writer and Klaus Schwab are primarily on the same level of consciousness while not understanding it, but Klaus Schwab is just on the unfortunate state for humanity to have power to carry these through.

This comes from misunderstanding life on a very deep level and major denial of life and existence, and what happens in it.

If you want the help of the Gods in that task, you must start removing yourself from the Samsaric level of consciousness to become someone who can lead others, because leading is done primarily for others and not for one's self needs of domination.

As everyone writes their real "desires" on this, you will see it has nothing to do with the Aryan Gita or Rita way of leadership, it just has to do with how open or closed your sacral chakra is, if you love makeup, or if you want to fuck girls or something.

______________________________________
I love this. Thank you.♥️
 
Abyssos said:

You keep damaging your own posts by your way of describing things. Maybe you wrote it to be funny, but it lowers the IQ of the thread. I am saying this for your own benefit, because I hate to see your passion go to waste. You have to accurately translate your dreams with proper wording, or people will fail to see what you see.

I don't think anyone here is against your end goals, which is the total prosperity of gentiles, in all aspects of life. Your method of going about it may cause friction, however.

More importantly, your only mention of spirituality is that which promotes for aesthetics or gender relationships, when it is much more important than that. You never mention having children learn how to meditate or do yoga in schools, but you only seem to care if they will be "Gigachads" or not.

All of this is a great dream, but to achieve it you need spiritual development, otherwise the people within your society will not be able to sustain what you demand of them. This is why JoS focuses first on spiritual development, as this leads to proper social ordering on its own. You yourself came to these ideas by way of your soul's Satanic affiliation and experience, rather than just because you read them.

That is why the "Who hurt you" statement that you dislike is actually a valid question, as it pertains to the trauma of the soul. Blackpill people don't understand this, only perceiving it as a feminist attack and nothing more. I agree that we should update our words to appeal to blackpill people or any others who will come to Satanism, but I wouldn't stress about this, to the point where you become despondent over the state of JoS.

Focus on the spiritual development, and everything else will come in time. Remember the houses on the zodiac wheel: the 8th house of transformations comes BEFORE the 9th house of philosophy, and before the 11th house of humanity and organizations, suggesting transformative activity is needed as some sort of prerequisite for the others.
 
Aquarius said:
Karnonnos said:
pacharica said:
I look 100% italic/iberic with white skin as I also said before,I am not a central american or south american,and I loathe their women and culture.

don't compare me to them.I have zero cultural affinity to 'latin americans'.

my white side is overwhelmingly germanic,with only some south slavic,italic,iberic and southern french blood.

As for 'white women'I have copulated with them before my coming into satanism,not after,and I was told also I can mix with a woman that is south european or near eastern,due to their similar mixture,albeit more ancient.

I will never go for a 'latina'.

saying me mixing with a racial copy of myself,is the same as a pure jungle dwelling cannibal mixing with them is just crabs in a bucket from the latter.

some south europeans like 'sardinians'are literally like 3x more african than me,they just look white because the african element was not jungle dwelling cannibals,but proto-cushite.

OK then you're delusional. You can't be 'tri-racial' and be White, it is impossible. I don't care how you look. The Gods are not America Firsters or the Apricity or some similar losers who would tolerate this shit so don't try this routine.

What you said about Sardinia is total bullshit too.
I think he thinks that because he has various types of Whites in him, that he's triracial.

He said a while ago he was Latino and of non-White races. Hence "my White side". No one White in an Anglophone country says that, ever. If his sister looks Eritrean, I doubt he is White. He completely ignored Blitzkreig's reply basically asking him to stop denying being non-White.

pacharica said:
We're majority Nordic with Mediterranean African and native blood but she looks Ethiopian or Eritrean(she has mostly white features like some of them but is brown with afro type hair)while I look very italic with white skin when not tanned ,pink nipples and wavy hair etc I was auburn haired until age six.

I hope I am a white soul but I'm afraid to ask the gods because I might get a answer that will depress me for life and I've already been clinically depressed before.

Also can I mate with a southern European woman or does she have to be a mixed mostly white woman like me like from latin america?

Sorry but I am getting tired of these brown, yellow men coming here and lecturing White women and European women, starting fights with female SS, etc. Since the rat Primal it's been endless. AskSatan has been full of miscegenation questions. Repsel1001 is Indian and writes tracts in his incel manifesto about 'White men being highest on the sexual hierarchy' as well. All this crap also gives the impression to some women here that White men are writing this stuff when we aren't.

The Gods are National Socialists. Your concerns do not lie with White women. You are not entitled to them and they aren't your objects to command sexually or otherwise. Observations as a neutral observer about them (to the effect of 'the sky is blue') are whatever, but demands are NOT YOURS TO MAKE - tell your own damn women how to behave first, since you apparently find them so disgraceful you won't even touch them and your lying abuela told you 'you are White due to having a penis, unlike your brown sister' plus other blanquimento bullshit lies of the church I've heard 100 times before.
 
