Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Welcome to Our New Forums

  • Our forums have been upgraded! You can read about this HERE

For people who thinks blacks are Africans

If I remember correctly the continent got the name Africa from the Roman general Africanus. I don’t remember what the real name of the land was before it though.
 
What's with the numbers in brackets? Did your hand twinge throughout typing all of that? In other words - it would be good if you linked to the material/s you are not referencing.

cGlZNlf.png

f4WdJtU.png

7oowHgd.png

M8pSksg.png


With the contradiction of it meaning superior and also inferior - like when we say the word "quite", that can mean both "a bit" and "a lot". With the jew, pretending to be White, having Blacks as slaves, then that would mean inferior, but also with the meme of "we wos kangz", that could mean both superior - being 'kings' - and also inferior - being 'was kings'. Plus in reference to interracial porn, Blacks and certain parts of the Black anatomy are supposed to be superior, and also with (((BLM))) and Blacks (or perhaps "Blacks" if they might be Black-looking j00z) forcing/encouraging/guilting Whites to bow down and kiss their shoes in public to apologise for things "Whites" did in the past (while forgetting one of the first Black slave owners in America was Black...), that is trying to show Blacks as superior. I am suspicious if the word "apara" is actually judaised and its actual meaning has been altered, both similarly to this book and also through dissimilation.

In real-life, the only superiority we have and be is what we make our individual selves have and be. Each person of each Human Race (i.e. non-jew), can improve, empower and enhance themself to any heights and betterment. We didn't all "come out of Africa", neither. The different sites here seem to agree that "Africa" meant Northern Africa, which then spread-out further south, but me being me I suspect each of these sites got their research from the same judaised and jewish places, probably having the article authours and/or researchers being jewish themselves.

More information about Blacks and Africa can be found on HPS Shanon's site, Blacks for Satan, here.
 
ModernMage said:
Dang wheres Shannon at for this cringe
Blacks do feel better if they live where the sun is stronger. It's their genetic. Just like its their genetic to have more muscles, and have a skin that helps them be protected from the sun and this is why they need to be in a place where the sun is stronger so it can penetrate their skin and give them vitamin D.
 
FancyMancy said:
Avoid using images that include text to reply something. Copy-paste and link sources instead. Images rely on external hosting (imgur in this case), once they get removed (after a period of time), they become unavailable in the forum, and questions answered with these become unanswered again. Plus, loading a lot of big-sized images slow down page loading for people that use TOR browser (everyone should anyway) and makes it difficult for people with phones to read them (no one should visit sensitive websites with their phone anyway).
 
luis said:
ModernMage said:
Dang wheres Shannon at for this cringe
Blacks do feel better if they live where the sun is stronger. It's their genetic. Just like its their genetic to have more muscles, and have a skin that helps them be protected from the sun and this is why they need to be in a place where the sun is stronger so it can penetrate their skin and give them vitamin D.
Most blacks are obese tho lol :lol: :lol:
 
Jack said:
Most blacks are obese tho lol :lol: :lol:
In America, there are a lot of poor blacks who are obese, just as there are a lot of poor whites who are obese. There's a lot of places in America that just do not get healthy food shipped in. Being obese is more of an economic thing than a black/white thing. People who live where there is healthy food to buy, and who have the money to buy it, are usually healthier people.

And of course there is a genetic component to which foods are best absorbed and used by a person. A specific grain may be easily digested by one population, and a different grain is digested by another population, and both populations are harmed if you switch their diets. Even when both grains contain the same types of macronutrients. This is by the genetic history of the group, which foods were eaten by this group throughout their evolution.
 
Pirate11 said:
FancyMancy said:
Avoid using images that include text to reply something. Copy-paste and link sources instead. Images rely on external hosting (imgur in this case), once they get removed (after a period of time), they become unavailable in the forum, and questions answered with these become unanswered again. Plus, loading a lot of big-sized images slow down page loading for people that use TOR browser (everyone should anyway) and makes it difficult for people with phones to read them (no one should visit sensitive websites with their phone anyway).

I still visit sensitive Website by using my mobile phone , How bad is the situation?
is the government going to arrest me because i visited JOS forums! ??

and why using TOR browser is it more trusted and safe ?
 
