You keep moving in the same circle, reproducing what has been done for ages. You’ve created a new belief system, but at its core it offers nothing that hasn’t existed before—especially in a time built on free thought and the pursuit of knowledge. You’re reviving gods once worshiped by others, as if you’re completing an old loop instead of opening a new horizon.
You criticize Judaism and Christianity, yet their followers are just as capable of thinking and questioning, and they have the same right to examine their beliefs the way you examine yours. What you call “Zeusism” isn’t a new idea in itself, but rather a mental approach to handling emotions and thought, and anyone can develop that skill.
And you say other religions were created by extraterrestrial beings. Fine—let’s assume that’s true. But how can you be sure that your own belief system isn’t also the product of other beings? How can you claim with certainty that “Zeus”—or any being you reintroduce—is a true deity and not just an impersonation, the same way you accuse other religions of being fabricated? Adding a few scientific notions doesn’t grant any belief absolute truth. Meditation is a human practice available to everyone.
I’m not asking these questions as an opponent; I’m asking as someone seeking understanding. I don’t want to believe in something whose roots I don’t know. What I’ve liked most about you is your openness, and I hope your response will reflect that openness. I’m here to learn, not to confront. And if I see what proves the truth, I won’t oppose it.