Karnonnos said:
pacharica said:
We're majority Nordic with Mediterranean African and native blood but she looks Ethiopian or Eritrean(she has mostly white features like some of them but is brown with afro type hair)while I look very italic with white skin when not tanned ,pink nipples and wavy hair etc I was auburn haired until age six.

I hope I am a white soul but I'm afraid to ask the gods because I might get a answer that will depress me for life and I've already been clinically depressed before.

Also can I mate with a southern European woman or does she have to be a mixed mostly white woman like me like from latin america?

Sorry but I am getting tired of these brown, yellow men coming here and lecturing White women and European women, starting fights with female SS, etc. Since the rat Primal it's been endless. AskSatan has been full of miscegenation questions. Repsel1001 is Indian and writes tracts in his incel manifesto about 'White men being highest on the sexual hierarchy' as well. All this crap also gives the impression to some women here that White men are writing this stuff when we aren't.

The Gods are National Socialists. Your concerns do not lie with White women. You are not entitled to them and they aren't your objects to command sexually or otherwise. Observations as a neutral observer about them (to the effect of 'the sky is blue') are whatever, but demands are NOT YOURS TO MAKE - tell your own damn women how to behave first, since you apparently find them so disgraceful you won't even touch them and your lying abuela told you 'you are White due to having a penis, unlike your brown sister' plus other blanquimento bullshit lies of the church I've heard 100 times before.

Really well said Karnonnos!

These people appear to have these misconceptions and delusions due to a serious racial inferiority complex on top of abrahamic programming which they deny and never try to fix.

Instead of fixing anything, they go around looking everywhere to find nonsense which validates their programming and their complex, even to the point of reading everything through tinted lenses purposefully and finding materials from biased xians or other abrahamic retards while disregarding reality and truth all the way.

It is disgusting, and pathetic.

Some of these idiots have straight up mudslime ideas and think this is reality or whatever,even trying to attribute this to our people as well? Wtf is that even about?

These idiots also need to stop denying their race, and go find a person to fuck of their own race, instead of parading here how they wish they were white so they can fuck our whites woman.


To these retards, Go fuck yourself.

This racial nonsense and adultery has absolutely no place here.

Hail Satan!
 
Blitzkreig [JG said:
" post_id=430590 time=1678871549 user_id=21286]
Lunar Dance 666 said:

Whether this is true or not doesn't change the situation anyway. You can see my other post for more details.
The main point is that even if true, men still get attached. There is no reason to put all of this "blame" on women, when men are also capable of cheating or other bad behavior.

True.
Its just views like this, strike a nerve.

However I must say, quite a few have already posted some well written things and counter arguments.
 
Abyssos said:

I would say that all of this reflects in your posts and mentality. It's starting to now make sense.

Regardless, I think you should be less insistent on the modes that already brought you in this condition, manage the tiredness, stop considering the world dirty [albeit stupid, and filled with mistakes, the world is still generally fine to be in], and numerous other things which lead you to fry and want to become a form of Klaus Schwab mirror from the "Nazi Side" in some sort of reactionary disgust because of what you perceive as a penultimate danger, which it kind of is, but life goes on and will go on.

I hope you also recover from what you have been inflicted on the trust territory, because these can be mortal wounds in the mind of a man, that few people can understand. I can understand you very well there.

Undoubtedly, we have to fight certain monsters that are quite different now, but we are doing this and successfully. I think your overview and how burden you might feel, or senses of urgency, and other things, maybe are pushing you to draw negative conclusions, extreme pressure, and overwhelming deadly seriousness, which mostly just harms you.

I think you need to relax a bit. And I mean this on an actual level not on some random "just chill" nonsense.

The Gods also have the situation under control. As cliche as it might sound, what the human brain cannot comprehend, they can comprehend. Further, many things that people consider wrong now, in the spectrum of life, are actually correct. Now of all times since the past, it's very obvious what soul is for what side, and what souls belong to the gutter, and which will go above.

Currently, we are at peak Kali Yuga, exiting slowly. Souls are being tested now, and severely so. Therefore, circumstances are seemingly insurmountable against us.
 
That medical study talking about Male DNA becoming permanently implanted inside of a Woman's body is something that was shared here I think 2 or 3 years ago. And for everybody who was here at the time, there was a lot of debate about it. So it is a little strange that some of the people who were strongly participating in that discussion are also pretending that it doesn't exist, or that they never saw that report. Or arguing only from the perspective of "that is not real, it doesn't exist." But then when shown that it is real, the response is "even if it is real, it isn't important."


Is that really not important that a person's body becomes permanently implanted with the DNA of other people? I see how in situations of marriage, family, or monogamous relationships, this may be considered as something that is not important. The two people may agree with this and it is not a problem.

