Will it work? Or will people rebel against the Government for such a choice, as if you take away their food? 🤔
Discussion
Sunny wrote: Will it work? Or will people rebel against the Government for such a choice, as if you take away their food? 🤔
Like all drugs or other bad choices, people will stop on their own when the culture they live in influences them to do so. We live in clownworld where people are negatively influenced to do drugs, not stop them. This is something that could be solved without magic, but will certainly be resolved as Zevism grows.
Blitzkreig [JG wrote: " post_id=373956 time=1657597940 user_id=21286]
Sunny wrote: Will it work? Or will people rebel against the Government for such a choice, as if you take away their food? 🤔
Like all drugs or other bad choices, people will stop on their own when the culture they live in influences them to do so. We live in clownworld where people are negatively influenced to do drugs, not stop them. This is something that could be solved without magic, but will certainly be resolved as Zevism grows.
Once Zevism becomes the world religion it used to be, I'm pretty sure everyone will adopt healthier habits, such as farming and growing food, using sacred geometry to create healthier places to live, etc.
My problem with banning something is that it takes considerable amount of government resources to enforce the ban, and in the end you have to weigh in everything and ask yourself “is it worth it”? Why do people even resort to drugs (nicotine is a drug) in the first place? Maybe it is our shitty society devoid of any spirituality, so people look forward to drugs to ease their pain a little bit?
In my humble opinion, the better option is taxation of such destructive habits. You want to smoke? Fine. Just pay up. If that is still not enough for you to reconsider your life choices, I don’t think there is much more we can do? Throw you in prison maybe? Ok, now you are state’s burden, your stay in prison is not free for the state.
Taxation and education. Maybe even a bit of public shaming. Shaming is a powerful tool.
Blitzkreig [JG wrote: " post_id=373956 time=1657597940 user_id=21286]
Sunny wrote: Will it work? Or will people rebel against the Government for such a choice, as if you take away their food? 🤔
Like all drugs or other bad choices, people will stop on their own when the culture they live in influences them to do so. We live in clownworld where people are negatively influenced to do drugs, not stop them. This is something that could be solved without magic, but will certainly be resolved as Zevism grows.
Yes, you are right. Advertising can also do a lot if it is correctly addressed, for example, the consequences of obesity. Many people ignore and underestimate obesity.
Active HelperConcerned wrote: https://drhealthbenefits.com/herbal/leaves/health-benefits-of-organic-tobacco
This doctor takes it even further than I do claiming tobacco can cure HIV!
The positives can be achieved via healthy methods and side effects are not limited to the ones listed in the article. Further, lungs are not meant for inhaling smoke as it dries them up. This is the fundamental cause for lung related issues from smoking according to Chinese Medicine.
All in all, a bad deal.
Henu the Great wrote: Concerned wrote: Smoking has many positive qualities OP. Ask yourself who told you smoking was bad? And why in an otherwise degenerate atmosphere with far more awful things people do and even argue it's healthy like pornography does the system still focus on smoking?
But even ignoring the obvious, nicotine itself has many qualities that improve cognitive function, reduce estrogen, promote metabolic increase, and actually wards off developing certain kinds of cancer. Everyone should smoke, dogs and children should smoke. Maybe not cigarettes, but that's like comparing a steak to a McDonald's cheeseburger.
Or look at coffee. No-one says coffee is bad for people.
Both are bad for health and not necessary for healthy functioning of Human being in any way whatsoever. You do you, but do not propagate falsehoods being okay here.
Well we're at a point here where we have to look at the front page sermon where it mentions science...
To raise prices (levy tax), reduce imports, put people in jail ... society still needs to be governed by some ruling body.
I wonder what the ToZ community feels about the future of human governance — do we want it? What does it look like? Global / country level / more local ? Is there taxes? How are they structured? What Dow’s voting look like?
Apologies if there is already a thread on this.
HAIL ZEUS!
To raise prices (levy tax), reduce imports, put people in jail ... society still needs to be governed by some ruling body.
