Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Why do the Jews promote so much sexual promiscuity?

Scourge

New member
Joined
Aug 25, 2023
Messages
45
All I see in the media and series is people having random intoxicated, unprotected sex with strangers and then acting like it's not a big deal. Also prostitution is rebranded as empowering work and the men who pay for sex are seen as just lonely/busy/awkward instead of the losers they are.
How does it affect a person spiritually when they prostitute themselves or when they have hook ups and one night stands repeatedly? Also how are the buyers of sex or sex services affected?
 
Because essentially this behavior leads nowhere in particular in life, it ruins families, leaves people in perpetual mental problems, and all of this translates into quite the hefty sum of profits.

Generally the jews always use the media to project the most lesser behaviors one can engage into, creating a situation where they benefit from this. The whole mindset behind this is very easy to manage, and they can buy easy slaves in a world without any ethical compass.

To stretch this to the highest ends is very beneficial to them and generally anyone who seeks to do mass exploitation for an array of reasons.
 
pimmlmag6 said:
What men don't want as a partner is a whore, a slut or a similar monstrosity.
Men want a virgin as a partner, they want to be the only one to enter her.
Jews want to destroy, so they give the men what they don't want.
Therefore they won't reprocreate.

If a man gets what he wants - a virgin woman and she gets raped, she will never have the same worth to him that she used to be. She will be seen as used goods. And not only by him, also by his friends and other men who know it.
Their relationship would no longer be the same.

Now what the jew does is he makes the women all be used goods.
Only difference is that he brainwashes them to do it by themselfes.
And i don't want to have my female partner around me permanently, who got fucked thousands of times by other men.
If i would like it, i would be a cuck/ subhuman.
I don't want a virgin.

Also, a woman is not a bag of Doritos. I think you don't understand how a hymen works.

Either extremes is completely negative and jew-pushed are you really a Satanist? Have you ever even read the homepage?

It's very obvious you're just a political fanatic with no value or any wisdom. God forbid any spiritual knowledge. It's even more obvious you are an infiltrator troll.

If you're not then this is a new level of spiritual and mental retardation and ignorance.
 
mercury_wisdom said:
I don't want a virgin.
Actually, it is ideal for both males and females (when the relationship in question is monogamous) to be together for the first time and for this relationship to last a lifetime, or longer.

Obviously, in this current era, this happens for a tiny percent of people, but it is what it is.
 
Henu the Great said:
mercury_wisdom said:
I don't want a virgin.
Actually, it is ideal for both males and females (when the relationship in question is monogamous) to be together for the first time and for this relationship to last a lifetime, or longer.

Obviously, in this current era, this happens for a tiny percent of people, but it is what it is.

It makes more sense for both to have a bit of experience before finding the one they want to settle down with if sex is important factor for both parties. Especially if they want to enjoy sex.

Instead of having sex with tens of people the experience to know how to please your partner can be learned from a small handful of partners.

If they are SS they can easily clean off any negative energies they might have picked up as well. In an ideal world what they would have to clean off wouldn't be much a problem.
 
hailourtruegod said:
It makes more sense for both to have a bit of experience before finding the one they want to settle down with if sex is important factor for both parties. Especially if they want to enjoy sex.
This is where astrology and getting to know each other comes to play. Self-knowledge is enough. Then you need to know about synastry, thus eliminating the need to play around with multiple people.
 
Henu the Great said:
hailourtruegod said:
It makes more sense for both to have a bit of experience before finding the one they want to settle down with if sex is important factor for both parties. Especially if they want to enjoy sex.
This is where astrology and getting to know each other comes to play. Self-knowledge is enough. Then you need to know about synastry, thus eliminating the need to play around with multiple people.

I think it's only nuance cases where this would work for the first person they hook up with and go thru their relationship even with astrology in mind. I wouldn't call it ideal for two virgins to be together and then spend their whole lives together even if they took into astrology into consideration. Might work for some of course but in my opinion I wouldn't consider it the standard.

The list of exceptions is too wide to mention thus is no one way or an ideal way to go about this in regards if virgins should stick with the first person they hook up with. That is my point.
 
hailourtruegod said:
I think it's only nuance cases where this would work for the first person they hook up with and go thru their relationship even with astrology in mind. I wouldn't call it ideal for two virgins to be together and then spend their whole lives together even if they took into astrology into consideration. Might work for some of course but in my opinion I wouldn't consider it the standard.

