Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

[Race] Ashley Banjo - Britain in Black & White, plus related clips

FancyMancy

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
7,007
This post is split into 3 posts. Firstly because it is long - it exceeded the 100 000 character limit, then because it exceeded the 35 picture limit. The pictures will have loaded by the time you get to them in the thread. I quote a lot from the video. I colour-code the quotes, not one colour for each and every person speaking, but to make it easier to read and notice what is a quote and what I am commenting.


feuLiQ6.png

With strong language from the start, some racist images and discussion of race matters.
Ashley Banjo explores British history & the negative reaction to his Britain's Got Talent dance. He meets supporters like actor David Harewood & critics like comedian Jim Davidson.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AHDu99ebqBQj


In all of that episode of Celebrity Gogglebox, not just this clip, regarding the goggleboxers, not the programmes/films that were being watched, were only Black or Asian or mixed families or friends. There were no Whites. Those two at the end, who were saying about Blacks multiplying and that we having to accept it because she reckons we can't do anything about it, are not celebrities; they are on the regular Gogglebox programme, as are two Asians who were saying about people complaining to Ofcom about being uncomfortable.


My comments are below. My comments may or may not reflect that of Joy of Satan Ministries, its materials, or its users. These are my own. This is quite long, and I didn't think it would be this long, so it might be a good idea to go through it more than once. It might be surely is controversial and difficult. Undoubtedly, I say things below which are offensive. You have been warned. You are also welcome to watch, read and reply.

Dear Black readers. I reply honestly in this post. I think that you will be offended by what I say here, but please try to understand what I am trying to say. You have been warned. You are also welcome to watch, read and reply.

Dear Asian readers. This video is about Blacks versus (and yes, I do mean versus) Whites, and hardly anything is mentioned about Asians. I do refer to non-Whites, which of course includes Asians. What I say might also offend you. You are also welcome to watch, read and reply.



I would like to open this with this picture -

KBnkSlH.png



"He was around at a time when it was like no Blacks, no dogs, no Irish on the doors."
So it's not racism, then. It's foreigners. We're not xenophobes exactly (although, some probably are), but we want to keep ours ours, we want - and need - to preserve our Whitehood, our Whiteness. What's wrong with that? Why is that so bad, wrong, offensive? With your dad coming over here in the '60s with his brother, undoubtedly their Children would be here... and then more Children... and then more Children... and then more... and more and more and more... and now we're not "allowed" to defend our own and keep our own because defending our own and keeping our own is racist.

"No wonder he was worried."
When one moves into another's home, they must respect that person's home and abide by their rules. The same applies on larger scales to foreigners going into others' countries - but since this is a racial matter, non-Whites - coming in to White areas. I will say something which might be offensive now - the person being welcomed into another's home surely would not try to take over, at the homeowner's expense, and try squatting there. Squatting in that person's home is non-Whites coming into White areas and it is a deliberate or unintentional attempt to take over and replace Whites.

It may be very worrying for your dad, his brother, etc., about whichever country he/they came from, so much so that it must have been bad enough for them to decide that they had to come over here instead, but once you are up and running, having been fed and given a comfortable bed by the homeowner, you should stand on your own two feet and fix your own country, instead of squatting, no?

Regarding them praying - your "god" didn't fix your country, so now you (as an individual, and also yous as non-Whites) are here and taking over Whites' countries. Why bother "praying" to that false-god? It didn't care about you nor your country to fix your country, and you didn't care to fix your country; instead, you're here and wanting to fit-in, expand, replace, instead of actually fitting-in in your and your ancestors' homes/countries. It sounds like replacement, squatting, invasion, takeover. That's illegal under both 1) international law, which is being ignored by all but some of those who are trying to keep ours ours, and 2) Brexit, which also is being ignored... It is, however, what I do in certain computer games when I want or need to defeat my enemy. I work closer to them, then I (depending on the game) build a colony or an area near or in their area, and take over. Deny that, please. Fixing one's own home/country brings immense pride and joy and happiness and self-worth and self-esteem; instead, allowing onself to be put through difficulty and strife and hatred and opposition by those wanting and needing to keep their own their own... is somehow preferred...

"[song in Britain's Got Talent performance] Black. Lives. Matter."
Yes. They do. I won't deny that, nor say that they don't. Asian lives also matter. White lives also matter. Those who say "all lives matter" more likely than not in response to "Black Llves Matter" doesn't negate Blacks' lives mattering. What I think people have a problem with is the BLM movement, and obviously the massive problems of the attempted conquering of Whites' areas.

I didn't archive the pages in this picture.
pQlqXgu.jpg


It's fine to say Black lives matter and Asian lives matter, but not Wwhite lives matter.

"When you see all of that negative press and energy... it is personal. We're called 'Diversity'. How are we gunna not stand up for something like that that we believe in so passionately?"
It is also personal that Whites want and need to keep Whites' things White. With the flooding-in of non-Whites (and also foreign Whites, but this is more about Race than subrace), that means our Whiteness is decreasing. Yes. It is very personal. It's OK for you to stand-up on a non-political stage which you know millions of people will see and make a statement about replacing Whites - which is what it is, even if you don't say that directly nor in those words - for your own, but it's very much not OK for Whites to defend Whites and White things in our White country. It is very personal.

"We're called 'Diversity'. How are we gunna not stand up for something like that that we believe in so passionately?"
A dance group wanting to make a political statement. Why can't dancing be dancing? Why does everything have to be 'a message'? Entertainment is supposed to be entertaining, not politics-debating-and-arguing. The forum or arena for things are there. They exist. "We can use this 'light entertainment programme' as a political stage and 'spread our message'." I understand the opportunity for doing it on there, but it is not for that. Besides, the name "Britain's Got Talent" is wrong. As I say, it is The World's Got Talent in Britain, so...

Notice also all of the 'urban' influence in music and dancing and communicating. "Urban" means "Black", and "street" means "Black" in these cases, but we're not "allowed" to say "Black" in some cases; "urban" or "street" has to be used instead - yet when we say "non-White" we are asked why we're so afraid of saying "Black". We can't win. We're being attacked from all sides. White music can be White without Black influence, rap, reggae mixed-in. I may sound like I am contradicting myself because I said before that I like a small amount of rap/hip-hop and reggae, including in some songs which appear to be White music, and I do like some of it. These are when I was younger and didn't really have my own opinions, with being bombarded by media and things. This was the earlier parts in diversity and Race-mixing AKA the replacement of Whites, burying it in the memory and psyche, normalising it; but at that time I didn't know that it was and the attempt of the repetition of die-versity and "equality" and tolerance made me like at least a small percentage of it.

How can you not stand up for what you believe so passionately in? You can't not stand up for it. We, on the other hand, can't. When we oppose, we're called muh waysist. (For anyone who is translating, "muh" is a crybaby way of saying "my" and "waysist" is "racist". I am being sarcastic and mocking.) When we go on "extreme/Far-Right websites/groups", we're called muh waysist. What about extreme/Far-Left? I never hear anything about that. When we question, we're called muh waysist. When we dislike, we're called muh waysist. When we defend our own, we're called muh waysist. When we try to defend our own, we're called muh waysist. We can't do anything. You, on the other hand, can't not. It just appears that you can't, to give you some resistance so as to help and encourage you to increase your zeal, to drive you forward stronger. In reality, you can. You need friction to be able to have direction. It's much easier to drive along a full-of-friction road to your destination than it is on ice. On ice, you'll crash and burn without being in control; on friction, you can control the speed and where you go. We can't; you can't not.

In London and elsewhere, there are police no-go zones, which have been overrun by non-Whites - I forgot if it is Blacks or muslim Asians, or possibly both. Once upon a time, London was White. Now even the police can't go there... I consider something that a sort-of gangster in GTA:SA says while fighting - "Comin' into mah 'hood 'n' startin' shit!". In real-life, going to someone else's ''hood' and trying to make it their own, instead of leaving it be as it was, is taking over and replacing and is OK and is to make even the police not be permitted to enter; but Whites trying to say, "Coming to my country and doing shit against us" is muh waysist, and Whites trying to defend their own is muh waysist.

"It affected all of us, including my brother and Diversity member Jordan. When I saw him on his radio show talking about it and I saw him break - that was really hard for me because he doesn't break. He's strong."
"It's sad. It's sad, genuinely. I feel anxious and worried saying something like 'Black lives matter', when that's all we want, man. It's just love and positivity."
We have different love and positivity. You're trying to find love and positivity in all the wrong places. Our mentalities and psychologies and ideals and cultures and customs, etc., are all different. We can't accommodate you, we can't accommodate what you need. We're ill-equipped for that. Only your own are well-equipped to help you; only they can.

"No-one's saying 'Only Black lives matter'."
When people reply "all lives matter", you - personally perhaps, but seemingly as a Race definitely, based on what I have seen, and realising how this indoctrination has been going - seem to think that "all lives matter" means "Black lives don't matter". We can't say anything. You say "no-one's saying 'only Black lives matter'"; when people say "all lives matter", they're not saying "Black lives don't matter". In this video, that has been accepted to mean "Black lives don't matter", though. So you saying "'Black lives matter' doesn't mean 'only Black lives matter'" permits non-Blacks to say "all lives matter" which doesn't mean "Black lives don't matter". If someone said, "Asian lives matter" and someone else replied "all lives matter", it doesn't mean "Asian lives don't matter". The same with Whites.

"We've said this now, and I don't wanna take it back but even if I wanted to, we can't - so what does that mean?
"I feel like the routine was just the beginning of this new chapter. I think now that lid has been lifted, you cannot avoid it; the conversations have to happen."
"I wanna go out there, I wanna speak to people who have been active already. I wanna speak to people that disagree with me."
Ashley wants to meet people who disagree with him, yet we can't say "all lives matter" because of either his bias, or him being indoctrinated with bias, has caused him to take offense at us saying "all lives matter" and take it personally and decide that it means "Black lives don't matter", decide that it is "racist". You want opposite, or opposing, opinions, thoughts, ideas... yet you won't accept "all lives matter". You want opposite, or opposing, opinions, thoughts, ideas... yet you want to have equality and diversity. How can one have diversity and equality? They're incompatible. Diverse means many different things. Equal means... being the same... You can't be different and the same. There need to be proper words, such as instead of "racism", have "xenophile" and "xenophobe" (see below). Instead of "diverse" and "equal" have...?

I just said, "How can one have diversity and equality? They're incompatible. Diverse means many different things. Equal means... being the same... You can't be different and the same." It is very important to make a big note of something, bring it to light. When we say things, are we speaking poetically or are we speaking literally and directly? Asians, Blacks and Whites are Humans; Humans are the same, but Asians, Blacks and Whites are different. Males and Females are Humans, so they are the same, but Males and Females are different. In this sense, we are diverse and equal; but in literal terms, different things are not the same. We can't be diverse and equal. Notice I said "in this sense". Literality is literality. If we speak poetically, then it is not literal, so how do we speak? How do we mean things? We can say 1+1=2. Pi=3.14159... We can say "Pi=3" but it is... not literal. It is incorrect. We may be Humans so we are the same, but we are different - you have your People, we have our People, Asians have their People.

When we buy something for £2.99, we say it is £3, but that is not literal. "Definition" doesn't always work; "law" is nonsense. Whatever (((they))) define things as is obviously not working - and I suspect that is deliberately so. We need to be very careful in what we say, how we say it, and what we mean by it. "I want to be myself in your foreign country." "I want to do my own different things in the country that you have established over many, many, many years." "I want to be different, but I want to be equal, and I want your different country to be diverse with me and my people." You're no good for us.

Don't be offended. I said already "we can't accommodate you, we can't accommodate what you need" and "we're ill-equipped for that", so instead of saying "we're no good for you; you're no good for us" I decided to put "you're no good for us" first, before saying this - we're also no good for you. I did it that way on purpose. We can't be what you want - diverse and equal with you, and you can't with us. We're White. Do Black things where Black things have existed already for many, many, many years.

"I didn't set-out to be the brunt of people's anger..."
When people are angry, there is something wrong. You could realise this and ask what's wrong and if you can help, but instead you go on and continue to promote your diversity in our White areas - as you were told to keep doing it, and upsetting people, and fighting "the good fight". You want, you want, you want. What about what we want? To defend and protect and keep our Whitehood, our Whiteness, our White things, but nooooo. You want diversity in our White areas, and that's all that matters. You/your predecessors come to White areas, and stay here, and say "Black lives matter", and you here the response "yeah, so do White lives matter" or "Yeah, so do all lives matter", and you get offended and have a tantrum, then go home and cry, and be told "continue to promote diversity, keep doing it, upset people, fight 'the good fight'". See the 51st State film, where Robert Carlysle goes into an opposing football team's pub and taunts them, and they react...

Some people assault when angry, others walk away and leave the situation. In the documentary when Jim walked out, that was "wrong", apparently. He's upset about things, but he's wrong, and you're right.

"Historian David Olusoga is at the forefront of British conversations about Race."
I didn't know that. I've never heard of him... I don't recognise him. I don't know anything, other than what is in this video, about him.

"It's difficult to navigate because it exists in this sort of toxic reality underneath our society. To be Black is to be told every day 'you are not who you are; you are this stereotype'."
It is difficult to argue. Is that literally it being said every day and being told every day that they are a stereotype, or is that an emotional exaggeration? Jim Davidson said there are no White people on TV; David Olusoga said you're told that you, as a Black person, are the stereotype every day. Ashley responds to Jim's, but not to David's. If one doesn't want to be offended by stupid people, then don't go near stupid people... Again - go to Black countries where you fit-in and where you will be happy. Build-up your Black communities and societies, and let us alone.

Bullshit charities can't make Black countries better, and there are billions of charities (oh, no, I exaggerated) but Akon was able to help with solar power to get electricity to 600 million in Africa. Many charities Worldwide who have many, many, many £millions or £billions - and that false-god you prayed to with at least "unlimited power" and the Worldwide church with at least £1tn 144bn/year - also can't fix your Black country... but Akon did something good to help. The innumerous charities and your false-god don't know how to help, but Akon did. Akon is Black. He ignored the stereotypes. Boo-fucking-hoo for you.

PZiOgEn.png


"So it is gunna be difficult to make sense of because it doesn't make any sense."
"It doesn't. For something that feels like it affects you so much, it's almost hard to grab hold of proof - you know, we're not in the '70s anymore, we're not in the '80s. You know, it isn't as obvious."
"The difference between the '70s and the '80s - a lot of the racism was overt, a lot of it was racial violence; there were swastikas and there were NF symbols on walls and it was really in your face. Things have got better, but racism still exists. It exists in new ways because we have new technologies, we have new platforms and I think people feel emboldened, in the last few years, to say things on those platforms that they wouldn't have said a few years ago."
Is it racist (discriminatory, offensive, of course) to go into an opposing football team's pub and be a dick against them? Is it "racist", when someone from an opposing football team comes to your pub to be a dick, for you to be offended and react? I don't mean "racism" in football. That's only a film but is realistic. Whites fight Whites over football. Whites hated the Irish, who are also White. I am using Robert Carlyle's bit in that film metaphorically, symbolically. It's about defending one's own. People have their own thoughts and understandings and free speech..., and (((authourities))) shut them down when they react to others, but now with the WWW/666, we can speak again - hence Jim Davidson's videos, hence the Joy of Satan Ministries and Her Materials, hence the jew paying the jew to defend the jew online...

Notice the opposition of, dislike of, hatred of Irish there, in the documentary. Ireland is White, yet they were still unwanted. It surely is not about racial matters. I interpret it as wanting and needing to defend our own. Yes, Irish are White, but they are their own. Again - and here is a poetic/literal contradiction - Irish are the same but different. It is, as David said, confusing. It is complicated. It is muddy. It is dirty. That, I suspect, is deliberate. While we can't put things into words, we have poetry and emotions/feelings and actions to try to compensate - and usually, we do compensate with these things, but in argumentation, it is too important to be direct and clear and real (as Ashley said to Jim). It's not racial against Blacks. It's preserving our own against even the Irish who are also White. Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland hate each other because one's catholic christian god must be preserved, and the other's protestant christian god must be preserved. The matter around Race is not the actual, true, real reason, but that has been made to be the focus - the repeated, relentless, biased and ignorant focus. With it being the focus, that also redirects the thoughts of those who are reacting, towards it being a Race matter, and if they do have their thoughts redirected, then they forget and/or don't realise it is about defending and keeping one's own. With it being a Race matter, that is a proxy for the real reasons, the real matters of keeping White things White, and - in regards to the Irish here - one's own local White things locally-White.

"It exists in new ways because we have new technologies, we have new platforms and I think people feel emboldened, in the last few years, to say things on those platforms that they wouldn't have said a few years ago."
I think people would have said things a few years ago. They just couldn't. They don't want to have to go through having to be cancelled, shutdown, arrested, etc. The WWW is dangerous for the jew and its plans - in jewish numerology, W = 6, and 666 is Nature. It is Natural and it is Nature, and the jew is afraid. (That surely also means the jew has 666 coursing through its veins... and in its other biological bits and pieces. The jew is so uncomfortable and eurgh.)