I wonder what the ToZ community feels about the future of human governance — do we want it? What does it look like? Global / country level / more local ? Is there taxes? How are they structured? What Dow’s voting look like?
Apologies if there is already a thread on this.
HAIL ZEUS!
Artoria Pendragon wrote: To raise prices (levy tax), reduce imports, put people in jail ... society still needs to be governed by some ruling body.
I wonder what the ToZ community feels about the future of human governance — do we want it? What does it look like? Global / country level / more local ? Is there taxes? How are they structured? What Dow’s voting look like?
Apologies if there is already a thread on this.
HAIL ZEUS!
Leadership and governments will always and forever be needed.
Studying ToZ and national, regional and global politics, I realised that there is hierarchy. So there is authority on every level.
Larissa666 wrote: My problem with banning something is that it takes considerable amount of government resources to enforce the ban, and in the end you have to weigh in everything and ask yourself “is it worth it”? Why do people even resort to drugs (nicotine is a drug) in the first place? Maybe it is our shitty society devoid of any spirituality, so people look forward to drugs to ease their pain a little bit?
In my humble opinion, the better option is taxation of such destructive habits. You want to smoke? Fine. Just pay up. If that is still not enough for you to reconsider your life choices, I don’t think there is much more we can do? Throw you in prison maybe? Ok, now you are state’s burden, your stay in prison is not free for the state.
Taxation and education. Maybe even a bit of public shaming. Shaming is a powerful tool.
I agree that spirituality is a great lack and deprivation and limitation of humanity. However, I think that even if humans had spirituality, they would rightly want to get more out of the material dimension as well.
Sunny wrote: I say that the companies in question are not guilty, the guilty ones are the smokers.
Sunny boy you should really reflect on this mentality you have it’s one of victim blaming and sounds like something the enemy would say you should know that some people got addicted to these substances not by choice.
The Outlaw Torn wrote: Sunny wrote: I say that the companies in question are not guilty, the guilty ones are the smokers.
Sunny boy you should really reflect on this mentality you have it’s one of victim blaming and sounds like something the enemy would say you should know that some people got addicted to these substances not by choice.
Listen grandpa, smokers are victims of themselves. Nobody gives cigarettes to people against their will.
The Outlaw Torn wrote: Sunny wrote: I say that the companies in question are not guilty, the guilty ones are the smokers.
Sunny boy you should really reflect on this mentality you have it’s one of victim blaming and sounds like something the enemy would say you should know that some people got addicted to these substances not by choice.
Moreover, cigarette addiction can be overcome if one wants to, but if you don't want to, you won't. Many people don't stop smoking because they don't want to, and....they start smoking because they want to.
I smoked for 6-7 years almost two packs a day, once I realised what useless and harmful crap dioxide and monoxide carbon are, I stopped smoking permanently, with some difficulty but I quit.
Lunar Dance 666 wrote: Sunny wrote: Sunny wrote: Initially I said that smoking must either be made safe or it must be banned because it is destructive. I am not confused and I stand by this idea.
Rather others have said that people should choose whether to use it or not.
However, since a safe and satisfying alternative will not be created soon, the best thing would be to remove cigarettes and wait until something better is created.
The question is, how will smokers react? Can you answer that? I am actually more concerned about this than the companies.
It is not just the addiction to nicotine, it is the habit that is the issue.
To want to have something in your hands. You've gotten so used to the stick..
Do you really think our Gods would do such a thing, have such an annoying habit?
The smoking of cigarettes has no place in a Satanic Society. Not now and not ever.
Even campfire smoke is bad for your health. Or when a house burns down you're also always checked in a hospital if you inhaled the smoke.
The substance doesn't matter. It is simply not great for your health.Also regarding policies. I think in regard to smoking and certain things global policies should be in place. There are other less important things that could be done more locally.
However, we all need to be on the same page if we want to fully enter a proper Satanic Society. We cannot leave any bad things in it, lest they fester and turn up again in different places.
Right, half the problem is habit.