Pirate11 said:
FancyMancy said:
Avoid using images that include text to reply something. Copy-paste and link sources instead. Images rely on external hosting (imgur in this case), once they get removed (after a period of time), they become unavailable in the forum, and questions answered with these become unanswered again. Plus, loading a lot of big-sized images slow down page loading for people that use TOR browser (everyone should anyway) and makes it difficult for people with phones to read them (no one should visit sensitive websites with their phone anyway).
I could tamper with any text I claim to have come from a site. Pictures are more trustworthy. Imgur seems to not delete the pictures; I've had some on for ages and they're still available. I understand what you mean, though.
 
sonnenkraft said:
and why using TOR browser is it more trusted and safe ?
If not connecting to a dangerous entry node into the Tor network; otherwise, any vigilante and/or three-letter agency could be monitoring you easily. You could connect to a VPN before connecting to Tor, but whether any VPN actually does not keep logs is anyone's guess. In short, it's all about trust - can we really, truly trust others and (((others))) to provide services for us?
 
sonnenkraft said:
I still visit sensitive Website by using my mobile phone , How bad is the situation?
Why would you do such a thing? Anyway, you are being tracked and profiled for that.

sonnenkraft said:
is the government going to arrest me because i visited JOS forums! ??
No, not yet. But I would not keep doing that. I hope you are aware of the fact that your ISP keeps track of the websites you visit, and will show that list to the police, if they request so.

sonnenkraft said:
and why using TOR browser is it more trusted and safe ?
Open source, built for anonymity in mind. Every connection goes through a few random nodes and is encrypted before reaching the destination. The network is very safe, and the browser is designed to make every user look identical to one another.

FancyMancy said:
I could tamper with any text I claim to have come from a site. Pictures are more trustworthy. Imgur seems to not delete the pictures; I've had some on for ages and they're still available. I understand what you mean, though.
Thank you for your understanding, just a heads up.

FancyMancy said:
(...) You could connect to a VPN before connecting to Tor,(...)
NEVER connect to a VPN while using TOR, the reason can be found on the TOR project's website.
Anyway, there has been a huge emphasis on VPN since, like, 2015. They are being promoted a lot, but in reality, they don't do much for improving privacy and/or security, this is all marketing. Just because your IP is different, it does not mean you are not being tracked and profiled. 80% of people who use a VPN don't really need it anyway.
 
Pirate11 said:
sonnenkraft said:
I still visit sensitive Website by using my mobile phone , How bad is the situation?
Why would you do such a thing? Anyway, you are being tracked and profiled for that.

sonnenkraft said:
is the government going to arrest me because i visited JOS forums! ??
No, not yet. But I would not keep doing that. I hope you are aware of the fact that your ISP keeps track of the websites you visit, and will show that list to the police, if they request so.

sonnenkraft said:
and why using TOR browser is it more trusted and safe ?
Open source, built for anonymity in mind. Every connection goes through a few random nodes and is encrypted before reaching the destination. The network is very safe, and the browser is designed to make every user look identical to one another.

FancyMancy said:
I could tamper with any text I claim to have come from a site. Pictures are more trustworthy. Imgur seems to not delete the pictures; I've had some on for ages and they're still available. I understand what you mean, though.
Thank you for your understanding, just a heads up.

FancyMancy said:
(...) You could connect to a VPN before connecting to Tor,(...)
NEVER connect to a VPN while using TOR, the reason can be found on the TOR project's website.
Anyway, there has been a huge emphasis on VPN since, like, 2015. They are being promoted a lot, but in reality, they don't do much for improving privacy and/or security, this is all marketing. Just because your IP is different, it does not mean you are not being tracked and profiled. 80% of people who use a VPN don't really need it anyway.
I was sceptical about VPNs, including from any yearly lists of the top 5 or 10 or whatever number "best VPNs" they create.

In very basic terms, Tor is more about anonymity, whereas a VPN is more concerned with privacy.

...

https://privacy.net/what-is-tor

I make no distinction between privacy and anonymity when it comes to online safety. To me they are one and the same, so now I am confused! This page seems to promote using a VPN with Tor, either one first then the other or vice-versa.

I would think the best option, if VPNs can be trusted, would be to connect to a VPN then Tor then a different VPN. The cost would increase and the speed would slow down, but I think it would work. Also with materials, i.e. from JoSM, if all things were encrypted on the file-level, then them going through VPN, Tor, VPN to one's computer should be more secure - but of course we don't have the set-up to encrypt videos, pictures, MP3s and documents and other archives in an archived file like that. My guess is that would need to be done on the server, which would increase its usage, cost, carbon footprint, etc. exponentially. Then, of course, we'd need to decrypt and extract them on our computer on our end, as well...

I am picturing that more like with regular Internet traffic like a stream flowing along, whereas my idea what I just said is more like a box or a chest/trunk being built and put together at the source, floating along that stream (which might be too heavy, hence the cost, extra time for delivery, etc.) which is secure from tampering along the way, and then opened and viewed at the destination. To me, it makes sense, but I know that won't be done any time soon - and if it would be, then I would be suspicious! M$, jewgle, maybe if Shatoo! made a come-back - they'd all be suspicious.
 
FancyMancy said:
I was sceptical about VPNs, including from any yearly lists of the top 5 or 10 or whatever number "best VPNs" they create.

In very basic terms, Tor is more about anonymity, whereas a VPN is more concerned with privacy.

