Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Welcome to Our New Forums

  • Our forums have been upgraded! You can read about this HERE

Beyond The "Political" & Banks, Banking and Jews

Hp. Hoodedcobra666

Administrative High Priest
Staff member
Joined
Sep 19, 2017
Messages
11,058
Website
joyofsatan.org
Elas Qilar said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Elas Qilar said:
Is money acquired (and then donated) through investiments/assets moral?

Yes, absolutely, it's borne out of intelligence and foresight. This proves proficiency for a person, and generosity towards what is right.

This seems weird to me. Weren't the national socialists against speculative income (income without work) as they end up strengthening even more the (((financial elites))) at the top? Aren't some of the RTRs against it somehow (e.g. Terminating Jewish Financial Control)?

We are way more than a political party here. We are not the political party of a country or something like this.

We just mention that a certain political party has followed certain eternal Truths that are incumbent in the beliefs that our Gods have created, or at least, did their best to try this. And they clearly did that as proven by history.

If they had not done this, we would not care for them. As one can see, we espouse no party and speak of none right now. Great politicians of the past are also honored in JoS. But we aren't exactly trying to enforce the lines of George Washington in our present day life politically.

It is rare to derive any ethics from politics, as politics in general preoccupy themselves with brutal realities of life such as corruption, dangerous things, necessity and so on. Regardless, few skilled and gifted politicians were able to play this role and also not allow themselves to sink in the sinkhole.

They were not the first or the last politicians to do this, but the situation, especially with the enemy as a rule for this planet, is extremely rare and almost non-existent.

National Socialists do constitute one part of our recent history that is worthwhile of admiration and considers an eventful part of our history, with it's rights, glories and challenges of the time.

Previous Empires, kings and conquerors have done this, or have not done this and reaped the consequences. To not do this, generally ends up in disaster.

Political policies are adjusted based on the Eternal Truths explained in the Aryan Religious roots that are common to Gentiles worldwide and then affirmed downwards to address the needs that arise out of a spacetime in a Nation or the world and above all the people living there.

If Hitler or anyone like this came back now, their movement would be different, but abide by the core teachings. From there on, one expands and formulates according to the needs of a time, era and century.

The National Socialists were in 1925 to 1945. We are closely 100 years later, the economy and life has reformed itself completely. Most of the charter in National Socialism was written to address the problems of the time, and then the eternal things that would stand the test of time. Policies change with time and influenced by everything in society.

Hitler as a politician inherited a land with specific problems, almost ruined, that was being bled dry by endless speculation, besieged by wars, faced with demographic demise as a result, and other imbalances. He made sure to even these out and revive the Nation fiscally and economically, in the world's greatest political miracle of the time. And also, at nobody else's expense financially.

Warren Buffet is a financial elite, but nor a jew, nor evil. There are many other Financial Elites, who are not evil people or necessarily do more harm than good, and quite a few, do from a management or general perspective, way more good than harm.

Then you have others who are trash. People like this arise in complex civilizations and economies normally as money and wealth managers, and they have a purpose in life and that is a very important aspect of a civilization. In Ancient times, to verify that the people involved in this practice would not be scammers and criminals, they were generally priests or others who were ethically inclined and intelligent for this work.

Clearly maintenance of the balance sheet or value in a Nation is important and the same goes for people. As most people have no clue what to do with any of this, trusting other people for their finances such as one trusts doctors for their health, is not a bad idea. I repeat also, that these people existed in the past and they exist today.

Going into the subject of Banks, Banking and so on, these institutions are copies from Gentile institutions that were wealth management institutions. The jews did not invent these as many conspiracy theorists claim.

The above was also related to more lies about jews, such as that money is evil, and they also added the other falsehood that "meditation is of the Devil" and in particular that every occult practice is "evil", such as people who call Jews "magicians" and other things like this claim.

In all of the cases of these liars, they position themselves as Christians, ie, they preach as good and moral a state of affairs that was made by the jews. Christianity for example, preaches disregard about wealth and material posessions, and kumbaya, and how Jews must be the wealth controllers of your Nation because they are evil and how you must remain "Good" by not engaging in the evil practices.

The same method is done in meditation and spirituality, which many idiot conspiracy theorists call "Of the devil" and they do exactly what the jews want: They never meditate or spiritually advance, and also, on top of it, think that they are "Good" because of this.

Going back to the wealth makers and financial maintainers, and fiscal managers, these are all parts of normal work and life routes that have to do with advanced civilization. They held financial control and management of many civilizations.

The favorite example here is when idiots say Babylonians were evil for having these institutions, but if they did not, they would not have created a single hut, let alone any advanced civilization. They know half the Truth and they say even less, and the reality is that this is not true. Therefore I say the factual reality here so that everyone can understand it.

Out of this caste of people, there arose through infiltration a caste of parasites as the jews got in, and like they hijack doctor positions or other places where seldom any care is given in the patients, so did they slowly hijack the fiscal control positions of Nations and people's to eventually subvert them, instead of producing good financial management for the people's future.

It is known historically that the jews destroyed empires through:

1. Instating bad fiscal policies
2. Stealing wealth from the backdoor
3. Ill advisory to kings or presidents, leading to bankruptcy, and oftentimes a bankruptcy through which they profited and caused on purpose.

The above is the history of the Middle Ages. Yet, before Christianity and Islam outlawed these people from existing, these people, like doctors, engineers, music makes, were part of society in the fiscal area of life.

Through the outlawing of this for Christians and Islamics and calling it a "sin that will send you in hell", and in particular, how both these two cults specifically say JEWS need to be put in control of the fiscal matters of Nations and States, and take the Wealth of the people, then Gentiles remained helpless against the financial assaults and control of the jews.

Rabbi Jeboo who reacts against the "Pharisees", these "Pharisees" in Israel also existed as a job elsewhere, and were called Money lenders. These people handled wealth, gave out loans, and generally did wealth management services. The profession itself at the core, was part of Babylonian, Egyptian, Greek and other origins.

Loans originally started as bankrupt people who did mistakes or got theft happen to them, went to the Temples [who functioned like banks back then] to ask for loans. Then through labor they had to repay the loans. Among these the temples also gave other services, such as management and storage services for wealth and so on.

This was done with serious oaths to the Gods, and theft, perjury, and ruin, was punishable by death, imprisonment and so on. It was seen as a huge responsibility. They were supposed also to provide other fiscal services, such as doing taxes collection and so on.