"There were people that voted for us, and they still then complained."
Ashley said there was nearly 7 million people watching. Not all of those viewers would have rang-in and voted. Presume half of those who watched did vote, then half or more of those voters might have - and yes, only might have - voted for Diversity. Maybe Diversity won with 30% of the vote, and the remaining 70% was split-up too much to be a majority. Ignoring that, as I said "only might have voted" - we don't know if the vote and results were genuine or if they were fake. When playing the lottery, other peoples' purchases of lottery tickets goes towards the winner or winners. With "israel" making a political song in Eurovision, which is against the rules, it still won. With Honey G on X Factor, who got booed left, right and centre, it still got to the final 5 and said it couldn't hear the booes, yet the booes were obvious.

You don't know who voted for Diversity, and you don't know who watched Britain's Got Talent - some people watch only the auditions and not the rest of the series - and you have no idea if the same people who, firstly, watched BGT were those who complained, and secondly who watched and voted for Diversity (if the vote was genuine) were the same people who complained. With the 7 million watchers, unknown number of voters, and the 24000 complaints, saying "there were people that voted for us, and they still then complained" seems to be inaccurate and unfair.

Ashley said that the British public voted for us who then complained; does Ashley not consider himself British?

How many Blacks voted for Diversity? Presumably all? (You can presume, so so can I.) Anyway - how many Blacks voted for Diversity and how many Whites didn't? How many Blacks complained and how many Whites didn't? You have no idea, so claiming the same voted for you
and then
complained about you is not an argument.

"So I think that's because it's alright when we were entertaining people and dancing around, but it's not alright if we speak our mind"
BGT is not (supposed to be) a political stage. It's an entertainment programme for the family. There are political arenas/forums - both online and off. An evening, family entertainment programme is not the place for it. I do understand taking the opportunity for doing so - and to be very honest, I actually don't blame you for doing so. In a way, you should have taken that opportunity, but you should have used discernment to realise the fallout. Others have done similar things - such as to thank frontline workers and things (and these were White and didn't win, so that's diverse, equal and far - NOT), and any other acts, but behind the programme, no doubt (((Simon Cowell))) and (((TPTB))) saw this opportunity of Diversity to promote non-White things in White areas. I know someone way back when when Pop Idol was on was trying to vote for Gareth Gates versus Will Young, and they couldn't get through on the phone, so they voted for Will Young. It was the only time they ever did such voting. Will Young won it. I doubt the phone-in vote made the blindest bit of difference for Diversity winning. We just have to trust and believe it is all genuine and honest. We can't exactly know, can we?

"and I actually had a post to that effect. It was to me, Lewis Hamilton, and Anthony Joshua, and esentially it was, 'Shut up and do what you do, because that's how you'll be accepted. You're not here to talk politics, you're not here to talk about what matters; your here to dance, drive and box'."
Who sent you that message? A White person? An Asian person? A Black person?I could also say - never send a Boy to do a Man's job. You're not as politician or a spokesperson for racial matters. I am guessing that you think that because you became famous and you got real or fake votes and won a talent competition that you can politicise things to suit yourself and your group. That's the wrong avenue - and the wrong venue, the wrong stage, the wrong arena, the wrong forum, the wrong platform. You don't play football in a wrestling ring - and you can cry and whinge and bitch all you want. Wrestling rings are for wrestling. You can cry and whinge and bitch that your car won't fly you to your favourite holiday destination, or fly you to the Moon and try to undercut Richard Branson or Elon Musk all you want.

"That's the type of post that makes you feel like less of a person."
Why do you need to get your self-worth from other people accepting your political message on a family entertainment programme in the evening? If you want to feel like less a person, then go see Roy "Chubby" Brown and he might let you know. (I am not 100% certain if Chubbs touches on racial matters, though, but he is a blue-humour comedian.) Go somewhere that makes you feel bad where you don't fit-in, or go somewhere that makes you feel good and where you fit-in. You want to win in White areas instead of winning in Black areas.

"Is that how people see you? Dancing object, a dancing monkey. Is that it?"
You came on to BGT as a dancer, in a dance group. Obviously that's what people expect of you. (((Friends))) made a joke of something along the lines of "that's what I'm expecting from these people". You're trying to mix family entertainment in the evening with important political matters. That's the wrong place and the wrong time. You got the venue wrong. People expect from X what that X thing offers. They don't expect other things. Did you ever work? Did you go into e.g. a farm job while trying to be a dancer, or a shop job while trying to be a farmer? From BGT, people want entertainment, not to be told "You need diversity in your country by letting me and mine in and letting me and mine be important".

"I think it gets to the heart of the forms of racism..."
This David Olusoga "is at the forefront of British conversations about Race". He is saying here it's about racism, not telling Ashley the truth. If he doesn't realise, then he may be forgiven, but this is pandering. It is brainwashing. It is evangelising. It is indoctrination. This applies to any audience member who is watching and sympathetic to it, as well - e.g. those real or fake reactions on Gogglebox, and anyone watching the documentary.

I know those persons on Gogglebox are at least partly fake. They do things for the camera - as they just would, wouldn't they? - and this has been proven. e.g. 1) one was being silly and took their glasses off and put them in front of their face, and angled them perfectly for us, the home audience, to be able to see directly through the camera so when we look at his eyes, they appear silly due to the correct angle of his glasses from his eyes to the camera; 2) any drawings presented by those in the programme, e.g. that they drew or that their Child drew, they don't just hand to their friend or family member; they have it angled so that we, the home audience, can see it through the camera.

So I think this David Olusoga is doing the same for Ashley there and anyone sympathetic to this cause who watches this documentary, hoping to catch as many fish in the net as possible. Again, maybe he really believes it, but it is repetition of things, it is an echo chamber, in different ways. Maybe not a church or a mosque, or a political arena/forum, or an online forum or website or video channel, or any other platform, but it is still presented in a biased way as an echo chamber. I know that people are very biased in arguments. I don't know how many people try to be fair. Yes, I have strong views, that is very obvious, but I have also tried being fair in this post. I have said where thre have been contradictions I have shared, and I have also sort of supported Diversity's (and whomever-else-who-is-connected's) opportunity-taking for using BGT for this. I don't agree with it, but I understand it is a chance to reach millions of people. People are biased - and this David Olusoga is, whether maliciously or not. He doesn't admit that the BGT stage was the incorrect place to do this (the closest he said was that he thought they were going to come for Ashley); instead, he speaks against Whites (and Asians?) here, saying it's muh waysism.

I notice that on-camera, Alesha Dixon didn't say that it is racist. She said that Pandora's Box, or a can of worms, has been opened, and now people have to talk about it. This "forefront historian of British conversations about Race", David Olusoga, who I expect is not very well-known, can say biased things, whereas well-known Alesha Dixon can't.

"...we inherited from the 18th and 19th centuries. Those forms of racism said Black people did have some qualities. Black people can be Physical, they can be strong, they can be athletic."
Is that racism, or is that working to your strengths? If Whites don't want non-Whites to be their leaders - simply because of preserving Whiteness, Whitehood and White things, and also because Blacks don't represent Whites - then why is that racist to prevent Blacks from being Whites' leaders? Blacks obviously are healthier Physically and stronger Physically, more durable, have more stamina, etc., Physically. I presume and expect that the conditions back then were not as good as they could have been, but if (((media))) tells us anything, those holier-than-thou aristocrats back then, the toffs, the arrogant higher-ups back then were all full of themselves. See how conditions were for White people under "White" i.e. (((certain))) monarchs. Quick Victoria didn't care about workers' conditions. See how society was - for Whites. This might be very offensive but perhaps you should be happy that you were treated the same way along with us, whether at the same time or at different times. It seems like you were put to good use for your strengths - that being Physicality. The working and living conditions left much to be desired, I expect, but it sounds like you were still used according to your abilities.

"What you couldn't do was have analytical, cognitive intelligence."
How much 'class' or 'caste' was there? The aristocrats were supposed to be the wise ones. oNlY tHeY kNeW wHaT wAs GoOd FoR tHe CoMmOnErS; tHe CoMmOnErS dIdN't KnOw WhAt WaS gOoD fOr ThEmSeLvEs. This includes White commoners who were to remain "in their station in life". Me saying above that Blacks were put to good use for their Physical abilites does not mean that I think their Mental abilities were not good.

"When people say 'Stick to what you know, just be a dancer', what they're saying is 'I'm comfortable with the structural racism of the society I live in, I'm comfortable with you in this box, I'll celebrate you in this box, but that's the limits of who you are because of your skin colour'."
Have you asked them that? Do you know what people mean when they watch BGT and expect BGT, not Britain's Got Political Messages? How is being advised to stick to what you know, what you're good at, instead of trying to fake your way into a pretend political place, a bad thing and something to be upset about? Not everything against a Black person is a racial matter. It seems to be getting about as bad as the jew's muh holocaust. Everything is about muh holyco$t, muh troloco$t. Waaah-waaaaaah.

There is so much bias in what David Olusoga said. Fair enough to the extent that he is defending Blacks and Black things, but that is very much incorrect for the entertainment stage of Britain's Got Talent in the evening for family entertainment. Was there any warning "The following programme/section contains Pro-Black, political messages in White Britain. Viewer discretion is advised", or was it just shown without any prior warning or notice or information, without any possibility of knowing what to expect?

"A lot of the criticism I received was framed in this way."
  1. So you say. There has been quite a lot of inaccuracy and bias in this programme, so we don't know quite - or exactly - what the posts and tweets you received were.
  2. OK, so then take advice and grow-up. Do what you're good at, not what you're not.

"Comedian Jim Davidson, once the king of Saturday night entertainment, took to his online channel to express his opinions about our performance."
You took to Britain's Got Talent, a programme for entertainment that millions of people watch, to express yours. On Jim's online channel, we see how many people view videos (but these are not always true, because fake views can be bought so I have been led to believe), and being one with controversial, strong opinions, anyone can choose to watch his videos and choose to not watch his videos; on BGT, with multiple different types of act - a variety act programme - there are many different types of things on there; political messages not one to be expected. So people watching BGT for funny dog acts and scarily-dangerous mentalist acts are the demographic for that who wouldn't expect political messages and who didn't watch BGT for political messages... So... Jim's online channel, where people would go there deliberately and watch deliberately for him to express his opinions, is not OK, but your millions-of-entertainment-expecting-viewers-seeing-unexpected-political-messages TV place is OK? Why?

Ashley was told that he was unaware of some of the things that BLM stood for, and he said he was aware. So he knew, and went on BGT anyway? To... shit all over Whiteness on TV for millions to see... and not expect a reaction?! blank blinking

"...and I saw it on the day that a Black Man was charged with murdering someone in Birmingham and injuring, quite badly, 7 other people."
"What's that got to do-- I'm sure on that day there were millions of people around the World who did wrong things, and I hope that Man who attacked people with a knife was sent to prison, but... what's that got to do with racial inequality?"
I'm sure millions of people around the World were doing bad things against Whites - but what does that have to do with racial inequality? A White copper kneeling on the neck of George Floyd - a Black Man - versus a Black Man killing 1 and injuring seriously 7. One is OK, the other is not. Why?

So if 1 White versus 1 Black has to do with racial inequality, why does 1 Black v 8 presumably Whites not? "What's that got to do--" Probably a lot.

"Like... it baff-- it actually baffles me."
I don't want to be mean or nasty or anything, but above, David Olusoga said, "What you couldn't do is have analytical, cognitive intelligence". Apparently, you proved him right. As I said, "8 presumably Whites" - I don't know how many, if any, of those 8 were White or Asian, or if any were Black. If none of those 8 were Black, or all 8 were White, then my comments here stand. If any were Black, then Black-on-Black violence is a point, and would that, then, be related to racial inequality, or do any of the stereotypes, that David said and any others, actually fit? The statistics seem to be that more Blacks are in jail for offences. There is so much Black gang violence and murder by rival Black gangs... It does seem as if they don't user their Brains to think. It seems like they think with their Emotions instead.

"...and there's loads of White people sticking-up for you. Young White Girls..."
":O :D"
"walking around with banners, 'de-fund the police', 'support Black people'. 5600 illigal immigrants in this country - that's this month."
"It's irrelevant. The only difference is the racism. Lol. It's the only common denominator - the fact that we're talking about people who maybe look different coming from overseas. The hatred and the venon he's got, and the language he uses is the real ugly, the real ugly side of it for me."
It's irrelevant but the only common denominator is the racism, people who look different coming from overseas? So are you saying racism but not "rEvErSe-RaCiSm"? If there are 2 or more Races, then racism can exist. The mere existence of multiple, different groups can mean, but does not necessarily mean, that prejudice, discrimination, racism, whatever, can exist. Because Blacks look different than Whites and come from overseas from Black areas, it's racism, but because Whites look different from Blacks who are going overseas to White areas... it's not racism?

Jim Davidson is a comedian. You know that he is. For part of his bit, when Ashley met Jim, with some of Jim's reactions, I don't think anything else needs to be said. Also - it's irrelevant because you say so, Ashley, but when it's against you, then it's very much relevant, of course, yes?

"I know that sentiment lives out there. I know it's more alive than I ever thought it was."
With the so-called legislation and regulation of things, moderating online platforms, etc., I think the regulating and moderating is kept to a certain amount on purpose so as to employ big data and data mining. People share their comments online and analytics are used for reasons we're not supposed or "allowed" to know about. AI, for example, can be used to analyse people's thoughts, the general opinion of the people, the 'chatter', see how things are with demographics, etc., all of which is fed to ((TPTB))) so they can then use (((their agenda))) nefariously further.

"That video probably upset my mum the most. Hearing a guy speak so violently about your kids - I just think as a mum, more than anything else, it just broke her a little bit."
Your mum is not the only one who is upset, broke. Our Whiteness, our Whitehood, our White things are being broke, more and more, because we're not "allowed" to keep them White.

"It's not directly about me. It's about the people I love - ironically, most of which are White."
How is it about them? How is Jim Davidson saying things about a Black Man killing 1 and attacking and injuring seriously 7 others, about your mostly-White loved ones? That just seems like an emotional ploy used to get people upset and agree with you, instead of having them think critically with their Brains.

"Last year, my Britain's Got Talent dance routine exposed the vibes in the way our nation thinks about Race."
24000 people is not 60-70 million people. A lot may share similar opinions, and it's not exactly possible to find out exactly, but based on the numbers that we have here 24000 is a lot different than 60-70 million. 24000 is also a lot different than the 7 million people who watched it. There are unknown numbers in Britain who support the BLM movement, as well as agree that Black lives, indeed, do matter. There surely are some who are indifferent. You also seem to have split priorities, and you seem to be confused or 'chatting shit', as it were. You say "my group" but you also say "our nation", and you admit being mixed-Race but you're defending Blacks and seem to be agreeing that saying "all lives matter" means "Black lives don't matter"... and you're saying Jim's reaction is not about mixed-Race you, or about Blacks, but is about Whites - most of your loved ones...

"I'm on a journey to find out why it outraged so many people, including many who are far from racist."
Define "racist". Those who don't like a Black political message on a family entertainment, variety act evening programme are racist? How does one oppose that without being racist?

Black: Black lives matter.
White: OK, yeah. That's true, but all lives matter.
Black: Racist.

BOCjnXZ.png

I4cRnaZ.png



That's not just a meme or a joke. It has been admitted, proven, in this documentary!

Can you remember the days when conspiracy theories were just conspiracy theories? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

"Dominique highlighted frequent criticisms of the Black Lives Matter movement, that they're just a front for more-radical groups and policies like de-funding the police - but that's not my position. I want to find out if one of the most-prominent BLM protestors agrees. Imarn Ayton began attending marches last year and is now a leading voice in the movement.
How did you get into activism?"

"Eugh, you know what? The real moment was right here when I organised my first protest on the 6th of June, Saturday, with 20 000 people, including Madonna, and I stood on this plinth right here, talking about institutionalised racism."
We have thousands and thousands of years of Whitehood behind us, now non-Whites come here and we have to put our Whiteness down for non-Whites here, and we have to put-up with with non-Whites here - and yes, I do mean put-up with. We have to tolerate, especially with this new definition by the "govern"ment. If we are not tolerating, then we're extremist, and the "govern"ment will cancel us, meaning that the "govern"ment favours, in "our" society, the toleration of things that we, the people who reckon democracy exists, oppose, things which are against us, and the "govern"ment shuts us down because we oppose them. The "govern"ment will effectively cancel anything it doesn't like. What was the point of Brexit? That has been ignored, and look at this -

dBzkopb.png

EUk7eeJ.png


3zESEeU.png

Gy92CjN.png


It was never meant to be used... So we had no chance, no choice, no option, but to be forced to accept non-Whites flooding in. Raping us. Being violent against us. Destroying us. Destroying our Lands. We must accept it, no matter what. It we don't tolerate this, then we're extremist and will be cancelled by "our" "govern"ment. What, or who, exactly, does the "govern" in "government" mean and stand for?

More and more and more and more non-Whites have been coming-in,

CYL14uu.png


and I doubt it's from only Turkey, and based on this international law, that is illegal; likewise, based on Brexit, that is illegal, yet it is still happening regardless - and the "govern"ment's new definition, while not law, is still to be used so as to de-fund and cancel any groups it dislikes. It says it won't stop free speech, but it will still cancel you. That sounds awfully like "god" - you have free will but if you don't do as "god" demands, nope. You're cancelled, you're discarded, you're thrown into an eternal lake of fire for using your own choice. That's great democracy, that is. It's democrazy -

YoWW1Yn.png

N7yYDgX.png


It is ignoring international law and it is ignoring Brexit, and we, Whites, apparently are not "allowed" to defend ourselves and our things in any of this. We have to share, just like in commjewnism, so instead of it remaining Whites', it has to become "ours".