...

https://privacy.net/what-is-tor

I make no distinction between privacy and anonymity when it comes to online safety. To me they are one and the same, so now I am confused! This page seems to promote using a VPN with Tor, either one first then the other or vice-versa.

I would think the best option, if VPNs can be trusted, would be to connect to a VPN then Tor then a different VPN. The cost would increase and the speed would slow down, but I think it would work. Also with materials, i.e. from JoSM, if all things were encrypted on the file-level, then them going through VPN, Tor, VPN to one's computer should be more secure - but of course we don't have the set-up to encrypt videos, pictures, MP3s and documents and other archives in an archived file like that. My guess is that would need to be done on the server, which would increase its usage, cost, carbon footprint, etc. exponentially. Then, of course, we'd need to decrypt and extract them on our computer on our end, as well...

I am picturing that more like with regular Internet traffic like a stream flowing along, whereas my idea what I just said is more like a box or a chest/trunk being built and put together at the source, floating along that stream (which might be too heavy, hence the cost, extra time for delivery, etc.) which is secure from tampering along the way, and then opened and viewed at the destination. To me, it makes sense, but I know that won't be done any time soon - and if it would be, then I would be suspicious! M$, jewgle, maybe if Shatoo! made a come-back - they'd all be suspicious.

Unfortunately, what you wrote makes no sense. I strongly encourage you to do proper research about how these things work. If your knowledge does not suffice, please retain from aiding others what to do. In particular, not distinguishing between privacy and anonymity is a huge mistake.
No bad feelings, I am not being a dick to you. I just want everyone to be safe, I value safety and privacy a lot given the current times. Using technology the wrong way can lead to real-life repercussion. I don't want this to happen to anyone.
The links above are a good starting points for a proper research.
 
FancyMancy said:
sonnenkraft said:
and why using TOR browser is it more trusted and safe ?
If not connecting to a dangerous entry node into the Tor network; otherwise, any vigilante and/or three-letter agency could be monitoring you easily. You could connect to a VPN before connecting to Tor, but whether any VPN actually does not keep logs is anyone's guess. In short, it's all about trust - can we really, truly trust others and (((others))) to provide services for us?

I should've acted wisely in the past. :oops: ,Now it's worth to find trusted software, it's time to delete chrome ,Firefox and deactivating many accounts unfortunately.
.

Pirate11 said:
Unfortunately, what you wrote makes no sense. I strongly encourage you to do proper research about how these things work. If your knowledge does not suffice, please retain from aiding others what to do. In particular, not distinguishing between privacy and anonymity is a huge mistake.
No bad feelings, I am not being a dick to you. I just want everyone to be safe, I value safety and privacy a lot given the current times. Using technology the wrong way can lead to real-life repercussion. I don't want this to happen to anyone.
The links above are a good starting points for a proper research.

thanks for the links , what i understand now , is that TOR can hide my IP Address , and i can access many Websites without leaving any evidence, no "Trace " = not going to get in trouble ,And no need to use VPN + Tor ,It won't increase security.

In conclusion, when it comes to SS internet battalion I should depend %100 on TOR .
 
luis said:
ModernMage said:
Dang wheres Shannon at for this cringe
Blacks do feel better if they live where the sun is stronger. It's their genetic. Just like its their genetic to have more muscles, and have a skin that helps them be protected from the sun and this is why they need to be in a place where the sun is stronger so it can penetrate their skin and give them vitamin D.

Yes it is True. Being in My Own country has made me much more healthier, happier and extremely handsome than i was when in studies Abroad.

Not to Forget the Spiritual Advancement. I have Grown more in the last one year than the other four years out of My Home. It’s something that surprises me everyday. And i wouldn’t desire to go anywhere else (even with opportunities being literally thrown into my face). It’s perfect here. I am perfect here.

#Proud to be black
#Proud to be a Gentile
#Proud to be A pagan
#Proud to be A SS
 
TanzanianGod said:
luis said:
ModernMage said:
Dang wheres Shannon at for this cringe
Blacks do feel better if they live where the sun is stronger. It's their genetic. Just like its their genetic to have more muscles, and have a skin that helps them be protected from the sun and this is why they need to be in a place where the sun is stronger so it can penetrate their skin and give them vitamin D.

Yes it is True. Being in My Own country has made me much more healthier, happier and extremely handsome than i was when in studies Abroad.

Not to Forget the Spiritual Advancement. I have Grown more in the last one year than the other four years out of My Home. It’s something that surprises me everyday. And i wouldn’t desire to go anywhere else (even with opportunities being literally thrown into my face). It’s perfect here. I am perfect here.

#Proud to be black
#Proud to be a Gentile
#Proud to be A pagan
#Proud to be A SS
I'm happy for you :) I wish for the day we will win this war fully and go back to a happier and better world.
 