As jews saw how much influence and power these people had, they took a position not only without being fit for it, but with the racial purpose to steal the wealth of the non-jews to establish Israel and with other nefarious planning in mind.

As one can understand, instead of them helping with stability, growth, or even taking risks to an extent, they generally just focus on theft and other practices which ruin people.

The same replacement happened with Politicians and other integral parts of society, like scientists or university teachers, noble families, financial elites and so on.

Certain people can be Financial Elites, but not be spiritual elites or elites of a kind heart and soul, or even be criminal animals. The closer one is with the enemy and in appreciation of their system, these evil "elites" will be created as a consequence of their evil. And these ruin the world.

In these categories, the jews have infested and mentally infected the majority of these people, who regularly exist in every civilization either through ability or through increased intelligence, which produces "elites". This could be financially, in universities, in knowledge, or in politics.

They transform them into fools and per-occupy them with stupid things. Some are fools from birth, and some very intelligent. There is no singular point here.

Income without "work" is relative, as even in working in stock markets and so on, one is still working, studying and making research. The lack of "labor", is compensated by the risks one takes, which is what one exchanges for this type of "less labor" work, but the rising "risk" which can be very costly.

Non traditional types of work and "labor" exist today more than ever. Albeit we have a confused economy, this is the result of greatly enlarged economies. They become more complex and more weird.

The National Socialists are a party that that was active within the very specific time spectrum, and for a brief time, and under specific circumstances of social, political, production, financial realities of the time.

Now, times have changed very much, and the world is also moving towards modes of production, development and fiscal management that are influenced by technology, remote work, and all sorts of other complexities that did not exist back then. If they existed, they would have adapted.

A basic example here is that if we found robots that would do the field work, then it is very high likely the work and life in the field would change and with it, the basic underlying structure of what one is pro or against. How has the tractor for example, influenced our labor? It clearly made labor able by fewer. How about automatic farming? Well, that requires work and "labor" too, and hours and management, but the means have changed, and therefore, the reality on this.

In Hitler's time, it was decided that a good time to work for people should never exceed 8 hours, as a general law. One could still decide overtime. But inhumane conditions like 14 hours per day, were forbidden. Now, many people worldwide [if we actually progress in Aquarius] might slowly be able to do less time at work, might even go down to 4, five times per week for a good salary.

Then, there are people like me, who enjoy to work and spend time on what they work at for 8 or 12 hours on the daily, sometimes, two days straight, and I do not consider it "humane" for anyone to stop me.

The basic realities always remain. Even stock brokers and others who are not total crooks, and economists, or even what we call "speculators", give a great amount of forethought, intelligence, planning and engage in other forms of indirect work that is not "traditional labor" to bear fruits.

The invention of the car, for example, does challenge many decisions such as for working or not "working". If a car was produced once upon a time, does the creator of it count as a person who is not "laboring"? Clearly, not. They have labored and the car is still there. Do they need to be paid? It should be clear, that yes.

Reality is a bit more complex than just a single law. We go by the time and developments.

The problem is that the same mechanism can be misused by the likes of the jews to cause speculations, crashes and so on. The fact jews use this on the negative does not make something evil in it's entirety, anymore than jews using meditation does not make it evil.

Stock markets and similar practices existed in the past, and are part of a quasi predictive process that is also related to luck, but also foresight. The situation of investments is also normal. People invest in things all the time, whether they know it or not. There are risks involved etc.

Even the manipulation of such was after the jews learned from the Babylonians, who were conducting trade and other "banking services" like most Ancient Civilizations did. Then Jews made the "Banks" who were institutions that had no spiritual and no ethical compass, just to take away the people's wealth.

The basis for this institution was not discovered by the jews, but they were discovered by Ancient Civilizations which as I explained had wealth managers, such as the popular movies where Pharaohs have had viziers and other people to make decisions in financial growth and management of a city, empire or even household. These were not evil, just institutions.

Jews and most specifically the jewish dogma, can take anything that is good and useful, or at least not that bad, and turn it into a weapon of destruction because they believe in hateful beliefs.

Lastly, the Rituals do work in the smartest and best way to achieve the affirmations there. Whether or not this will happen through social changes, or changes in fiscal structure of the world, or what other forms it will bring, are up to the Gods, humanity, our decisions, and the knowledge of the universe which manifests things.

-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666
 
Excellent article. The jews have nothing of their own. Disgusting creatures. They rant and rave about how they have given so much to the world, yet they just steal and pretend something is theirs.

Fractional Reserve lending has totally corrupted banking and made it a jewish thing. They just lend people's money without their permission to other people and charge an interest on it, creating free money for themselves out of thin air.

May the wrath of Satan and every Demon in Hell be poured on these blood sucking parasites.
 
Priests were also held very accountable by the gods as everyone knew they had to be moral and do what was best for the people being a self serving asshole landed you into quite the shake down when you died and that's a nice way of putting it.
 
I don't believe the jewish bible crap, were it says jews were slaves in Egypt, but I'm wondering if the jews had some forms of dept, in those days an when it came time to pay they would yell persecution (reeeeeeeeeeee wes chosen bye godses goyims you can't make us work reeeeeeeeeeee)I'm sure lots of gullible idiots helped the jews an got screwed over.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Elas Qilar said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Yes, absolutely, it's borne out of intelligence and foresight. This proves proficiency for a person, and generosity towards what is right.

This seems weird to me. Weren't the national socialists against speculative income (income without work) as they end up strengthening even more the (((financial elites))) at the top? Aren't some of the RTRs against it somehow (e.g. Terminating Jewish Financial Control)?


-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666

first of all this topic is invaluable.
when people think about what it means to advance, besides having siddhis etc, they should ask themselves: What does a spiritually and mentally advanced man think about such a complicated subject?

the way you "see" things is fantastic, and it is a great source of inspiration for me. You are able to treat every topic in a true satanic perspective, that is, as much as possible to what is the truth, I don't know how many realize how special this is.

however my little contribution on this topic is this.

in my country, Italy, there are many micro-enterprises, much more than in the rest of europe, the enemy's plan is to destroy them and replace them with large companies, in which instead of human relations, there is a tablet with a program above that evaluates your work, if you meet the standards you are maintained if you are below the standards even for serious emergencies etc. you are cut off and replaced.

the point is that I have known many people who are employees who hate entrepreneurs.

the communist doctrine has instilled in these people the hatred of the entrepreneur.

this does not make sense I know many small business owners and shopkeepers who earn less than those who have an employee job, but there is this dogma that these communists hate entrepreneurs.

instead, many entrepreneurs are committed to CREATING and employing these people.

one of the things that makes me proudest in life is to have created companies that employ people and to be able to CREATE something.

as far as top-level entrepreneurs are concerned, I don't hate jeff bezos, on the contrary, it employs many people, only when companies are so large they tend to consider people as numbers.

to give an example if one day one of my employees works at 50 percent of his ability, I know why he does it, for example he could be partially injured etc., and therefore I can UNDERSTAND it.

