curio
New member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2018
- Messages
- 252
I appreciate that you shared a conflicting view in a thread that seemed to be so unanimously in favor of Caesar. I'd hate to see what the world would be like if there weren't anybody willing to openly question the narrative and popular opinion. Since my last post, I can see that it seems like I'm president of Caesar's fan club or something, but that can't possibly be true, because that title belongs to Zola.Savitar said:I really enjoyed reading this and appriciate your input, vast knowledge of history, mine is nowhere near yours, however I thought It's worth mentioning,that there are (pro-white) sources stating Caesar was on the jewish side - since this thread become a bit too subjective on Iulius O think. The one mentioned (Ben Klassen) is also referenced by HP Mageson.
As for Republics: Republic is not Democracy.
I believe It's much harder to subvert a Republic where power is not overly centralized like in Monarchies, where you can subvert the whole empire by controlling only a few people. When my Ideal Republic is a National Socialist one, the same what the American Founding Fathers envisioned: A Society led by the best (true aristoracts) and leadership is based on meritocracy rather than family history/prestige/privilege.
However, I do admit that I may be a little biased because I like Caesar and Cicero, and I am partial to them and would like to believe that they were, in the grand scheme of things, on our team(kinda like the real Curio in the sense of hoping they could be unified). But this doesn't mean that my mind or my eyes are closed to the truth, which is where my favor ultimately lies.
The problem is that the truth regarding our pagan past can be difficult to find, because so much knowledge and information has been lost thanks to the jewish takeover, and whatever did survive was in all likelihood corrupted, especially accounts by the historians of the period, and memoirs for example can be unreliable even when they're unadulterated because it is inherently biased to the author's motives and perspectives. It takes extensive research and a keen, intuitive eye to be able to figure out how things really were, especially in the ancient world.
Now, I admit that I don't know everything there is to know about this period, but from what I know at the moment, a case can be made against Caesar from his dealings with Clodius. This post is already getting to be very long and I'm going to resist the temptation to give another lecture on this for now, but I'm going to look into the period a little more and see if I can get a clearer picture of what's going on and figure out who Caesar's allegiance really lies with(other than himself). I'm not familiar with Klassen's works or which ones cover Rome, but I'll keep him in mind going forward. Thanks.