"You also have those that believe in reform, like myself. So those that advocate for changing the education system, or making sure that reviews, in regards to racism or tackling equality, are implemented."
We must change our curriculum to suit those for whom the already-established curriculum was not designed, because it didn't need to include them because they were not here? Now they are here, despite our protestations, our dissension, you want to change the way we run our own things. You want to have equality in our own White areas with, or replacing, our own White things, instead of being in your own Black areas with your own Black things. You may not have chosen to be born here, and that's not your fault nor your doing, but we don't want our things lessened and deleted and replaced for others' things to be here instead. Why is that so wrong to keep ours ours? Why is it so wrong for you to not go to yours and have, be and keep yours yours? Black lives matter - they do, of course, and Black countries exist for Black lives. Asian countries exist for Asian lives. White countries exist for White lives.

It -
  1. is wrong for, and
  2. is as if it is actually, if not officially, illegal for
Whites to want to keep, need to keep, and try to keep White things White, and you're OK with that and you're riding on that. It is actually illegal to replace Whites and White things, yet you still are doing that because you can.

"Our frame of reference for racism in this country is overt, and that is, obviously, as we know when someone has racial prejudice and it is obvious, deliberate and direct; and in actual fact, covert racism is what is most-prevalent in England, and that is when someone has hidden racial prejudice and they disguise it and rationalise it with an explanation that society would deem acceptable."
You say "racial prejudice". Are you sure it's prejudice and not post-judice? I can't speak for everyone, nor anyone other than myself, for that matter, but pre-judice and post-judice don't matter. What matters is the replacing of Whites and White things in White areas.

"I'll give you an example - the statement 'all lives matter'..."
"Which is true, by definition...!"
"...and that's my point, actually! Thank you very much.
"Of course it's true."
"That's my point."
"Yeah."
"So 'all lives matter' is obviously in response to 'Black lives matter', so it is shrouded with racial prejudice..."
It does not follow that saying "all lives matter" means the person saying it is being prejudiced racially against... Blacks or Asians, regardless of whether or not "all lives matter" is said in response to "Black lives matter". The person on the receiving end hearing you say "Black lives matter" might consider you to be racist against non-Blacks, and presumably would try to be unbiased and say, "all lives matter", or "Yes, of course Black lives matter. All lives matter.", or similar ways of saying it, but you're saying because they're saying "all lives matter", the mere mention of it, means that they are being prejudiced racially - presumably against Blacks and not Asians. That is not the case, necessarily. Unless you actually know if they - Whites, by the sounds of it - are being prejudiced against Blacks (but obviously not Asians), then you don't know. Unless you actually know, then you don't know.

"...however, it is a factual statement; therefore, it is justified."
You say that "Black lives matter" is a factual statement; therefore, it is justified. "Make America Great Again" - this has other iterations. "All lives matter" is a response to "Black lives matter", but it is not discriminatory necessarily; it is inclusive of Blacks - which is what you want, it is diverse, it is equality to say "all lives matter". The evolution of/from "Black lives matter" to "all lives matter", and from "Make America Great Again" to its other iterations, is memetic. That's the way things work, that's how people are.

How many Blacks or Whites or Asians say, "Black lives matter", and then Whites say, "All lives matter"?
How many Blacks or Whites or Asians say, "Black lives matter", and then Asians say, "All lives matter"?
How many Blacks or Whites or Asians say, "Black lives matter", and then Blacks say, "All lives matter"?

Is this alleged racial discrimination aimed at "people", unspecified, or is it aimed only at Whites? Are you being racially-prejudiced now? It is undeniable that England, since you mentioned England, is a White country, which has been forged by Whites and has been White, with White values, White culture, White customs, White thoughts, White feelings, White mentalities, White things... and now "people" are racially-prejudiced for saying "all lives matter" when Blacks, Asians or Whites can and surely do say "Black lives matter". (Now being told "saying "all lives matter" is a racial reaction to "Black lives matter", some stupid people will refrain from saying "all lives matter" because they think they will be - or at least will be accused of being - racist even when they know they're not being.) To whom are you referring when you say they are racially-prejudiced? "In this country...". In this country there are non-Whites, so why not be specific and say "Whites", instead of "this country" or "someone"? You claim "all lives matter" is factually-correct but also is covert racism (presumably against Blacks only), yet you don't specify which "people" you are referring to, which "someones" you are referring to. Talk about covert racial prejudice - and wanting to change the curriculum so that "people" "in this country" - which surely means Whites as well as Asians and Blacks - think like you, on your terms.

According to you, that's wrong. You don't like it. It's wrong to not only be White with White things in White areas, but also to be oneself as one is, and instead one has to change, not say certain words or phrases. So much for free speech. It's OK for you to say that we're being racially-prejudiced by replying "all lives matter" even when we're not, but it's not OK for us to actually say "all lives matter". You have free speech and we don't, and you want diversity and equality? You don't like the way things are as they have been, which are trying to remain. You don't like it, so you say we're racially-prejudiced, and wish to change the curriculum so that Children think your way, instead of their own diverse ways, and altering "reviews in regards to racism or tackling equality" so that they "are implemented". What about those who have their own speech and thoughts and things already? Why change those just to suit you? Why say that they must change because you are offended? Stop being offended. Offence is taken, not received nor given. "No offence"; "None taken". Why should we change for you? I come to your home and force you to live and be on my terms? You come to my country and you force me to live and be on your terms? Where's the diversity? Where's the equality? Force is not equal; it is overpowering. You want, you want, you want, but what about what we want - which we have already and are trying to maintain?

"That is what we deal with. This is the type of racism we deal with in this country."
This is going to be offensive and taken out of context, blown out of proportion, misunderstood. It's just an analogy. It is not literal nor an attack. The Body is xenophobic [still, see below regarding "-ism" and "-phobe" and "-phile"] against foreign invaders - germs, diseases... The Body fights them off, and the Body attempts to remain, keeping itself as it is, as it should be, as it was. I am referring to Whites living in Asian countries and Black countries. I am referring to Asians living in Black countries and White countries. Yes, of course, I am, of course, referring, of course eyeroll to Blacks living in Asian countries and in White countries. Dogs don't like 'foreigners' entering their grounds - perhaps most-humourously the postman. Dogs don't like cats or other dogs entering their garden, but bringing-up puppy with kitten goes against both Animals' Natural inclinations. Indeed, it is unnatural to be replaced by others and it has become illegal only recently in the historical timeline. It is supposed to be illegal, but that is being ignored because of muh reaz0ns.

"Both Imarn and Dominique have shown me that Britain is still divided about what racism is, let-alone how to tackle it. There are so many opinions, but the hurt and damage remain, but why does racism matter so much? For many, the consequences are all too real.

...

Actor David Harewood is launching a book about his experiences, and I want to find out more.
Just the small clips and the small bits I've seen of you talk about your story, there was pivotal moments for you where you felt like you changed."

"When I came out of drama school, the World said to me, 'You're Black. You're Black. You play Black parts. You go for Black auditions. You don't go there... you don't play this, you play that'."
So? Type-casting is something that actually happens - a lot - in the entertainment industries. You have the skills to drive the tractor but you complain that you are not employed to muck-out the farm Animals. It is fair enough that Hermione Granger was played by a Black Girl in the play, as opposed to a White Girl - which some were upset about. The reason it is OK is, according to the person who told me, because nowhere in the Harry Potter books does it say that Hermione Granger is White. What's not OK is James Bond being played by an Australian or an American or a Woman; or in the Powerpuff Girls, there being a magicked Black 4th "sister" after how the 3 White actual sisters were established already and it being shown how they came to be already; or Cleopatra being played by a Black actress; or Eminem doing Black hip-hop/rap, even though I enjoyed some of his music - and as I have said before, in a video clip I saw of Black artists praising Eminem, I think they would have had to praise a White Man doing Black music - and doing Black music better than some Blacks, some would argue - because if they didn't praise him, then I suspect that they'd be in trouble and would not be as famous or continue being. I have no source for this; it is just my own cynicism regarding the matter.

"I suddenly realised, 'Oh. I'm not gunna be James Bond. I'm not gunna be the hero saving the Girl, getting the money, driving the car. I'm not gunna be the hero."
I have not read the James Bond books, so I don't know if he is described as a White Male, and given the time when the books were written it might be reasonable to assume Bond is White and not Black and not Asian, so depending on that it might be fine that you're not going to be James Bond - even though I expect Bond to be played by a non-White and a Woman or a robot or a banana one day. As for being the hero saving the Girl - why not? Why can't you be? Not all heroes are White,

JWyT3HG.png


but if you want to be the hero saving the Girl, then I refer back to what I have said - you have so much more freedom in Black areas, instead of trying to be the hero in White areas, but since you mentioned James Bond, driving the car, having the money, saving the Girl, it sounds like you want fame, not to actually help anyone. Diversity with you as a famous actor? Equality with you as a famous actor? Davyon isa real, actual hero. Why make life difficult for yourself - and for us? We have our own things here which others are attempting to change and replace. You have your own things there already. They have been forged and built-up for you.

Besides, why care and be upset about being or not being a fake hero in a film? Why is that important? Why not be a real, actual hero, like Akon? Like Davyon? Why is that not important? Don't you have actual priorities?

"The weight of that really hit me - knocked me for six."
"How did that racism impact you and change you?"
"Dude, it put me in a mental institution. A complete and utter psychotic breakdown."
You're putting the wrong weight on your shoulders, then. Having such strong convictions and expectations and - no offence but - delusions about reality, you're right in saying it knocked you for six. It brought you back to reality somewhat. That's not how things are - but now you are sort of like a hero, for Blacks to look-up to and possibly emulate, and definitely support. Your resolve has been strengthened, and now you are like a pioneer, perhaps. A hero in a way. Surely you don't know or realise these things. You don't realise that things are not supposed to be mixed, Races are not supposed to be miscegenised, we're not supposed to be bubbling away in a melting-pot crucible. You've been a victim in more ways than one, and while you fight to not be a victim, and Whites fight to not be victims, "law", media, "education", etc. is on your side against Whites in White areas.

70ujmVO.png


There is, apparently, no evidence she said this; however, she's been suspended because the jew hasn't experienced racial discrimination, so she claimed. One thought being a jew was a religion, not a race, but whatever. There might not be any evidence that she said White people are the problem in Britain, but Diane Abbott made 'terrible mistake' by saying Irish people did not suffer racism, says Labour grandee. There might not be any evidence that she said Whites are the problem in Britain, but it seems to fit, it seems as if she did say so, if we can extrapolate from other things she has said and done...

"Race is a very difficult... issue to talk about in this country."
"You've noticed!"
"Lol."
Yeah, comedic response. Lolling helps brainwashing. Lolling at things can help in accepting it. It buries deeply within the mentality and the psychology of a person, and it works away unconsciously. Then they believe it and accept it and behave it and become it. It is Cognitive Behavioural Therapy - it starts in the mind, it influences and guides the emotions and then encourages and enacts the behaviours. If one is opposed to something, they block it out; if one lols, they have happy hormones released which helps to influence them. That's no doubt why "comedy" programmes have canned laughter, to try and influence the audience to accept and agree and go along with "the (((moral))) of the story".

"Just the fact that we're not supposed to talk about Race plays into why so many Black people struggle with their mental health."
"I think there's a lot of people that are probably more impacted by it than we know."
"We internalise it. 4-times more Black people than White people end-up in mental institutions. 10-times more Black people than White people have schizophrenia and other mental health conditions."
There are places that are Black-friendly, which have Blacks and support Blacks and be Black. Can you guess any? You're in a non-Black area and trying to remain yourself. We're trying to remain ourselves and having to move around for non-Whites. Make a cup of tea without milk. Then add milk. You expect the milk and the tea to remain unchanged. Then you have sever mental ill health problems.

Patient: Doctor FancyMancy, It hurts when I do this.
FancyMancy: OK. Keep doing that, then.

What about Asians, though? Is this racism thing about only Blacks v Whites? There are Asians, as well, you know? They seem to be ignored - unless it is a subtle, or unconscious, realisation that Blacks are coming in to White areas, and that White areas are White areas and not Asian areas or Black areas...

I'm also going to suggest that - based on the theme of this documentary - the 4-times and 10-times figures of Blacks more than Whites might also be included in the anti-Black racism. Perhaps a large portion of the Blacks in those figures are actually not as bad as the figures say, but because they're Black they're more in the statistics.

"The pressure... just for having this tone of skin is massive."
"You feel it every day."
"I feel it every day."
Then go to where the pressure is tiny or doesn't exist, then! Fuck sake, man. This is exasperating... It won't be easy work - it'll be very hard work, but you can do it. They're your people, and you love them more than I do - more than I can. How many Black-made charities are there? Blacks have so many agencies for them, and White have merely "privilege", and Blacks complain and leave their Black areas in shit. You have more stamina than Whites, so you can work harder for longer and get the job done quicker than we can. Try and change ours all you want; yours needs heroes - real, actual heroes, not fake James Bond zeroes - real heroes, like yourselves.

"It's the first time ever I was scared of being in the public eye. There was a fear, and I would go, 'What does that person think of me? What does that person think of me?' and it was something I'd never experienced."
"I watched that performance - it's fantastic"
"Thank you."
"and it's really, really powerful. The fact that you upset people, I think is a great thing, because they were like, 'We're not having that'."
"Yeah, of course, yeah."
"You must continue with-- you must continue pushing that, because if you don't, I don't think it would ever change. It gives hope to a lot of other people. You're discovering your political power, so I'd have to say to you, brother - welcome to the struggle!"
Oh, thanks. Put this direct and blatantly-obvious anti-White attack in a programme on for Whites to see, on TV. Thanks. Tell us Whites that you're going to offend us, try to change the curriculum, keep forcing your non-White views on us. That sound like rape. It might not be sexual, per se, but it is still what we don't want, it it is still against us, it is still forced upon us, in our own White areas. Thanks. I thought that was illegal, as per the international law and as per Brexit. Great. Thanks.

"10 years ago, I can't imagine this auditorium right now maybe being so mixed and being so diverse. I think it shows you that like the conversation really has widened out, and Dave is a prime example how that can be difficult, life-changing sometimes, but he's harnessed that and what he's doing now is bringing all of these people together."
Yeah, 100 years ago, as well. 200 years ago. 500 years ago. 1000 years ago. 10000 years ago. We want to remain what we are, and we want our history to remain, intact, and our future history to remain, intact, not be replaced.

I have said previously that what we are increases, for good or for bad. Whatever it is that we are and do is what we are and do. It become more and more, Karma-wise. The jew is attempting to put things in "our" Karma so that non-Whiteness grows, increases, becomes more. The jew is trying to create and enforce "our" Karma in a guided and directed way.

"Since my Britain's Got Talent dance routine received tens of thousands of complaints, I've been trying to understand the nature of racism and why it continues to exist."
I suppose that's fair enough, but it seems very much like you're being biased to one side of the matter. You're saying it is against you, against Blacks, but I am saying it is us being against against-Whites; it is for Whites; and when we are against against-Whites, you/your People are, and the anti-White "govern"ment is, against against against-Whites, i.e. it is for against-Whites - and based on what the intended outcome would be - the enslavement of a mongoloid mixed non-race of Asians and Blacks - it is not exactly for non-Whites, but it certainly is for against-Whites. A lot of people surely agree that it is not a matter of against-Blacks or against-Asians; rather that it is against against-Whites, i.e. those who are "racist", but I think a lot of them don't realise, or perhaps don't know, quite what they mean to mean.

"David Harewood told me to fight the good fight, but what does that look like?"
It looks like trying to change and replace Whites, Whitehood, Whiteness and White things in White areas - and you/David/Blacks call that good? I don't think all Blacks agree. I hope not. I once, actually, saw some muslim Asian young Boys playing near someone's car. I don't know exactly what happened but the owner of the car, a Black Man, checked his car and was angry with those Asian Boys, and he said something to the effect of that they should go back to where they came from... A Black Man said about Asian Boys to himself, that they should go back to where they came from, in a White country. I actually found it funny - laughable, not funny-humourous. It's more eyerolly now. "Fight the good fight, brother" eyeroll. Alternatively, go to Black areas and fix them. There are so many charities for helping Blacks, and these charities... "have been" "helping" for many years, yet Blacks still need help. At the end of the day, only one can help themselves - and we're trying to help ourselves, help ourselves remain and stay existent. They're still drinking dirty, insanitary water, still have bad education if any, still are being born with cleft lips, etc., etc., etc. Couldn't they at least clean the water? It's the same with all charities. The charity 'Children in Need' made £1bn in 40 years. For Blacks, Akon helped with toilets. I say to you - fIgHt ThE goOd FiGhT, or actually help where help is needed. You'll be proud and it will be a different type of difficulty, instead of claiming that White-history-made White areas are "ours".

"As one of the UK's most-respected activists, Leila Hassan Howe..."
You must mean being the most-respected in the Black portion of the UK...

"The decision was taken that we ought to have a demonstration to say enough is enough."
Yet enough is not enough. Things continue to happen anyway. It's terrible that people died because a building was torched, but actions have reactions. If Whites stay and "fight the good fight" to keep and remain and be, then that's wrong and racist. Look at how many White places have been replaced by non-Whites; Whites have had to move - and some by authouritarian force. One Swedish family removed a White Swedish family out of their own home so that "refugees" could replace them. So much for that being illegal.