Instead, according to Amazon's logic, at least in Italy, if you are at work and that day your arm hurts but you can still work, the program that evaluates your performance will not be interested, and will only see that you worked badly that day.
 
This has always been an interesting topic for me. People say banks are evil and should be destroyed, put out of business, to which I say but where would you be without them?

Save up and pay for a house in cash? A mortgage helps you buy a house with a smaller amount of money which you would probably have a lot of difficulty doing without one.

Same with cars.

Or how about those with a viable business idea? Bank loans helps businesses grow when used wisely. Raising capital through selling stock for your company is usually done through investment banks. So where would society be if we didn’t have lenders? Certainly not a world where we emerged from caves. We’d still be living in them or in pretty crappy situations and conditions.

So banks in general are not inherently bad, but like magic capital is a neutral tool that can be used for good and for evil. The adage is not that money is the root of all evil but the “love” of money is, in other words greed…but even greed is a motivator to some extent. People want to become rich and is there anything wrong with that if it’s done honestly and ethically? Aren’t we supposed to better ourselves?

Capital is also power, You can’t accomplish much without it. Capital is clout and those who are honest businesspeople do get respect for the most part. They only reap the opposite by those who are parasites wanting something for nothing. (Insert Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged concepts here.)

And then there is old age. Social Security isn’t going to cut it and unless you have substantial assets you’ll die in a nursing home with substandard care (if you are lucky without the cash….unlucky and you’re in a gutter dying in the rain), while if you have capital you can extend your life. In fact, capital allows you to buy better food as opposed to crap like McDonalds, and better medical care. You can do more, live more, buld a legacy with capital. The opposite would be a much lower quality of life.

I, for one, lived a Xtian life of poverty and it never got me anywhere. It wasn’t until I seeked the help of the old Gods, even Satan that I understood through study and conversation with them that many people simply do not understand finances and are shackled by Abrahamic ideas of money. I had to scrap all my preconceived ideas and learn to love money just to survive and then to build some kind of legacy.

As far as the JOS goes, imagine all that could he done with sufficient funding, a war chest to wage war against a jewish machine that has no qualms at all about wealth and using it for power. I say we need to do the same thing. Eventually investments can be made so they self perpetuate. Imagine getting in at 6 cents for Bitcoin and what you could do today with that. Or simply good investments that pay excellent dividends so you have a constant stream of money coming in. The freedom that would give to the JOS priest(esses) would be enormous.

Jews use their magic AND capital to wage war. We should do the same thing, use both.

Money and banks aren’t inherently evil, but the purpose and energy using them can be…..or you can change your thinking and grow your assets and use them for a worthwhile cause, not to mention being satisfied and living a really good life in which you can do more for the cause.

This just sounds correctly Satanic to me.
 
It is going to be known worldwide? That the Jews have been responsible for stealing from the pagan people and other tribes throughout the centuries!? And have the people forgotten this? It is being revealed more and more every day.. Jews are even exposing each other as it is. And reminisce on there workings, they admitted!. And even the Christians are aware of it, along with their Bible and what they read out of it. And even they are being exposed more and more everyday. Among all of their other evil Deeds that they have done throughout the centuries! The dates clear back... is there a possibility we can send flies to Israel?...and make the fish 🐟 of their Waters stink? And do the same thing? to Israel.. that they have done to ancient Egypt and the Egyptian Empire .. ? 🤔😁🔥🔥🔥 and how would they like it? If they got all of their precious stuff stolen from them! And had Israel destroyed just the same?...And that time is coming !☆⚡Hail Satan!!!
 
But isn't it so that this kind of work doesn't bring any benefit to market participants, and that's the point?

The thought of this topic also followed me for some time and continues to return, because let's imagine a market in which there is an exchange of goods and services between participants.

Someone produces a product, someone performs a service. What service does the speculator/investor perform? No one has any use of his work, and he only gains wealth and then benefits from the needed goods and services produced by others, without giving anything from himself in return. Does it matter that he does the work when none of the other participants in the exchange have any benefit from it?

Let's imagine that money does not exist and we have to exchange goods or services directly. What does an investor have to offer for the exchange for really necessary products for living? In fact, he has nothing useful to offer the rest, but only consumes the results of their work. Isn't it what the National Socialists meant?
 
Chain_Breaker said:
...

Someone produces a product, someone performs a service. What service does the speculator/investor perform? No one has any use of his work, and he only gains wealth and then benefits from the needed goods and services produced by others, without giving anything from himself in return. Does it matter that he does the work when none of the other participants in the exchange have any benefit from it?

Let's imagine that money does not exist and we have to exchange goods or services directly. What does an investor have to offer for the exchange for really necessary products for living? In fact, he has nothing useful to offer the rest, but only consumes the results of their work. Isn't it what the National Socialists meant?

The investor and the speculator are two different things, although they take a similar venue of acting. The speculator looks to gain profit from trading, their agenda could be any.

The existence of speculators or gamblers or anything of the sort, is always a grey area. They can act in criminal ways towards a society, but this again depends on how these things go. In certain cases this is done by extensive deception etc, and is not dissimilar to theft.

In other cases, this can be simply because people out of their free will started betting or "speculating", and therefore some lose and some win. This can happen in a pave-walk, or in the stock-market.

From the investor, everyone has benefit, and the investor assumes risk and enters his capital into unforeseen circumstances which might or might not come into fruition, but their capital might be necessary to expand something.

It is a lie that intermediaries do not offer a service, because if that were the case, they would not exist, and they do exist to handle all the menial and other forms of tasks that are incumbent in transfer of wealth or value, or things that prove this value.

The intermediaries in the past and even currently do profit by taking care of laws, regulations, acting as a means of transfer [or you could send your tomatoes to someone in another empire yourself if you want, or do your paperwork necessary, or assume risk, etc]. Intermediaries have their own value in anything.

