Joy Of Satan Forums

TopoftheAbyss wrote:

Stormblood wrote:There is no issue for White subraces to live together out of necessity. The only thing subraces should care about is to preserve Nordic lineages. Translated: Nordic and other subraces can live together, but they should let the Nordics have children among themselves instead of having children with them. That's because more Nordic bodies are needed for people to reincarnate.

The ideal would be if all White subraces could live in the part of Europe that is most attuned to their genetics, which means a compatible climate and compatible local food. This is not possible yet, so there's point discussing it.

Also the Celtic subrace. There are less redheaded people than blondes.

I love redheads.

Stormblood wrote:

Inflorescentia wrote:

Stormblood wrote:
Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French and Romanian are the Neo-Latin/Romance languages and they didn't exist before the fall of the Roman Empire. Get your facts straight. Italian is a very young language. The Old French variant of the French language didn't even exist before the 8th century CE. Spanish in the 9th century CE. Romanian around the 10th century BCE. Portuguese is a little older, depending on whether you consider the first appearance of written documents or the spoken language. Old Portuguese was also known as Galician-Portuguese. Italian didn't appear until much, much later, coming from post-Latin languages now considered dialects, especially from Tuscanian. Still, after the fall of the Roman empire and successive invasions of Germanic tribes. These languages all come from Latin mixed either with some remnants of the original pre-Roman language and/or with the Germanic language of the invading tribes.

A simple research, instead of useless far-fetched preconceptions, would've given you many answers.

That's the accepted paradigm. However, the Roma Madre theory is often defeated by empirical data and often-ignored linguistic research. I am confident that Spanish and Romanian are not derived from Latin, and if you were to study how languages form, you will realize that the concept of a language transforming into another makes absolutely no sense. At best, a language can derive neologisms and borrow expressions, but it will never change its grammatical structure and nuances as a result from foreign exposure, let alone one from a hostile invader, like the Roman Empire.

A language is either adopted or forms naturally. It is never spliced so violently as you seem to think.

I speak Spanish and I understand a little Romanian because a relative of mine is married to a Romanian woman and we would meet often, would also hear her speak to the phone. Her sister is good at reading cards but they're not gypsies of course, like many Italians think. Italian, Spanish, Romanian and Portuguese are very similar to Latin. Why? Because they were developed from it and other local languages. The Roman Empire was warlike but was also disciplined and wasn't much hostile before the Flavians started ruining it and its customs. The goal of the Imperium was to recreate the global Vedic Empire of old, because up to a certain point the priests kings, the senators and the emperors knew we all came from the same Satanic culture, and so did the population.

Italians, Spaniards, French, and Romanians can easily learn to speak the other three languages, but all have a hard time learning Latin. Now, I know that it's a dead language, and that immersion plays a big role the learning process, but the truth is that Latin's structure is fundamentally different when compared to the surviving Romance Languages. It carries a different taxis, so it would be a miracle if it managed to influence four other languages, all of which are unitary in structure between themselves and different to Latin at the same time.

If you sepak Spanish, I would recommend you check out Carme Jiménez Huertas' work.

Stormblood wrote:There is no issue for White subraces to live together out of necessity. The only thing subraces should care about is to preserve Nordic lineages. Translated: Nordic and other subraces can live together, but they should let the Nordics have children among themselves instead of having children with them. That's because more Nordic bodies are needed for people to reincarnate.

The ideal would be if all White subraces could live in the part of Europe that is most attuned to their genetics, which means a compatible climate and compatible local food. This is not possible yet, so there's point discussing it.

this is absolutely true.
It has also been said by the hp.
@ ahaha666
I agree with everything you said, except the part where you said that we didn't do any good, and that we don't have good industry.
The automotive industry is the most luxurious in the world, especially Italy is an excellence in craftsmanship, art, music and food.
For the rest I totally agree with you

Cfecit wrote:.....

I agree with you, my brother.
I was just trying to help, because it looks like you may have been more harsh than you had to be. But I understand why to be harsh sometimes, and sometimes I need to be that way also.

Inflorescentia wrote: Italians, Spaniards, French, and Romanians can easily learn to speak the other three languages, but all have a hard time learning Latin.

That actually depends on one's aptitude for languages. Some terms may sound similar but, if someone doesn't have an aptitude for languages, they will always find it difficult to learn other languages. Slightly less difficult when it comes to languages belonging to the same branch, of course. Linguistic aptitude is given mostly by favourable Mercury/Jupiter aspects and Mercury in Sagittarius, but also by a prominent Sagittarius and/or a prominent 9th house.

In Italian school, some high school types have a curriculum geared exclusively to university prep. Two of these, the one with classical curriculum and the one with a scientific curriculum, have Latin as a language from the first year to the fifth. In Italy we have up to 13 years of compulsory high school (with a mininum of 11 when you complete secondary education in a technical, vocational or professional school). In these schools where Latin it's taught, they don't even teach you how to speak the language, but only the extensive grammar needed for translations (all 5 years) and latin literature from the third year. (In classical curriculums there is also Ancient Greek.)

The thing is Latin is actually phonetically similar to all of these languages and those of us who have studied in high school (sometimes even as early as middle school as an extracurricular project) always cringe at the ridiculous anglicised pronunciations we hear from some occult-related American tv shows and films. I personally cringe every time I hear from American colleges how they pronounce "alumni" as if the final 'i' was a letter of the English alphabet and how they use the word as a singular noun, when it's in fact a plural noun.

In the last couple of years, I've also had conversations with American Spiritual Satanists (unsurprisingly), who think cases are irrelevant and they can just twist the words however they see fit and it won't change the meaning (it's real in their minds, I guess). So, for example, "Nox draconis" and "Draco noctis" would mean the exact same thing, as if Latin had such a vague grammar as English has. Some others also proposed how it is irrelevant what it really means and it's okay to butcher Latin because "it's dead language that doesn't matter and it's only used to sound cool."

Inflorescentia wrote:If you sepak Spanish, I would recommend you check out Carme Jiménez Huertas' work.

I may read some articles of her on how "we don't come from Latin" in the future, but for now I have other priorities. Thanks for the suggestion.

Stormblood wrote:

Very accurate.