The list of exceptions is too wide to mention thus is no one way or an ideal way to go about this in regards if virgins should stick with the first person they hook up with. That is my point.
You are simply thinking this through the lens what is currently going on. I said, ideally. We are far from ideal.
 
I am asking this question seriously as a monogamous person. I also know my GD represented monogamous couples as a God.

If being with one person forever is the apex or ideal of all behavior, why does Satan have multiple wives? This isn't just about the Gods. Why did HPS Maxine agree in an audio sermon I heard recently with the rollout in the SS of elite men having multiple wives?

I understand completely this has nothing to do with the jewish sexual egalitarianism, toilet behavior and meaningless promiscuity involving mixing of castes, shit energies and mostly being a waste of time and drama discussed in the OP.

But I am more talking about the language of some members here, which seems to define multiple wives or sex before marriage in any case whatsoever as promiscuous, irrevocably damaged and indicative of impaired pair bonding...
 
Henu the Great said:
hailourtruegod said:
I think it's only nuance cases where this would work for the first person they hook up with and go thru their relationship even with astrology in mind. I wouldn't call it ideal for two virgins to be together and then spend their whole lives together even if they took into astrology into consideration. Might work for some of course but in my opinion I wouldn't consider it the standard.

The list of exceptions is too wide to mention thus is no one way or an ideal way to go about this in regards if virgins should stick with the first person they hook up with. That is my point.
You are simply thinking this through the lens what is currently going on. I said, ideally. We are far from ideal.

I am saying even if people took synastry into consideration this doesn't mean they will stay with their first partner as it can be seen in some people's chart they like to date around before settling down.

This is what I meant by nuances.

I believe it will always be a complex situation and people will have to go by case by case.
 
Karnonnos said:
If being with one person forever is the apex or ideal of all behavior, why does Satan have multiple wives? This isn't just about the Gods. Why did HPS Maxine agree in an audio sermon I heard recently with the rollout in the SS of elite men having multiple wives?
It is ideal for those who are monogamous, not all.
 
Karnonnos said:
I am asking this question seriously as a monogamous person. I also know my GD represented monogamous couples as a God.

If being with one person forever is the apex or ideal of all behavior, why does Satan have multiple wives? This isn't just about the Gods. Why did HPS Maxine agree in an audio sermon I heard recently with the rollout in the SS of elite men having multiple wives?

I understand completely this has nothing to do with the jewish sexual egalitarianism, toilet behavior and meaningless promiscuity involving mixing of castes, shit energies and mostly being a waste of time and drama discussed in the OP.

But I am more talking about the language of some members here, which seems to define multiple wives or sex before marriage in any case whatsoever as promiscuous, irrevocably damaged and indicative of impaired pair bonding...


Just because it's not the extreme jewish way it doesn't mean the way people in question do it is the only and ideal way. It's good people here have found what they rather have and look down at the jewish type of promiscuity but people's desires will always be complex. What matters more is as long as the sex is healthy in all ways between mature adults there is no damage being done whatsoever.
 
Henu the Great said:
It is ideal for those who are monogamous, not all.

Then I agree with you. I do think most people are monogamous by inclination, or at least, with successful polygamy, it really requires being of high quality on some level, whereas when you roll it out to any man who can financially sustain (it as in pisslam) or to shock people because 'new thing' (reddit) it seems to go in the direction of disaster...

hailourtruegod said:
Just because it's not the extreme jewish way it doesn't mean the way people in question do it is the only and ideal way. It's good people here have found what they rather have and look down at the jewish type of promiscuity but people's desires will always be complex. What matters more is as long as the sex is healthy in all ways between mature adults there is no damage being done whatsoever.

People are definitely complex. From experience of doing charts of individuals like this, I do find it hard to believe those with strong detached air signs or Aries in love planets can be totally happy being hitched to one person forever with zero sexual contact with others, even if their only errant behavior consists of checking others out. Obviously it depends on the rest of their chart but the temptation seems to be there.
 
Karnonnos said:
Henu the Great said:
It is ideal for those who are monogamous, not all.

Then I agree with you. I do think most people are monogamous by inclination, or at least, with successful polygamy, it really requires being of high quality on some level, whereas when you roll it out to any man who can financially sustain (it as in pisslam) or to shock people because 'new thing' (reddit) it seems to go in the direction of disaster...

hailourtruegod said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666
Just because it's not the extreme jewish way it doesn't mean the way people in question do it is the only and ideal way. It's good people here have found what they rather have and look down at the jewish type of promiscuity but people's desires will always be complex. What matters more is as long as the sex is healthy in all ways between mature adults there is no damage being done whatsoever.