Accumulation of wealth and the power it indirectly represents, is put into something, which empowers it by raising it's value, and then this value can be used in anyway there is. Accumulation happens because not everyone wants to save anything at once or use their rights to specific things at once.

The above has to do with free will, and also necessity of life. If someone cuts a ton of wood, it's not for certain someone else will want to get it. There might be no replacement service for now. Or someone else may buy to store it, and plans to use it in 5 years, not immediately.

Only in neolithic societies does "moneyless" situation exist and even there, "money" as a value is replaced by other forms of ownership. If there was no "money" as in coins, then it was a form of a bond, or written tablet such as in Babylon. In these tablets, they wrote for example, X cleaned the garden of Z, so Z owes X a future service of ___insert service___. This is a form of what we call a "bond" today.

The above, required workers to do, and keepers to maintain. This is what in Crypto today or in modern finances is actually called a "Ledger".

All other advanced civilizations have to come up with something that we refer to as money to contain value for use at a later date or reflect compound wealth that has manifested itself from previous actions. In the case of Nations, needs arise of doing things NOW, even when this accumulated wealth does not exist, therefore, the inverse happens and money as a future proof of labor is demanded in the form of taxes.

Money cannot not exist, as not everyone has the same needs and desires at every given point, nor there is a strict medium of exchange, nor all needs arise at all points, nor there is certainty that every service will be met by another "equal" service.

I might need a house 10 years from now, and I must somehow have a means to accumulate my own purchasing power by services I gave for 10 years earlier than this, and the medium through which this is done is money or something that holds value, value that can be actualized at a different time.

This is why money exists, to have in itself the different modes, times, and measures of what could be spent.

Additionally, there is a situation where things invented or given do not represent another service that one can recommend. You cannot exchange a tomato for supernal knowledge or the discovery of the automobile or penicillin, evidence tells us it's not the same things.

Therefore, as advancement happens in civilizations, the economy has to extend itself through mediums of wealth storage.

As all of these things fluctuate and change, the job of financial managers is to pay attention to the needs and desires of the market, and decide how to progress in an ever moving world.

For example, the certainty of tomatoes existing now in a place might be questionable or might come under the pressure of a famine. But you need tomatoes now. Then, another place that produces this could care less what you have to offer them in regards to a "service", and would rather want a medium of value to use later. In the past, people used rare metals for this and money.

The situation is anything but simple.

Lastly, one note: Try to see what the jews are doing, versus what the Gentiles are doing or would do. The NS tried to remove jewish influence specifically and stabilize their economy. So they had to do some kicking out of certain elements, until the situation would stabilize.

Kikes ruin everything.
 
Thanks for everything HP!
So the money we have in the bank is safe even if the banks are Jewish?
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:

Thank you for this explanation Cobra. I actually see my donations to JoS as an investment too, and the "return" I see is a brighter future devoid of enemy influence. I also see cryptocurrency miners, that don't just mine and dump, as long term investors. The mine and dump mentality unfortunately is highly encouraged, and serious investors are shunned.

The speculators in crypto tend to do the "pump and dump", kind of like the wall street gamblers. They don't care that most PoS (Proof of Stake) coins are a Piece of Shit, they just want to "win". Most normies too, don't care and just "want something for nothing", so they gamble with the PoS coins and never attempt any meaningful research into crypto.

I do think PoS may have its place as a digital fiat currency in the future due to the very fast transaction rates, kind of like how debit cards work now, but not as an "end of all mining" thing like many of these PoS networks seem to push.
 
Kanye West's accounts have apparently been shut down at JPMorgan Chase Bank for expressing his opinions. Moderate conservative podcast owners have also had their accounts shut down with money seized. Now banking has become increasingly politicized... right after the Convid nonsense.

d6IQCbf.jpg
 
soulfortruth said:
Thanks for everything HP!
So the money we have in the bank is safe even if the banks are Jewish?

Jews have control of banks on the highest levels to a total extent.

I never said anything about safety. I just said about the history of how this occurred, which many people think "banks" got "created" by jews or invented out of thin air.

As with anything else, they represent Gentile institutions and Gentile inventions. Then, they were used as weapons, like anything else jews used to enslave humanity.

Currently they are on a medium level of safety, and they are known to pull the plug on Gentiles same as many other jewish institutions. One must be careful with what they own. Crisis after crisis has been machinated by jews to leave Gentiles in the gutter.

Theoretically speaking, banks have agreements with Nations so that if a bank fails, money is reassured up to an extent for people. But even these are like saltwater. Yet, you can never be too sure with jews.
 
Ursa Minor said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:

Thank you for this explanation Cobra. I actually see my donations to JoS as an investment too, and the "return" I see is a brighter future devoid of enemy influence. I also see cryptocurrency miners, that don't just mine and dump, as long term investors. The mine and dump mentality unfortunately is highly encouraged, and serious investors are shunned.

The speculators in crypto tend to do the "pump and dump", kind of like the wall street gamblers. They don't care that most PoS (Proof of Stake) coins are a Piece of Shit, they just want to "win". Most normies too, don't care and just "want something for nothing", so they gamble with the PoS coins and never attempt any meaningful research into crypto.

I do think PoS may have its place as a digital fiat currency in the future due to the very fast transaction rates, kind of like how debit cards work now, but not as an "end of all mining" thing like many of these PoS networks seem to push.

I agree with what you said. I prefer the concept of Proof-of-Work(PoW) rather than PoS. Some people were like I gotta deposit 200 maybe 250 dollars minimum to PoS new etherium.

PoW would be awesome as it's luck based and anyone can mine for gas fees. I don't mean mining directly the coin. No I mean mining the transaction of a transaction.

Imagine if Smartphones had mining software that does transaction, NOT mining the coin i.e. hashing the crypto coin itself. No PoW Gas-transaction fee. And let some people make money on the side from doing small transactions.

Best of all Bitcoin and other PoW produce luck-based calculation. Even a mega farm of crypto cannot get the gas fee even a crappy computer mining away can luck and poof capture a ledger imprint.

I like the idea of people gaining lucky strikes with mining and making the gas fee to one random person. Who knows maybe they get some money and can purchase something, say 7 dollars of crypto for a transaction.

I'm surprised luck was programmed into Bitcoin originally for such thing. In reality Bitcoin is outdated as hell it's cyberpunk futura concept is interesting. I'm not the biggest cyberpunk fan as usually it delves into nitty gritty dystopian futures with nasty dark, cold cities a.l.a. Bladerunner. But I do respect the DeFi parameters of it.

