FancyMancy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2017
- Messages
- 7,036
Rembrandt, 1639
Modern "art"
Modern "art"
Zeffie of the Wind said:As an artist myself I have noticed that within the art community there are several detrimental thought processes that continuosly lower the bar so to speak.
One of which is that the idea of technical skill in a medium (such as acrylic paint, oil paint, sculpting, etc) doesnt truly matter in creating ''real art'' and that its the expression or raw emotion that matter more. Its how we end up with splashes of paint in a canvas, give it some BS meaning, and host it in galleries. We even end up having ''artists'' that show off literal feces and call it art.
There's also the tiptoeing around trying to not offend an artist otherwise you face the wrath of obnoxious SJW or 'fanbois' that lick the creators feet or something like that. Then there are artists that take personal offense to anything poorly said about their works and attack the critic as if they made the next generation Mona Lisa or something.
Then we have critics that think they know the ins and outs of art. They think they know absolutly everything about how to make good art and anything that doesnt fit that guideline in their head is not 'real' art
Worst of all though is the extremly self depreciating way I see young artists, proffesional or not, speak about themsleves and their own work. There is a lack of pride in both themselves and what they create. Not everyone is like that hopefully but the artists that I interacted with, most if not all of them talk poorly about themselves. Theres a lack of pride and happiness in creating art. Then when someone does act prideful you have people purposly trying to bring them down or call them haughty/cocky/bigot/etc.
Maybe its just the communities that I saw or were in and hopefully there are some that arent like that.
(I am assuming you didn't see my other replies before replying to me, which I hope explains a bit more of what I mean.)zolaluckystar said:Fancy Mancy, I would say that while art can seem an illusion, and in some senses it is as it exists in each person who views it as something wholly unto the viewer. It is arbitrary. The viewer will see things in it that the artist never intended. I just sold a painting to a woman who wrote me a thank you letter for it, and called it/described the image....as something that I had never had in my mind at all when I painted it and yet for her it was truth and it moved her. Art is a language. It is a language that transcends the written word to speak to the soul. And every soul is different and will interpret what they see individually.
While its true there are many out there who think they are amazing when they don't even grasp the vocabulary (I can think of a few examples of these from personal experience), let alone even begin to employ that to create, I think what has happened is that the jews have so defiled 'art' with them controlling what it even means, that when you look around you could easily think that....that art has been brought down to rubble.
But I respectfully disagree. There are many fine artists who labor on in the shadows who deserve recognition and can't get it because of how this foul system is set up at this time. Only the shit is uplifted. Literally. Look at that foul Jewess Marina Abramovic. She is filth.
But we are out there. Art is not dead, it will never BE dead, no matter how the jew tries to strangle it, control it or use it. Or to defile our vision. To denigrate beauty and truth. For that is, I feel, what Art is at its core essence: It is a visual of something that is truthful and ultimately beautiful. We seek to bring that truth of beauty into this world. The pure light of Satan. The enemy will never be able to grasp that.
All they can do is censor us by promoting their filth as 'Art'. But it isn't real art. Real art is indeed, like a child to those of us who create it. And we do fall in love with it. Of course we do. And then we send it out into the world to other people to enjoy and to fall in love with. Art is meant to uplift, to inspire, to transform. It is, at its core, magic. It is the highest form of expression because as I said, in its most pure form, it speaks soul to soul. The jews cannot comprehend this, as its not in their foul soul. They celebrate darkness, we celebrate light. Lucifer, in all His Glory and Majesty, Father Satan. They cannot ever comprehend this as they are alien to us. And we to them.
Just look at this dancer. He is sheer physicality/power mixed with pure art, perfection of line and form:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-tW0CkvdDI
NaziMan12 said:Some masters in the early Renaissance died in poverty because they were paid so little. Art today is just a big FU to Satan in general. Beauty is not in the eye of the beholder that is a Jewish maxim. This is the same maxim that rules the art world and art is the way it is because the guys with money control art production. The Renaissance had alot of white princes and such like Lorenzo de Medici who sponsored Leonardo, Michaelangelo and many others/
Well, with the computer programme doing all of the rendering, and filling-in, and everything. Even I, who is not an artist in such a sense, knows and agrees computerised, digital image manipulation is not art - it is image manipulation. A jew can smear its own shit all over a wall and call it art, but that is just smelly wallpaper manipulation.Yagami Light said:I believe digital art takes away the hard work that is required for someone to master the art of drawing/painting.Andevili666 said:Digital Art is "ART". An artist is one at the soul. I think traditional art was to train the mind along with the spiritual practices in preparation for technological advancement. It would have been a transcendence where artistry would be a siddhi. I think with one's mind/brain fully functional, one can finish artworks in their mind and imprint them via technological means so they come out instantly. I read where Nicola Tesla could do this in his mind palace. I think It would be ridiculous to use traditional means with such advancements in existence, you would probably be the meme of the internet.