But when you talk about how promiscuous a very large number of people are now, having sex with a different stranger every day and bragging about a "body count" of hundreds of strangers. And all of the DNA of all of those strangers are becoming stuck inside of the body. If we know that this is something that happens, even if it only happens some of the time and not always, it should at least be thought about if this is a good thing or what the possible effects of it are. And not just flat out ignoring it and refusing to look at what it is doing. Anybody who has pieces of DNA from 100 different people inside of the body, I can't imagine this could be a healthy person. Especially since one of the popular places that this other DNA has often been found inside is the brain.


We already know about the jews spreading absolutely suicidal advice to all of the young people, for the direct purpose of causing the extinction of our race and the destruction of all of humanity. There is an extreme amount of propaganda for young people to use drugs. There is an extreme amount of propaganda for young people to race mix. There is an extreme amount of propaganda for young people to consume pills and/or surgeries that will make it impossible for them to ever have children. There is an extreme amount of propaganda for young people to kill themselves. And there is an extreme amount of propaganda for young people to be extremely promiscuous with no limits, and different people every day. Drug use, race mixing, and promiscuity are the 3 most popular and strongest pieces of propaganda, and they always work together. For everybody of our race to have minds and bodies destroyed by drugs, and to either never have any children or have race mixed children so that within only one generation all of our people will be extinct. Just think, do you know of even one example of one piece of the jew propaganda which is actually a good thing and would help our people?


How much of this propaganda you choose to accept as being okay is your own choice. But none of it was created for any other purpose besides our extinction. And you can talk about things in a hypothetical paradise where society is all 100% racially homogeneous, all people are perfectly healthy, and all people are good with good souls. How in a situation like this, certain actions would not be harmful. But that is not what we have, and I don't know any white country where this situation exists anymore.


This type of propaganda has been done for longer than one generation now, so we can see people who were victims of this and how it has affected their lives. And they are starting to regret it, and creating warnings to younger people to warn them not to do the same thing. Women who spent years only focusing on "having fun" with a hundred different partners, and now they want to be a family with children and a husband. But they are getting too old to be able to have children, and men don't want to be their husbands after she has had so many past partners. A woman with that many past partners, this is something that nearly all men are discusted by and are not interested in. This is a trending thing on the internet that heartbroken women this age are talking about, and people are saying about it "The wall is undefeated." The wall of time that nothing is able to defeat. And they missed their chance to ever have a family.


 Www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2PgCAwelaI


 Www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpTjdP5x7zE



Everything I said, I am not putting a limit on anybody. Anybody will do whatever they want. If you want to do something that may hurt yourself, that is your choice and nobody can stop you. All I'm saying is some things are harmful, and nobody is helped by ignoring these harmful effects. Nobody is helped by pretending that a harmful situation is perfectly safe, or thinking that it will lead to a good result in the end. And people should look realistically about the risks and harm that come with anything and not just refuse to examine it. Because one day, it will be too late to go back and make a different choice. So you better make the decisions for your life that you actually want to make, and that will lead you to the future that you want to have.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:

I agree that it is a big deal, but I believe that the way out is the same solutions which we already employ, which is to detach from karma, clean, yoga, etc. Of course, this cannot be truly studied or measured until the future.

We are trying to balance these ideas without falling prey to Abrahamic solutions. In this case, we were fighting a guy who has gone crazy (now deleted post) who was using that fact of DNA transference to promote an Abrahamic solution.

Ultimately, I believe this DNA transfer to be representative of the natural energy exchange which occurs in sex, so I don't think it would make someone unhealthy, zombified, or whatever gruesome images people think of. However, it would clearly show the person has been influenced by their partners, for better or worse.

We are going to have to deal with all of these problems, and the solution cannot be to just throw people away, yet I do believe it will require extra spiritual effort and healing. To find a Satanic middle ground, we have to balance out the Islamic solutions, which are overly controlling and outright attack sexual activity, even masturbation.

A lot of these studies were focused on the DNA that transfers through pregnancy, not sex itself. Even then, a condom would mitigate this DNA transfer. So, there is some hope. We also see within Islam that the enemy is using sexual suppression, rather than promiscuity, as their weapon of choice.

I think the focal point of this should be to continue to encourage people to find safe and healthy partners, although keeping in mind that people will have to deal with the results of their past action. This is different from the usual beliefs which arise from the DNA study, which is to act like a women is permanently tainted and should be basically avoided.

This is a very similar dilemma to drug use and its physical changes. Even people who "don't use drugs" may still drink heavily. What about the Covid shot and other toxic elements which may change DNA? In these situations, we are more accepting of people if we learn that they are now clean and have done 3 years of Satanic activity. I think the same can be said about dangerous promiscuity.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
...And you can talk about things in a hypothetical paradise where society is all 100% racially homogeneous, all people are perfectly healthy, and all people are good with good souls. How in a situation like this, certain actions would not be harmful. But that is not what we have, and I don't know any white country where this situation exists anymore.
...