People are definitely complex. From experience of doing charts of individuals like this, I do find it hard to believe those with strong detached air signs or Aries in love planets can be totally happy being hitched to one person forever with zero sexual contact with others, even if their only errant behavior consists of checking others out. Obviously it depends on the rest of their chart but the temptation seems to be there.

Could you explain a little more what are detached air signs or what does aries in a love planet mean?

Is there any more that indicates that a person is polygamous (astrology wise)?

Much thanks in advance.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Because essentially this behavior leads nowhere in particular in life, it ruins families, leaves people in perpetual mental problems, and all of this translates into quite the hefty sum of profits.

Generally the jews always use the media to project the most lesser behaviors one can engage into, creating a situation where they benefit from this. The whole mindset behind this is very easy to manage, and they can buy easy slaves in a world without any ethical compass.

To stretch this to the highest ends is very beneficial to them and generally anyone who seeks to do mass exploitation for an array of reasons.

Could you explain the astrological difference, between monogamous people and polygamous people? (In there birth charts)

Much thanks in advance HP. Hoodedcobra666
 
Karnonnos said:
in any case whatsoever as promiscuous, irrevocably damaged and indicative of impaired pair bonding...

It seems like you are talking about me with these specific terms that I have talked about before. I never said "in any case whatsoever." The damaging effects I have talked about are what come from large amounts of those behaviors. Or multiple lifetimes of certain actions. Accumulation of karma influences by repeated actions. I talk about end results.
Just like to say that smoking cigarettes causes lung cancer. This is not saying that everybody who has ever smoked any number of cigarrettes immediately grows lung cancer. Just that this is the very likely end result of continued repetition of this action.
 
hailourtruegod said:

It seems like you are really asking why should somebody stay with his or her first partner if his or her first partner is not of the right quality? My suggestion is to pick a first partner who is of sufficient quality that it is a good thing to stay with this person. Don't ever pick any low quality person to begin with.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
It seems like you are talking about me with these specific terms that I have talked about before. I never said "in any case whatsoever." The damaging effects I have talked about are what come from large amounts of those behaviors. Or multiple lifetimes of certain actions. Accumulation of karma influences by repeated actions. I talk about end results.
Just like to say that smoking cigarettes causes lung cancer. This is not saying that everybody who has ever smoked any number of cigarrettes immediately grows lung cancer. Just that this is the very likely end result of continued repetition of this action.

Other people have mentioned impaired pair bonding mechanisms creating irreversible damage and the DNA chimera idea before, like afaik Jack (I think) ages ago back in that topic with Jrvan, to the point where it is a regular theme in these types of topics. More relating to the topic of sex before marriage than polygamy necessarily, but you did just bring up your ideas on polygamy in the other topic and it made me wonder how successful polygynous arrangements could co-exist with the rotten type of promiscuity.

Yes, I agree it can be done to total overload and have heavy karmic themes too. But I'm not sure people right now exhibiting promiscuity are reeling from past lives of doing this to excess completely. The first reason I say that is that a lot of them are ethnic and likelier to be new souls, and other than Chinese and Indians who have always had massive populations, most groups 'of color' were not as numerous in the past.

But for old souls, with an oversaturation of propaganda perhaps they don't really know what they are doing. Think about it. If someone is incarnating from a past existence where they were some old person with another old person for life [like a typical G.I. gen or a silent gen couple], you go from the more monogamous mores of that time yet your life partner suddenly isn't there. So what can you do? You probably end up trying to subconsciously find someone 'like' your former partner [or any partner that took precedence throughout lifetimes] on Instagram or a dating app but you can end up with total illusions. This is especially true if the marriage of the past life was less than perfect beneath the surface and also inscribed negative behavior [i.e. abuse], which is always possible.

Given the speed at which reincarnation can happen, maybe some people have spent their last lifetimes as relatively promiscuous/divorcing boomers and now incarnated as a gen zer where it is piled on twice as thick, which could explain your theory. But obviously one can inscribe negative behavior in the present life very quickly, regardless of past lives.

There is also the concept Stormblood brought up in some other topic that a lot of marriages, functionally speaking, were not really that romantic and tended to be arranged for reasons of power. This wasn't as true in the recent past but I do know a lot of couples sort of stayed together for the sake of the children, respectability and stability. So perhaps some people go towards this as an instinctive reaction against that, or against xianity. HP Cobra also said before that people overestimate the level of love they have when it comes to soul mates and things like this.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
hailourtruegod said:

It seems like you are really asking why should somebody stay with his or her first partner if his or her first partner is not of the right quality? My suggestion is to pick a first partner who is of sufficient quality that it is a good thing to stay with this person. Don't ever pick any low quality person to begin with.