Time is of outmost value to us, one can use digital means to express their artistic souls as it is fast, while honing their trad skills for how long it will take to master them and at the end of the day, it would be a double win. If one has to wait until they master a skill before they showcase themselves, they will get little to nothing done. There are always mistakes even with digital artistry.
Precisely. It's just a load of crap. There's nothing artistic about it. It might be cool and trippy and twinkly, etc., but it's not art. Pressing a few keyboard buttons and clicking a few mouse buttons a few times in a few places and bam, an image of a whatever. They tried making music mathematically, because it was supposed to have mathematical properties; yet when they did, it was so rubbish, from what I've been told. The jew is logical. Art is not.when I actually tried doing this on a canvas I was SHOCKED at how difficult it was. There is no Ctrl+Z there.
Yeah, cheapens it. Waters it down. Lowers its tone. Makes it hollow and empty. To reiterate - I'm not an artist in this sense, but I can still notice it, as well. It's more than I can understand, though - I just know this with thinking and seeing; artists such as any in this thread, Rembrandt, and whomever else who have actual experience and knowledge of it know much deeper than I ever will if I never get into art.I've come to believe that digital art... kind of cheapens the concept of art itself.
(how strange... I had seriously not considered these things before, but your response kind of triggered my thinking on this)
I think one point which has not been raised yet is that of mass production. Each art piece is unique - rendering on GIMP or Photoshop is an exact, precise, perfectly-identical copy. All you have to do is go to Print and select a thousand copies of the same thing. Mass production of a once-imaginative industry, IMO, is Soulless.Andevili666 said:Lol, Yagami and Fancy should learn to read. Towards the end of my previous post I said to do the two so it would be a double win.. lol. That's exactly what I'm doing, mastering the canvas secretly and also expressing my soul digitally. Don't place limitations on yourselves. In the future, you will see a lot of masterful trad arts from me done on canvas. As well as digital stuff. All I do is win. Question of the thread, if digital artworks were dollars how many would you do?... lol
Rhetorical or not, I use neither the dollar nor the euro, and from what I have read, the dollar is not worth using to clean one's private lower back region with.Question of the thread, if digital artworks were dollars how many would you do?... lol
Digital is auto-fill, not manual-fill. It is lazy. It's 1s and 0s, not brushstrokes and physical hand movements, with too much or too little pressure, and as Yagami Light said no CTRL+Z. Digital is mass-produced, which has less value because you just print another one off and another one off and another one off, and it's not unique. Art, on the other hand, is unique, man-made/hand-crafted, and has value - time and effort, more so than computer image manipulation.Andevili666 said:Any opinions about digital art not being art will remain an opinion. The last time I checked, the Almighty value of such 'opinions' was almost zero as it didn't reflect the millions or maybe billions of people who enjoyed such.
Digital art has come to stay. What matters is how it's used, we are in the digital age. You might as well disregard photography because it takes away the hard work of drawing the environment, you might as well also disregard all of the good Movies because they entail digital 'manipulation' and editing. In fact our digital meet-up on the forums is wrong, we should do it the traditional way, lol...
Traditional art is very good art and I expect those who strongly disregard Digital Art to never ever enjoy such or express themselves digitally as it will very hypocritical of them. I have created unique digital pieces and also done mass-production and my understanding about digital art is increasing everyday and I won't stop. I know also know the value of trad arts is to sharpen the mind and to give on some manual dexterity, it may be slow but I will keep brushing up my skills.
The comment about the 'worthlessness' of the dollar shows how uneducated the poster is.
It's just a phase, be it a short one or a long one. Physical paper books will last forever; people won't dump them for eye-straining, electricty-and-money-wasting, cold & plastc ebook readers.Digital art has come to stay.
In the non-jew, less-populated world, there'd be less red tape, and things would be much fairer in price. People would go and sit in an area, e.g. trainspotting, and paint or draw a scene. - These days, people are lazy. They want quick results. With the contention of rain and weather patterns, a painter/drawer has to work slowly and carefully. I won't deny there is skill in digital image manipulation, and also in photography, but standing in a strange position, pointing the camera at something, and then clicking the button before the heavens open up is easy. Trying to get done, or part of it done, before it rains on your canvas and pallete to spoilt it is patience and commitment. Then having to return after the air dries up enough for you to continue, and finish eventually.You might as well disregard photography because it takes away the hard work of drawing the environment, you might as well also disregard all of the good Movies because they entail digital 'manipulation' and editing.
Yeah, nice sarcasm. We would be if it weren't for the jew. There is only the need for technological communications because the jew raped us into atrophying our Pineal Glands and our Spiritual Abilities, which includes telepathy, or interacting Astrally.In fact our digital meet-up on the forums is wrong, we should do it the traditional way, lol...