"Fight the good fight" is a euphemism for "continue to infiltrate, change and replace", including with upsetting those who are here already. Why do you suppose there is so much racism, as you call it, or prejudice and backlash? You're damaging us, hurting us, replacing us, displacing us, killing us... in our own White countries - and you're the offended ones?! You are the fucking offended ones?! I wanted to be direct and offensive in retaliation, saying about being fucking retarded and not having the cognitive abilities to understand (referencing what David said)..., but you've been victimised, as well. (((TPTB))), in its 6000-year plan, decided to have White areas be built-up with few births, and Asian and Black areas quite the opposite in some ways, so as to have multiculturalism with the flooding-in of non-Whites into White areas, instead of us all - Asians, Blacks a Whites - remaining and being where we were decades, centuries and millennia ago.

Let me come into your home and "fight the good fight", infiltrate, change and replace against you. You will bend over and let me win. No. You won't. You'd defend yourself, your own, your things, and get rid of me. If "enough is enough", then do one.

"You are being carried by the momentum, by the passion, by the feeling and by the fact that you know it's a just cause."
It's a just cause to infiltrate, change and replace others? That's illegal under international law, which existed in 1981, and it's also illegal now under Brexit.

"Sitting here now after everything you've seen, been through, been a part of, are you optimistic?"
I realised earlier that Ashley, in particular, is an agent for this. I realised, while I know already that this is indoctrination, now that Ashley is similar to "islamists", or terrorists, you might say. It's just a slower, subtle, less-direct and more gentle action and attempt.

"I'm optimistic because I can see a great number of people - Black and White people - who want to make things better."
Define "better". Different people have different mentalities and different ideas and different intentions. Whites have to kowtow to Blacks' ideas and intentions, and pretend to have Blacks' mentalities (e.g. "urban" or "street" culture things), but Blacks don't seem to be kowtowing to Whites' things...

"One thing I'm starting to realise - this is not just Black history; this is British history."
So our history is being replaced already, then?

"It's a part of history that I've never been taught, I didn't know about."
It shouldn't be. In the future, we can look back at these things and repeat those words "never again" with actual meaning, intention and effort and actions and behaviour.

"Keep on keeping on."
"Yeah."
"Always."
Onward, christian soldiers, marching as to war.

"This is about people, this is about the way that we... operate, the way we- we- we come together; our Humanity, essentially."
Really? Seriously?!

"Surely learning a history and having a deeper understanding of what has been is gunna help us massively in terms of where we need to go."
Your history, your ancestors, are not White, and they are not in White areas. You might know unconsciously and racially where you need to go, but your conscious knowledge and understanding have been polluted.

"Accusations of institutional racism continue to be directed at the Metropolitan Police."
I don't know but I presume that the murder of Stephen Lawrence was unjustified, but now police are not sorting out racial matters for fear of being labelled racist. Again - there are police no-go zones in certain areas, and they don't deal with matters for racism reasons.

1JVyPtF.jpg

S0uup0Q.png


I can only surmise that, with Stephen being only one example, that was allowed to happen or it was orchestrated, so that nowadays, police are too afraid of entering no-go zones and too afraid to deal with matters for fear of being labelled racist. One thing led onto another, onto another, onto another... and all the while, Whites are not "allowed" to have, keep and be White in White areas. It's a thread, and at points along that thread appear knots - Whites are restricted.

"Institutional racism - is it imagined or is it real?"
"You should ask those lads there, if I was honest - how they've been stopped, how they felt, how they were spoken to, did they think they got a fair crack at the whip. They'd probably say that institutional racism definitely sort of exists."
Previously, Blacks had been discriminated against. Now, there are agencies and groups and things for them, to help them. Older persons, from decades ago, had their mentalities; today, younger ones have different education and media, etc. One wonders what, and how, the older generations were taught so as to give them the mentalities that they had - and why they were taught such things and in those ways, to just have today's people be taught differently than their grandparents were. These days, White people have "privilege"

Y26EUCP.png


and that may be American, but it explains the point. Besides, shouldn't Whites have privilege in White areas, just like Blacks should in Black areas and Asians should in Asian areas? We supposedly have the so-called "privilege" of believing that, but you actually do have so many agencies and things to help you...

"I tell young coppers that when I train them - 'if you've made a mistake, tell everyone'."
It's not wrong to admit things, and it's not wrong, in arguments, to say, "I don't know", instead of being biased and trying to argue, probably in ignorance, and definitely in stupidity. That is at least part of the reason of racial matters, such as this.

"It's also easy to not want to listen if it doesn't affect you directly."
Listen to Whites who want to preseve Whiteness, Whitehood, White things in White areas, then. Except that does affect you... yet how much do you listen?

"Detective Sergeant Ray Sekalongo..."
Ray... Sekalongo. RaySekalongo. Race-ekalongo. We love coincidences...

"Well, why should I wait 'til someone's going in custody, having been arrested for an offense, to interview them, to talk about changing their life, when I can do it here and prevent it from going any further?"
It certainly does sound like the police are trained to behave in certain ways. It seems to be that a lot of police officers fit the profile. The training brainwashes them into a way of thinking - a mentality - or it brings that out of them, and that steers things in a direction which may or may not be actually helpful and down to Earth with civilians. It's not a secret that police have lost the respect of civilians over the decades... and if someone, like Ray, can ask this question why he can't help them openly and publicly/privately, instead of institutionally in custody, then it is obvious that he is capable of thinking for himself, but also with me being cynical he might have been taught and trained differently - maybe deliberately - than how White police officers are and were taught and trained.

"Some people said to me that 'taking the knee' pre-game is posturing, it's more sort of... you know... a gesture."
Just like Diversity shouldn't have (although, I can't blame them for doing so) used BGT as an opportunity to reach millions of people, I reckon football, likewise, also shouldn't. Will it go into rugby, tennis, snooker, darts, etc., as well - or does it already?

"I think the thing we have to remember is every form of Black protest has been described as illegitimate"
I don't know if that is true or false, but people watching the documentary will accept it without question and without a second thought.

"I think that the moment that accountability comes into play, and people can't just say what they want without any repercussions - I think that will be a huge game-changer."
No free speech because muh feewings? Grow-up. What about saying what you want, about changing the curriculum? Saying what you want, about using BGT as a political stage? Saying what you want, about wanting to have equality which means changing our White things to suit your Black things? If you want equality and accountability, then try to be White. "Oooooohhhh! You can't say that!" I can, but I don't mean it. It's not a problem for you - with this BLM movement - once you die, all of the effects that happen will no longer be your responsibility, so you'll have escaped accountability (at least in the World's current thinking).

"'We proactively find 65% of the abusive content that we remove.' From being on the opposite end of it, 65% doesn't always feel like enough. It's a real, serious problem."
It means that of all of the content that is removed, Twitter's moderators find 65% of it themselves; the other 35% is reported by users. It doesn't mean that Twitter removes only 65% of all of the content that they deem breaks their rules.

"We've seen that with CoVID and the public health crisis we've had. If social media platforms really wanna stop misinformation, and stamp-down on things, they can. They can really identify this stuff. I'd love to see that energy being put behind racism online."
You misunderstood Twitter's statement, and you're using one misunderstood statement by one website to say that all of online should be better. Regardless of all of that, that's more difficult. A lot of websites are echo chambers. Groups on those websites are echo chambers. If you are not into... e.g. My Little Pony, then you wouldn't be a brony; you wouldn't go to that website or that group, so if in there everyone agreed that non-bronies are fools, then you wouldn't know about that, and if it was classed as "bronism" or "bronist" abuse, then... well... whatever, whether it is moderated or not, or those who ae against that might be the ones who would be "bronist" engaging in "bronism"; if you are not an incel, then you wouldn't think all Females are shit and should be sex slaves; incels who do might be classed as "incelist" who engage in "incelism" or those who oppose that might be "incelist" who engage in "incelism"... you wouldn't see that content nor see it remain or be removed. Regarding so-called and alleged racism - because defending one's own Race doesn't mean hatred of/for other Races - people not of that Race, not of that website, not of that group, wouldn't be a part of it (except to troll and harass, of course, which might be classed as racial abuse even if it is just to mess about).

"What the fuck do you want? Diversity, what the fuck do you want?"
"Equality. A decent conversation."
There is no such thing as equality anywhere. You need to realise this - and I don't mean just racially. I mean "equality" doesn't exist. There is, has been, and always will be hierarchy, no matter what, forever. You have been indoctrinated with nonsense, and you are now further a victim, maybe with heavier weight on your shoulders. I think-- no, I wonder, and I hope, that once people realise eQuAlItY doesn't exist, then things should be easier, maybe, or at least simpler, but if you want "equality"; rather, if you want fairness which aligns with your Blackness, then go to countries that have forged and built-up Blackhood for many, many, many years, instead of trying to change many, many, many years' worth of building-up and forging work of White countries... You say "for my people" (or "my group") - what about those in Black countries who are not living a decent life like you are over here? What about your people, your group? What are you doing for your group there?

I don't doubt that you'd reply, "that's not what I meant". You should choose your words more carefully, then.

I also notice that when talking about Whites (but not specifying Whites, with Blacks and Asians also living here), it is "this country" and "people". When talking about Blacks, it is "my group". Herp-derp - I love this equality-on-unequal-terms - and "terms" here means both terminology and in regards to one side's preferences.

"To be around people who wanna stand-up for change and see the World be a better place."
What's "better"? Define it. Replacing Whites in White areas with Blacks? Replacing White things in White areas with Black things? Michael Jackson might have sung "It doesn't matter if you're Black or White", but he was wrong. It does matter. White countries are for White people. Don't cry - Black countries are for Black people; Asian countries are for Asian people. Get over it. Is that not the way Nature made it, before (((politics))) and then (((media and "education")))? Michael Jackson was clearly very insecure and lacking in pride and self-worth and self-esteem. Akon can help Blacks with solar panels; Davyon can help save people's lives! You're here, in White-built-up-and-forged White areas crying while trying to undo what has been weaved for many, many, many years; you're trying to pull-up the very-deeply-buried roots that have been growing for many, many, many years. Do you expect the garden will be clean and tidy while you unroot us? Lol, and you cry "racism" because of the mess. eyeroll Dear fucking me...

"Freedom of expression."
Whites are not "allowed" to say "all lives matter" in response to "Black lives matter" because that's muh waysist! You said, "I'd love to see that energy being put behind racism online" for those opposing you, and/but want freedom of expression for yourself. Herp-a-derp. Whites are not "allowed" to have White things, do White things and be White; we're not "allowed" to express ourselves freely, lest you cry and we get arrested - so no wonder we go to the Internet - but you want to express yourself freely? No for us but yes for you? Such dIvErSiTy and such eQuAlItY that is. Herp-derp.

So Whites are not "allowed" to have freedom of expression in our own White countries, so... you, also, are not. Fuck off, yes? It's all for you, in White areas, and not for us, in White areas. That's replacement, displacement - and that is illegal under international "law"; these again -

dBzkopb.png

EUk7eeJ.png


- and based on the "govern"ment's bullshit dEfInItIoN of "extremism", I am being extremist because I am against tolerating the things that you stand for - the replacement and displacement of me and my people, of me and my country, of me and my group.

"Equality, a decent conversation, freedom of expression."
You're trying to play basketball in a netball match, on a netball court. They may be quite similar, but the rules are different and the games are different. You're trying to change netball to suit your basketball. You're trying to play football in a rugby match, on a rugby pitch. They are similar, but the rules are different and the games are different. You're trying to change rugby to suit your football. While doing that, you're crying that the other players in the other game are picking on you. You're trying to go to the opposite sex's changing rooms and toilets and trying to say it has to be the same, then be offended when you're told to fuck off. It's a case of apples and oranges.

David Harewood said he'll never be the hero because he's Black. That's bullshit. Akon could be classed as a hero for the help he has done. Davyon certainly is a hero for what he has done. You can, and Harewood can, as well - but you both prefer to cr instead. You stay here and try to change here to be more like your things instead. "If Blacks weren't there, then Davyon wouldn't have saved those two people's lives." Consider the butterfly effect.

You can go to help your group where your group resides as the majority, instead of crying that netball and rugby and changing rooms and toilets are too different to amalgamate with basketball and football and other sexes, but you choose not to. You can go build sanitation and better farms and this, that, and the other - but you prefer to focus on the muh eQuAlItY of here while attempting to shut Whites up and attempt to change and replace Whites and White things, in an already-established society that has sanitation and farms and this, that, and the other already. Isn't that theft? Cultural appropriation? One rule for you, another rule for me if I put my hair into cornrows. Great muh equality.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you don't realise these things, but that is what you're doing. Go to your group where they reside as the majority and be a fucking hero. Be an amazing hero. You and David Harewood be the best heroes. I know you won't (not only because you won't read this).

"After weeks of negotiation, and to my surprise, Davidson has agreed to meet me. [I'm] about to have a conversation with Jim Davidson, a Man that has said some disgusting things both about me and my group personally, and more generally."
I am reserving this for the end of my post here. Please check below.

"Thanks for accepting the interview, thanks for coming to chat, because I wanna have a real, direct, honest conversation..."
He was real, direct and honest in his video, which you are reacting to. I can't say if he was being sarcastic (since he is a comedian) or was misinformed with what he said about most people on TV being non-White, but he is a comedian, his mentality is for teh l0lz (at least in part). You are reacting to his video, and that is not discrimination, but "all lives matter", a reaction to "Black lives matter" strangely is discrimination.

"You've got to realise, for me to contradict what you're saying - people will say, 'How dare you? How dare you go against what Ashley is saying? You must be a racist'."
He wasn't wrong.

"As far as I'm concerned, that video you made about Diversity was... it was racist in every way. Every single way."
"Really? If I was talking about you, why would that be racist? It'd be personal rather than racist."
"Mate, it was both. It was personal and racist."
I am reserving this for the end of my (3rd) post here. Please check below.

"I'm from this country, I love this country, I'm from a mixed-Race background."
"Do you consider yourself Black or White?"
"I consider myself mixed, mixed heritage."
You're mixed and you admit that, yet you're defending Blacks and BLM against Whites who are trying to defend White things in White areas? (If it hasn't happened already, then)How long will it be before "mixed-White-and-Black" i.e. jew, happens and pretends to prefer to "be White" rather than "be Black"? Of all I have seen, all mixed-Black-and-Whites go towards Black. Is it a choice? It doesn't seem to be. DNA, their Soul, their Racial blood negate decision, but I expect "mixed-White-and-Black" i.e. jew, will happen and prefer to "be White" than "be Black" before long. I would also be very doubtful if any Black-and-White mixed person said and behaved as if they were White rather than Black, as well. I'd bet that the differences and the choice between Black and White will always be at the forefront of their thinking whenever they're doing anything, and think that they have to choose to be White, rather than it not being a decision, and it happening Naturally.

"Do you consider the video you made about me and the rest of Diversity racist?"
"No."
"Not at all?"
"No. You just happen to be Black. It was about you."
"OK, then."
"Do you think it was racist - your performance?"
"It was made to start a conversation."
"Well, it didn't, because the people that I've spoke to and the people that get in touch with me and give me the finger in the street - all that did was cause controversy..."
"Yeah, and..."
"...it's making people more racist."
"...racist people would say that, Jim."
How do you know? Have you asked every racist person, or every person who might be racist, or every non-racist person? You've made your mind up already. Why would anyone saying "What you did is controversial" make them racist automatically? How would it? Why would anyone saying "What you did is making people [more] racist" make them racist? How would it?

Ashley, I'm trying to keep giving you the benefit of the doubt here, but... Well, anyway, Jim said most people on TV are not White; you, though, say that people saying you performing your routine
  1. is controversial and
  2. makes people be racist
means that that person saying such is racist themselves. Look - there's muh eQuAlItY. Both you and Jim said stupid, incorrect things. That's eQuAliTy. You have it. You achieved it. Be happy - yet you're not, and you won't be.

"People don't like what they see."
A lot of people react without thinking. I refer to those real or fake goggleboxers who just reacted very quickly. Take time to think... Not once did they, on Gogglebox, support Jim, but Jim was right - people will say Jim is racist and question how he can be against Ashley; however, in comments sections on videos, I have seen people agree with Jim. Ashley Banjo wants more and better moderation online. See how often Jim's and my words are not deleted. If I were to post this entire OP on most other websites, it would be removed and I'd no doubt be banned. I may be pushing the limits, if not having broke them, on this website with this OP, but on other websites I'd definitely see something happening as a reaction to my words. It's OK in this "democratic" society for me to have "free speech" and "free expression" but not say anything; yet it actually is OK for e.g. Ashley and Alesha and Imarn and Leila and David and the other David... to say what they want, though - oh, and against not just Jim, but against the entire White Race! Yes, that is very personal and very racist, Ashley Banjo, et al.

"What we're not gunna do is we're not gunna have it where we're talking over each other."
"They'll edit me out."
"No, they won't."

Well, we'll see... or maybe we won't. I doubt the full, unedited interview between Ashley Banjo and Jim Davidson is available anywhere.

"That is why I want to speak to you - because you think differently to me."
How can there be equality when there is diversity, difference?

"I don't see any racism in this. I just see a rotten cop. A rotten cop. If it was a White bloke under there, the cop should have got the same amount in prison..."
"Absolutely."
Daniel Shaver, anyone?! He might not have been under a copper's knee, but he was murdered by a copper.