Pirate11 said:
FancyMancy said:
I was sceptical about VPNs, including from any yearly lists of the top 5 or 10 or whatever number "best VPNs" they create.

In very basic terms, Tor is more about anonymity, whereas a VPN is more concerned with privacy.

...

https://privacy.net/what-is-tor

I make no distinction between privacy and anonymity when it comes to online safety. To me they are one and the same, so now I am confused! This page seems to promote using a VPN with Tor, either one first then the other or vice-versa.

I would think the best option, if VPNs can be trusted, would be to connect to a VPN then Tor then a different VPN. The cost would increase and the speed would slow down, but I think it would work. Also with materials, i.e. from JoSM, if all things were encrypted on the file-level, then them going through VPN, Tor, VPN to one's computer should be more secure - but of course we don't have the set-up to encrypt videos, pictures, MP3s and documents and other archives in an archived file like that. My guess is that would need to be done on the server, which would increase its usage, cost, carbon footprint, etc. exponentially. Then, of course, we'd need to decrypt and extract them on our computer on our end, as well...

I am picturing that more like with regular Internet traffic like a stream flowing along, whereas my idea what I just said is more like a box or a chest/trunk being built and put together at the source, floating along that stream (which might be too heavy, hence the cost, extra time for delivery, etc.) which is secure from tampering along the way, and then opened and viewed at the destination. To me, it makes sense, but I know that won't be done any time soon - and if it would be, then I would be suspicious! M$, jewgle, maybe if Shatoo! made a come-back - they'd all be suspicious.

Unfortunately, what you wrote makes no sense. I strongly encourage you to do proper research about how these things work. If your knowledge does not suffice, please retain from aiding others what to do. In particular, not distinguishing between privacy and anonymity is a huge mistake.
No bad feelings, I am not being a dick to you. I just want everyone to be safe, I value safety and privacy a lot given the current times. Using technology the wrong way can lead to real-life repercussion. I don't want this to happen to anyone.
The links above are a good starting points for a proper research.
People have difficulty understanding how technological things, such as the Internet, works. I was going for metaphor. Talking about subnet makes, default gateways, etc., would cause people to scratch their heads until they were scratching at their brains - except that they'd give-up long before then. It also does make sense, as Internet traffic has been described metaphorically both by water down a pipe and also traffic along a motorway with more or fewer lanes. As for the dangerous entry nodes, that is rather simple to understand; as I said - any vigilante or 3-letter agency can see what you are doing. I also said that I consider privacy and anonymity online to be the same; I didn't say that everyone should agree with me and copy off me. If I was not private; rather, I was public, then I would be known; I could not possibly be anonymous. Regardless of anything - Tor is not as safe as people rely on it to be.
 
Pirate11 said:
FancyMancy said:
I was sceptical about VPNs, including from any yearly lists of the top 5 or 10 or whatever number "best VPNs" they create.

In very basic terms, Tor is more about anonymity, whereas a VPN is more concerned with privacy.

...

https://privacy.net/what-is-tor

I make no distinction between privacy and anonymity when it comes to online safety. To me they are one and the same, so now I am confused! This page seems to promote using a VPN with Tor, either one first then the other or vice-versa.

I would think the best option, if VPNs can be trusted, would be to connect to a VPN then Tor then a different VPN. The cost would increase and the speed would slow down, but I think it would work. Also with materials, i.e. from JoSM, if all things were encrypted on the file-level, then them going through VPN, Tor, VPN to one's computer should be more secure - but of course we don't have the set-up to encrypt videos, pictures, MP3s and documents and other archives in an archived file like that. My guess is that would need to be done on the server, which would increase its usage, cost, carbon footprint, etc. exponentially. Then, of course, we'd need to decrypt and extract them on our computer on our end, as well...

I am picturing that more like with regular Internet traffic like a stream flowing along, whereas my idea what I just said is more like a box or a chest/trunk being built and put together at the source, floating along that stream (which might be too heavy, hence the cost, extra time for delivery, etc.) which is secure from tampering along the way, and then opened and viewed at the destination. To me, it makes sense, but I know that won't be done any time soon - and if it would be, then I would be suspicious! M$, jewgle, maybe if Shatoo! made a come-back - they'd all be suspicious.

Unfortunately, what you wrote makes no sense. I strongly encourage you to do proper research about how these things work. If your knowledge does not suffice, please retain from aiding others what to do. In particular, not distinguishing between privacy and anonymity is a huge mistake.
No bad feelings, I am not being a dick to you. I just want everyone to be safe, I value safety and privacy a lot given the current times. Using technology the wrong way can lead to real-life repercussion. I don't want this to happen to anyone.
The links above are a good starting points for a proper research.

I've had this feeling for years. That certain fake accounts post links, just to get you to click them and steal your information. I've never clicked them for this reason.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top