merlin
New member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2021
- Messages
- 4
I've been reading this website for a while and I come across with this topic, which is very interesting, says Göbeklitepe might be fake and if you know, Göbeklitepe is known for being the oldest temple in the world. It's tend to be almost 10.000-11.000 years old which is much older than the pyramids. Also it's said to be the first belief center of humanity. Göbeklitepe was discovered in 1963 during the "Prehistoric Research in Southeastern Anatolia" survey conducted by Istanbul University and the University of Chicago and excavations were started in 1995 after the survey conducted under the presidency of the Şanlıurfa Museum and under the scientific consultancy of Harald Hauptmann from the German Archaeological Institute in Istanbul.
The reason why it is so important is that the first traces of the Neolithic Age, the wheat symbolizing settled life and pointing to agriculture, were discovered in Göbeklitepe. Göbeklitepe, which also affected the history of religions, is the first known center of worship. There are basically two theories about the transition to settled life. The first has to do with hunter-gatherer society basically learning to grow plants and settling on fertile lands where it can produce crops. The second view is in the opposite direction, that is, the society first settled down and then learned agriculture. Göbeklitepe is a very important area that has added a new dimension to these two debates. Klaus Schmidt says that as a result of these excavations to which he devoted himself, Göbeklitepe could be a kind of pilgrimage center with today's understanding, that people from different communities may have come to the region and resided here for a while, and that this could be a preliminary preparation for the transition to settled life.
Being the oldest and largest settlement temple in the world and also place of worship, comes up with a few mysteries:
-There are gigantic stones on the hill and some works of art made on these stones.
- Considering the remoteness of the nearby stone resources and the manpower required for processing, it is estimated that up to a thousand people would have to be employed to build these monuments.
- this number of people would have to stay close to the area to work in such a job.
- Since so many people are staying close to the region, these people must be fed in some way.
- It is not possible to feed so many people together with gathering or hunting.
- Studies on thousands of different wild wheat species show that the genetic structure of the wheat that grows spontaneously in this region is almost the same as the arable wheat we use in agriculture today.
- The man's giving up painting on cave walls, in other words, abandoning the cave life based on hunting and gathering, coincides with the construction of this monument.
First of all, I think we need to question the reality of the Neolithic Age. If our evolution was accelerated by the gods, the prehistoric ages comes out as a lie. When we assert this claim, we encounter that the Göbeklitepe is also fake. In addition, the mysteries I wrote above are still unsolved by archaeologists. So those assumptions put a lot of question marks in my mind so I'm very curious about your thoughts on this topic. What do you think accordingly? Göbeklitepe is real or is it one of the enemy's games like Nazca lines?
Here's the link:
https://big-lies.org/general/gobekli-tepe.html
The reason why it is so important is that the first traces of the Neolithic Age, the wheat symbolizing settled life and pointing to agriculture, were discovered in Göbeklitepe. Göbeklitepe, which also affected the history of religions, is the first known center of worship. There are basically two theories about the transition to settled life. The first has to do with hunter-gatherer society basically learning to grow plants and settling on fertile lands where it can produce crops. The second view is in the opposite direction, that is, the society first settled down and then learned agriculture. Göbeklitepe is a very important area that has added a new dimension to these two debates. Klaus Schmidt says that as a result of these excavations to which he devoted himself, Göbeklitepe could be a kind of pilgrimage center with today's understanding, that people from different communities may have come to the region and resided here for a while, and that this could be a preliminary preparation for the transition to settled life.
Being the oldest and largest settlement temple in the world and also place of worship, comes up with a few mysteries:
-There are gigantic stones on the hill and some works of art made on these stones.
- Considering the remoteness of the nearby stone resources and the manpower required for processing, it is estimated that up to a thousand people would have to be employed to build these monuments.
- this number of people would have to stay close to the area to work in such a job.
- Since so many people are staying close to the region, these people must be fed in some way.
- It is not possible to feed so many people together with gathering or hunting.
- Studies on thousands of different wild wheat species show that the genetic structure of the wheat that grows spontaneously in this region is almost the same as the arable wheat we use in agriculture today.
- The man's giving up painting on cave walls, in other words, abandoning the cave life based on hunting and gathering, coincides with the construction of this monument.
First of all, I think we need to question the reality of the Neolithic Age. If our evolution was accelerated by the gods, the prehistoric ages comes out as a lie. When we assert this claim, we encounter that the Göbeklitepe is also fake. In addition, the mysteries I wrote above are still unsolved by archaeologists. So those assumptions put a lot of question marks in my mind so I'm very curious about your thoughts on this topic. What do you think accordingly? Göbeklitepe is real or is it one of the enemy's games like Nazca lines?
Here's the link:
https://big-lies.org/general/gobekli-tepe.html