"...but what you did on the television is use your position to make a statement."
"Yeah. Absolutely."
"My problem was - it was on a light entertainment show on a Saturday night."
"What that murder did - it stoked a flame, it awakened something, it sparked something that is very real for a lot of ethnic minorities in this country and around the World."
Firstly, you can live where you are the ethnic majority, and fix those ethnic-majority places that need fixing, i.e. Children starving to death in Africa, but you choose not to. Secondly, OK, so that murder, of George Floyd, stoked a flame, it awakened something, it sparked something that is very real for a lot of ethnic minorities in this country and around the World. That's OK for you, but when Jim said about a Black Man killing 1 person and injuring 7 others seriously, you ask "What does that have to do with racism?", flabbergasted. That =about George was America, but Jim saying something about here, nope. Plus all the other Black-on-White crimes, nope. One White-on-Black crime, yep, but any Black-on-White crimes, nope. So it's all for you and not for us? Yeah, thanks a lot. Thanks so much, Mr Real, Direct and Honest Conversationalist.

"Yeah, but look at the cop. We don't have people like that in this country, surely."
"I'm happy for you, that you have the privilege in a way of under-- believing that."
Oh. Shit! Haha. Lol. Let's look at this again, shall we, Mr Banjo?

Y26EUCP.png


Fuck. Me. Sideways. Herp-derp.

This is like christians, who just repeat the things that they have been brainwashed with like a knee-jerk reaction. It's as if it is not their own thoughts and opinions. They just regurgitate and spew - as Ashley said about Jim, etc. - the... what seems now to be rhetoric, the auto-responses. "You have the privilege of believing that". Whites have so much privilege that even the "govern"ment is against us Whites who won't tolerate shit against us.

"I've been in situations where I've been discriminated against, arrested, taken to the side, stopped and searched."
OK. Have you had a knee on your neck, like George Floyd did? Like this White Baby Boy did?

60FBZzJ.jpg

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Yvq1QX2kHmyX

No. I thought not. MF.

"The statistics prove it. Discrimination is disproportional when it comes to things like stop-and-search and when it comes to people in prison - these are proven things, so these things is what people were protesting against on the day."
I thought BLM protestors were protesting to de-fund the police, etc., that was said above, which you say you were aware of but apparently forgot before you chatted with Jim Davidson... If you are looking at statistics which prove things, claiming it is disproportionate, then is that racism specifically, or is it because - as seems to be the case where Blacks are - Blacks are more prone to crimes due to not thinking things through with their Brains, but instead thinking with their Emotions, which results in more custodial sentences, generally? I know this is not easy to read and consider, it is offensive and things like that, but I'm asking genuinely. Maybe the statistics also show that?

"When you speak about those 7 people being stabbed..."
...but not the one who was murdered?

"...by a - as you refer it - 'Black Man' with heavy emphasis on that--"
"Can you not say 'a Black Man murdered a White person'?"
"Jim, you have to let me finish, please."
"No. I won't let you finish, that's because you're talking bollocks."
Apparently we can't say that. If we say "a Black man murdered a White person", Ashley Banjo gets upset. If we say "non-White", a non-celebrity on the celebrity version of Gogglebox gets upset and asks, "When you say 'non-White', what - you're scared to say the word 'Black', Jim?". Yeah, so we can't win either way. We can't say shit. There is an English saying - you can't say boo to a goose. What is it? Is it that we want freedom of expression, we want free speech, we want diversity, we want equality - but we want it only for "our group", not for you who live in your country already?! Thanks!

"What you see there, and what you emphasise very heavily in the reporting of that story on your channel, was his skin colour."
Skin colour, but not sex? I see Men by the way they look. I see Women by the way they look. I see bananas by the way they look. I see cars by the way they look. It is observation and noticing and being able to tell who is who and what is what. You also made notice of the White copper who knelt on George Floyd's neck, so it's OK for you to mention White but not for Jim to mention a Black Man killing 1 and injuring 7 more?

"Why didn't you have a Black dancer kneel on the neck?"
"Because what George Floyd represented when he was killed by that White officer was a wider problem."
Strange. Lyrics in that song were "I can't breathe"... yet George Floyd was saying he can't breathe before the White copper was kneeling on his neck.
 
FULL VIDEO: Leaked police bodycam footage shows George Floyd's arrest for the first time
HTFWZWL.png

https://www.bitchute.com/video/7dR5a58QcWX2

Leaked police bodycam footage shows George Floyd's arrest for the first time

https://ancient-forums.com/index.ph...-arrest-for-the-first-time.42855/#post-181056

"It represented a wider racial discrimination."
"No, it didn't, it didn't, it represented a bad cop."
"Countless videos of unarmed Black Men being killed by police."
Yes, and an unarmed White Man was killed by a copper. His name is Daniel Shaver. That's ignored, though, isn't it? Where was the Worldwide media attention about that? George Floyd said he can't breathe before the White copper was kneeling on his neck; Daniel Shaver was murdered by a White copper, and the copper was shouting, and demanding inappropriately, that if Shaver lowered his hands, to break his fall when he laid on the floor while on his knees, the copper would shoot him, so he had to land on his face, or the copper would shoot him. Shaver was pleading for his life. The copper murdered him, regardless. The police are taught and trained into a way of thinking which directs things. They are agents of (((TPTB))). The police are the social army. No wonder police have lost respect of civilians. The police is its own subcultural group, with sPeCiAl PeRmIsSiOn to do certain things that mere, lowly civilians can't - i.e. defend ourselves, for one thing. It's not only Blacks who have been victimised, targeted, murdered. Only one of these two cases between George Floyd and Daniel Shaver had Worldwide media attention and protests and a movement to such a huge extent. Please be biased, Ashley, instead of "real" and "honest" as you claimed.

So much for diversity and equality. Oh, but me mentioning this makes you ask what that has to do with racial problems. The American police are notorious for being like that. It is being spread elsewhere. It is not a secret that americanisation exists. It may, or may not, be that more Blacks are in such situations, possibly because they get into more crime situations, possibly because they lack some IQ points (as David Harewood said) if that actually is true, but American police are known for being like that regardless, and it has been infesting elsewhere in the World. Society, politics, media, education... all gears and directs and guides things into a direction, and the sPeCiAl-PeRmIsSiOn group, known as "law enforcement officials" get to behave in these ways. I am becoming more and more convinced that it is much less a racial matter than it is a (((much larger, insidious, pervasive and dangerous matter))) - not just because we would jump to such a conclusion automatically, but after more and more evidence and proof, and consideration and realisation. I am more and more convinced it is about defending and preserving one's own, rather than hating others. You didn't choose to be born here, but your father and his brother decided to come over here. Did they not consider the consequences?

"I'm not here to defend that."
"That's what George Floyd represented. What you then did, was then take a random killing and you used it to represent the fact that the Man was Black, so it's the same..."
White (and Black?) coppers kill and murder indiscriminately, whether the victim is Black or White. The George Floyd incident was, one could also say, a random event. "So it's the same."? Are you saying, Ashley, that a White copper killing Black George Floyd is the same as 'a random killing' of a White person and the injuring of 7 more by a Black Man? They're both the same? White coppers, as we have seen, kill and murder indiscriminately. Black civilians, as we have seen, blow things out of proportion indisctriminately.

It is the same? The World is so mummied by (((TPTB))). We can't - we're not "allowed" - to stand-up for ourselves and live. We have to rely on (((the establishment))). We've been left so immature. We're not "allowed" to defend ourselves - and that Remy Gordon and that Kami Carpenter decided it was correct to defend themselves disproportionately - as you said, Ashley. Their reactions were way over-the-top. So you saying "it's the same" - perhaps it is. The disproportionate arrests and stop-and-searches of Black Men (and Women?) by White (and Black?) police is the same as the disproportionate behaviour of Black Men (and Women?) in their overreactions. Maybe there is actually a correlation there... and not just Black people. I refer also to muslim Asians specifically, but this topic is about Black v White so... but their exaggerated beliefs which fuel their extremism and terrorism, as well...

"...and that link in itself - that's racist, Jim."
"OK. OK. Well, you've got me there. You've got me there."
I don't think it is. Again, it is very difficult, because the term "racist" hasn't been defined, decided, explained. People just use "racist" as a knee-jerk reaction - everything is racist, everyone is racist. Muh, muh, muh.

"How do we report, then, if a Black Man's murdered someone?"
"'A Man.'"
"'A Man.' Yeah. OK. Gotcha."
Yet you say it was a White copper on George Floyd's neck. Yet you are making this documentary for your group, which is Black. Yet you are mixed-Race but defending Blacks, not Whites. The hierarchy of genetics here wins (Black genes are dominant over Asian genes and White genes, Asian genes are dominant over White genes); you can't have diversity and equality. Do you think you can have it both ways? Maybe you're doing it for your Black Men and Women and Boys and Girls... but with no mention of skin colour, just "my group". It's not sexist to say "a Man" but it is racist to say "a Black Man". If a tree fell on top of a person, then would it be... speciesist to specify that it was a yew tree or a conifer tree or an oak tree, etc.? One is capable of saying "a Black Man" without being racist.

"You did a dance about a crime - a terrible crime, OK, but ignored all the other crimes that are committed by Black people, because even to report it seems racist."
He was also aware of the bad things about BLM - he said he was aware after they were mentioned to him - but he ignored it because he had only 4 minutes to get a biased "message" out in an inappropriate venue.

"No. What's racist is when you use their skin colour as a reason for crime."
So he, and others in this documentary, deliberately doesn't mention "White" except for that one copper, and when he says most of his loved ones are White.... They say "people" and "this country", but also "my group"...

OK, so "a Man" is sexist, for using their sex as a reason for reporting a crime, then, yes. Jim Davidson is racist, Ashley Banjo is sexist. Here, Ash - you have your diversity! You also have your sort-of equality again! More of it for you! Enjoy!

Is is discriminatory to specify a muslim Man came and raped White Women, after going on a "do not rape" course? "It's their culture", blah, blah, blah. Yeah, so to specify it was a muslim, to inform others that muslim Men have been in trouble for raping White women, would be discriminatory, then? It would be... religionist? Faithist? "Faithist" is theist; used to mean one of a faith, i.e. a christian, muslim, etc..., i.e. not atheist (and not agnostic). "Religionist" is the same, but zealously. So "racist" means one who cares for [their] Race. It's not a bad thing, FFS. Also FFS - we shouldn't use "-ism" and "-ist"... It's OK to be a Grammar Nazi sometimes, you know... eyeroll It's important...

"Why was his colour relevant?"
What do you mean by "his"? Why was that person's sex relevant? It's bad to be racist but it's good to be sexist. Come on...

Eventually, news will be "someone murdered someone else". Then we'll not be "allowed" to discriminate against what the action was, so "someone did something", then it will be offensive to specify "a person" because that is discrimination against all things (people are things), so it will be "something happened"... Then... When and where will it end? Finally, I have an agreement with what has been said on this forum numerous times (not that I was trying to find one) - this certainly is clown world...

"That is symbolic of ethnic minorities being oppressed for hundreds of years."
Go to where you're/they're not suppressed, then. Go to where you fit-in, with your own, "your group", who have built your own for many, many, many years, and fix things there that need fixing. Be proud, be happy, be heroic, and do things there. Get rid of that "god" that you prayed to who didn't care about helping the Black area where your ancestors lived as the majority. be a real hero like Akon or Davyon, not a fake hero like David wants to be. You can save the Girl; you can save your group, your People.

Well... or don't.

"George, George, George."
"'George'?"
"I beg your pardon. It's on my mind at the moment."
Well, yeah. Both are going on about it, and that was the focus of the conversation. Jim only just met Ashley. On Gogglebox - "'Cause we all look alike, babes!", I am not convinced by. Some parents go through each of their Children's names until they reach the right one. Maybe Jim did it on purpose; being a comedian and clever to do comedy and thinking quickly.

"We're here to talk about this."
"No, no, no. This is no-win."
It's too controversial and emotive. It's not easy to be unbiased. One's biases and preferences come out, as do their knee-jerk reactions. Jim capitulated in this video a couple of times; Ashley never did. It's not unbiased. It's very biased. Let's go to Black areas and try and change their Black things for us, yes? No.

"It's a much better programme with me walking out."
Jim Davidson is not stupid. I wonder if some of the things he said, which seem stupid or seem like mistakes or insensitive, were done deliberately.

"The next day, Jim gets in touch. I've just had a text forwarded to me from the producers, from Jim Davidson, that says, 'Thanks. Sorry I couldn't stay. He was on transmit but no recieve. We will get two good shows out of this.'. That means Jim was obviously secretly recording and he plans to put out his own version."
How is it obvious that he was recording secretly? Why don't you ask the producers to ask Jim what he meant by that, instead of accusing him? Is this real, direct, honest? Oh! Jim's not there - "real, direct, honest conversation" you said to Jim - so you don't have to be anymore. It's very biased.

"If Jim Davidson and people like him keep walking away from the conversation, spewing their bit and not coming to the table and be willing to engage in the dialogue, then how do we ever move forward?"
We don't. It's more like how could or how should we ever move forward. Maybe by putting a lion in a pen with a deer, or a piece of chalk with some cheese, or some oil with some water. Yes, I'm being sarcastic, because there are so may problems and we're wondering why we get electrocuted when we touch electric plugs with wet hands, or get burnt when we play with fire... The lion and deer, chalk and cheese, oil and water don't go together. They don't work. If there is a problem, then fix it, instead of keeping the problem and trying to change it a bit so it looks a bit or a lot different.

If Jim Davidson said what he did in the video he made, and what he said to Ashley, in a stand-up routine where he'd be paid by fans who went to see him, then it would be different. It would have been OK. I wonder if Ashley Banjo wouldn't have made that documentary.

On Britain's Got Talent, their act was named Diversity. How many of them were Asian and White?

I went through comments on both Jim Davidson's initial video, and in the radio interview video, and commenters are on Jim's side, defending him, agreeing with him, saying that Jim is saying what people are thinking, etc. There were also some agreeing with Jim who were "god"-blessing him. It's lollage that "god" plays both sides against the middle, as well! PMSF! Lol!

"It's the day of the BAFTAs. Our dance routine has been nominated for the Must-See Moment of the Year award - the only one voted for by the public.

...

"First, thank you to every single person that voted for us, because this - as much as there is so many conversations and so much that needs to change - this is what change looks like."

Trying to change White things in White areas for Black things in White areas? To make White areas be Black areas? no thank you so much.

"Our BAFTA win has capped-off an unbelievable year. For me, that vote represented a rejection of hate, and showed the true heart of the British public."
We don't know if the BAFTA votes are done by the public or if they are fake and chosen by the directors or their bosses or whomever. Just like voting for your favourite act on BGT or on X Factor, as I said. Media is biased, "education" is biased, news is biased... What makes you think that winning an award is the "true heart of the British public" - and after they complained about your dance routine after they voted you the winners of BGT? The British public seem to not be able to make their minds up. I don't think winning a BAFTA was a vote by the British public. Like "we asked 100 people...". I have never been asked, and I don't know anyone who has ever been asked, and I don't know anyone who knows anyone who has ever been asked... so it is the same, I am sure, about this BAFTA "public" vote.

"There are people I've met that are a lot braver than I am, but one thing we all have in common is that we just believe in something wholeheartedly and we wanna stand-up for it - and that doesn't necessarily mean you have to arrange a protest or do a dance on a mainstream television show, it just means that if you hear something or you see something you think isn't right, stand-up."
Jim disagreed and stood-up.

"Just put your heart in the right place."
Who decides where "the right place" is for your heart to be?

"Nobody's perfect. I'm not perfect - far from it, and this whole process doesn't have a perfect ending. I don't now understand everything, but I'm on the way just to being better and I'll continue to fight continue to stand up, and that's all I can ask of anybody."
That sounds like that's the christianity coming out of him. Going on a mission but still being ignorant but still fighting anyway.



This documentary seems like evangelism. As I said above, indoctrination. "All lives matter" means you're being racist against Blacks because "Black lives mater" has been promoted relentlessly and biasedly so of course "all lives matter" will be said as a reaction, and ignorance says "you're going against me saying Black lives matter!" - and that makes it muh waysist. Who is saying Black lives don't matter? Saying "all lives matter" doesn't make the person saying it be racist against Blacks. That's being closed-minded and having decided beforehand, having made-up your mind before going into the conversation or debate.



Gogglebox
"Why were people so angered by this? It were brilliant, it were amazing."
sigh I doubt you would sit through all of this thread, and other conversations, arguments or debates about it, and try to understand it...

"Jim will say to you at this point 'all lives matter'."
So all - if I can say all - Blacks have been indoctrinated with "saying 'all lives matter' makes you racist", then?!

"When you're saying 'non-White', what - you're scared to say the word 'Black', Jim?"
No -
  1. Jim said "a Black Man".
  2. Saying "non-White" does not mean "Black". Saying "non-White" means "non-White", i.e. those who are not White, which includes Asians.
  3. Apparently, according to Ashley Banjo, his skin colour doesn't matter.
Non-Blacks... or Whites... can't win either way.

"In fact, most people on TV are White people."
In White areas, either White or jewish. It's not always easy to tell. In Asian and Black countries, I have no idea. I think these young'ns are unfamiliar with Jim Davidson as a comedian. I don't expect they'd enjoy Roy "Chubby" Brown, George Carlin, Billy Connolly...