Even if I personally feel like we need simcrypt. A simulator like a Forex simulator application, program, computer simulator to teach people how to use crypto. I think most people still gimmick around crypto and some people don't know how to really use it confidently enough. Knowing is half the battle. Hell with cashapps and digital currencies even someone pulling out a wallet and paying with cash and coin is considered a hassle for people. I'd like to see training of skills and people simcrypting to teach them how to use crypto, credit cards, cashapps, digital systems, cash, coin etc.etc. sounds silly but people like me like practice especially people who are more timid and shy such as me as well. Add videos and quizes and tests helpful tips etc.etc.

Seems like a good idea and especially to younger people who seem to be getting involved with smartphone, finances and whatnot early on sorta like uber drive or food deliveries or groceries.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Chain_Breaker said:
...

Someone produces a product, someone performs a service. What service does the speculator/investor perform? No one has any use of his work, and he only gains wealth and then benefits from the needed goods and services produced by others, without giving anything from himself in return. Does it matter that he does the work when none of the other participants in the exchange have any benefit from it?

Let's imagine that money does not exist and we have to exchange goods or services directly. What does an investor have to offer for the exchange for really necessary products for living? In fact, he has nothing useful to offer the rest, but only consumes the results of their work. Isn't it what the National Socialists meant?

The investor and the speculator are two different things, although they take a similar venue of acting. The speculator looks to gain profit from trading, their agenda could be any.

The existence of speculators or gamblers or anything of the sort, is always a grey area. They can act in criminal ways towards a society, but this again depends on how these things go. In certain cases this is done by extensive deception etc, and is not dissimilar to theft.

In other cases, this can be simply because people out of their free will started betting or "speculating", and therefore some lose and some win. This can happen in a pave-walk, or in the stock-market.

From the investor, everyone has benefit, and the investor assumes risk and enters his capital into unforeseen circumstances which might or might not come into fruition, but their capital might be necessary to expand something.

It is a lie that intermediaries do not offer a service, because if that were the case, they would not exist, and they do exist to handle all the menial and other forms of tasks that are incumbent in transfer of wealth or value, or things that prove this value.

The intermediaries in the past and even currently do profit by taking care of laws, regulations, acting as a means of transfer [or you could send your tomatoes to someone in another empire yourself if you want, or do your paperwork necessary, or assume risk, etc]. Intermediaries have their own value in anything.

Accumulation of wealth and the power it indirectly represents, is put into something, which empowers it by raising it's value, and then this value can be used in anyway there is. Accumulation happens because not everyone wants to save anything at once or use their rights to specific things at once.

The above has to do with free will, and also necessity of life. If someone cuts a ton of wood, it's not for certain someone else will want to get it. There might be no replacement service for now. Or someone else may buy to store it, and plans to use it in 5 years, not immediately.

Only in neolithic societies does "moneyless" situation exist and even there, "money" as a value is replaced by other forms of ownership. If there was no "money" as in coins, then it was a form of a bond, or written tablet such as in Babylon. In these tablets, they wrote for example, X cleaned the garden of Z, so Z owes X a future service of ___insert service___. This is a form of what we call a "bond" today.

The above, required workers to do, and keepers to maintain. This is what in Crypto today or in modern finances is actually called a "Ledger".

All other advanced civilizations have to come up with something that we refer to as money to contain value for use at a later date or reflect compound wealth that has manifested itself from previous actions. In the case of Nations, needs arise of doing things NOW, even when this accumulated wealth does not exist, therefore, the inverse happens and money as a future proof of labor is demanded in the form of taxes.

Money cannot not exist, as not everyone has the same needs and desires at every given point, nor there is a strict medium of exchange, nor all needs arise at all points, nor there is certainty that every service will be met by another "equal" service.

I might need a house 10 years from now, and I must somehow have a means to accumulate my own purchasing power by services I gave for 10 years earlier than this, and the medium through which this is done is money or something that holds value, value that can be actualized at a different time.

This is why money exists, to have in itself the different modes, times, and measures of what could be spent.

Additionally, there is a situation where things invented or given do not represent another service that one can recommend. You cannot exchange a tomato for supernal knowledge or the discovery of the automobile or penicillin, evidence tells us it's not the same things.

Therefore, as advancement happens in civilizations, the economy has to extend itself through mediums of wealth storage.

As all of these things fluctuate and change, the job of financial managers is to pay attention to the needs and desires of the market, and decide how to progress in an ever moving world.

For example, the certainty of tomatoes existing now in a place might be questionable or might come under the pressure of a famine. But you need tomatoes now. Then, another place that produces this could care less what you have to offer them in regards to a "service", and would rather want a medium of value to use later. In the past, people used rare metals for this and money.

The situation is anything but simple.

Lastly, one note: Try to see what the jews are doing, versus what the Gentiles are doing or would do. The NS tried to remove jewish influence specifically and stabilize their economy. So they had to do some kicking out of certain elements, until the situation would stabilize.

Kikes ruin everything.

Of course, the work of the intermediary matters. Just let's be aware that today's investor is a person in front of a computer, whose work for which he receives his remuneration boils down to clicking the buy button and then, after some time, the sell button. Who benefits from this? I'm already explaining further what I mean, because, of course, the fact that an investor must have good information, resulting, for example, in the fact that we have well-informed people in society, can be a positive phenomenon. But the very way he makes money seems to me a bit lacking in substance.

I gave the example of the lack of money in exchange due to the fact that the origin of money is "anonymous" in the sense that we do not know how someone who uses it got it, and let's say that in a situation where there would be no money in the market (this is just a theoretical situation, I know that societies do not function without this medium of exchange, but it's needed for an example), people would go to exchange products/services directly among themselves. And that's what I mean, what useful for the producer of food, clothes and so on is today's investor? Who has a use for his work? If he were an intermediary, that is, whether he provided a warehouse or transported the goods, then this is a situation with which I do not see a moral problem, because here there is indeed useful work done. But such a situation is not the case in the vast majority of what people today call investing.

Wouldn't the rest of the people who would exchange in such a moneyless market have the right to feel somewhat cheated that everyone is providing some goods needed by the rest, while one of them is simply pushing a button on a computer screen, from which no one has any use?

I gave an example of a situation in which people don't use money precisely to emphasize the fact that in such a market, everyone is forced to create the products/services needed by the rest, otherwise people wouldn't want to exchange with someone who has something to exchange that isn't needed for anything. What does today's lion's share of investors give to exchange? And if they give nothing for which someone in this kind of market would be willing to offer their valuable goods/services, is their way of working fair?

