Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Welcome to Our New Forums

  • Our forums have been upgraded! You can read about this HERE

What do you guy think about this statement about Hitler

Necrorifter

New member
Joined
Dec 18, 2019
Messages
197
This article says that Hitler is not of National Socialism as he believed that they will destroyed the nation but rather that he is of Fascism but balance so the worker and the elite are of equal and the state will only get involved in if the two classes start to put personal interests above the interests of the nation.

https://www.vox.com/2019/3/27/18283879/nazism-socialism-hitler-gop-brooks-gohmert
 
Avoid getting info on NationalSocialism by mainstream sources.
 
I think it's completely irrelevant.

Why don't you let the media dogs have at themselves debating semantics?
 
I read that entire thing what a joke, oy vey 6 kabillion was the undertone. National Socialism wasn’t exactly facist. Fascism was just a less efficient and less race/people oriented version of NS which is the reason it failed in Italy.
 
Necrorifter said:
This article says that Hitler is not of National Socialism as he believed that they will destroyed the nation but rather that he is of Fascism but balance so the worker and the elite are of equal and the state will only get involved in if the two classes start to put personal interests above the interests of the nation.

https://www.vox.com/2019/3/27/18283879/nazism-socialism-hitler-gop-brooks-gohmert

dude vox lol
 
I said something quite a while ago which someone else either confirmed 100% or half-agreed with - and that was that, generally, Fascism is National Socialism but without the element of Spiritual Satanism. What I didn't say, which I am asking now, is that I think Mussolini was a Fascist, meaning he didn't know about or believe or invest in Spiritual Satanism. (I am not very well-versed in politics.) Staying on-trend with what I just said in another thread - National Socialism and Spiritual Satanism go hand-in-hand, or hand-in-glove, with each other; and in this case, these two do go off into the sunset together, in reality, in a nice way.
 
Necrorifter said:
This article says that Hitler is not of National Socialism as he believed that they will destroyed the nation but rather that he is of Fascism but balance so the worker and the elite are of equal and the state will only get involved in if the two classes start to put personal interests above the interests of the nation.

https://www.vox.com/2019/3/27/18283879/nazism-socialism-hitler-gop-brooks-gohmert

The Article does not say this. What the Article says, is Hitler was National Socialist, and that he wasn't Socialist. That he believed Socialism was Marxism--Which is true.

Socialism, is essentially Communism. National Socialism, equates more too Facism. Although, Hitler was not a complete fan of that, either.
 
Thanks for all that information guys, I too have my doubts otherwise the whole joy of the satan community shouldn't have claim as national socialism in the first place. and besides there was so much mainstream media that I don't even know which one is mainstream or which one is actually small local media...
 
People commenting here actually didn't look through this post of Vox. Im not saying this to insult anyone but understanding and dissecting an enemies argument requires you to actually go through them. And people don't have patience nowadays which is understandable considering the massive amount of disinformation out there.

You have to look at why someone is saying something i.e, who are they appealing to and what is their objective. The article linked here is from a far left website that is trying to counter the absurd republican conservative claim that Hitler was a socialist and thus WW2 was a war against God Capitalists (Americans and Britishers) against Socialists (Nazi Germany.)

1)The Republicans are trying to associate Adolf Hitler with Socialist Bernie Sanders and appeal to the mass anti socialist sentiment that is ingrained in the americans hearts. Obviously Vox being an far left website is appealing to literal communists and socialists who do not want to be associated with Adolf Hitler.

2)The article also appeals to the anti capitalist sentiment marxists and socialists have that by disproving Adolf Hitler was not a socialist and was infact a Capitalist they can achieve their objective of labelling Capitalism as evil.

What all of these means and if you know WW2 history is that even if the purpose of the article is malignant, the argumentation given in the Article is 100% correct. ADOLF HITLER WAS NOT A SOCIALIST. He hated socialism and had the marxist socialists in his party executed. And also Adlof Hitler was not a Capitalist. He was also not A fascist as in National Socialism wasn't Fascism but had elements of it.And he was certainly not evil.

Adolf Hitler was a National Socialist because these Germans had a very different and original view of Socialism DISTINCT from Marxists and Marxist Socialists. WW2 was started against Adolf Hitler and the nazis by evil jewish psychopaths who were having heart attacks and migranes with hitler liberating germany from jewish financial slavery, political control and cultural degenarcy. I'll link an actual communists video who is against national socailism and explains why it is different from Socilaism,Its called Prussian Socialism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITBJ0K-9aas
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top