"Honestly, some people are so bothered about - when it comes to Race, they're so bothered about Black people standing up for their rights. Like why is that such an issue for you?"
I'd best not comment...

"Do you think it was racist - your performance?"
"How can his performance be racist?"
Because this is a White country and his skin colour doesn't matter, so mentioning his skin colour makes one racist, and mentioning a performance regarding Black skin colour and White skin colours makes one racist, and seeing as this is a White country, then doing that dance, which represented that racism... is racist... perhaps?!

"all that did was cause controversy, it's making people more racist."
"Racist people would say that, Jim."
"Huh-huhrr, good answer!"
How is that a good answer? How would saying "it makes people more racist" make Jim racist for simply saying that? It's as if people don't think... They just react... Maybe they don't react; maybe the are a knee-jerk reaction...

"My problem was it was on a light entertainment show on a Saturday night."
"Oh. So wow. You can make your statement, but it's not meant to be on a show on Saturday night, then, basically, yeah?"
"It's meant to be on at 3 o'clock in the morning."
No-one said that. It's the wrong stage for it. There are right stages for it.
"Look at the cop - we don't have people like that in this country, surely."
"That's it - you have the privilege of believing that, 'cause yeah, you're not an ethnic minority trying to understand that, do you know what I mean? To get stopped and searched and them things."
We might not be an ethnic minority in our country trying to understand that, but more and more non-Whites are coming in to our country, so our numbers are reducing percentage-wise, and if that continues, then we will be an ethnic minority in our own country. If you look at the numbers, there are more Blacks than there are Whites, and there are more Asians than there are Whites. Police are corrupt no matter what, and Whites are a minority in the entire World. We're trying to hold-on to existence. Such "privilege" that is.

Stop being indoctrinated. There are so many parallels with christianity and ignorance, and racial indoctrination and ignorance. Just - as Ashley said - spewing their bit; although, it's probably not their bit because they've been indoctrinated... When Jim, for example, speaks his own, then he is "spewing" his bit, but when sheep bleat along, they are, in truth, spewing but not their own bit, but it's classed as honesty and truth, and not bile.

"George. George."
"His name's Ashley."
"'Cause we all look alike, babes!"
I'm not convinced by that. I think it's because either they were talking about George and Jim made a mistake, or while Jim says he doesn't and won't joke about Blacks he just took an opportunity to heckle Ashley personally (he said it was personal, not racist, what he said in his video). Jim did say he's not shy of controversy.

"Well, you've won, Ashley. You've actually won."
"That's not the way out, Jim."
"Don't you just hate that?! When you can't even storm out."
"I'm sorry, but that is fucking hilarious!"
"That is karma."
Again - I'm not convinced. I think Jim knows what he's doing.


Celebrity Gogglebox
"It's so sad, because we're not going anywhere.
"I know!"
"We're here to stay and we're multiplying. Yeah? We're multiplying and multilpying and we're mixing and we're blending."
"Like normal people do."
"You cannot get rid of us!"
"Right."
"So it's better to just accept it!"
Why? Because if I don't accept it, I'd be extremist and I'd be cancelled? I'd be displaced? Replaced? Destroyed? For you to be, instead?

"In a perfect World..."
A perfect World, indeed...

Oh, sorry. I didn't mean to be racist. Let me try again.

72XuQs3.gif



It is too important to ask for a definition of "racism", what one means by it and how they are using it, because people just say "racist" and "racism" and use it automatically as a knee-jerk reaction. What is meant, actually, by "racist" and "racism"? Having thought about these things repeatedly, and considered them repeatedly, and seeing these programmes and videos and news, etc. - I have come to the conclusion that "racism" means defending one's own Race (I think I said something similar before), regardless of its "technical dEfInItIoN". If feminism is for feminine/Female stuff (to very-over-simplify it), then racism is for racial/Race stuff (perhaps to over-simplify it). "-ism" is deliberate in being used for both for and against things. I propose we use "-phobe" and "-phile" - raciophobe and raciophile; or better xenophobe and xenophile which exist already, but at least using "racio" in the terms it is more common word usage and easier for most people to understand and realise and remember. (That's probably why "-ism" is used, because "xeno-" and "-phobe" and "-phile" are too clever and too clear.)

I know this won't happen, because I'm one person and not muh importants and not very influential; plus because if we use the for-and-against "-ism", it can be muddy and confusing, which I think has been done deliberately; whereas the very clear and direct and obvious "-phobe" and "-phile" is very distinct, deliberate and direct as to meaning; thus, all the many arguments - too many to mention here - would be much clearer and fairer; instead, with "-ism" we have to - and also we do - interpret, misinterpret, assume and presume, which further fuels arguments and upsets and emotions.

One example is in Jim Davidson's video, saying that most people on TV are not White. Shall we take that, what Jim said, as literal and perfect, or shall we realise he is exaggerating and/or being sarcastic to make a point? It is rhetoric and hyperbole. Is he being for-or-against race-ist? Is he being xenophobic? Is he being xenophilic? He seems to be against diversity (with a lowercase S, referring to diverse things), but he also says it's good that people are defending Black things. With "-ism", it's difficult; with "-phobe" and "-phile" it's much clearer. We could move on quicker, but with the confusion of "-ism" we are also stuck behind a bit, trying to figure it out, as well as argue, etc. This clearer understanding, I suspect strongly, is also a reason that "racism" won't be replaced with "xenophobe" and "xenophile"; rather, "racism" is to both "xenophobia" and "xeniphilia" (if we go by "femin-ism" v "race-ism") as "racist" ("femin-ist" v "race-ist") is to "xenophobe" and "xenophile".

Jim saying that most TV presenters are Black - I understand how Ashley Banjo and those on Gogglebox would take notice of that and comment on it, but Jim is a comedian and obviously sarcastic. I think these young'ns just took what he said without
  1. the context (as in the documentary) and
  2. realising who and how Jim Davidson is, i.e. a comedian
Ashley said those who voted for Diversity then complained. David said every single day you're told you're a stereotype. Jim said everyone on TV is not White. Black Ashley and Black David can exaggerate, but White Jim can't? Where's the diversity? Where's the equality?

With Jim calling Ashley George - I wonder if that might have been either a serious way of being sarcastic and comedic, or perhaps Jim's personal gripe and a direct attack against Ashley personally, to upset him, if it wasn't a genuine mistake. Jim said that George was on his mind recently. I don't know. Maybe so, and having thought about George a lot and having met Ashley only then for the first time, it might have been a mistake, if not a sarcastic joke or a direct attack.

"All lives matter" does not mean "Blacks lives don't matter", and it is not a reaction to "Black lives matter" in the sense of hating Blacks; it is a reaction to "Black lives matter" because some people think all lives matter, and some say so when others say "Black lives matter", but apparently - as we have seen here - saying "all lives matter" means you hate Blacks and means you are racist. Some who are against racial diversity and miscegenation might also say "all lives matter" while still being against racial diversity and miscegenation, but merely saying "all lives matter" doesn't mean hatred against Blacks - nor Asians nor Whites.

From the Celebrity Gogglebox episode, I shared only a bit. In the full episode, the goggleboxers - not in the programmes that they they were watching - were all non-Whites. There were Blacks mostly; either light-skinned Blacks or mixed-Blacks, and there were Asians; there weren't any Whites watching the TV and commenting. I counted two families/couples who were not celebrities but still appeared in the celebrity version of the programme. They're not celebrities in the sense that they should appear in the celebrity version of the programme but did in this non-White-and-mostly-pro-Black episode. If they become celebrities or politicians, for example, then they have to leave Gogglebox, but they were still in this celebrity episode. They may (I am guessing because I don't know for certain) be classed as celebrities if they appeared on e.g. a celebrity version of a quiz programme, or another celebrity programme. The two I counted in this clip who are not celebrities in this sense are Asian sisters Amira and Amani, and Black couple Marcus and Mica, who appear to be christians. All of these 4 were seen in the regular Gogglebox episode and bit I shared.


From above, where I said I am reserving it for the end (I typed this bit here before I typed other bits above regarding "my group") -
"After weeks of negotiation, and to my surprise, Davidson has agreed to meet me. [I'm] about to have a conversation with Jim Davidson, a Man that has said some disgusting things both about me and my group personally, and more generally."
Oh, I'm so glad you said "group" and "my group". You want to change the curriculum here and you want to have your own way and your own say here. Oh, I am so glad. Under international law, it is illegal for you - your group - to effect changes against me and my group. You may be doing only a bit, and someone else may be doing only a bit, and another someone else may be doing only a bit... but they all add up, and then those bits equal a lot, and that is replacing Whites with Blacks, replacing White things with Black things. Thank you, and goodnight.

However - the Prime Minister deems me extremist because I disagree with what you, Ashley Banjo and your Black group, are doing against me; and the Prime Minister is ignoring international law of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. It might be slow, but it still is incessant. I think Ashley added "and more generally" to try and cover more ground by widening the net.

At the beginning, Ashley said,
"I'm looking for answers ... from those who fought to change."
That sounds like some soldiers in some wars who fought to change how things were and to protect one's country and People... just for all of these things to happen anyway. All the times people protested and forced monarchy or government to change, throughout centuries of history. Just like Brexit - this has still been happening regardless. Are Whites' and White countries' fights and efforts all a waste? All for nothing? Was all of White history and Whites' forging and building-up of White societies for many, many, many years all for non-Whites to come-in and culturally-appropriate/steal what Whites have done, and to replace Whites? You could go and build-up your own, and stop African Children from starving to death. If you want to...

I feel quite sorry for Ashley Banjo in particular. He didn't choose to be born mixed, he didn't choose to be born in the UK, he didn't choose to be born in an environment that is, or seems to be, anti-Black (in this White county) if it is true that his environmental upbringing was anti-Black. I want to use the term "brainwashing" here calmly - I don't know if he has been brainwashed with pro-Black-and-anti-White-replacing-Whites-in-White-areas things; he and we both are victims of the (((plan))) to replace Whites everywhere, and Ashley, et al, are confused, misinformed, and ignorant about bigger things, so it seems as if he is going through these things to try and correct what he thinks needs to be corrected.

It may be "racist" (in the sense of xenophobic) to say to go to Black countries where Blacks are majorities where there wouldn't be such a racial struggle, "but I was born here!" - and so were Whites for many, many, many years, long, long, long before Blacks and Asians were, no? Yes? It boils down to that - preserving our Whitehood. I don't hate Blacks, and I don't love Blacks - I love my White Peoples. It's not easy to mix oil and water or chalk and cheese - and they don't mix and they shouldn't be mixed. Ashley, etc., thinks he is, and think they are, dong a good thing and doing that good thing well, but it is not the correct solution.

I wonder also how they will react, what they will think, how they will feel when in the future, Races will be separated again and individuals... well, might not be shipped-off exactly, but will move back to their own respective areas at the correct times. I think it would be more gentle than shipping them off and sending them back home. One way would be the demonstrations of Magick and proper Political engagement. These would influence them and help them to realise the actual, true Truth. So maybe they won't be as embarrassed as they might have been, but maybe thinking back about how things were, possibly being humiliated and saddened about being duped AKA jewed... I think some will just go with the flow, because you can't change the past because it would be pointless and a waste to be embarrassed by it; but then at least they'd know the correct ways and means of things, and Planet Earth shall thrive again. I also think the things from this several-thousand-years of history should be kept and stored, for future historians and education and possibly media, for reference and reflection and determination and resolve for the better future.


Y29Axmh.png



So George Floyd, an American, and his case with the White American copper, was the inspiration for the dance routine. What about Anthony Johnson, Ashley?

DM1XrPX.jpg

clzOjxp.png


Black lives matter? What about the bad things about the movement BLM? When did Black lives start mattering? Who has attempted to put an end to slavery, so that "all lives matter" is in the World's consciousness?

You are a dancer in a dance group and a singer in said dance group, and you want to be political. You want to spread your message, and you have Asians, Blacks and Whites defending you, supporting you, ignoring and/or unknowing about, other things. You were told that you were ignorant of the BLM movement's bad things, yet you defended it and supported it, while actually being "aware", as you said. Above, I said, "Ashley was told that he was unaware of some of the things that BLM stood for, and he said he was aware. So he knew, and went on BGT anyway? To... shit all over Whiteness on TV for millions to see... and not expect a reaction?! blank blinking".

Hm. Ashley, You actually said Dominique Samuels "is a really vocal critic of my routine and the politics of Black Lives Matter". On Good Morning Britain, she said, "I think the issue with entertainers using platforms such as Britain's Got Talent for overtly political statements is that a lot of the time, they quite frankly don't know anything about politics so therefore don't have an in-depth or nuanced view, and I think it's very irresponsible to push messages like these..." You told her, "One thing you said - it really stuck with me - was entertainers like us don't have an idea about politics, we have an oversimplified view of the World". In reply to you, she said, "My concern is that you weren't aware of some of the facts around BLM, but you just assumed 'cause we are told every day that 'Ooh, it's just about anti-racism, and if you don't support it, you're racist'", and you said, "I was aware".

So you were aware, Ashley Banjo, about some of the things that BLM stands for. You said, "Dominique highlighted frequent criticisms of the Black Lives Matter movement, that they're just a front for more-radical groups and policies like de-funding the police - but that's not my position.". How the fuck was anyone supposed to know your position? Obviously there'd be a reaction! You might (allegedly) not have the position of, as Dominique said, "...but that performance - some people would see it as you guys demonising the police; some people would see it as you promoting BLM the organisation, what I would have appreciated is to mention the bad things about BLM, as well." You might not share that position, so you claim. In reply you said, "I had an opportunity - 4 minutes to create something. If I didn't try to paint a picture of what was going on in the World, simplistic or not, and try and open up more of a dialogue, what kind of person does it make me?". 4 minutes for a dance act is not enough time, as you alluded to, and 4 minutes for a dance act is not a dialogue. It is you showing us your support for BLM, while we didn't know that you allegedly were not supporting BLM... Then you have the audacity to be a crying, little whingey bitch about being offended by the reactions of some Whites trying to keep White things White in their own White country. Then further than that, those Asians, Blacks and Whites on Gogglebox were defending you and on your side (either truly or fakely, because it is a TV programme). This influences weak-minded individuals watching.

"I don't personally think that that performance in itself has had a seismic impact in terms of the condition of Black people in this country, and I think a lot of focus does get put on gestures..."
"Some of the gestures, you're right, may feel hollow, but they represent the idea of change, and it's a step in the right direction."
"I think sigh--"
"Because otherwise, what do you do, Dominique? What do you do?"
You sound desperate, Ashley. What you do is go to the correct political places to do politics, not a family, variety-act entertainment programme in the evening. It seems like a desperate attempt, and ill-considered. There is such thing as tactical retreat, but you went in all-guns blazing to the wrong place at the wrong time. The correct political places are where your ancestors forged and built-up, over many, many, many years, where your majority resides, where you can and will have recognition, being among your own, not having to go through a stupid struggle.

Again - you're a dancer, an entertainer. You admitted that 4 minutes is not enough time...

"People from my street who would never ever normally talk about the word racism are going, 'Oh, what is this about?' and it's op-- it's sparking debate. That, for me, is one way to really activate change."
"I get where you're coming from, I still have my disagreements, obviously"
"Of course."
"but I think it's important to have that dialogue, and for it not to be... like, a shouting match, if you know what I mean."
"If this magic pot was a time machine and I could go back with you and say, 'Dominique - do we walk on stage and perform, yes or no?', what would you say?"
"...sharp intake of breath Oh, that's a hard question. Because--
"No, no. It's not, lol. What would you say?"
"Just off the top of my head, I would say, 'Yeah. Go ahead and do the performance.'. I would probably still have"
"No. Fair enough."
"criticisms..."
It seems as if Dominique was just saying what Ashley wanted to hear, and it seems that Ashley tends to accept what 'his group' says because they seem to be on his side and are polite; that White ex-policeman Clive Driscoll is also polite, so Ashley accepts what he says; but because Jim Davidson uses a certain group of words which people choose to be offended by, i.e. expletives, and puts it in format quite similar to a stand-up routine, and talks more passionately and emotively, it seems that Ashley doesn't agree with him. (Again, if Jim did it as part of a comedy act, this documentary might not exist.) I realise this is the case for people in general, and they react to other people's actions, reactions, behaviours, emotions... and tend to ignore their words and thoughts and opinions, trying to understand what they're trying to say. If Jim had have phrased things more politely and didn't not care about controversy, Ashley might have been more in agreement with, or at least acceptance of, Jim - even when Jim said that he supports 'Black lives matter' the statement, but not the movement. Ashley looked like he was on the defensive with Jim, trying to control the flow of the 'adult conversation', and basically telling Jim not to interrupt him, but with his 'own group' he was calm and agreeing and accepting.

It was more confrontational than amicable. Jim's a comedian who is not afraid of controversy; Ashley is a christian who has undergone some or a lot of discrimination by police. Two personalities, with experiences and beliefs and opinions, etc., clash quite easily. It's in-group/out-group, as I say - and as I said, the mere existence of multiple, different groups can mean, but does not necessarily mean, that prejudice, discrimination, racism, whatever, can exist. With Ashley's own group, (except for a lot of Black-on-Black crime...) they seem to be more on the same side, so more amicable than confrontational.