I'll admit that I'm an investor myself, so this topic is of considerable importance to me, as it's an area in which I'm quite clever, while also having these moral roadblocks to some degree and I can never feel completely proud of it.
 
NitrateOsfatate666 said:

The money we have in banks is, of course, partially safe! I mean, it is safer from non-fully Jewitized countries that promote the BildenBerger or Illuminati agenda.

But still, financial education at its best in order for one not to go in huge debt, have some economy funding.

One should be smart in order to not keep large or important sums of money in bank accounts or credit / debit cards 💳 as the shekel-snorting joos ar3 constantly trying to make some debts out of it.

We should thank Father Satan that we are not in China or North Korea. Those communistic joos are sick in their minds.

already .. somewhere we have to keep them though! we hope to make the right financial moves!
 
In the current state of affairs and the current global economy, having at least some form of investments is completely normal. Even people who work and have a regular 401k and so on, they are all invested for their pensions and so on. There is nothing bad about investments in anyway, shape or form, morally or otherwise. It's part of good financial management and future proofing.

Be aware that it's good for us to focus on the reality we have in front of us, and while rhetorical situations and what if's are good for us to expand our mind, it's important especially in finances to stay focused on how things are today.

I say this because the world is cruel and unforgiving on these matters, and the world is shaped as is now. We have to try to be as considerate as possible, but the world also "considers us" only to an extent, or sometimes, not at all...

Generally, what investors give to markets is size, capital, power to use said capital, or increasing the value of things so they get past certain barriers of valuations which deal with the larger macro-economic reality the world is based upon. They make things bigger long story short. The investor also assumes risk, even if this is Apple or other "certain" companies". These valuations are a form of macro-economic type of giving, not necessarily focused into service. They willingly or not uphold a macro-economic world that is necessary for the micro-economy to run on.

Speculators give even less, but they too can be swindled out of their own capital, or fail massively, therefore, giving a form of what they risk back into others. 96% fail to be "successful speculators" because it's not easy to do. In this case, their value of market share is suckered in by others who can manage this, or who are more "capable" (or deceitful) than they.

In advanced economies where accumulation is the norm, this is how these things end up happening. And it's all based on the ability of people to own and manage their finances and how this reflects itself in the different decisions between some people and other people.

I will answer more indepth soon [as I am online to moderate and check on some things]. Very interesting questions however, they made me think about certain things too.

Chain_Breaker said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Chain_Breaker said:
...

Someone produces a product, someone performs a service. What service does the speculator/investor perform? No one has any use of his work, and he only gains wealth and then benefits from the needed goods and services produced by others, without giving anything from himself in return. Does it matter that he does the work when none of the other participants in the exchange have any benefit from it?

Let's imagine that money does not exist and we have to exchange goods or services directly. What does an investor have to offer for the exchange for really necessary products for living? In fact, he has nothing useful to offer the rest, but only consumes the results of their work. Isn't it what the National Socialists meant?

The investor and the speculator are two different things, although they take a similar venue of acting. The speculator looks to gain profit from trading, their agenda could be any.

The existence of speculators or gamblers or anything of the sort, is always a grey area. They can act in criminal ways towards a society, but this again depends on how these things go. In certain cases this is done by extensive deception etc, and is not dissimilar to theft.

In other cases, this can be simply because people out of their free will started betting or "speculating", and therefore some lose and some win. This can happen in a pave-walk, or in the stock-market.

From the investor, everyone has benefit, and the investor assumes risk and enters his capital into unforeseen circumstances which might or might not come into fruition, but their capital might be necessary to expand something.

It is a lie that intermediaries do not offer a service, because if that were the case, they would not exist, and they do exist to handle all the menial and other forms of tasks that are incumbent in transfer of wealth or value, or things that prove this value.

The intermediaries in the past and even currently do profit by taking care of laws, regulations, acting as a means of transfer [or you could send your tomatoes to someone in another empire yourself if you want, or do your paperwork necessary, or assume risk, etc]. Intermediaries have their own value in anything.

Accumulation of wealth and the power it indirectly represents, is put into something, which empowers it by raising it's value, and then this value can be used in anyway there is. Accumulation happens because not everyone wants to save anything at once or use their rights to specific things at once.

The above has to do with free will, and also necessity of life. If someone cuts a ton of wood, it's not for certain someone else will want to get it. There might be no replacement service for now. Or someone else may buy to store it, and plans to use it in 5 years, not immediately.

Only in neolithic societies does "moneyless" situation exist and even there, "money" as a value is replaced by other forms of ownership. If there was no "money" as in coins, then it was a form of a bond, or written tablet such as in Babylon. In these tablets, they wrote for example, X cleaned the garden of Z, so Z owes X a future service of ___insert service___. This is a form of what we call a "bond" today.

The above, required workers to do, and keepers to maintain. This is what in Crypto today or in modern finances is actually called a "Ledger".

All other advanced civilizations have to come up with something that we refer to as money to contain value for use at a later date or reflect compound wealth that has manifested itself from previous actions. In the case of Nations, needs arise of doing things NOW, even when this accumulated wealth does not exist, therefore, the inverse happens and money as a future proof of labor is demanded in the form of taxes.

Money cannot not exist, as not everyone has the same needs and desires at every given point, nor there is a strict medium of exchange, nor all needs arise at all points, nor there is certainty that every service will be met by another "equal" service.

I might need a house 10 years from now, and I must somehow have a means to accumulate my own purchasing power by services I gave for 10 years earlier than this, and the medium through which this is done is money or something that holds value, value that can be actualized at a different time.

This is why money exists, to have in itself the different modes, times, and measures of what could be spent.

Additionally, there is a situation where things invented or given do not represent another service that one can recommend. You cannot exchange a tomato for supernal knowledge or the discovery of the automobile or penicillin, evidence tells us it's not the same things.

Therefore, as advancement happens in civilizations, the economy has to extend itself through mediums of wealth storage.

As all of these things fluctuate and change, the job of financial managers is to pay attention to the needs and desires of the market, and decide how to progress in an ever moving world.

For example, the certainty of tomatoes existing now in a place might be questionable or might come under the pressure of a famine. But you need tomatoes now. Then, another place that produces this could care less what you have to offer them in regards to a "service", and would rather want a medium of value to use later. In the past, people used rare metals for this and money.