Not what I'm saying at all but good advice.

In an ideal world partners are meant to help each other grow but can end the relationship in a mutual manner if the "spark" between them goes away which I believe happens naturally.

The above is the case for some people and not all of course.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
Or the experience to know what one person likes, can all be gained with that one person by actually seeing what he or she likes. What do 10 other people have to do with one person?
Exactly ,...sexual relationship must be only be done with your husband or wife ..Not here with the biblical garbage .But that is what is good for your soul where u will not take the filth of another person and have wrong astral ties
 
Karnonnos said:
Ol argedco luciftias said:
It seems like you are talking about me with these specific terms that I have talked about before. I never said "in any case whatsoever." The damaging effects I have talked about are what come from large amounts of those behaviors. Or multiple lifetimes of certain actions. Accumulation of karma influences by repeated actions. I talk about end results.
Just like to say that smoking cigarettes causes lung cancer. This is not saying that everybody who has ever smoked any number of cigarrettes immediately grows lung cancer. Just that this is the very likely end result of continued repetition of this action.



There is also the concept Stormblood brought up in some other topic that a lot of marriages, functionally speaking, were not really that romantic and tended to be arranged for reasons of power. This wasn't as true in the recent past but I do know a lot of couples sort of stayed together for the sake of the children, respectability and stability. So perhaps some people go towards this as an instinctive reaction against that, or against xianity. HP Cobra also said before that people overestimate the level of love they have when it comes to soul mates and things like this.

Having to do this for arranged relationships or convenience for many past lives can cause your soul to accumulate a lot of suffering and your ability to establish bonds ends up being seriously damaged.
 
Henu the Great said:
mercury_wisdom said:
I don't want a virgin.
Actually, it is ideal for both males and females (when the relationship in question is monogamous) to be together for the first time and for this relationship to last a lifetime, or longer.

Obviously, in this current era, this happens for a tiny percent of people, but it is what it is.
Not necessarily.

Also, if you really believe a relationship with a human being in this day and age can be this monogamous and last a lifetime or longer I would be deluding myself really.

These types of sacred relations are really just extinct with the humans that are alive right now. This type of sacredness can only be honored between God relations. Which I am not ready for at this point in my journey.
 
mercury_wisdom said:
Also, if you really believe a relationship with a human being in this day and age can be this monogamous and last a lifetime or longer I would be deluding myself really.
Still, these things happen nowadays. One close example is my grandparents. It's just an example, and if you have an open mind about this you can see this happen here and there. But it is very uncommon, even rare, that I admit.
 
The jews promote both sides, both promiscuity but also celibacy.

Just heave a healthy mindset, and have sex when the time is right with the person who is right for you. It's as simple as that.
 
mercury_wisdom said:
Henu the Great said:
mercury_wisdom said:
I don't want a virgin.
Actually, it is ideal for both males and females (when the relationship in question is monogamous) to be together for the first time and for this relationship to last a lifetime, or longer.

Obviously, in this current era, this happens for a tiny percent of people, but it is what it is.
Not necessarily.

Also, if you really believe a relationship with a human being in this day and age can be this monogamous and last a lifetime or longer I would be deluding myself really.

These types of sacred relations are really just extinct with the humans that are alive right now. This type of sacredness can only be honored between God relations. Which I am not ready for at this point in my journey.
Don't close yourself to possibilities just because in your life you haven't experienced such possibilities.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
Wotanwarrior said:
Having to do this for arranged relationships or convenience for many past lives can cause your soul to accumulate a lot of suffering and your ability to establish bonds ends up being seriously damaged.

This makes a lot of sense. I think this is what happened with a lot of people.

But in my case it did not make me become a polygamist, but rather a solitary person with an aversion to bonding with other persons.
 
mercury_wisdom said:
pimmlmag6 said:
What men don't want as a partner is a whore, a slut or a similar monstrosity.
Men want a virgin as a partner, they want to be the only one to enter her.
Jews want to destroy, so they give the men what they don't want.
Therefore they won't reprocreate.

If a man gets what he wants - a virgin woman and she gets raped, she will never have the same worth to him that she used to be. She will be seen as used goods. And not only by him, also by his friends and other men who know it.
Their relationship would no longer be the same.