Then so are the HPs/HPSs and other individuals who realise the dollar is toilet crap paper.The comment about the 'worthlessness' of the dollar shows how uneducated the poster is.
My guess is that it was just a stepping stone, to degenerate Art into "art" slowly over time. If it were done too quickly, then it wouldn't work, so it has to be eased-in slowly, taking time to sink-in, for people to accept it, for it to be normalised.What about salvador dali
I know... You just wouldn't believe it, would you? It is literal scribbling and smearing, and blocks of nothing - literally. No meaning, depth or anything. The blocks are just blank, and the rest is scribble mess. Children do that, and their drawings get put on the fridge with magnets, not being sold for millions. I forgot to say something above, and actually I'm glad I did. Let us recall (as sickening as that might be) that scribble-de-gook and smearage above, and compare it with Children's.The prices of those. Tens of millions of dollars... I have no words other than "clown world".
Lol, yes... In history, there were actual "grooms of the stool". If the jew was not in as high as a position as it can be today, I wonder if the jew who was groom of the stool might have got Henry 8th's stool and used that as honourable canvas equipment, to venerate its king... if not selling it to an illiterate christian as holy material...you silly!
you have to look at who is the artist.
if it is a jew, a holohoax survivor, a poor mixraced kid, or something like that, you have to pay 10 milions.
it may be a litteral shit on a piece of paper, but think about how that jew was felling while he took a shit, while thinking about your nazi grandpa who gassed him.
this whole process is holy, it's beutiful and historycal journey, and also a representation of life.
The result of life, grow, hunt for food, eat, gain energy by consuming life around you, destroying the world cuz you are not eating ze bugz. And then shit. All the hardship, the toilet paper he used for cleaning his ass, maybe some pain.
The dinosauros who died to make petroil to make toilet paper.
The evolution to have hands to take it.
The difficult to remember that if it's sabath you can't use toilet paper, cuz you can't do calculated cuts.
This is like pure gold, 12 milions.
2 shekel for every gassed kike.
And he is a woman, so the price here is +100 milions.
That's 100$ for the tour guide.
Don't be antisemitics and ask me how was the shit? He/she was felling good?
Then don't forget to also buy something from the shop, and to rate me 5 starts, or I will scream victim.
holey*! (Sorry!)if not selling it to an illiterate christian as holy material...
It's also superior, cuz you can see it, smell it, hear the flies, even taste it *yummy artist noises* it's 3d and malneable.Lol, yes... In history, there were actual "grooms of the stool". If the jew was not in as high as a position as it can be today, I wonder if the jew who was groom of the stool might have got Henry 8th's stool and used that as honourable canvas equipment, to venerate its king... if not selling it to an illiterate christian as holy material...
Seriously I had an idea.It's also superior, cuz you can see it, smell it, hear the flies, even taste it *yummy artist noises* it's 3d and malneable.
Not like those bitch ass paintings of yours. How boring! Hitler made these, how evil from you, goy! oy vey!
Then of course the shop, you can buy little shits made of plastic to attach them to the fridge or to your keys and the like (don't know if having animals outside to sell litteral shit will work, maybe too extreme. Or maybe in India). So the shop will be focused on this.Seriously I had an idea.
Hitler vs jew
The Art gallery contest.
A gallery full of painting of Hitler, with poor descriptions, with normal and enjoyable decorations.
Then a room, completely empty with a smelly shit in the middle.
Before entering you take the paper with story written on it. It will talk about all the sensational story I wrote above, and how he is and artist, what he ate, and all the stuff. (the jew one of course).
This will be so contraditory for normies, but so artistical accurate and modern for today standards. So supportive of jews thanks to the story. It will be so obious that Hitler is the good one and that jew done a shit, but still so artistical right for today standards, and this whole sentiment will open the doors to success.
It will create a paradox.
For me it's a good idea. If you know someone for art galleries, send me a DM. I want to have a gallery in all major cities of europe and USA.
He can sell himself to only girl costumers, it will work.Italian Artist Sells Invisible Sculpture for Real Money
1 June 2021
Salvatore Garau has sold his latest invisible sculpture. The work, titled "I Am", doesn't exist except in the artist's imagination. The buyer gets a stamped certificate in exchange for $18,000.
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Good morning. I'm Steve Inskeep. Move over nonfungible tokens. An Italian artist, Salvatore Garau, recently sold his latest invisible sculpture, a work titled "I Am". It isn't. The art does not exist except in the imagination of the artist. Garau says the sculpture may be displayed in any light since it's not there. The buyer gets a stamped certificate in exchange for payment of $18,000, assuming they can't just imagine they paid. It's MORNING EDITION.
Archived by someone else.
"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan