Joy Of Satan Forums

I was researching on Aryan race recently, and I discovered some works of Helena Blavatsky, she seem to describe Aryan race positively.


Has anyone else read her books? Is her work legit, or more serving enemy agenda? I think she is legit, in plethora of fools like Edgar Cayce, (((Zechariah Sitchin))), Aliester Crowley...and so forth and so on...

She was a con the Mahatma letter scandal proved such. At the time she was writing the anti-White narrative didn't exist. And the study of the Aryan Race and racial anthropology was mainstream. So was eugenics'.

Blavatsky stated Theosophy is mystical Christian sect. Theosophy is literally communism if you study its doctrines. The Nazi's didn't buy into this stuff they drove Rudolf Steiner out of Germany in an occult war because Steiner the leading Theosophist of Germany was against National Socialism because it was woke on the Jew problem. Krisna Murti was trained by the Theosophists to be the second coming of Christ but he realized that was too big of a move. So he was content with being a standard Communist who hid behind fancy sounding script.

Vivekananda was a bigger subversionist than all of these. I have spoken to many Indians. West bengali people are mostly SJW many times and beleive in crap of theology and stuff. A sensible guy from there says how all this opened West Bengal to Muslim and Ethno bangla militants and lunacy. Blavatsky doesn't have as much followers as Vivekananda.

Thank you, both. I won't be reading her crap anymore.

Vivekananda was pushing from what I understand a Puritan style of Christianity with Hindu trappings.

anonymous666 wrote:Vivekananda was a bigger subversionist than all of these. I have spoken to many Indians. West bengali people are mostly SJW many times and beleive in crap of theology and stuff. A sensible guy from there says how all this opened West Bengal to Muslim and Ethno bangla militants and lunacy. Blavatsky doesn't have as much followers as Vivekananda.

Hello. I have studied theosophy quite thoroughly and the end result is creating the (((6th sub-race))) of the 5th root race (Aryan, which they construe as the compilation of most currently existing races). Basically the Kalergi plan as laid out in "Practical Idealism" by Count Richard Coudenhove von Kalergi. It serves, like xianity as a subtle cover for the globo-commie agenda. The whole complexity is indeed jewish kabbalah and is something best avoided. It is a hijacking of gnosis perverted and twisted to suite the jews agenda. Blavatsky was apparently a Rothschild agent and a member of the hohenzollern family I believe

loki88 wrote:Hello. I have studied theosophy quite thoroughly and the end result is creating the (((6th sub-race))) of the 5th root race (Aryan, which they construe as the compilation of most currently existing races). Basically the Kalergi plan as laid out in "Practical Idealism" by Count Richard Coudenhove von Kalergi. It serves, like xianity as a subtle cover for the globo-commie agenda. The whole complexity is indeed jewish kabbalah and is something best avoided. It is a hijacking of gnosis perverted and twisted to suite the jews agenda. Blavatsky was apparently a Rothschild agent and a member of the hohenzollern family I believe

She is a kike and an agent, and all your assesments are correct.

The fact our enemies use knowledge, such as "Gnostic" knowledge, or "Spiritual Knowledge", to pass down their putrid agenda, means nothing. The greatest and most sly and sick spawn of theirs, Christianity, was based on the same principle of using true spiritual knowledge and perverting it to suit their agenda.

Similar types to Blavatsky right now are people like Pinkham, who essentially use spiritual knowledge and even Satan's name to promote bastardization of the races, and pretend this is some sort of divine mission into it.

HP. Hoodedcobra666 wrote: Similar types to Blavatsky right now are people like Pinkham, who essentially use spiritual knowledge and even Satan's name to promote bastardization of the races, and pretend this is some sort of divine mission into it.

I was reading some years ago Pinkham's material such as "The Return of Serpents of Wisdom" and I saw he was legit in many things he wrote but I didn't like the acceptance of the Jew and Hebrew materials he has in his books.

Drakon wrote:

HP. Hoodedcobra666 wrote: Similar types to Blavatsky right now are people like Pinkham, who essentially use spiritual knowledge and even Satan's name to promote bastardization of the races, and pretend this is some sort of divine mission into it.

I was reading some years ago Pinkham's material such as "The Return of Serpents of Wisdom" and I saw he was legit in many things he wrote but I didn't like the acceptance of the Jew and Hebrew materials he has in his books.

He is a very knowledgable person and that is a respectable quality, but the rest, and how he extolls jews, and he refuses to anknowldge that all of the damage done to the actual Serpent religion, ie Satanism, came from Jews, is just reeking that he is dishonest or too new age to see the facts.

At his knowledge level he either knows or he is a shill. There is no middle ground here.

" Pinkham"
I fell for him around 2013/14 with his 'serpents of wisdom'. It all seemed well and good but the universalism reeked of disinfo and this turned me away from 'gnosticism' altogether.
According to you what sources are trustworthy as a primer in 'gnostic' philosophy/hermeticism or whatever it may be called? I have printed off the J.O.S info but am always seeking outside sources

loki88 wrote:" Pinkham"
I fell for him around 2013/14 with his 'serpents of wisdom'. It all seemed well and good but the universalism reeked of disinfo and this turned me away from 'gnosticism' altogether.
According to you what sources are trustworthy as a primer in 'gnostic' philosophy/hermeticism or whatever it may be called? I have printed off the J.O.S info but am always seeking outside sources

Read whatever you want and consider you should read, but always be conscious when doing it, and you should be fine. There are a lot of books like the Kybalion which contain some actual knowledge. With all occult manuscripts at this point, it is all lukewarm. There is unavoidably a huge amount of disinfo into them, and that is on purpose.

Eventually daily meditation can help clear the fog.

Franz Barton has been recommended here frequently. Is his work legitimate(not kabbalistically corrupted)?

loki88 wrote:Franz Barton has been recommended here frequently. Is his work legitimate(not kabbalistically corrupted)?

The initiation into hermetics book would be good for someone who is not an SS but we don’t need it. Some of the exercises in there are on the JoS meditation page anyways.

Bardon was a member of several groups one of them was a small Satanic group that was run by an actual member of a Satanic lodge. The knowledge that Bardon put into Hermetic's was taken from that group. I wrote an article of this its in the archives.

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=18139

loki88 wrote:Franz Barton has been recommended here frequently. Is his work legitimate(not kabbalistically corrupted)?

thanks I need to figure things out. I assume Giordano Bruno is a legit source to? Is there a 'grocery list' of sources for neophytes independantly of J.O.S content in case the latter is offline/scrapped by zog? I'm thinking about compiling a library