Now what the jew does is he makes the women all be used goods.
Only difference is that he brainwashes them to do it by themselfes.
And i don't want to have my female partner around me permanently, who got fucked thousands of times by other men.
If i would like it, i would be a cuck/ subhuman.

I don't want a virgin.

Okay that is weird.
I guess you are the moderator who deleted my post here.
1 moderator let my post go through, the other deletes it. "Nice" system that you have here.
And not only that, but he's also searching the couple of posts that i have made and delete everything that he disagrees with.
Now i have about 4-5 of my messages deleted, probably by you.
Because i have called other men who like a used woman as "cuck/ subhuman".

Also, a woman is not a bag of Doritos. I think you don't understand how a hymen works.
I don't know what a hymen is, but i know that sluts and whores are inferior to virgins.
And i know that these inferiorities are jewish creations (hook up culture/ slut-shaming/ my body my choise etc. crap) in short - feminism.

Either extremes is completely negative and jew-pushed are you really a Satanist? Have you ever even read the homepage?
I'm not a Satanist, i have put it now in my signature.
Yes i have read the homepage, i find this anti kike religion the best of them all.
What i find the most interesting is the relation from the 3rd Reich to the occult.
I have read a long quote from Hitler despicing Christianity and it was eye opening.
He also wanted to have a virgin, or am i mistaken and Eva Braun was already used by someone else?

It's very obvious you're just a political fanatic with no value or any wisdom. God forbid any spiritual knowledge. It's even more obvious you are an infiltrator troll.
If you're not then this is a new level of spiritual and mental retardation and ignorance.
What's obvious is that you are a feminist who deletes my posts.
You have deleted 4-5 of my posts which were approved by other moderators and you just go into my posting history and delete everything that your feminist brain can't comprehend.
Very ignorant and feministic/ mental retadation from you.
 
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=460698 time=1693395631 user_id=57]
The jews promote both sides, both promiscuity but also celibacy.

Just heave a healthy mindset, and have sex when the time is right with the person who is right for you. It's as simple as that.

Haha, pagan virginity mode goo brr

10157.jpg
 

It's obvious you're not the type to look at simple things like the rules of this place. That is why posts don't get approved or get deleted later.

I'm glad your posts like this last one was approved so the majority of people here know what type of person you are and how they should take your words.

You are only here to flame instead of trying to convince others of your views. It was already stated to you that this only makes those who are in disagreement with you be more against you.

How is this difficult for you to understand.

Also you are the same as the leftists you hate where anyone who disagrees with them is literally Hitler but in your case they are unhinged feminists.

Why not approach discussions in a civil manner instead? This place isn't your reddit or 4chan cesspool where ideas can't be expressed in a civil manner.
 
hailourtruegod said:

It's obvious you're not the type to look at simple things like the rules of this place. That is why posts don't get approved or get deleted later.

I'm glad your posts like this last one was approved so the majority of people here know what type of person you are and how they should take your words.

You are only here to flame instead of trying to convince others of your views. It was already stated to you that this only makes those who are in disagreement with you be more against you.

How is this difficult for you to understand.

Also you are the same as the leftists you hate where anyone who disagrees with them is literally Hitler but in your case they are unhinged feminists.

Why not approach discussions in a civil manner instead? This place isn't your reddit or 4chan cesspool where ideas can't be expressed in a civil manner.
Funny i get a next poster with 2000+ posts to answer me/ let my post go through.
Will my post stay now, or will it get deleted again?!
You give me contra, i'm wondering if i don't get deleted again while you spill your nonsese?
I'm not the one who deletes my posts. Get that in your brain!
You're the one who's censoring me, who's talking shit at me and when i answer you just delete it!
 
pimmlmag6 said:
hailourtruegod said:

It's obvious you're not the type to look at simple things like the rules of this place. That is why posts don't get approved or get deleted later.

I'm glad your posts like this last one was approved so the majority of people here know what type of person you are and how they should take your words.

You are only here to flame instead of trying to convince others of your views. It was already stated to you that this only makes those who are in disagreement with you be more against you.

How is this difficult for you to understand.

Also you are the same as the leftists you hate where anyone who disagrees with them is literally Hitler but in your case they are unhinged feminists.

Why not approach discussions in a civil manner instead? This place isn't your reddit or 4chan cesspool where ideas can't be expressed in a civil manner.
Funny i get a next poster with 2000+ posts to answer me/ let my post go through.
Will my post stay now, or will it get deleted again?!
You give me contra, i'm wondering if i don't get deleted again while you spill your nonsese?
I'm not the one who deletes my posts. Get that in your brain!
You're the one who's censoring me, who's talking shit at me and when i answer you just delete it!