Going back to memetics, the repetition and evolution of things e.g. "Black lives matter" and "Make America Great Again" and any other - have you never heard the saying, "imitation is he highest form of flattery"? You should be flattered that some repeat "Black lives matter", which Black lives do matter, and along with the natural evolution of memes, say "all lives matter", which some may or may not matter - does a rapist's life matter, does a jew's life matter, does a brutal mugger's life matter, does a murderer's life matter, etc. You should be flattered, instead of offended. Some take your thing (or "your", if it was jewish, but it appears to be yours) and use it, and evolve it. It's not a bad thing, per se. Then on the other hand, we have a conundrum.

We take "Black lives matter" and repeat it and evolve it to be all-inclusive with "all lives matter" for whatever reason, one reason being to be all-inclusive.
You take our White history and things, and evolve them to be yours. You might argue not to replace, but that's the jew's intention. If you argue not to replace, I can argue to culturally-appropriate.
So we evolve your phrase, you evolve our... existence. (If one thinks long and ard enough, they might think that's fair.) There is both diversity in that, and equality in that. Notice the problems.

As I said above again, I am reserving this bit for the end.
"As far as I'm concerned, that video you made about Diversity was... it was racist in every way. Every single way."
"Really? If I was talking about you, why would that be racist? It'd be personal rather than racist."
"Mate, it was both. It was personal and racist."
So Jim saying something against you is personal and racist, but you and Alesha and Imarn and Leila and David and the other David... saying things against the entire White Race... is not racist? Wanting to change our curriculum is not racist? Wanting to change how reviews are conducted is not racist? Wanting your own free speech and free expression, but wanting Whites to not say "all lives matter" and show their dislike of being replaced and destroyed... is NOT racist?! Fuck me - and it appeared that those on Gogglebox were supporting you in-spite of all of this?! I can extrapolate and presume that all BLM supporters support the same anti-White racism - actual racism - in White areas, when we are merely trying to not be removed, displaced, replaced, destroyed - which you bullshit about saying it is racism against you!

Maybe you are not bullshitting at all. Maybe you genuinely believe it but are confused. Maybe you are ignorant of things. I realise a lot - a lot of things are not one's own. They have been instilled in people, and it becomes unconscious. Maybe you focus so tightly on a small selection of things and don't let yourself realise other things. Maybe your thinking is polluted and maybe you've been brainwashed... Maybe you're victimised as well as us being victimised...

If I didn't know better - well, in fact, actually, I don't - I'd think you were just pulling a massive troll prank. You're a dancer. Stop trying to be a politician. I am saying that after review, and repeated review, and long and hard consideration, of this video. There is a difference between being intelligent and being clever. You're not stupid; you're well-spoken and you can put either your, or your brainwashed, points across. Presumably (because you didn't say) you have some school qualifications, but while you're not stupid, you are stupid. You're a dancer, an entertainer - and no, I'm not being mUh WaYsIsT. "I have a Black friend", said one of the non-celebrity Asians on Gogglebox who was also in the Celebrity Gogglebox episode, to mean that saying having a Black friend makes one not racist actually doesn't mean one is not racist. I'm not being racist. I'm responding to your stupidity. I will, however, take point of that Asian's words and use them deliberately - I'm not being racist; I have a Black friend we have Black Gods and Goddesses, there are Black Gods and Goddesses who are on the same side.



SzVA6cg.png

You're welcome

CYL14uu.png


XdpxJKn.jpg


Ashley, Diversity members, Alesha, Dominique, Imarn, David, David... why don't you go and help your African Children who are starving to death?
TO82f57.png

F4b4kOY.png

HSf5a9p.jpg

XMOP22i.jpg

Lo7weAZ.jpg

Wpxv8zQ.jpg

UDSxx6A.png


Don't forget the 1tn 144bn (1 144 000 000 000) that the church makes per year. That is an estimate of the number of christians Worldwide, at about 2bn 200mn (2 200 000 000) giving £€$¥10 each and every Sunday all year.

For "god" so-loved the World, that is decided to make Africans starve to death and say "Pray for me to pretend to care about them, while I make these poor White-looking jews, and others, rich". You love your Black Children so much, Ashley and Alesha and Imarn and Leila and David and the other David... Maybe.

You said, "Rashford, for example, will be a hero; miss a penalty, and you'll be a Black player!". Running around and kicking a bag of air into a net is not being a hero. Akon is a hero, Davyon is a hero, Ray is a hero. Make a good difference there, instead of praying to that fake god. Make a good difference there, instead of a bad difference here, and instead of degenerating here, and instead of leaving there to rot and be shit and your Black Children to starve to death there. Go be heroes and heroines.

8KANtbw.png

N6ibdNI.png

BZVz7rN.jpg

iw0Ol4K.png


This one again.
L4UMkt9.png


sQnqOhb.png

dbDZyIE.png

XamSAUN.png

avKOO6A.png

2d4v3lx.png


NSfW (as if this thread is SfW already) -

This one is a fake pic.
F0yoQFL.png

It was edited, not by me, from "Refugees Welcome".

ZKUz3AP.png

HJmryL2.jpg

dpopY2N.png

SmUYJkp.png

No WLM Worldwide movement here.

g8X5sZM.png

NQAP8BE.png

eG40npB.png

No WLM Worldwide movement here.

I have absolutely no idea what anything has to do with racism, Ashley Banjo. No idea at all...



I was making this thread and I didn't expect this following bit to be included.

25/03/2024
Two guilty of murdering footballer Cody Fisher in Crane nightclub stabbing
Cody Fisher, 23, was attacked by a masked group at the Crane club in Birmingham on 26 December 2022, in front of more than 2,000 people. Remy Gordon, 23, and Kami Carpenter, 22, were convicted of murder at Birmingham Crown Court on Monday. A third defendant Reegan Anderson, 19, was found not guilty of murder but guilty of affray.

Less than an hour after the encounter that night in Popworld, Gordon sent messages in a Snapchat group he was in with several friends appealing for help to identify Mr Fisher and threatened to "shank him up". "Who knows this likkle pip squeeze [sic]?" he posted with a photograph and arrow pointing to Mr Fisher, along with comments of "man think he's bad" and "posh yout".

Gordon and Carpenter discussed smuggling a knife into Crane nightclub and wearing masks to conceal their identities. Gordon was even captured on CCTV adjusting his mask as he exited the venue after the attack.

MM233Uj.png


https://archive.is/IuIEB
https://archive.is/dD5bM

Is there going to be a Worldwide WLM movement now? There was George Floyd and BLM happened. There was Daniel Shaver and WLM didn't happen; there was Maria Lidenburger abd WLM didn't happen; there was Kriss Donald and WLM didn't happen; there are many, many more unnamed or unknowns and WLM didn't happen; there was this Gemma who Jim knows and WLM didn't happen; there was that 1 person and 7 more and WLM didn't happen; there was Cody Fisher and WLM didn't happen; and what do you care, Ashley, about these lot and about WLM? Will you, your Black People, your Group, support WLM now? Leila said "enough is enough". When - and for whom, and against whom, and where is enough enough? Ashley said, "Then it's like, 'Guys, twenty thousand complaints', and when it starts to build and build and build, you go, 'Where does this stop?'.". I ask the same, for my Race, for my People, for my Group. Where, and when and how, will this anti-Wihte racism, replacement, displacement, destruction, stop?

You can ask 'wHaT dOeS tHaT hAvE tO dO wItH rAcIsM?' and say that it baffles you. You say "the statistics". Don't the statistics show Blacks being sent to jail for more crimes/dangerous crimes? I don't know what it has to do with racism... It baffles you; it baffles me, as well. "Whites kill Whites. Whites Kill Blacks. Whites commit crimes." Yes. We have more-than enough shit to contend with already, without extra shit on top of it. I have posted news articles which have included Whites, as well. e.g. druggy "parents" who murdered their own Daughter. These were White. Not all lives matter. One makes their life matter. All lives matter - if one makes it be so for themselves. That White Baby Girl's life didn't matter.

To her White druggy parents.

Maybe such things are about racism. Maybe they are not. Maybe they weren't about racism, but now have become about racism. Regardless, there are problems, and they are getting worse and worse. Take your hand out of the pan of boiling water, or out of the fire. Yes, you might have a protective glove on while in the boiling water or in the fire, but you're still not solving the problem. You're showing-off. You're - as was said earleir - gesturing. You're posturing. You're stupid-ing.
 
You want equality while wanting diversity. You want lots of things to be equal (equality), and you want lots of different things (diversity). There is no, and there always will never be, such thing as "equality" - and Whites are diverse already.

TaZQ21Y.png

EOPe7qk.png

kEzkd7W.png


slIAeoc.png


We don't need diversity. You want/need diversity, but we neither want it nor need it. We have a lot already, yet you want it. You want it here. You want to make already-diverse White areas... diverse. Have you ever heard of "too many cooks spoil the broth"? Ice cream is tasty, but too much ice cream is undesirable. Cakes are tasty, but too much cake is undesirable. We have diversity, but you want to make our already-diverse White areas "diverse". You want to make our already-diverse White areas dIvErSe. Our diversity is enough already, thanks. We don't need any other, extra, irrelevant diversity which doesn't fit-in with us. Your dance group Diversity had a lot of Asians and Whites in it, yes? No?

You want equality but you won't support WLM. You claim to be mixed but you're supporting and defending BLM, the movement, in White areas because a White copper killed a Black Man, instead of having Black lives mattering (not the movement) in Black areas. You won't support WLM, nor White lives mattering, after a White copper killed a White Man, nor 2 Black Men killed a White Man by taking a large knife deliberately to murder him, nor a Black Man killing a White person and injuring severely a further 7. You won't support WLM, nor White lives mattering. Will you?

In Jim's video, he clearly mentions Asians, as well, but you ignored that. Maybe these are what it has to do with racism. Alternatively, again - you are also a victim. Imarn and Jim and one of the hosts on the radio programme all said it's racism - if you don't support BLM, the movement, you're racist; if you support Brexit, you're racist; not bending the knee, you're racist; blah, blah, blah, you're racist.

Shit. I'm sorry. I was racist again. Allow me to rectify that.

dic57Fh.gif


There we go. That's better.

People have been brainwashed with "it's racist", and use it as a knee-jerk reaction, instead of thinking and realising. George Floyd's life mattered. Daniel Shaver's life mattered. Cody Fisher's life mattered. That one's life who Jim mentioned, mattered. You were told by Jim that you shouldn't have gone onto Britain's Got Talent, a variety act, family entertainment eveneng programme, and you seem to disagree with him, saying his opinion was racist and personal. David and Dominique told you you shouldn't have done that, or said 'they' would come after you, and you seemed to accept them telling you that. Why them but not Jim? Please stay baffled, and please stay idiotic by defending the use of an entertainment programme for the family in the evening to spread "your message" of politics in 4 minutes, which - as you know, as you said - is not enough time...

With Jim saying if it was a White bloke under the copper's knee, the copper should have got the same amount of time in jail, Ashley said, "absolutely". So you, Ashley, agree that the copper should have got the same sentence in jail - and you said "absolutely" - but for some reason a White copper kneeling on a Black Man's neck sparked something, a song and a dance about it (literally 'making a song and dance about it') with the song including "I can't breathe" - when the fact is George said that he can't breathe before the White copper knelt on his neck... So if it was a White Man "under there", the copper should have got the same amount of time in jail - "absolutely" - but 3 Black Men attacking this Gemma person, or 1 Black Man killing 1 White person and injuring severely 7 more - "wHaT dOeS tHaT hAvE tO dO wItH rAcIsM?". Seriously?

Just like that Remy Gordon and Kami Carpenter who made a song and dance about Cody going past, in the nightclub. One or both of them made a mountain out of a molehill, exaggerating things. I am trying very hard to not be "racist" - or discriminating racially - but there seems to be a theme... From what I can gather, it seems like Black people think with their Emotions instead of with their Brains. (Dear JoS Members and Black people in particular - please don't be offended by me saying that. I don't mean it as an attack. I hope it can be considered constructive criticism, as this entire post can be, I hope.)

You're like Rishi, from Everett, Washington, in and episode of Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares USA, who thought a restaurant was a good venue for bellydancing for customers. Stop bellydancing in a restaurant, Diversity. There is a correct time and place for that - a family entertainment variety act programme in the evening is not it.

There is a saying - you shouldn't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down and win from experience. I also consider the Gods and Goddesses apparently not remaining here for very long, because of the lower vibration of this Planet and area of the galaxy. If one lives in a bad neighbourhood, they'll likely be guided and directed by that. If one lives in an affluent neighbourhood, they'll likely be guided and directed by that. We can add higher and lower things together, and the result will not be that all parts, parties, items are improved. I am not saying that Whites are higher and Blacks are lower. I am saying we are too different; we are unequal; we are diverse and working together obviously is not working, clearly. Not until we all each, as Races and as individuals, improve the state of this Planet and defeat the orchestrations, the orchestrators of this clash of cultures, of these racial tensions, this miscegenation, this degeneration.

5EwyIaV.png




I was surprised that I could go further and further with this thread being longer and longer, when I went through it again and again. I might even be able to go on further, but this is way more than enough, so I'll leave it there. These are my own thoughts on this. They might be right, they might be wrong.

Humanity needs a new Hitler, please lord gods sent us powerful soul like him and bless the souls that are already here.
nGt69Fb.jpg




P06xOaI.gifx



More -
Blatant, Open anti-White Racism
https://ancient-forums.com/index.php?threads/j-news-blatant-open-anti-white-racism.86299
 
Dang. Those two pictures that didn't load, and shouldn't have loaded at all because they are NSfW, are -

-https://i.imgur.com/DPRNCho.png
-https://i.imgur.com/FoPgLGB.jpg

If you wish to view them, then open them in a new tab without hyphen at the beginning.
 
Let's congratulate FancyMancy.

#1 Official Longest Post in JoS History

Even I have my limits reading long posts. Mind if I ask one question Fancy?

Where is the principle racial element property whereby I can increase my racial technology in your article?

This article you posted is nice and all. But again it would require like 1hour+ to read. Even if I've done my fair share of 45 min typing posts and re-reads in 15minutes and retypes.

Excuse me I don't want to seem ignorant or stupid. Your a wonderful EnglandReich person. But even this is above me. But excellent job with memetic enforcement.

The M.M.S.P's are wonderful! (Memetic Macro Strike Package/s).

What section is the principle racialist/racist technology?

BTW TLDR: Is it fair to state "Racism" = a healthy bio-spiritual principle of physical, mental, and spiritual self-perservation of ones race and racial society?

Is it fair to state the Gods imbued in us to get racist if we were ever clustered together against our will so we can return back to our Racialist and segregation/separation of O.R.I.O.N. | O.N.I.O.R.; Our Race Is Our Nation | Our Nation Is Our Race?

One day hopefully an Ai scans this when we make our own JoSAi and we can extrapolate more data/information and racial cohesiveness of our own and racial understanding of others so we can enlighten people.
 
Where is the principle racial element property whereby I can increase my racial technology in your article?

...

What section is the principle racialist/racist technology?
I must be on a different brainwave at the moment. I don't know what you're referring to.
 
Is it cultural appropriation for Beyonce to...

l0nqDve.png


? Maybe this is a topsy-turvy World, where Blacks are cowboys and Whites aren't cornrow-wearers. I wanted to do this -


yYyWh8S.png


but I didn't know if it is correct, and if it is, then it might upset some people. Even Blacks who were cowboys is cultural appropriation by Beyonce, because she's not a cowgirl. She may be Black, but it's not her culture (if Blacks were supposed to be in America at all in the first place, of course...). There is not only one Black culture - look at all the different Black countries and how they are not all the same, just like with Asian countries and White countries; a lot, and not all the same culture - but it seems like we've been led to believe that there is only one Black culture.

FHAZwHP.png


APU49dn.png


QXYTIkE.png


Ndce83t.png


Don't forget -

FqMp4Wi.jpg


P60iZt5.png


X4NIKig.jpg



White staff in Seattle are being trained to "undo Whiteness"
NN46dP0.jpg

https://ancient-forums.com/index.ph...nd-retarded-j-news-recently.41861/post-172150

4EOdrpc.jpg
 
He is asking where the cold hard facts about racialism are in your post.
Like I said - what does anyone mean by "racist" and "racism"? Apparently, Jim Davidson reacting to Ashley Banjo personally is racist. I have noticed that "-ism" is a contradcitory term. "-ism" is used for things and against things, i.e. femin-ism is for, and rac-ism is against. It's nonsense.
 
Like I said - what does anyone mean by "racist" and "racism"? Apparently, Jim Davidson reacting to Ashley Banjo personally is racist. I have noticed that "-ism" is a contradcitory term. "-ism" is used for things and against things, i.e. femin-ism is for, and rac-ism is against. It's nonsense.
Writes a long post about racial issues--thinks racialism is nonsense.

Don't worry, carry on. :D
 
Writes a long post about racial issues--thinks racialism is nonsense.

Don't worry, carry on. :D
I like your ignorance and troll reply. I didn't say "racism is nonsense". I said the use of "-ism" is nonsense, and people using "racist!" automatically is nonsense, without defining what they mean. Thanks for ignoring that and then lying. Some people speak literally; others speak metaphorically, symbolically. When I was younger, it was common to call Asian people Black, even though they are actually not Black. Thanks for your contribution, and don't forget to continue to be sarcastic and trolling.
 