I thought about it lately, this is mostly only present in capitals and more cosmopolitan cities in Europe and whatnot. 90% of the rest of the country areas yes the people do see those things in movies etc. - however they are most of the time normal people, and don't take that things to their personal lives, or don't even interact with non-White aliens, who 99% of the time dwell only in the capitals and big metropolitan areas - so do drugs and whatnot. For one, you see that decades of alcohol propaganda did cause a pandemic of alcohol abuse, and although it is a problem that must be addressed, the majority of population do not engage in such acts.

Think about this historically:

At the worst case scenario for one I think it would take a thousand years for France to look like modern Iran - Iran/Persia which after thousand years of invasions and jew-warfare on them like to Europe, still holds a high amount White genes, and became jew-hating to the core after what the jews have done to them. The jew don't have this time, they would be wiped out by both the native citizens and the middle eastern aliens they imported. I'm not saying this doesn't matter and our people did not suffer but this warfare did nothing positive to the jew but bringing resentment to them and achieve nothing with this. Central/Northern Europe is suffering the same Persia or Greece suffered, but it would take a whole literal Middle Ages again and worst of the worst case scenario for things to become as bad in terms of racial hybridization and drug pandemics like Afghanistan or Egypt which are extremely backwards - that would be the day for them but they don't have this time or background in Europe to back it up.

Kalergi plan is a very ineffective and lost battle for them, most Gentiles are normal people with better instincts despite the loud minority of cosmopolitan college nutcases they try to sell as the majority rule in the movies. This propaganda exists to undermine the spirit of the actual majority of Gentiles, that this is somewhat a lost battle and we should run to the hills - which is not the case.

I don't know how to elaborate this with better arguments, but I want our people to remain positive about this and don't get trapped in victimhood.



Abyssos said:
There's going to be a lot of venting. Don't take any of this too personally.
Nice approach, we all have problems, and mutual respect is a nice thing.

...This cucked mindset and instinct is a literal epidemic that has infected almost the entire White race. It is prevalent everywhere, and it is even very largely prevalent right here at Ancient Forums...

I literally feel like in a reddit forum when I'm here....

Then you proceed to insult us with a comparison to other places not only doesn't even make any sense, but is essentially incorrect to what any actual members here say or think. Well fuck you.

Chose your slander:
*For redditors*
"Omg they said being White is ok and they deserve to have rights and not be beaten by people of color. They are literal White supremacists."
*For fringe political groups LARPing the 1940's that they don't even comprehend and can't attract any productive females or males*
"Omg they said being a Woman is ok and they deserve to have rights. They are literal feminists and cucks."

*Proceeds to act antagonistically against the Joy of Satan for no fucking reason after we welcome them, then pretend we are the ones being antagonistic.*

This is basically acting like a new negro that came from an afrocentrist place and reads one positive thing about Whites here in the forum and their whole world colapses, only that this victimhood mentality is applied to White Men here, just change muh Wakanda for muh imaginary Reich as it should be in their head.


, and secular egalitarianism and wokeness has taken over. I'm trying my best to concisely describe a core problem that the Ancient Forums culture suffers from.
Well it is not and it has never been the case here. Limited binary brains can't comprehend the difference between "equal access" to "universal equality" and start shouting "muh egalitarianism" out of their asses, from their lens of other "Nationalist" places whose opinions we don't give a shit about. The one dude who aligned himself pretty well with those places you think we should sound like, like with muh traditional patriarchy and muh Blacks aren't of Satan (I'm saying from them, not you in particular), was himself a lazy faggot who didn't meditate and therefore couldn't understand the real Hitler, and got kicked off the clergy.

I won't elaborate further on those groups, HP HC exposed these political LARPers to oblivion. We are not limited to the Hegelian binary mentality of those places. "If feminism bad then Hitler was a xtian and wahmen should go back to kitchen, Let's make Paganism into catholicism 2.0".
Yes we defend White Rights, Black Rights, Men Rights, Women Rights, etc. Lilith the wife of Satan will destroy Communism, she defends rights to abortion, Women rights and even the further improvement of it, etc. (for fuck's sake if I have to make a disclaimer of what this means for two braincell WN groups), such as HPS Maxine herself told in the groups even the latest years even. Deal with it.

"(Women Rights)/(White Supremacy) is holding me back!!!😭😭😭"

You like venting I have some. 99% of people who join here had terrible things happening in their lives one way or another that I don't want to elaborate here for many reasons like decency or demeanor.
I'm tired of the these White Negroes posing their unending whining and weakness as toughness, and blaming us of it, while we give actual practical means to uplift White Men and improve their lives.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top