You don't know what you're talking about. You need to chill our little buddy.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Because essentially this behavior leads nowhere in particular in life, it ruins families, leaves people in perpetual mental problems, and all of this translates into quite the hefty sum of profits.

Generally the jews always use the media to project the most lesser behaviors one can engage into, creating a situation where they benefit from this. The whole mindset behind this is very easy to manage, and they can buy easy slaves in a world without any ethical compass.

To stretch this to the highest ends is very beneficial to them and generally anyone who seeks to do mass exploitation for an array of reasons.

Can we all agree, that no one should damage a monogamous relationship between a man and a women, as this is the sacred bond, that will create healthy children, as probably many here need a new body for reincarnation/ want good parents. Whoever does damage this, is trash below even a Jew.
 
Fuchs said:
Can we all agree, that no one should damage a monogamous relationship between a man and a women, as this is the sacred bond, that will create healthy children, as probably many here need a new body for reincarnation/ want good parents. Whoever does damage this, is trash below even a Jew.

Marriage is sacred, two people building a life together as one unit. I'm so glad my parents never divorced.

However, people need to rise up, become mentally healthier and wiser. Too many people don't understand the importance of marriage or life.
 
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=460959 time=1693546127 user_id=57]
Fuchs said:
Can we all agree, that no one should damage a monogamous relationship between a man and a women, as this is the sacred bond, that will create healthy children, as probably many here need a new body for reincarnation/ want good parents. Whoever does damage this, is trash below even a Jew.

Marriage is sacred, two people building a life together as one unit. I'm so glad my parents never divorced.

However, people need to rise up, become mentally healthier and wiser. Too many people don't understand the importance of marriage or life.

Is there any difference between just living together, or being married (forever), is it not just a romantic gesture?
 
Fuchs said:
Is there any difference between just living together, or being married (forever), is it not just a romantic gesture?

It's up to the couple. I should have clarified "marriage-like relationship". Marriage is very xian these days, so a lot of people who are not xian choose to have like a commitment ceremony, or just live together and it's important to them. Whatever is best for the couple, is what matters.
 
Fuchs said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Because essentially this behavior leads nowhere in particular in life, it ruins families, leaves people in perpetual mental problems, and all of this translates into quite the hefty sum of profits.

Generally the jews always use the media to project the most lesser behaviors one can engage into, creating a situation where they benefit from this. The whole mindset behind this is very easy to manage, and they can buy easy slaves in a world without any ethical compass.

To stretch this to the highest ends is very beneficial to them and generally anyone who seeks to do mass exploitation for an array of reasons.

Could you explain the astrological difference, between monogamous people and polygamous people? (In there birth charts)

Much thanks in advance HP. Hoodedcobra666

I actually wrote something on this awhile back. Gemini Venus for men and mars for women are one of the biggest indicators for polyamory (even with a lot of water). Aspects from Uranus to mars or Venus or aspecting planets in the 7th house can also play a role. Venus in aquarius and Sagittarius or Aries aspecting Jupiter especially with Pisces emphasis can indicate polyamory especially with a pisces mercury or moon. These are just some factors but I am sure much more come into play and can have other influences.
 
Wotanwarrior said:
Having to do this for arranged relationships or convenience for many past lives can cause your soul to accumulate a lot of suffering and your ability to establish bonds ends up being seriously damaged.

Not necessarily. It's more likely for people in a marriage of necessity to have "concubines" like existed in Ancient Greece and the Roman Imperium. These concubines would be the true lovers and take care of the psychological and sexual needs of the person in the forced marriage, where the forced couple would only have sex to conceive a child for the sake of creating purebloods for specific reincarnations of people and karma.

For example, people used to do these for eugenics purposes (purifying a bloodline or maintaining it pure) and for other karmic purposes, such as creating excellence in a certain professions. There were clans completely dedicated to a specific profession. In fact, if both parents are genius scientists, for example, the child will most likely inherit the genius from both parents, surpassing them both in excellence and being nurtured for free by 2 geniuses in their ideal career. A colossal win for everyone. There are magickal workings that can be done to ensure that this inheritance happens, and the Gods can also be petitioned for help, but it's not unlikely for it to happen without any insurance in place.

It's a sacrifice people do for the greater good of their race and nation. It may be inconvenient but it's not necessarily traumatic.

A marriage of necessity can also have no sex and no emotions involved.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top