The situation is anything but simple.

Lastly, one note: Try to see what the jews are doing, versus what the Gentiles are doing or would do. The NS tried to remove jewish influence specifically and stabilize their economy. So they had to do some kicking out of certain elements, until the situation would stabilize.

Kikes ruin everything.

Of course, the work of the intermediary matters. Just let's be aware that today's investor is a person in front of a computer, whose work for which he receives his remuneration boils down to clicking the buy button and then, after some time, the sell button. Who benefits from this? I'm already explaining further what I mean, because, of course, the fact that an investor must have good information, resulting, for example, in the fact that we have well-informed people in society, can be a positive phenomenon. But the very way he makes money seems to me a bit lacking in substance.

I gave the example of the lack of money in exchange due to the fact that the origin of money is "anonymous" in the sense that we do not know how someone who uses it got it, and let's say that in a situation where there would be no money in the market (this is just a theoretical situation, I know that societies do not function without this medium of exchange, but it's needed for an example), people would go to exchange products/services directly among themselves. And that's what I mean, what useful for the producer of food, clothes and so on is today's investor? Who has a use for his work? If he were an intermediary, that is, whether he provided a warehouse or transported the goods, then this is a situation with which I do not see a moral problem, because here there is indeed useful work done. But such a situation is not the case in the vast majority of what people today call investing.

Wouldn't the rest of the people who would exchange in such a moneyless market have the right to feel somewhat cheated that everyone is providing some goods needed by the rest, while one of them is simply pushing a button on a computer screen, from which no one has any use?

I gave an example of a situation in which people don't use money precisely to emphasize the fact that in such a market, everyone is forced to create the products/services needed by the rest, otherwise people wouldn't want to exchange with someone who has something to exchange that isn't needed for anything. What does today's lion's share of investors give to exchange? And if they give nothing for which someone in this kind of market would be willing to offer their valuable goods/services, is their way of working fair?

I'll admit that I'm an investor myself, so this topic is of considerable importance to me, as it's an area in which I'm quite clever, while also having these moral roadblocks to some degree and I can never feel completely proud of it.
 
Gear88 said:

I know about the whole ETH (Ethereum) PoS thing, they finally did "the merge" recently, and all the hashing power it had has been scattered around to various Proof of Work alt-coins. I don't think the network will fail, but it won't be a wealth storage like Bitcoin and some other PoW alt-coins like Monero could be.

I understand Bitcoin is old tech, but it's a household name, even people who have zero interest in crypto have at least heard of it. All of us here know the "popular choice" isn't always the "best choice", but normies (NPCs) never see the cliff until someone falls off.

The luck system you explained is similar to how a PoS "validator" is, but your method makes entry more fair by allowing anyone with capable hardware to validate transactions on the chain and doesn't auto-ban you and steal your coins if your hardware fails. As of now, a "validator" is picked at random, and they must have dozens of coins (whole coins) to participate unless they join a validator pool.

I'm not into the whole "gloomy future" mentality of some of those folks either, I just see it as another way to take our money back from the jews and keep it safe. The only "disadvantage" is that people can't be sloppy about keeping their private addresses and mnemonic phrases secure. If they lose both codes, they lose all their money.

I agree, there should be some crypto tutoring classes of some sort, so folks who are completely new can have some trusted places to learn. Yes, this could be fully online as well, with the option of downloading a self-paced class to your device. I for one would prefer the download option, as I could download it and not worry about lag or server issues.
 
Do you see that there is any potential to use blockchain to

1) help organise society, i.e voting, raising funds, public registras (i.e. registering digital house titles), etc,

2) just a way to store wealth, in face of inflation, or bank account seizures

or

3) only to make profit via trading?

can i ask

4) whats your thoughts on private cryptos?

SAtanama <3


Ursa Minor said:
Gear88 said:

I know about the whole ETH (Ethereum) PoS thing, they finally did "the merge" recently, and all the hashing power it had has been scattered around to various Proof of Work alt-coins. I don't think the network will fail, but it won't be a wealth storage like Bitcoin and some other PoW alt-coins like Monero could be.

I understand Bitcoin is old tech, but it's a household name, even people who have zero interest in crypto have at least heard of it. All of us here know the "popular choice" isn't always the "best choice", but normies (NPCs) never see the cliff until someone falls off.

The luck system you explained is similar to how a PoS "validator" is, but your method makes entry more fair by allowing anyone with capable hardware to validate transactions on the chain and doesn't auto-ban you and steal your coins if your hardware fails. As of now, a "validator" is picked at random, and they must have dozens of coins (whole coins) to participate unless they join a validator pool.

I'm not into the whole "gloomy future" mentality of some of those folks either, I just see it as another way to take our money back from the jews and keep it safe. The only "disadvantage" is that people can't be sloppy about keeping their private addresses and mnemonic phrases secure. If they lose both codes, they lose all their money.

I agree, there should be some crypto tutoring classes of some sort, so folks who are completely new can have some trusted places to learn. Yes, this could be fully online as well, with the option of downloading a self-paced class to your device. I for one would prefer the download option, as I could download it and not worry about lag or server issues.
 
Queen of the Stars said:
Do you see that there is any potential to use blockchain to

1) help organise society, i.e voting, raising funds, public registras (i.e. registering digital house titles), etc,

2) just a way to store wealth, in face of inflation, or bank account seizures

or

3) only to make profit via trading?

can i ask

4) whats your thoughts on private cryptos?

SAtanama <3


Ursa Minor said:
Gear88 said:
...

Yes, I actually considered this before, I was thinking of using tokens for voting, both small and large scale. The developers involved with Ethereum Classic are looking into becoming a multi-purpose blockchain as are others. The technology can also be used as permanent, nigh-indestructible data storage, not just as "digital gold". Meaning nobody could "hack" your property away from you as long as you hold the private keys to it.

If by "private cryptos" you mean the "high security" ones like Monero or Beam that can hide your transactions yes, we should all be able to have those and it should be an option. It can be used for savings and other large accounts in which you want to keep the amounts and transactions hidden. On the Bitcoin network, all transactions are exposed, meaning someone can "guess" how much you currently have in your account.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
[...]

Warren Buffet is a financial elite, but nor a jew, nor evil.

Then you have others who are trash. People like this arise in complex civilizations and economies normally as money and wealth managers, and they have a purpose in life and that is a very important aspect of a civilization. In Ancient times, to verify that the people involved in this practice would not be scammers and criminals, they were generally priests or others who were ethically inclined and intelligent for this work.