I like your ignorance and troll reply. I didn't say "racism is nonsense". I said the use of "-ism" is nonsense, and people using "racist!" automatically is nonsense, without defining what they mean. Thanks for ignoring that and then lying. Some people speak literally; others speak metaphorically, symbolically. When I was younger, it was common to call Asian people Black, even though they are actually not Black. Thanks for your contribution, and don't forget to continue to be sarcastic and trolling.
I am sorry. I did not understand this was so serious for you.
 
I am sorry. I did not understand this was so serious for you.
No, not at all. White people being replaced and destroyed and eradicated from the Earth is not important to me at all. I swear I'm not being sarcastic.

Did you watch the video? At the end, a Black, who is in the celebrity version of Gogglebox despite not being a celebrity because she, and her partner, are in the regular version of Gogglebox (and that celebrity version also didn't have Whites in), said,

It's so sad, because we're not going anywhere. We're here to stay and we're multiplying. Yeah? We're multiplying and multilpying and we're mixing and we're blending. You cannot get rid of us! So it's better to just accept it!

Is that acceptable? Is that racist? Is that important? Is that OK to bend over for and accept the allegedly-debunked coudenhove-kalergi plan of murdering the White Race, and for the intention of enslaving the remaining Blacks and Asians as a mongoloid non-race? Is any or all of that racist or important? No, that's not important to me at all... I'm still not being sarcastic... For those who don't understand - I am being sarcastic. It is very important.

Part of what I do... i.e. uploading videos to Bitchute and linking back to this forum and JoS websites... is to bring people here. I don't do it for fun... I think it's quite important...

I don't know why I need to explain that it is important. Anyone would - or at least should - have thought and realised by now that it is important, and some should have noticed it is important to me...





For the sake of clarity - a "Race war" is obviously happening. It appears to be that - because this documentary is about Blacks v Whites and ignores Asians - Blacks are "allowed" to do things but Whites aren't, and Whites have "privilege" yet Blacks have agencies and groups and things to help them try to fit-in and integrate.

Perhaps if we went to Satan's Planet and whinged like little bitches that He and They have privilege in Their own area, that maybe we might get to take over and replace Them? Retarded. That They must throw away Their own culture and customs and ways, etc., to suit us? Fucking retarded.

Whites have privilege in White areas. Get over it. They're our areas.

Asians have privilege in Asian areas. Get over it. They're Asian areas.

Blacks have privilege in Black areas. Get over it. They're Black areas.

The use of "racism" is stupid. People need to explain what they mean by the term. I have attempted to come from the perspective of Whites trying to keep White things White, despite Asians and Blacks coming in and trying to take over. Anyone can deny that all they want.

"Diversity is Humanity's Destiny ... Europe will be diverse" - Frans Timmermans
V4P22AU.png

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1cLatSvFzF36

It is clearly a threat, and worse. Once it was 100% White, now it's a less than that. Once it becomes <50% White, despite it still being a White country, it would demographically be a non-White country. Which White countries are still White? We have no choice but to accept others coming in.

The falsely-debunked coudenhove-kalergi plan of murdering the White Race, and for the intention of enslaving the remaining Blacks and Asians as a mongoloid non-race, was made before the (((UN)))'s Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, was it not? coudenhove-kalergi, being a jew, has the rights above all. Was the (((UN)))'s Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide merely a reaction? Because Humans complained, so that (((TPTB))) made a thing to pretend to help us, to appease us? Article 50 for Brexit was not meant to be used. The jew's plans and intentions have higher priorty over Humans' plans and intentions. The jew's diplomatic weight is greater than Humans'. Who decides what and how dimploamtic weight is... spread? The jew is obviously biased to its own things, so it cannot be trusted to be fair and impartial. There are many more Humans, and Whites, than the jew, yet our say is nothing, and we must have "elected representatives" to pretend to be on our side... yet we still have no choice but to accept being taken-over and to be called extremist if we disagree.

AzxrMTa.png


We want X but Y is given, instead. Which country has greatest diplomatic weight to get its own way against us, and why, and how? We need people like Charles Martel and Adolf Hitler.

I am now being "extremist", by the UK ((("govern"ment)))'s dEfInItIoN, because I refuse to accept - tolerate - such shit against me and my Group, my Race, my People, and by extension all Human Races. I also suggest that, because the documentary ignores Asians, Blacks should go to Black areas to help Black Children who are starving to death and to fix there, building-up society and decent living and education, etc., and be real heroes/heroines.

dfb5wEB.png

5mNv9uN.png

wRDBbcG.png


MGgLrex.jpg

I can't wait for this to be dEbUnKeD...

We're not "allowed" to do what Charles Martel did now, despite wanting to in one form or another. Democracy doesn't exist. A post was made about NPCs who apparently don't have any internal voice in their heads, yet they can still vote. Non-White ideals and preferences influence votes and voting results, as well..

It is dEmOcRaCy to bring-in others' ideals and mentalities and preferences, have them become the majority, and then replace the indigenous population.
It is dEmOcRaCy to give a referendum for Brexit, with an article supposedly for it that is not intended to be used, so it can't happen.
It is dEmOcRaCy that Brexit won, yet it is being ignored and non-Whites are flooding-in still, I think more than ever before.
It is dEmOcRaCy to say "you have free will/expression/speech" then punish you for exercising them.

I am one who wants White to remain White in White areas. Call me extremist for disagreeing with, and being against, that. Call me racist. Call me whatever. Fine. Whatever. Enjoy.
 
No, not at all. White people being replaced and destroyed and eradicated from the Earth is not important to me at all. I swear I'm not being sarcastic.
I was not referring to that, but about being lighthearted.

I must admit that while I share the concern I know that things are going to turn out better, eventually. The road to a better world will be rocky, but I do not worry in the same sense you portray worry in this post in my day-to-day life. My main concern is personal elevation, and being successful im that area affects my surroundings as well so I know I am doing my part...
Did you watch the video? At the end, a Black, who is in the celebrity version of Gogglebox despite not being a celebrity because she, and her partner, are in the regular version of Gogglebox (and that celebrity version also didn't have Whites in), said,
No, I did not. I try to avoid riling myself with such matters as I feel that I does not help me in any manner. Even reading some forum posts in other forums by those without is quite the task as the sheer ignorance and lack of higher purpose is appalling.
 
I never said anything about the cold hard facts.

I meant what is the underlying technological improvements and technology tree to which your data/information is expressing. So I can upgrade my racial understanding and produce new information and thoughts in my head.

In Social Maxism/Social Capitalism Racist = Hatred of anther race

In Social Nazism Racist may be deemed in context in debate to them but could be better understood as the Racialist property of Racist = a healthy sentiment of racial preservation. Just because I HATE XYZ race doesn't mean I'm against them or wipe them out that's a very kosher mentality. No simply is I wish them gone from my midst and be placed far away from me.

Racialist = Racial Superiority, Supremacy, Nationality, and Power in respective racial-nation.

I'm simply using the enemy logic to twist and unbend their racial topographical principles and hijack their words.

For example everyone calls it wokeness. Why? Call it sleeping or sleepiness or asleep.

Woke, Wake, Awakened. If I'm woke I'm aware or more aware of the facts presented.

It seems like too much cuckservative bullshit but that is what you get when retarded political people believe in political division.

As Johann Von Goethe said, Divide and Conquer is a sound motto, Unit and lead is a better one.

I'd rather follow the all-wing, full-wing, all-side Black Spectrum Political property of National Socialism. Conservative of Satanism/Paganism/Gentilism, Revolutionary, Centrist, Progressive, Extreme on both sides and all sides and all positions.

Use everything positive, neutral towards improving our people and the negative we sublimate and turn it into positive and neutral.

As Hitler and Gottfried Feder might put it, Don't fuck with the money, economy, people, races, ancient religions, science, technology, evolution, and progress. Simply be Dharma to the Hu-Gaderin-manity. We are HUs-Man and deserve the best, elite, and most wonderful things.
 
I never said anything about the cold hard facts.

I meant what is the underlying technological improvements and technology tree to which your data/information is expressing. So I can upgrade my racial understanding and produce new information and thoughts in my head.
Also known as facts. You are simply saying the same thing in a more complicated manner.
 
C0hxn8F.png


You might be offended by what I say here.

re: the comment/tweet in that picture
No-one will, though. Only BLM, apparently - and in White Countries, no less; WL don't M in White Countries. Only BLM, apparently, in White Counties. There is a clear difference between Blacks and Whites. When a druggie who couldn't breath before his neck was knelt on died, Blacks decided to go out and cause a Worldwide anti-White racism group to terrorise Whites [some videos on here] more than what was happening already. Only when 3 White Children were murdered did Whites go on a rampage, a lot of which was said to be completely unrelated to that incident and was said to be more for rioting and causing damage than being related to the murders of those three Girls and the injuries of the others. No matter what, we still have to put-up with anti-White racism in our own White Countries, (((in media, in politics and in "education"))).

With the BLM nonsense, Blacks think with their emotions instead of with their Brains because a druggie who couldn't breath died related to, but not because of, police; Blacks didn't make any fuss whatsoever, nor did any Worldwide media attention happen, when Daniel Shaver was murdered by police. "Niggers" (not all Blacks are niggers, by the way; I refer to "nigger" culture; I don't have any Black friends but I have interacted with Blacks quite amicably - yes, that's right, Ashley, David, etc., I don't have Black friends, so I'm not racist! Herp-derp! I still behave amicably with Blacks, though, so I'm not muh waysis! Herp-derp! /sarcasm) hate the police. With the 3 White Children being murdered - oh, by a Black, no less!! and not police, but a mere civilian!! - Whites displayed their hatred and anger and upset and frustration, etc., yet were shot-down by the police and media and politicians, and no doubt false-education.

Blacks are not thugs inherently, but tell me how many people are involved in crimes, and go out stealing Nike shoes instead of food during riots, and are in jail... Also look at Africa and how much they refuse, or don't know how to, fix... even the fucking dirty water! Drinking dirty water full of germs... Fuck sake... The same with India. Use your Brains! Not all Blacks are stupid, but it seems that Blacks in White Countries can learn to use their Brains (Akon doing good things to help in Africa); Blacks in Black Countries either seem to not care to or don't know how to keep drinking water clean...

The idea of carrying clean or dirty water also seemed to not be realised better, for a long time. This below is information about an inventions regarding transportation of water over distances.

9K4HKXx.png

Upper: traditional method of carrying water; lower: more water can be transported easily using the roller

9N7Gl5s.png

Hippo Rollers with the World Food Programme (WFP) logo printed on it. The WFP is one of the NGOs that distributed Hippo Rollers.

mgrRvk4.png

A close up image of a Hippo Roller, showing the drum, the larger (white) and smaller cap (red), the stainless steel handle, and the friction-reducing polymer end-caps.

The Hippo water roller, or Hippo roller, is a device used to carry drinking water more easily and efficiently than traditional methods, particularly in the developing world and rural areas. It consists of a barrel-shaped container that holds the water and can roll along the ground, and a handle attached to the axis of the barrel. Currently deployed in rural Africa, its simple and purpose-built nature makes it an example of appropriate technology. The devices cost around $125 each and they are mainly distributed by NGOs.

Claimed benefits​

It is claimed that approximately five times the amount of water can be transported in less time with far less effort than the traditional method of carrying 20 litres (5.3 US gal) on the head.[5]

Critiques​

This is not a solution that meets the criteria of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6. “Safely managed drinking water services” (SMDWS), which is the global indicator for estimating progress toward the SDG for safe drinking water for all (SDG 6.1). Global use of SMDWS is estimated by the Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) using data on four subcomponents which measure whether households use a primary drinking water source that is (i) improved, (ii) accessible on premises (4), (iii) available when needed (5), and (iv) free of fecal and priority chemical contamination.[8]
https://archive.is/IinHO Archived 4 years ago
https://archive.is/BPAEz Archived by me


CMOPhVe.png

https://archive.is/X2cXu
Above, where Ashley, David, etc., were complaining about not being the fake hero in a fake story with a real-but-fake car saving the fake Girl... please. You make me sick. Wake the fuck up. You need to do actual, real-life things to actually help. Go to Africa and save "your People", "your group", as you say. Go to your People, your group, and actually help them, instead of being a little bitch, crying and whingeing over here among my People, in my group.

It seems that either they don't care about keeping water clean or they don't know how to... Apparently, they can't even invent the wheel (i.e. the hippo water roller)... I can remember reading that in ancient times, Whites actually were the leaders or rulers of Black Countries. I may be mistaken, but I think it was the Egyptian Pharaohs. Seeing all of these things that we see, it seems as if it is no wonder why...

In a similar vein as the Americanism "these people vote", this is being forced upon us against our will, and when we protest, we are cancelled and de-funded and arrested, etc. The police is the jew's social army to subdue us, the People.

It's going further with Race-mixing, where Whites are mixing with Asians and Blacks in White Countries, and if procreating, then no White Babies being born, as per dominant and recessive genes. Whites are being destroyed in our own White Countries - Whites being forced out of their own homes to make way for 'refugees' or rapefugees, as some say, which is not entirely inaccurate.

Any groups the "govern"ment disagrees with are cancelled and de-funded. So that means we can't be pro-White in our own White Countries, because the "govern"ment, who was supposedly elected and supposedly represents us, goes deliberately against us.

1xV0bRm.png


Dear Ashley, David, etc. - go to your own People, your own group. Go. Help them. Stop being little bitches in someone else's home, crying that you can't have things, can't do things, can't get your own way in someone else's home. When a Mum gives birth to her Baby Boy or Girl in her friend's home, the Baby doesn't live in his/her Mum's friend's home. He/she may stay there for a little while to help nurture him/her and to help the Mum, but then he/she and Mum goes home to... guess where... their motherland, Mother's home. When Mum gives birth in the hospital, Mum and Baby don't overstay; they stay for a little while, then go home. Grow up and stop crying like little bitches on TV for millions to see, playing the sob story, and instead, go help your People.

I do realise that Ashley Banjo, David Harewood, and the others will probably never read this. I am simply making points. I hope they are good points. Stop being stupid. Go and help your People. As is quite obvious, your own, your own People's homecountry is shit. Go there to help them, instead of crying here that you do have
  • a decent beach-front flat or house to live in,
  • a decent car to drive, or be driven in by a chauffeur,
  • a decent fattening meal every 4 hours every day,
  • a lot of fans to basically give you money to hear your (or someon else's who you are singing) words,
  • a lot of money because you are celebrities,
  • a decent life
and instead, go over to them, to your People, where they have none of these things, and grow up. There are "charities" to pretend to "help" e.g. Africans get clean water (which Africans didn't seem to do themselves...). I don't trust "charities", though. One example, as I always repeat, is Children in Need raised £1bn in 40 years. I wonder how much it cost Akon to help with solar panels, and how many were helped with that. I wonder why Ashley Banjo and David Harewood can't - and most-certainly, most-definitely will not, by choice, of course - go and do similar things... (I'd like to eat my hat...)

Clearly, the "govern"ance is done very carefully, in a very calculated way. Different options are given, and if the voters vote for A, then it will be done in this way; or B, in that way; then later in the next General Election, depending on that, the options are skewed such that, depending on what has happened previously, the direction the Country takes is driven down will depend on how things are next; if option B is chosen, then it goes in that way as opposed to A which would be a diversion but towards the same goal eventually. With Labour winning, people were sick and tired of the Tories, and that was done on purpose to make people choose the Labour option with making sure things happen this way; if the Tories won again, more 'Tory sleaze' would happen on purpose to further frustrate the electorate into voting for Labour next time. In other words it's good-copper/bad-copper bad-copper/worse-copper. "Which option did he choose? OK, pile on the pressure until he cracks. ... Finally, now what you need to do is..."

It is not "wrong" to have Black-only performances -

Blatant, Open anti-White Racism

but if any White did that to have White-only performances, then things would burn. Prove me wrong, change my mind, demonstrate otherwise.

I see in adverts, Blacks and Whites pretending to be couples and families. Usually, the Whites are scripted to be stupid and retarded and the Blacks are scripted to be the clever ones and know how to handle whatever the situation of the advert is. e.g. To go paperless for TV license, the advert is a bit dramatic, and the White, in dramatic voice, says something like to not get rid of that, because it's the only proof they have, and the Black says that it's alright because people are going paperless and the White does an uncomfortable laugh in embarrassment. That's just one example; other adverts advertise products/services, and I'm not being paid to advertise their product/service, so you'll have to name them yourself. The TV license one is just one example. In other media, Whites are uncool and Blacks always have the great poses and the cool stances (physically and metaphorically) to save the day in an impressive way while Whites are portrayed as boring or usless or embarrassing. It also reminds me of what HPS Maxine said, that baddies in media tend to be Whites, good-looking baddies, and the "saviours" are the dirty jew or are simply not Whites. I have also noticed that, as well.

If I was a business owner, and it passed the (((Advertising Standards Authourity))) "the UK's independent regulator of advertising across all media", and I tried doing an advert where Whites are the decent ones and Blacks are the stupid ones, I wonder what wouldn't happen... If I managed to be "allowed", I wonder how many Blacks would cry and bitch about that. Then, if it was possible, I'd do a reaction advert, reminding them of all of the times they loved it when Blacks were the amazing ones and Whites were the shit ones, and they, Blacks, never whinged and Whites didn't, either. By the sounds of it, Asians would be eating popcorn strawberries and cream at this tennis match...

It seems Whites are being beaten and destroyed in our own White Countries, and others are getting nearly-free-reign to do so. When Whites protest and react or do things, go full throttle! When Blacks, in these cases, do, hold back and wait to see what happens...
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top