Joy Of Satan Forums

I have read from Tamil pandits that Tamil is the original language however I have also heard the opposite. It seems that both are different variations of each other.

What are peoples opinions, it also seems all the important texts are in Tamil. The Muslim's never got that far.

I remember a while back and it was mentioned perhaps it might have been you Mageson. Whomever it was stated "Tamil original language before Sanskirt" is the "We wuz kangz mentality".

I'm not trying to simply say a joke but perhaps there might have been some truth to such message. Or another possibility perhaps Tamil popped up with the Gods around teaching different Kaballahs and Yantra-Mantras for a more diverse world through national identity.

Or perhaps the Gods just employed multiple languages and saw perfect places to develop such. Rather than a strict global only language.

Could even be a racial/sub-racial thing just a possible interpretation.

Sanskrit and Tamil are complementary to each other. Almost all original sanskrit texts were burnt by muslims so there was some hope there of finding some concrete links,if we had those texts i.e.

https://www.myindiamyglory.com/2017/09/ ... oks-burnt/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwmJQBQP4lA

Theres this professor who could provide some info,and some other informative discussions ,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3D9_F83Gus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0KMXbtoTcg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpML4ZLuxRw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enfZZvQ5AB4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8OTfay7a2I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvdNckoR4WQ

A lot more info on this channel (long videos and presentations),
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaUSUD ... o0w/videos

An informative book,
http://booksdescr.org/item/index.php?md ... 12E874FB02

All of confusion stems from Academic Hinduphobia(Pagan phobia) of the jews who're translating and interpreting such texts like Wendy Doniger and Sheldon Pollock . Theyre misguiding the readers into believing something the text does not mean,mistranslating it or outright lying in some cases. I hope you find something interesting in the swadeshi indology source i provided ,HPMageson.

The theory that seems to be real is that Tamil and Sanskrit are both from the same previous culture the Lemurian one. Agastya is credit with the Tamil language a Vedic Rishi. It also seems Murugan is credit with the Tamil language as well. I notice a lot of the Siddha's come from Sri Lanka, Southern India, after the Islamic invasion and many fled to the south from the north. Sanskrit of today is written in the Urdu script due to the influence of the Islamic Mogul's.

HP Mageson666 wrote:The theory that seems to be real is that Tamil and Sanskrit are both from the same previous culture the Lemurian one. Agastya is credit with the Tamil language a Vedic Rishi. It also seems Murugan is credit with the Tamil language as well. I notice a lot of the Siddha's come from Sri Lanka, Southern India, after the Islamic invasion and many fled to the south from the north. Sanskrit of today is written in the Urdu script due to the influence of the Islamic Mogul's.

Yes there is old Sanskrit and new Sanskrit with different letters. In old Sanskrit many of the words are exactly the same as other indo European languages but in new Sanskrit these are not in the other indo European languages. For example the Sanskrit nach meaning night equals German nacht meaning night. In new Sanskrit its replaced by ratri which is not found in any other indo European language. However the chakra sounds and the mantras and legit from old.

Jack wrote:Old Sanskrit

Very intriguing...so New Sanskirt perhaps a switch-a-roo situation?

By the enemy like changing Ancient Greek to Modern Greek?

So-called "Evolution of language".

Jack wrote:new Sanskrit with different letters.

Are you implying that New Sanskirt as Yantras have lesser potency or altogether incorrect making the Yantra property pointless?

(Like for example Surya vibration is legit; but what about Surya letter used as a Yantra in the center of your body?)

Damn shame how things where changed simply by Pislam.

Would it be fair to assume that the enemies of India tried to kinda remove the European out of Indo-European(Aryan) and sorta break the link back to the Original Holy lands of mankind.

Interesting, I note in the translation of a Tamil book which is supposed to be five thousand years old. The Gaum is given as the mantra for the head. The whole book is based mainly on spiritual practices. The mantra's within are the same mainstream Vedic mantra's.

Jack wrote:

HP Mageson666 wrote:The theory that seems to be real is that Tamil and Sanskrit are both from the same previous culture the Lemurian one. Agastya is credit with the Tamil language a Vedic Rishi. It also seems Murugan is credit with the Tamil language as well. I notice a lot of the Siddha's come from Sri Lanka, Southern India, after the Islamic invasion and many fled to the south from the north. Sanskrit of today is written in the Urdu script due to the influence of the Islamic Mogul's.

Yes there is old Sanskrit and new Sanskrit with different letters. In old Sanskrit many of the words are exactly the same as other indo European languages but in new Sanskrit these are not in the other indo European languages. For example the Sanskrit nach meaning night equals German nacht meaning night. In new Sanskrit its replaced by ratri which is not found in any other indo European language. However the chakra sounds and the mantras and legit from old.

HP Mageson666 wrote:Interesting, I note in the translation of a Tamil book which is supposed to be five thousand years old. The Gaum is given as the mantra for the head. The whole book is based mainly on spiritual practices. The mantra's within are the same mainstream Vedic mantra's.

Jack wrote:

HP Mageson666 wrote:The theory that seems to be real is that Tamil and Sanskrit are both from the same previous culture the Lemurian one. Agastya is credit with the Tamil language a Vedic Rishi. It also seems Murugan is credit with the Tamil language as well. I notice a lot of the Siddha's come from Sri Lanka, Southern India, after the Islamic invasion and many fled to the south from the north. Sanskrit of today is written in the Urdu script due to the influence of the Islamic Mogul's.

Yes there is old Sanskrit and new Sanskrit with different letters. In old Sanskrit many of the words are exactly the same as other indo European languages but in new Sanskrit these are not in the other indo European languages. For example the Sanskrit nach meaning night equals German nacht meaning night. In new Sanskrit its replaced by ratri which is not found in any other indo European language. However the chakra sounds and the mantras and legit from old.

The spiritual practices have been passed on in a linear fashion except those that have vaishnava influence and we can pretty Much see this when they espouse ideology which was previously not there.

What is your opinion on the Nama Shivaya, mantra?

HP Mageson666 wrote:What is your opinion on the Nama Shivaya, mantra?

I have had success Aum Shiv Bhairavaya Nama" mantra. The BBB stimulates the crown and you can feel the energy. The mantra acts on the sixth and crown like Satanama. Generally it acts on the Sixth and crown.

I've also noticed the shhh acts and stimulates the base chakra sometimes and it feels pretty awesome there.

Like Shhh acts on the base, eeee acts on like a ascending current upwards through the chakras, Vvvv acts on the pineal and sixth chakra and Ahhh acts on the heart chakra. Then Bbbb acts on the crown ahhh acts on the heart rrrr acts on the solar ahh again on heart,vvv again on the sixth and pineal. I broke it down after feeling it some times to deduce where the sounds are being targeted.

What are your thoughts on the Gayatri mantra?

I note it is among the most popular mantras in the Vedas. If not THE most popular mantra. It is said to contain the vibration of the entire vedas. I have tried it before and was directed to it by a Guardian that stated it would cause greater influences in my direct environment.

Needless to say, I haven't practiced it since due to time constraints and other pressing workings, but I will get back to it soon.

Braun666 wrote:What are your thoughts on the Gayatri mantra?

I note it is among the most popular mantras in the Vedas. If not THE most popular mantra. It is said to contain the vibration of the entire vedas. I have tried it before and was directed to it by a Guardian that stated it would cause greater influences in my direct environment.

Needless to say, I haven't practiced it since due to time constraints and other pressing workings, but I will get back to it soon.

I don't know since I never did it constantly.