[...]

Loans originally started as bankrupt people who did mistakes or got theft happen to them, went to the Temples [who functioned like banks back then] to ask for loans. Then through labor they had to repay the loans. Among these the temples also gave other services, such as management and storage services for wealth and so on.

This was done with serious oaths to the Gods, and theft, perjury, and ruin, was punishable by death, imprisonment and so on. It was seen as a huge responsibility. They were supposed also to provide other fiscal services, such as doing taxes collection and so on.

[...]

-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666

So we don't hate Warren Buffet? I don't have much knowledge on him beyond that of a common layman, so I'm asking out of pure curiosity.

And aha. So this is why Jupiter rules religion and spirituality, as well as banking and finance (and prosperity too, but that's way too multifaceted to boil it down to one cause]? Or to put it another way - because Jupiter rules these things together, that temples ended up as banks as their secondary function too? That makes perfect sense when you consider planetary rulerships. It clicked into place now.

And it makes perfect sense to put the wealth and livelihoods of the people at the highest of importance, by possibly even forfeiting the lives of mishandlers. As you said in a sermon a couple years ago, the punishment for mismanaging the wealth of the public was death in ancient civilizations, and if I remember right, you said this includes even kings.

As always, thank you for your wisdom, our exalted Brother in Clergy.
 
Every week on camera, rabbis brag and cheer about destroying western countries and the white race. Their Talmund commands them to do it.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DVgRw1TdgVF3/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1Ghp3eg3dZXF/
 
Drecomancer said:
Every week on camera, rabbis brag and cheer about destroying western countries and the white race. Their Talmund commands them to do it.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DVgRw1TdgVF3/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1Ghp3eg3dZXF/

Great post, should make everyone understand why we do RTR's in the first place. Look at their hate and how comfortable they are with claiming all of Europe and the United States should die. Even a normal person would wonder what they have in store for this world.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Chain_Breaker said:
...
It is a lie that intermediaries do not offer a service, because if that were the case, they would not exist, and they do exist to handle all the menial and other forms of tasks that are incumbent in transfer of wealth or value, or things that prove this value

The intermediaries in the past and even currently do profit by taking care of laws, regulations, acting as a means of transfer [or you could send your tomatoes to someone in another empire yourself if you want, or do your paperwork necessary, or assume risk, etc]. Intermediaries have their own value in anything.

A lot of blockchain contract platform promotion is based on the replacement of intermediaries, i.e a replacement on the need to 'trust' a human being.

This is by the way of smart contracts and digital assets, that represent physical items. i.e. you no longer need a 'trust' a third party in high value exchanges, as the exchange is handled automatically by the contract layer above the ledger of the blockchain.

Do you think it is possible that if blockchain comes to replace the need for intermediaries, a lot of which are middle class vocations, then even more power will be placed in the hands of the technocratic elite of software developers.

We also see a lot of contract platforms promoting the future of a global democracy with voting on the blockchain, where your crypto holdings represent the weight of your vote. Again, this seems as though it will definitely lead to more centralisation of power, doesn’t it?

I would love to hear your thoughts on this

Satanama <3
 
Blackdragon666 [JG said:
" post_id=393158 time=1665458395 user_id=19170]
Excellent article. The jews have nothing of their own. Disgusting creatures. They rant and rave about how they have given so much to the world, yet they just steal and pretend something is theirs.

Fractional Reserve lending has totally corrupted banking and made it a jewish thing. They just lend people's money without their permission to other people and charge an interest on it, creating free money for themselves out of thin air.

May the wrath of Satan and every Demon in Hell be poured on these blood sucking parasites.

Fractional Reserve Lending(FRL) ceases to exist in the U.S.(since many are from here). They changed it to IRL(Infinite Reserve Lending).

This was around March of 2020.

Any bank can ask from the Federal Reserve to print out any amount. Even obscene amounts. Say a bank needs 2 million to cover itself. They might explain the situation then they go can you give us 45 million.

You can ask for anything at this point. Banks are pretty much Nationalized even if Nationalization is rarer in the U.S.

I like Griffith's (A creature from Jekyll Island: A second look at the FedRes); private banking system. Although it's true a gold-standard slows down the economy for certain things. Russia with the Gold-Standard Ruble might not want to continue waging war for long as that constricts it a bit an area Gold-Standards do.

I think if Griffith had appreciation of the NS system it would open new avenues to him. He mostly relishes an old America on the Gold-Standard like with Washington's time.

Sheer fact nostalgia aside okay sure I understand but you still have a lot more things to back it up. Infrastructure, Labor, E.o.t.M.o.E.(Exchange of the Medium of Exchange), Private market exchange, bonds like Feder bonds and Low, Medium, and High- Yield bonds.

In fact banks were doing that with Drexler and White's High-Yield Bonds market developed late-70s. Made banks a lot of capital in the 80s. Till the elites crashed it in Government and they picked up everything for pennies and made a killing on the bonds market.

============================

Sheer fact is we are dealing with people who in many cases are in financial circles and on top of that might even be talking to historical data involving hidden, forbidden history. In fact judging from the enemy how they interact with greys, reptilians, and other hostile entities. Who knows how far the rabbit hole goes for them to find financial benefits.

I hate these discussions on finances as people seem like money is the only thing that matters. And it does money unfortunately is God of this World. I wish more Gentiles were "greedier" and into "evil" money in larger and more powerful circles.

Sheer fact is if the enemy aliens studied us well and made sure their reptilian trick offsprings were well versed in hijacking civilizations. I see we are facing a huge monster.

Unfortunately for all the internet and studying data on finances things get obsolete after a while. Crypto changed a lot of things and other financial sources. For example credit card is superior than debit. A properly financed person would rather under a capitalist credit system pay with credit, get cash back 1-3% or crypto back, and pay the debt immediately or automatically through their debit system. And have perfect payment.

Unfortunately credit like Ray Dalios explains is bigger than money back in 2012 video he's like 3-5 trillion in money. But 50.4 trillion in credit.

I don't know much about credit outside credit cards. I know the NS studied credit in Germany before the invention of the credit card and it's systems as we know it in the 50s-60s time period.

But both from a macro-National vs a micro-Individual finances is a head game. It's like technology the hardware moves too fast or the software moves too fast or both move too slowly or we are just like smartphones buy a new one every year basically or every two years. Seems technology is purposefully made for planned obsolescence and shekelberging.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top